Skip to content

NSA triples metadata collection numbers, sucking up over 500 million call records in 2017

Political Discussion
33 8 438
  • Oh my God!

    I especially hope they recorded the one when the Indian chick named Peggy called me and asked about my car warranty.

    WSS

  • Oh my God!

    I especially hope they recorded the one when the Indian chick named Peggy called me and asked about my car warranty.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Oh my God!

    I especially hope they recorded the one when the Indian chick named Peggy called me and asked about my car warranty.

    WSS

    So, do you believe that the government should be able to record and store your cellphone and email data, without a warrant? 

  • MAGA!

  • @westside-steve said:

    Oh my God!

    I especially hope they recorded the one when the Indian chick named Peggy called me and asked about my car warranty.

    WSS

    So, do you believe that the government should be able to record and store your cellphone and email data, without a warrant? 

    @jbluhm86 said:

    So, do you believe that the government should be able to record and store your cellphone and email data, without a warrant? 

    The Obozo administration took data collection to a whole ‘nother Level.

  • @jbluhm86 said:

    So, do you believe that the government should be able to record and store your cellphone and email data, without a warrant? 

    The Obozo administration took data collection to a whole ‘nother Level.

    @canton-dawg said:

    The Obozo administration took data collection to a whole ‘nother Level.

    I'm happy Trump shut the whole thing down

  • I hope they track all of woodywoodpeckerhead's one liner bitchy retorts.... and I hope they all end up

    in a looney birdcage.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    The Obozo administration took data collection to a whole ‘nother Level.

    I'm happy Trump shut the whole thing down

    @mld-woody said:

    I'm happy Trump shut the whole thing down

    Me too.

  • @jbluhm86 said:

    So, do you believe that the government should be able to record and store your cellphone and email data, without a warrant? 

    The Obozo administration took data collection to a whole ‘nother Level.

    @canton-dawg said:

    The Obozo administration took data collection to a whole ‘nother Level.

    And Trump continued that policy. But I don’t think anyone gives a Sheet about it in Washington outside of Rand Paul. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    The Obozo administration took data collection to a whole ‘nother Level.

    And Trump continued that policy. But I don’t think anyone gives a Sheet about it in Washington outside of Rand Paul. 

    @logicisforsquares said:

    And Trump continued that policy. But I don’t think anyone gives a Sheet about it in Washington outside of Rand Paul. 

    He sure did, and I believe there will be a continuation into the foreseeable future regardless of which political party is in office.

    However, DC doesn’t hold a candle to the data harvested by the likes of Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and others.

    I attended a company sponsored seminar this past week, which also included a representative from the FBI.

    The FBI is concerned with the data collection from multiple foreign companies that manufacture home wireless routers, smart tv’s, cameras, and home assistance devices.

    Apparently these home network devices are listening, an that will be another source of data harvesting.

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    And Trump continued that policy. But I don’t think anyone gives a Sheet about it in Washington outside of Rand Paul. 

    He sure did, and I believe there will be a continuation into the foreseeable future regardless of which political party is in office.

    However, DC doesn’t hold a candle to the data harvested by the likes of Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and others.

    I attended a company sponsored seminar this past week, which also included a representative from the FBI.

    The FBI is concerned with the data collection from multiple foreign companies that manufacture home wireless routers, smart tv’s, cameras, and home assistance devices.

    Apparently these home network devices are listening, an that will be another source of data harvesting.

    @canton-dawg said:

    He sure did, and I believe there will be a continuation into the foreseeable future regardless of which political party is in office.

    However, DC doesn’t hold a candle to the data harvested by the likes of Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and others.

    I attended a company sponsored seminar this past week, which also included a representative from the FBI.

    The FBI is concerned with the data collection from multiple foreign companies that manufacture home wireless routers, smart tv’s, cameras, and home assistance devices.

    Apparently these home network devices are listening, an that will be another source of data harvesting.

    I can choose to use any of those private companies’ services. If I don’t like that they collect my information, I won’t use them. The Feds monitoring everything we do is unconstitutional. Huge difference.

  • Maxine Waters on Obama’s database. . .

    Well, you know, I don’t know. And I think some people are missing something here. The president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful. That database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before.

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/28439/flashback-maxine-waters-brags-about-obamas-james-barrett

  • But luckily Trump took care of it

    Cuz he's a real American

  • But luckily Trump took care of it

    Cuz he's a real American

    @mld-woody said:

    But luckily Trump took care of it

    Cuz he's a real American

    About time you started to catch on.

    MAGA!

  • @westside-steve said:

    Oh my God!

