#4 Trade Down Talk
-
1. Darnold
2. Chubb
3. Rosen
Browns trade with the Bills for their first next year (no negotiation, this is a must inclusion in any trade) #12, #53 and #56
4. Mayfield
5. Nelson
Brown might well now come back up for Chubb using say #53 and #64 (plus #12) but I’d be happy to stay at #12 and take Harold Landry
-
I'd rather trade down than take Barkley or Chubb
-
I'd rather trade down than take Barkley or Chubb
I couldn't disagree more. They are the two top prospects in the draft.
Best Qb + Barkley or Chubb = Good day at the office.
Zombo
-
This is the scenario that I have heard discussed more than once on the radio and TV:
Browns take their QB at #1
Giants take Chubb with #2
Jets take a QB with #3
Then what do the Browns do? They wanted Chubb at #4...but if the Giants nab him.....they are not willing to just settle for Barkley. Dorsey don't want no RB in round one.....so....the do the trade with Buffalo:
#4 for #12 and #22.
And with those they get combination of maybe CB, OT, DE........guys like Tremaine Edwards, Denzel Ward if he is still there, McGlinchey if he drops, Jaire Alexander, Marcus Davenport.
It would NOT be a total surprise if something like this happens...at all.
Not willing to "settle" for Barkley?
What retarded radio and TV shows do you listen too?
I listen to a lot and never heard that floated...
Zombo
Zombo said:
Not willing to "settle" for Barkley?
What Retarded radio and TV shows do you listen too?
I listen to a lot and never heard that floated...
Zombo
I don't know....every radio and TV show out there? I heard it brought up on two different shows just this morning....that if Chubb is not there, they may pass on Barkley for a trade down. ESPN 850....and 92.3 .I think it may have been on Wingo and Golic.
Again....it was just speculation on options...if Chubb is gone.
-
Zombo said:
Not willing to "settle" for Barkley?
What Retarded radio and TV shows do you listen too?
I listen to a lot and never heard that floated...
Zombo
I don't know....every radio and TV show out there? I heard it brought up on two different shows just this morning....that if Chubb is not there, they may pass on Barkley for a trade down. ESPN 850....and 92.3 .I think it may have been on Wingo and Golic.
Again....it was just speculation on options...if Chubb is gone.
I don't know....every radio and TV show out there? I heard it brought up on two different shows just this morning....that if Chubb is not there, they may pass on Barkley for a trade down. ESPN 850....and 92.3 .I think it may have been on Wingo and Golic.
Again....it was just speculation on options...if Chubb is gone.
They'd be nuts to pass on Chubb or Barkley.
We've got to stop passing on superstars. Dorsey will deliver.
Stand your ground and pick BPA!
Zombo
-
I'd rather trade down than take Barkley or Chubb
I couldn't disagree more. They are the two top prospects in the draft.
Best Qb + Barkley or Chubb = Good day at the office.
Zombo
Zombo said:
I couldn't disagree more. They are the two top prospects in the draft.
Best Qb + Barkley or Chubb = Good day at the office.
Zombo
I would have no problem with that either. All I am saying is that I have heard speculation that if Chubb is not there, they may elect to trade down.
Of course it is all media speculation....but that is what the media does...and that is what we do: Report what the media says...or make up our own shite. I did not make this up....I just reported it.
-
I don't know....every radio and TV show out there? I heard it brought up on two different shows just this morning....that if Chubb is not there, they may pass on Barkley for a trade down. ESPN 850....and 92.3 .I think it may have been on Wingo and Golic.
Again....it was just speculation on options...if Chubb is gone.
They'd be nuts to pass on Chubb or Barkley.
We've got to stop passing on superstars. Dorsey will deliver.
Stand your ground and pick BPA!
Zombo
Zombo said:
They'd be nuts to pass on Chubb or Barkley.
We've got to stop passing on superstars. Dorsey will deliver.
Stand your ground and pick BPA!
Zombo
But, here perhaps is where you may not be getting it: Dorsey may NOT think that Barkley is the BPA (or any RB would)
I guess, at this point, we will know soon enough.
-
Zombo said:
They'd be nuts to pass on Chubb or Barkley.
We've got to stop passing on superstars. Dorsey will deliver.
Stand your ground and pick BPA!
Zombo
But, here perhaps is where you may not be getting it: Dorsey may NOT think that Barkley is the BPA (or any RB would)
I guess, at this point, we will know soon enough.
But, here perhaps is where you may not be getting it: Dorsey may NOT think that Barkley is the BPA (or any RB would)
I guess, at this point, we will know soon enough.
Oh, I'm getting it.
John Dorsey is not a retarded man.
I have heard him speak.
Zombo
-
Not sure how far I would be willing to trade down. Don't give a single Shmuck about Barkley, but I wouldn't like missing on Ward should Chubb be taken ahead of #4.
-
I don't know....every radio and TV show out there? I heard it brought up on two different shows just this morning....that if Chubb is not there, they may pass on Barkley for a trade down. ESPN 850....and 92.3 .I think it may have been on Wingo and Golic.
Again....it was just speculation on options...if Chubb is gone.
They'd be nuts to pass on Chubb or Barkley.
