Gambling on NFL and other sports coming soon to a casino near you
-
You are a Homo I am a liberal nothing else need be said
I am a conservative.
What you do with your partner does not effect me. Did you two meet over at the jailhouse?
I am a conservative.
What you do with your partner does not effect me. Did you two meet over at the jailhouse?
Whatever else you are....you are a pussy and an arsehole.
I mean...you are a Patriots fan....and there is only one worse insult to call you: Steeler fan.
-
I am a conservative.
What you do with your partner does not effect me. Did you two meet over at the jailhouse?
Whatever else you are....you are a pussy and an arsehole.
I mean...you are a Patriots fan....and there is only one worse insult to call you: Steeler fan.
Whatever else you are....you are a pussy and an arsehole.
I mean...you are a Patriots fan....and there is only one worse insult to call you: Steeler fan.
Stop whining.
-
It must be exhausting for conservatives to constantly overcompensate to prove to everyone - and themselves - how masculine they are.
-
Wrong again, Henderson is in Clark County (which is well over 700,000 now) and has a population of 300,000+ by itself. No other city/county is close to the 700,000+ club. Whats with 60 mile, 100,000 population?
Oh my old plant engineer had a brother who lived in Henderson over 30 years ago, it has grown since then.
Nevada total population by county
County Total Population Clark 
1,997,659 includes Vegas and Henderson
Washoe 429,079 Reno area
Carson City 54,616
Lyon 51,264
Elko 50,954 and that's the top 5 as of 2012 the rest are very small
Never wrong. Clark County uses 60 miles from a 100K city. Thats all there is to it.
Never wrong. Clark County uses 60 miles from a 100K city. Thats all there is to it.
FROM CNN, 2016.....
"Brothels not legal in big cities
Nevada law allows counties with a population below 700,000 to offer brothel prostitution.That means no legal prostitution in Clark County, where Las Vegas is. County law prohibits brothels in Washoe County, home to Reno, and several other counties." (SEE THE LINK IT EXPLAINS NRS 244.345 in detail.)
The current law says under 700,000 in population, 60 miles is never mentioned.
Nevada is a tiny little state with nothing except Vegas and Henderson in Clark County and Reno in Washoe county...... nevermind this is going nowhere.
Facts just tend to confuse some people.
GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND! -
Never wrong. Clark County uses 60 miles from a 100K city. Thats all there is to it.
FROM CNN, 2016.....
"Brothels not legal in big cities
Nevada law allows counties with a population below 700,000 to offer brothel prostitution.That means no legal prostitution in Clark County, where Las Vegas is. County law prohibits brothels in Washoe County, home to Reno, and several other counties." (SEE THE LINK IT EXPLAINS NRS 244.345 in detail.)The current law says under 700,000 in population, 60 miles is never mentioned.
Nevada is a tiny little state with nothing except Vegas and Henderson in Clark County and Reno in Washoe county...... nevermind this is going nowhere.
Facts just tend to confuse some people.
FROM CNN, 2016.....
"Brothels not legal in big cities
Nevada law allows counties with a population below 700,000 to offer brothel prostitution.That means no legal prostitution in Clark County, where Las Vegas is. County law prohibits brothels in Washoe County, home to Reno, and several other counties." (SEE THE LINK IT EXPLAINS NRS 244.345 in detail.)The current law says under 700,000 in population, 60 miles is never mentioned.
Nevada is a tiny little state with nothing except Vegas and Henderson in Clark County and Reno in Washoe county...... nevermind this is going nowhere.
Facts just tend to confuse some people.
Violates equal protection and the commerce clause
-
My understanding is that the weed money cannot be put into the US banking system because of federal drug laws.
Who gives a rats a$$ that you want it legal. The state of Ohio wont be asking you. Alcohol leads to so many problems, but combined with weed screws people up.
Nobody after eating sugar or smoking a cigarette ever got behind the wheel of a car and killed somebody. You sitting down and devouring a whole chocolate cream pie does not effect me.
Weed money can't be put into the US banking system? Then what do the 7 states where it is legal do with their "weed" money? They sure as hell don't carry cash around.
Alcohol does and will affect far more people driving a vehicle that weed does/ever will. And I can tell you....being in the business....there are more OVI arrests where prescription drugs are involved than where weed is involved.
Weed money can't be put into the US banking system? Then what do the 7 states where it is legal do with their "weed" money? They sure as hell don't carry cash around.
Alcohol does and will affect far more people driving a vehicle that weed does/ever will. And I can tell you....being in the business....there are more OVI arrests where prescription drugs are involved than where weed is involved.
