Skip to content

Duke Johnson, Browns agree to 3 year extension

The Browns Board
22 15 670 1
  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Since Duke was drafted in 2015, Gordon was the only other offensive "plays makers" on the field. In which Gordon was hardly ever there. When you jog out the only one (Duke), it's taken away by defenses not having both or more on the field. I find this as a great signing knowing Duke can't be targeted as the only guy that may cause a offensive threat now. Duke's best years should be ahead of him with Haley running the offense with multiple weapons. If we can keep other threats on the field. I was shocked to read Duke played every game. His rookie season he carried the ball 104 times, most between the tackles & got rocked (few concussions) by some of the best head hunters in the AFCN. Glad Duke physically can rely on Chubb & Hyde to bang not just having Crow to lean on anymore. Dukes carries have decreased to 73 in 2016, about same with 82 in 2017. Against our division foes is where Duke seems to struggle with.Twice on tape per year. But if we keep the sole playmaker jersey off Duke, with others now on the paper? Just maybe things start to change into some wins on offense?..Hue Jackson needs to sink or swim as the results of his team as a unit. Hue's has already failed has a coach with a playcalling title..Congrats D U K E!!  

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #14

    why did we draft chubb then?

  • why did we draft chubb then?

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by jcam222
    #15

    @clevfan4life said:

    why did we draft chubb then?

    Chubb is a whole different game than Duke. Better question is why did we sign Hyde. That said I love the depth. 

  • Only 5 TD's in his 5 years here...  I'm not seeing the logic in resigning him.

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @nickers said:

    Only 5 TD's in his 5 years here...  I'm not seeing the logic in resigning him.

    Last year he was probably our best receiving weapon......and he can run the ball inside or out.  I like him.

    There's this young gal researcher who always wears a Phillies baseball cap,  I told her I was a Browns fan and she tried so hard to say something good about us...finally she said, Oh!  You have that one good guy....ummm...he...um...., so I said, Duke.   And she said, YEAH, he's good.   🙂

  • @clevfan4life said:

    why did we draft chubb then?

    Chubb is a whole different game than Duke. Better question is why did we sign Hyde. That said I love the depth. 

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @jcam222 said:

    Chubb is a whole different game than Duke. Better question is why did we sign Hyde. That said I love the depth. 

    rb's need reps more than any other position. barring injury one of tbosr guys is going to be very displeased with his lack of workload

  • Only 5 TD's in his 5 years here...  I'm not seeing the logic in resigning him.

    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @nickers said:

    Only 5 TD's in his 5 years here...  I'm not seeing the logic in resigning him.

    He was a good player on an awful team. Now they see him in a key role on a winning team.

    Good teams have players like this. As I have said many times, acquiring Landry and re-signing Duke is the best thing he could ever do for not only Taylor ... But Baker Mayfield. Mayfield should have a nice cockpit to step into once he's ready. Gotta find the LT, hopefully he's on the roster now.

    Zombo

  • @nickers said:

    Only 5 TD's in his 5 years here...  I'm not seeing the logic in resigning him.

    He was a good player on an awful team. Now they see him in a key role on a winning team.

    Good teams have players like this. As I have said many times, acquiring Landry and re-signing Duke is the best thing he could ever do for not only Taylor ... But Baker Mayfield. Mayfield should have a nice cockpit to step into once he's ready. Gotta find the LT, hopefully he's on the roster now.

    Zombo

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Zombo said:

    He was a good player on an awful team. Now they see him in a key role on a winning team.

    Good teams have players like this. As I have said many times, acquiring Landry and re-signing Duke is the best thing he could ever do for not only Taylor ... But Baker Mayfield. Mayfield should have a nice Sockpit to step into once he's ready. Gotta find the LT, hopefully he's on the roster now.

    Zombo

    Totally agree.Even Brady has those quick little short yardage outlets that often turn into 1st downs. And he has those quick twitch sure handed mini-mites to carry it out. Now we do too.

  • why did we draft chubb then?

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @clevfan4life said:

    why did we draft chubb then?

    To establish a consistent deep running game to help the passing game?  Ball control, eat up the clock, keep the quarterbacks from getting as beat up as much?

    Sounds like a plan......I guess. 😉

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Are we really complaining about having potentially three talented RBs?

  • Are we really complaining about having potentially three talented RBs?

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @dutch-oven said:

    Are we really complaining about having potentially three talented RBs?

    Wait!  We have three talented RB's?!  That won't be tolerated!

    ...I've heard a couple of interviews with Carlos Hyde now.  He shouldn't do interviews.  He's boring as hell.