We've got to stop passing on superstars. Dorsey will deliver.
Stand your ground and pick BPA!
Zombo
Zombo said:
They'd be nuts to pass on Chubb or Barkley.
We've got to stop passing on superstars. Dorsey will deliver.
Stand your ground and pick BPA!
Zombo
If Chubb is gone, I'm ok with a trade down, but no lower than #6. The chatter on NFLN yesterday was if we take Darnold, the G-men are taking Barkley.
Hmm. Bills could do a twofer trade. Give a bunch of picks to the Colts for #6, then offer the Browns #6 and a 2019 first round for #4. Deal? I think I take it.
-
This is a very old discussion, but there just aren't many new rocks to turn over at this late date.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
But, here perhaps is where you may not be getting it: Dorsey may NOT think that Barkley is the BPA (or any RB would)
I guess, at this point, we will know soon enough.
Oh, I'm getting it.
John Dorsey is not a retarded man.
I have heard him speak.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Oh, I'm getting it.
John Dorsey is not a Retarded man.
I have heard him speak.
Zombo
He is not Retarded (do we no longer have the Retard autocorrect?).....but he does have a track record:
https://brownswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/10/john-dorseys-draft-philosophy-on-running-backs/
-
This is a very old discussion, but there just aren't many new rocks to turn over at this late date.
This is a very old discussion, but there just aren't many new rocks to turn over at this late date.
Well....we will feed you some of the grubs that we find if there are any after turning over the rocks we do. It is optional for you to dip them in chocolate syrup before consuming them.
-
Memo to self: Never use "Grub Hub" for delivery service.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Memo to self: Never use "Grub Hub" for delivery service.
Mmmmmm, grubs, maybe with tartar or Socktail sauce.
Wife got stuck in pouring rain yesterday getting groceries at three different stores, we then decided we'd pay ~$10 or so for home delivery IF they don't screw up the order!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now trade down, I hope not unless Chubb and Barkley are both gone. Trade up, unlikely.
-
-
Targeting Ward in Trade down?
hate the idea of trading down..several BPA sit at #4.just Make the pick & stop passing..Dorsey(who was reported as going to church at 8am) has drafted 6 CB's,liking 6 fts. weighing 190lbs.'ish. ..Marcus Peters was the slowest at 4.53. Also dorsey seems to like Vertical numbers with longer arms at CB position.Josh Jackson,Alexander,I.Oliver seem more his style.. can we continue to play smurf's at CB with the size of our divisional WR's & TE's?
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson -
Targeting Ward in Trade down?
hate the idea of trading down..several BPA sit at #4.just Make the pick & stop passing..Dorsey(who was reported as going to church at 8am) has drafted 6 CB's,liking 6 fts. weighing 190lbs.'ish. ..Marcus Peters was the slowest at 4.53. Also dorsey seems to like Vertical numbers with longer arms at CB position.Josh Jackson,Alexander,I.Oliver seem more his style.. can we continue to play smurf's at CB with the size of our divisional WR's & TE's?
hate the idea of trading down..several BPA sit at #4.just Make the pick & stop passing..Dorsey(who was reported as going to church at 8am) has drafted 6 CB's,liking 6 fts. weighing 190lbs.'ish. ..Marcus Peters was the slowest at 4.53. Also dorsey seems to like Vertical numbers with longer arms at CB position.Josh Jackson,Alexander,I.Oliver seem more his style.. can we continue to play smurf's at CB with the size of our divisional WR's & TE's?
I picked Oliver for the Broncos in our draft just for those reasons. I like him better for us than I do Ward. Maybe @ #33 especially if we move up for a RB end of the 1st.
-
Targeting Ward in Trade down?
hate the idea of trading down..several BPA sit at #4.just Make the pick & stop passing..Dorsey(who was reported as going to church at 8am) has drafted 6 CB's,liking 6 fts. weighing 190lbs.'ish. ..Marcus Peters was the slowest at 4.53. Also dorsey seems to like Vertical numbers with longer arms at CB position.Josh Jackson,Alexander,I.Oliver seem more his style.. can we continue to play smurf's at CB with the size of our divisional WR's & TE's?
Also dorsey seems to like Vertical numbers with longer arms at CB position.
How does that eliminate Ward from consideration?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
This is the scenario that I have heard discussed more than once on the radio and TV:
Browns take their QB at #1
Giants take Chubb with #2
Jets take a QB with #3
Then what do the Browns do? They wanted Chubb at #4...but if the Giants nab him.....they are not willing to just settle for Barkley. Dorsey don't want no RB in round one.....so....the do the trade with Buffalo:
#4 for #12 and #22.
And with those they get combination of maybe CB, OT, DE........guys like Tremaine Edwards, Denzel Ward if he is still there, McGlinchey if he drops, Jaire Alexander, Marcus Davenport.
It would NOT be a total surprise if something like this happens...at all.
Not willing to "settle" for Barkley?
What retarded radio and TV shows do you listen too?
I listen to a lot and never heard that floated...
Zombo
Zombo said:
Not willing to "settle" for Barkley?
What Retarded radio and TV shows do you listen too?
I listen to a lot and never heard that floated...
Zombo
The Gipper is perfectly capable of independent Retardism.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login