Naturally you miss the point. https://www.denverpost.com/2017/08/25/colorado-marijuana-traffic-fatalities/
Weed combined with alcohol really impairs judgement. Weed driving is illegal. Why legalize and tempt people to do it. Look at alcohol and behavior.
-
Actually its a win for the public.
Vegas will offer more perks to entice the public to visit.
I just did a tour of the city with what was our 3rd time going there. I noticed this time (april 2017) rates for hotels were WAY higher than before. I asked the guy and he went into a whole story that basically Vegas is moving strongly away from assuming gambling winnings as the main income source. They're already moving into what you're describing of tailoring more to the "luxury" of Vegas as opposed to the gambling. I'm not going to make up numbers, but this has been proven to be true over the past several years where profits from gambling have markedly gone down, while profit from rooms/food/booze have gone up. I have no doubt this decision was in part the reason they did it.
I just did a tour of the city with what was our 3rd time going there. I noticed this time (april 2017) rates for hotels were WAY higher than before. I asked the guy and he went into a whole story that basically Vegas is moving strongly away from assuming gambling winnings as the main income source. They're already moving into what you're describing of tailoring more to the "luxury" of Vegas as opposed to the gambling. I'm not going to make up numbers, but this has been proven to be true over the past several years where profits from gambling have markedly gone down, while profit from rooms/food/booze have gone up. I have no doubt this decision was in part the reason they did it.
I believe that profits via gambling are down because of the economy which is now on the rebound. Some states were still suffering a slight recession as early as 2016. I know that in 2008 Vegas really took it hard. I had a friend working on a high rise there and one day they just shut down the job and sent everyone home with the building 50% complete.
I now dont have to go to Vegas to place a football bet.
-
A whore is a f u c k i n g whore whether legal or illegal.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Now for something really different.
-
Never wrong. Clark County uses 60 miles from a 100K city. Thats all there is to it.
FROM CNN, 2016.....
"Brothels not legal in big cities
Nevada law allows counties with a population below 700,000 to offer brothel prostitution.That means no legal prostitution in Clark County, where Las Vegas is. County law prohibits brothels in Washoe County, home to Reno, and several other counties." (SEE THE LINK IT EXPLAINS NRS 244.345 in detail.)The current law says under 700,000 in population, 60 miles is never mentioned.
Nevada is a tiny little state with nothing except Vegas and Henderson in Clark County and Reno in Washoe county...... nevermind this is going nowhere.
Facts just tend to confuse some people.
-
Weed money can't be put into the US banking system? Then what do the 7 states where it is legal do with their "weed" money? They sure as hell don't carry cash around.
Alcohol does and will affect far more people driving a vehicle that weed does/ever will. And I can tell you....being in the business....there are more OVI arrests where prescription drugs are involved than where weed is involved.
Naturally you miss the point. https://www.denverpost.com/2017/08/25/colorado-marijuana-traffic-fatalities/
Weed combined with alcohol really impairs judgement. Weed driving is illegal. Why legalize and tempt people to do it. Look at alcohol and behavior.
Naturally you miss the point. https://www.denverpost.com/2017/08/25/colorado-marijuana-traffic-fatalities/
Weed combined with alcohol really impairs judgement. Weed driving is illegal. Why legalize and tempt people to do it. Look at alcohol and behavior.
No I get the point exactly.I'm well aware of that it. I deal with it all the time. The point is that weed is probably far less of a problem than alcohol or prescription drugs. Prohibition of it is just stuck up foolishness
-
A whore is a f u c k i n g whore whether legal or illegal.
A whore is a f u c k i n g whore whether legal or illegal.
But if you Shmuck a whore in Nevada it is legal to do so
-
Naturally you miss the point. https://www.denverpost.com/2017/08/25/colorado-marijuana-traffic-fatalities/
Weed combined with alcohol really impairs judgement. Weed driving is illegal. Why legalize and tempt people to do it. Look at alcohol and behavior.
No I get the point exactly.I'm well aware of that it. I deal with it all the time. The point is that weed is probably far less of a problem than alcohol or prescription drugs. Prohibition of it is just stuck up foolishness
No I get the point exactly.I'm well aware of that it. I deal with it all the time. The point is that weed is probably far less of a problem than alcohol or prescription drugs. Prohibition of it is just stuck up foolishness
Probably far less of a problem. Evidently not in Colorado.
Legalization will lead to more people driving after smoking pot. And, as if booze is not bad enough, smoking after drinking.
