The left's censorship and hatred of conservative voices in America
-
heres the tos from jones own site....
"Indeed, Infowars’ own website says in its terms of service that the company “may review and delete any content you post on the website or elsewhere utilizing our services or system if we determine, in our sole discretion, that the content violates the rights of others, is not appropriate for the website, or otherwise violates this agreement.”
pls note "in our sole discretion"........tuff sht alex, fb/twitter/etc,etc...have decided to excercise their "sole discretion"
heres the tos from jones own site....
"Indeed, Infowars’ own website says in its terms of service that the company “may review and delete any content you post on the website or elsewhere utilizing our services or system if we determine, in our sole discretion, that the content violates the rights of others, is not appropriate for the website, or otherwise violates this agreement.”
pls note "in our sole discretion"........tuff sht alex, fb/twitter/etc,etc...have decided to excercise their "sole discretion"
So they can censor whomever they want at their sole discretion. Just saying and you should be on board with this that censorship is a real slippery slope. What gets censored is subjective and whoever makes the call are likely influenced by their own personal biases. I have seen many conservatives already complaining about the double standards and liberal biases of FB, twitter and google in how they enforce their own rules in their "sole discretion".
-
heres the tos from jones own site....
"Indeed, Infowars’ own website says in its terms of service that the company “may review and delete any content you post on the website or elsewhere utilizing our services or system if we determine, in our sole discretion, that the content violates the rights of others, is not appropriate for the website, or otherwise violates this agreement.”
pls note "in our sole discretion"........tuff sht alex, fb/twitter/etc,etc...have decided to excercise their "sole discretion"
So they can censor whomever they want at their sole discretion. Just saying and you should be on board with this that censorship is a real slippery slope. What gets censored is subjective and whoever makes the call are likely influenced by their own personal biases. I have seen many conservatives already complaining about the double standards and liberal biases of FB, twitter and google in how they enforce their own rules in their "sole discretion".
So they can censor whomever they want at their sole discretion. Just saying and you should be on board with this that censorship is a real slippery slope. What gets censored is subjective and whoever makes the call are likely influenced by their own personal biases. I have seen many conservatives already complaining about the double standards and liberal biases of FB, twitter and google in how they enforce their own rules in their "sole discretion".
point missed obf. You can't complain about the tos of services like twitter and FB while on ur very own site have literally almost the exact same language. In fact, FB and Twitter have more lenient language and their history backs that up. To date they've let ALOT of sht go on for a long time. They're "just now" getting around to cleaning some of this crap up. A few days ago a video about a meth head screaming N***** at a random black person was being passed around FB. ONe of my friends commented "what a piece of white trash", so FB decided to time him out for a couple days while the people who either reposted the vid or made funny comments apparently had nothing happen to them. But yesterday he got back into FB and im not sure but perhaps that video has been bant. That's the kind of sht they have to clean up. If you think sht like that is free speech that's between you and jesus I guess.
-
So they can censor whomever they want at their sole discretion. Just saying and you should be on board with this that censorship is a real slippery slope. What gets censored is subjective and whoever makes the call are likely influenced by their own personal biases. I have seen many conservatives already complaining about the double standards and liberal biases of FB, twitter and google in how they enforce their own rules in their "sole discretion".
point missed obf. You can't complain about the tos of services like twitter and FB while on ur very own site have literally almost the exact same language. In fact, FB and Twitter have more lenient language and their history backs that up. To date they've let ALOT of sht go on for a long time. They're "just now" getting around to cleaning some of this crap up. A few days ago a video about a meth head screaming N***** at a random black person was being passed around FB. ONe of my friends commented "what a piece of white trash", so FB decided to time him out for a couple days while the people who either reposted the vid or made funny comments apparently had nothing happen to them. But yesterday he got back into FB and im not sure but perhaps that video has been bant. That's the kind of sht they have to clean up. If you think sht like that is free speech that's between you and jesus I guess.
point missed obf. You can't complain about the tos of services like twitter and FB while on ur very own site have literally almost the exact same language. In fact, FB and Twitter have more lenient language and their history backs that up. To date they've let ALOT of sht go on for a long time. They're "just now" getting around to cleaning some of this crap up. A few days ago a video about a meth head screaming N***** at a random black person was being passed around FB. ONe of my friends commented "what a piece of white trash", so FB decided to time him out for a couple days while the people who either reposted the vid or made funny comments apparently had nothing happen to them. But yesterday he got back into FB and im not sure but perhaps that video has been bant. That's the kind of sht they have to clean up. If you think sht like that is free speech that's between you and jesus I guess.