    I especially hope they recorded the one when the Indian chick named Peggy called me and asked about my car warranty.

    WSS

    So, do you believe that the government should be able to record and store your cellphone and email data, without a warrant? 

    @jbluhm86 said:

    So, do you believe that the government should be able to record and store your cellphone and email data, without a warrant? 

    Actually, and I'm being completely honest, I really don't care very much one way or the other. I guess it would have to depend on for what purpose?

    I assume in any instanced that it matters they are already doing it with impunity

    WSS

  • If the Government wanted you do 'disappear' it wouldn't be hard for them to do it.  Just saying.

  • watched the third part of the Jason Bourne series...it occured to me that our gov

    is now actually resembling those dirtbags in the cia etc...in the movie.

    that is very bad.

    Real life, they are now trying to character assassinate anybody close to the president, to get the president.

  • If the Government wanted you do 'disappear' it wouldn't be hard for them to do it.  Just saying.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    If the Government wanted you do 'disappear' it wouldn't be hard for them to do it.  Just saying.

    But at the same time you feel the 2nd Amendment gives you a legitimate chance of defending the company from this type of government? (At least, I thought that was your stance, I kind of forget. This just seemed like a good comment to jump in on).

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    If the Government wanted you do 'disappear' it wouldn't be hard for them to do it.  Just saying.

    But at the same time you feel the 2nd Amendment gives you a legitimate chance of defending the company from this type of government? (At least, I thought that was your stance, I kind of forget. This just seemed like a good comment to jump in on).

    @mld-woody said:

    But at the same time you feel the 2nd Amendment gives you a legitimate chance of defending the company from this type of government? (At least, I thought that was your stance, I kind of forget. This just seemed like a good comment to jump in on).

    defending the company? maybe you should slow your beakness down and stop trying to look like a smartass birdbrain, woodpecker.

    you are, typical woodpecker, being really stupid. One person having a gun isn't going to fight the gov. A hundred million gun owners, in an extreme scenario - of course they could, given some far-fetched civil war kind of scenario.

    You ever watch a Jason Bourne movie? I'd say obamao, holder, lynch, comey, mueller, rosenstein, mccabe, etc could hire a small army of assassins like in the jb movie, and they wouldn't have a chance vs 100 million Americans with their guns.

       It sounds silly - but on principle, it is very serious. Countries around the world have fallen into fascim/genocide because they let themselves be unarmed. You don't know history, you don't know principles, and you don't know how to respond intelligently to any subject. You don't know your beak from a hole in the ground. Molt much, feathers4brains?

  • @mld-woody said:

    But at the same time you feel the 2nd Amendment gives you a legitimate chance of defending the company from this type of government? (At least, I thought that was your stance, I kind of forget. This just seemed like a good comment to jump in on).

    defending the company? maybe you should slow your beakness down and stop trying to look like a smartass birdbrain, woodpecker.

    you are, typical woodpecker, being really stupid. One person having a gun isn't going to fight the gov. A hundred million gun owners, in an extreme scenario - of course they could, given some far-fetched civil war kind of scenario.

    You ever watch a Jason Bourne movie? I'd say obamao, holder, lynch, comey, mueller, rosenstein, mccabe, etc could hire a small army of assassins like in the jb movie, and they wouldn't have a chance vs 100 million Americans with their guns.

       It sounds silly - but on principle, it is very serious. Countries around the world have fallen into fascim/genocide because they let themselves be unarmed. You don't know history, you don't know principles, and you don't know how to respond intelligently to any subject. You don't know your beak from a hole in the ground. Molt much, feathers4brains?

    @calfoxwc said:

    defending the company? maybe you should slow your beakness down and stop trying to look like a smartass birdbrain, woodpecker.

    you are, typical woodpecker, being really stupid. One person having a gun isn't going to fight the gov. A hundred million gun owners, in an extreme scenario - of course they could, given some far-fetched civil war kind of scenario.

    You ever watch a Jason Bourne movie? I'd say obamao, holder, lynch, comey, mueller, rosenstein, mccabe, etc could hire a small army of assassins like in the jb movie, and they wouldn't have a chance vs 100 million Americans with their guns.

       It sounds silly - but on principle, it is very serious. Countries around the world have fallen into fascim/genocide because they let themselves be unarmed. You don't know history, you don't know principles, and you don't know how to respond intelligently to any subject. You don't know your beak from a hole in the ground. Molt much, feathers4brains?

    Ignoring the very mature name-calling...

    Where did you get the 100 million number?

    Please expand of your... Ummm... Jason Bourne argument