-
No I get the point exactly.I'm well aware of that it. I deal with it all the time. The point is that weed is probably far less of a problem than alcohol or prescription drugs. Prohibition of it is just stuck up foolishness
Probably far less of a problem. Evidently not in Colorado.
Legalization will lead to more people driving after smoking pot. And, as if booze is not bad enough, smoking after drinking.
Probably far less of a problem. Evidently not in Colorado.
Legalization will lead to more people driving after smoking pot. And, as if booze is not bad enough, smoking after drinking.
yThen we deal with it just likewe do now. Pot not being fully legal now does not seem to stop anyone from using it and driving. I see it in court all the time. It won't get any worse if it's legalized I don't believe and I am the one with The experience in this area
-
Probably far less of a problem. Evidently not in Colorado.
Legalization will lead to more people driving after smoking pot. And, as if booze is not bad enough, smoking after drinking.
yThen we deal with it just likewe do now. Pot not being fully legal now does not seem to stop anyone from using it and driving. I see it in court all the time. It won't get any worse if it's legalized I don't believe and I am the one with The experience in this area
yThen we deal with it just likewe do now. Pot not being fully legal now does not seem to stop anyone from using it and driving. I see it in court all the time. It won't get any worse if it's legalized I don't believe and I am the one with The experience in this area
My link already proves that driving after puffing weed accidents have increased. I dont need to be in the business to understand their findings.
Laws are in place now to discourage weed. Once lifted it it will become more accepted and available for use.
-
yThen we deal with it just likewe do now. Pot not being fully legal now does not seem to stop anyone from using it and driving. I see it in court all the time. It won't get any worse if it's legalized I don't believe and I am the one with The experience in this area
My link already proves that driving after puffing weed accidents have increased. I dont need to be in the business to understand their findings.
Laws are in place now to discourage weed. Once lifted it it will become more accepted and available for use.
My link already proves that driving after puffing weed accidents have increased. I dont need to be in the business to understand their findings.
Laws are in place now to discourage weed. Once lifted it it will become more accepted and available for use.
I don't think that we have seen most of the good and mainly bad effects from the legalization of weed yet and won't have all of the hard numbers for awhile.
-
yThen we deal with it just likewe do now. Pot not being fully legal now does not seem to stop anyone from using it and driving. I see it in court all the time. It won't get any worse if it's legalized I don't believe and I am the one with The experience in this area
My link already proves that driving after puffing weed accidents have increased. I dont need to be in the business to understand their findings.
Laws are in place now to discourage weed. Once lifted it it will become more accepted and available for use.
My link already proves that driving after puffing weed accidents have increased. I dont need to be in the business to understand their findings.
Laws are in place now to discourage weed. Once lifted it it will become more accepted and available for use.
And laws are in place to deal with driving while under the influence.....of any and all substances. Just a sampling from the Ohio Revised Code:
(j) Except as provided in division (K) of this section, the person has a concentration of any of the following controlled substances or metabolites of a controlled substance in the person's whole blood, blood serum or plasma, or urine that equals or exceeds any of the following:
(i) The person has a concentration of amphetamine in the person's urine of at least five hundred nanograms of amphetamine per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of amphetamine in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least one hundred nanograms of amphetamine per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(ii) The person has a concentration of cocaine in the person's urine of at least one hundred fifty nanograms of cocaine per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of cocaine in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least fifty nanograms of cocaine per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(iii) The person has a concentration of cocaine metabolite in the person's urine of at least one hundred fifty nanograms of cocaine metabolite per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of cocaine metabolite in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least fifty nanograms of cocaine metabolite per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(iv) The person has a concentration of heroin in the person's urine of at least two thousand nanograms of heroin per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of heroin in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least fifty nanograms of heroin per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(v) The person has a concentration of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) in the person's urine of at least ten nanograms of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least ten nanograms of heroin metabolite (6-monoacetyl morphine) per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(vi) The person has a concentration of L.S.D. in the person's urine of at least twenty-five nanograms of L.S.D. per milliliter of the person's urine or a concentration of L.S.D. in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least ten nanograms of L.S.D. per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(vii) The person has a concentration of marihuana in the person's urine of at least ten nanograms of marihuana per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of marihuana in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least two nanograms of marihuana per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(viii) Either of the following applies:
(I) The person is under the influence of alcohol, a drug of abuse, or a combination of them, and the person has a concentration of marihuana metabolite in the person's urine of at least fifteen nanograms of marihuana metabolite per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of marihuana metabolite in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least five nanograms of marihuana metabolite per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(II) The person has a concentration of marihuana metabolite in the person's urine of at least thirty-five nanograms of marihuana metabolite per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of marihuana metabolite in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least fifty nanograms of marihuana metabolite per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(ix) The person has a concentration of methamphetamine in the person's urine of at least five hundred nanograms of methamphetamine per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of methamphetamine in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least one hundred nanograms of methamphetamine per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(x) The person has a concentration of phencyclidine in the person's urine of at least twenty-five nanograms of phencyclidine per milliliter of the person's urine or has a concentration of phencyclidine in the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma of at least ten nanograms of phencyclidine per milliliter of the person's whole blood or blood serum or plasma.