I'm speaking more about the liberal bias seen here:
FACEBOOK BANS TWO CONSERVATIVE WOMEN WITH HIGHLY POPULAR VIDEOS
http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/09/facebook-bans-diamond-silk/
-
apparently they were not banned. The facebook algorithm which banned them also got some transgender activists banned in the same sweep. FB apologized to the ladies and rectified it apparently.
-
apparently they were not banned. The facebook algorithm which banned them also got some transgender activists banned in the same sweep. FB apologized to the ladies and rectified it apparently.
apparently they were not banned. The facebook algorithm which banned them also got some transgender activists banned in the same sweep. FB apologized to the ladies and rectified it apparently.
Viewpoint Discrimination with Algorithms
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/social-media-companies-discriminate-against-conservatives/
-
apparently they were not banned. The facebook algorithm which banned them also got some transgender activists banned in the same sweep. FB apologized to the ladies and rectified it apparently.
apparently they were not banned. The facebook algorithm which banned them also got some transgender activists banned in the same sweep. FB apologized to the ladies and rectified it apparently.
So explain to me why twitter banned black conservative Candace Owens for retweeting Sarah Jeong?
All Candice did was replace the word “white” with the word “black”? and “Jew”?
It was okay to tweet racist remarks when it comes to “Ol Whitey” but as soon as you insert something else...that’s a big no-no.
That is the perfect definition of a double standard on social media.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
A conservative Christian not wanting to see gay people on TV doesn't equate to someone not wanting to see Alex Jones wipping up right wing mobs with blatant lies
A conservative Christian not wanting to see gay people on TV doesn't equate to someone not wanting to see Alex Jones wipping up right wing mobs with blatant lies
but you equate to being the board's people-bashing woodypeckerhead asswhole with nearly every post, you ignorant feathered borg bird.
-
apparently they were not banned. The facebook algorithm which banned them also got some transgender activists banned in the same sweep. FB apologized to the ladies and rectified it apparently.
So explain to me why twitter banned black conservative Candace Owens for retweeting Sarah Jeong?
All Candice did was replace the word “white” with the word “black”? and “Jew”?
It was okay to tweet racist remarks when it comes to “Ol Whitey” but as soon as you insert something else...that’s a big no-no.
That is the perfect definition of a double standard on social media.
So explain to me why twitter banned black conservative Candace Owens for retweeting Sarah Jeong?
All Candice did was replace the word “white” with the word “black”? and “Jew”?
It was okay to tweet racist remarks when it comes to “Ol Whitey” but as soon as you insert something else...that’s a big no-no.
That is the perfect definition of a double standard on social media.
yes - Candace Owens deal went back a few weeks earlier than the dust up on AJones,
but twiiter guy like most looney libs realize after their angry me too moments
that calmer measured responses work better.
http://fortune.com/2018/08/11/twitter-alex-jones-tweets-rules/
(but the democrats are still known by the company they keep!)
-
funny how now its acceptable to talk about regulating private companies like twitter and facebook. Heres an idea, stop using them. Make ur own social media hangouts. Srsly. Cause i get labeled a commie for suggesting we should strictly and vigilantly enforce what private companies dump into our environment. But you all arent commies for suggesting social media should be regulated? services u can just stop fukking using and paying attn to literally "right fukking now".
Ive never once used twitter, instagram, pinterest etc,etc. Its all shiite thats madr us infinitely stupider fir using. But there are companies out there making products that go into other products that go into even more priducts. These companies cannot be regulated by free market forces. A governing body insisting they dont put sht in our environment isnt communism, its common fukking sense. And i loathe the republican party for letting democrats claim that as a "liberal ideal".
-
-
funny how now its acceptable to talk about regulating private companies like twitter and facebook. Heres an idea, stop using them. Make ur own social media hangouts. Srsly. Cause i get labeled a commie for suggesting we should strictly and vigilantly enforce what private companies dump into our environment. But you all arent commies for suggesting social media should be regulated? services u can just stop fukking using and paying attn to literally "right fukking now".