(xi) The state board of pharmacy has adopted a rule pursuant to section 4729.041 of the Revised Code that specifies the amount of salvia divinorum and the amount of salvinorin A that constitute concentrations of salvia divinorum and salvinorin A in a person's urine, in a person's whole blood, or in a person's blood serum or plasma at or above which the person is impaired for purposes of operating any vehicle, streetcar, or trackless trolley within this state, the rule is in effect, and the person has a concentration of salvia divinorum or salvinorin A of at least that amount so specified by rule in the person's urine, in the person's whole blood, or in the person's blood serum or plasma.
-
I just did a tour of the city with what was our 3rd time going there. I noticed this time (april 2017) rates for hotels were WAY higher than before. I asked the guy and he went into a whole story that basically Vegas is moving strongly away from assuming gambling winnings as the main income source. They're already moving into what you're describing of tailoring more to the "luxury" of Vegas as opposed to the gambling. I'm not going to make up numbers, but this has been proven to be true over the past several years where profits from gambling have markedly gone down, while profit from rooms/food/booze have gone up. I have no doubt this decision was in part the reason they did it.
I believe that profits via gambling are down because of the economy which is now on the rebound. Some states were still suffering a slight recession as early as 2016. I know that in 2008 Vegas really took it hard. I had a friend working on a high rise there and one day they just shut down the job and sent everyone home with the building 50% complete.
I now dont have to go to Vegas to place a football bet.
I believe that profits via gambling are down because of the economy which is now on the rebound. Some states were still suffering a slight recession as early as 2016. I know that in 2008 Vegas really took it hard. I had a friend working on a high rise there and one day they just shut down the job and sent everyone home with the building 50% complete.
I now dont have to go to Vegas to place a football bet.
Yeah, that was brought up as well. I've only been three times, and it was definitely very interesting to see how things shifted. This last time I was amazed that even places like Luxor were $100+ a night on a non-descript week in April. When I first went (2013) I simply called for rates and was offered a buy one, get two nights free deal and paid a whopping $110 total.
I really enjoy the wow factor of Vegas, but that just isn't worth it.
-
Speaking of things coming together....
Mike Renner, one of the PFF analysts, is on this season's Bachelorette. Who wants to bet he's the final winner - i mean, the last guy who the girl doesn't "choose" ?
-
I believe that profits via gambling are down because of the economy which is now on the rebound. Some states were still suffering a slight recession as early as 2016. I know that in 2008 Vegas really took it hard. I had a friend working on a high rise there and one day they just shut down the job and sent everyone home with the building 50% complete.
I now dont have to go to Vegas to place a football bet.
Yeah, that was brought up as well. I've only been three times, and it was definitely very interesting to see how things shifted. This last time I was amazed that even places like Luxor were $100+ a night on a non-descript week in April. When I first went (2013) I simply called for rates and was offered a buy one, get two nights free deal and paid a whopping $110 total.
I really enjoy the wow factor of Vegas, but that just isn't worth it.
Yeah, that was brought up as well. I've only been three times, and it was definitely very interesting to see how things shifted. This last time I was amazed that even places like Luxor were $100+ a night on a non-descript week in April. When I first went (2013) I simply called for rates and was offered a buy one, get two nights free deal and paid a whopping $110 total.
I really enjoy the wow factor of Vegas, but that just isn't worth it.
Question.....will losing their monopoly on sports gaming mean that LV will lose a lot of tourism there....seeing as how they (Nevada) WERE the only place you could go to do that legally? Or will they go the other route and jack up hotel prices by claiming that their basic....non gambling attractions are enough to warrant tourism on a large scale? Will they think they have similar to offer to a tourist as does San Fran, Boston, NYC, DC etc...other places where the hotel rates are high?
from this link you see that the highest hotel rates are in:
1. Boston
2. New York City
3. San Fran
4. Wash DC
5. Honolulu
6. Chicago
7. Nashville
8. LA
9. Seattle
10. New Orleans
11. Miami
12. Philly
13. San Jose
14. Scottsdale
15. Denver.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login