Ive never once used twitter, instagram, pinterest etc,etc. Its all shiite thats madr us infinitely stupider fir using. But there are companies out there making products that go into other products that go into even more priducts. These companies cannot be regulated by free market forces. A governing body insisting they dont put sht in our environment isnt communism, its common fukking sense. And i loathe the republican party for letting democrats claim that as a "liberal ideal".
funny how now its acceptable to talk about regulating private companies like twitter and facebook. Heres an idea, stop using them. Make ur own social media hangouts. Srsly. Cause i get labeled a commie for suggesting we should strictly and vigilantly enforce what private companies dump into our environment. But you all arent commies for suggesting social media should be regulated? services u can just stop fukking using and paying attn to literally "right fukking now".
Ive never once used twitter, instagram, pinterest etc,etc. Its all shiite thats madr us infinitely stupider fir using. But there are companies out there making products that go into other products that go into even more priducts. These companies cannot be regulated by free market forces. A governing body insisting they dont put sht in our environment isnt communism, its common fukking sense. And i loathe the republican party for letting democrats claim that as a "liberal ideal".
Oh don’t give me that stoopid bullsh!t.
You know damned well if the shoe was on the other foot the libs would have their tampon strings in a twist.
Besides, you’re overlooking this little thing called the first amendment.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
I think you're over looking a private company's Terms of Service...
-
none of u want to own up that ngr jones own website HAD THE SAME FUKKING TOS.
ofc liberals would be up in arms if facebook started leaning right. I dont give a fuk tho since i think all social media jobs people out to make money. Ur all cnts for caring one way or the other. Let people who like alex jones stupid round stupid round fuk face, go to the stupid round fuk faces own website and say fuk all they want there. The ONLY reason they dont want that is brcause they want easy access to liberals they can shtstart with.
ive seen this on fb way too many times to convinced otherwise which is why i drastically dialed down my presence there. People who got in constant arguments that spilled over into multiple feeds, woukd not drop each other under the excuse it would embolden the other. FB is insanity. Literally. If any of u use more than just keeping in touch with family and a few VERY close friends.....stop.
-
funny how now its acceptable to talk about regulating private companies like twitter and facebook. Heres an idea, stop using them. Make ur own social media hangouts. Srsly. Cause i get labeled a commie for suggesting we should strictly and vigilantly enforce what private companies dump into our environment. But you all arent commies for suggesting social media should be regulated? services u can just stop fukking using and paying attn to literally "right fukking now".
Ive never once used twitter, instagram, pinterest etc,etc. Its all shiite thats madr us infinitely stupider fir using. But there are companies out there making products that go into other products that go into even more priducts. These companies cannot be regulated by free market forces. A governing body insisting they dont put sht in our environment isnt communism, its common fukking sense. And i loathe the republican party for letting democrats claim that as a "liberal ideal".
Oh don’t give me that stoopid bullsh!t.
You know damned well if the shoe was on the other foot the libs would have their tampon strings in a twist.
Besides, you’re overlooking this little thing called the first amendment.
Besides, you’re overlooking this little thing called the first amendment.
ur oveelooking this little thing called capitalism. Is facebook publically funded yes or no? if u dont like their tos stop using them. No one is forcing u to yse fb are they?
-
Besides, you’re overlooking this little thing called the first amendment.
ur oveelooking this little thing called capitalism. Is facebook publically funded yes or no? if u dont like their tos stop using them. No one is forcing u to yse fb are they?
ur oveelooking this little thing called capitalism. Is facebook publically funded yes or no? if u dont like their tos stop using them. No one is forcing u to yse fb are they?
Yeah it's all about capitalism freedom, First Amendment blah blah blah as long as it's politically correct.
WSS
-
ur oveelooking this little thing called capitalism. Is facebook publically funded yes or no? if u dont like their tos stop using them. No one is forcing u to yse fb are they?
Yeah it's all about capitalism freedom, First Amendment blah blah blah as long as it's politically correct.
WSS
Yeah it's all about capitalism freedom of speech First Amendment blah blah blah as long as it's politically correct.
WSS
after all the vile sht they let jones say for decades, the video i linked to was the final straw. Its beyond "political correctness"...theres a line and he crossed it. I would argue he should have been thrown in jail for getting his followers to harrass parents of dead children but whatevs. Urging people to get their "battle rifles" out was the last act.
-
and capitalism is tough to understand steve i get it.
-
and capitalism is tough to understand steve i get it.
and capitalism is tough to understand steve i get it.
No it really isn't. Neither is hypocrisy. But just for the record seditious speech by the colonists was exactly the reason the first amendment was written.
WSS
-
It wouldn't be the first time there's been a lack of understanding on here regarding freedom of speech.
That actor that said something homophobic is getting fired??? Free speech free speech free speech!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login