Manafort
-
I saw Bob Woodward on television yesterday and they asked him if he looked into any Trump campaign and Russian collusion in writing his book and he said he couldn't find any....and he said he looked REALLY hard.
LOL! Yeah he only found a totally impaired POTUS that everyone is protecting us from. That's some real consolation!
LOL! Yeah he only found a totally impaired POTUS that everyone is protecting us from. That's some real consolation!
Woodward used second hand accounts not eyewitness testimony. One of the accounts in Woodward's book was about a strategy meeting on Afghanistan where Woodward says he was told that Trump acted like a child asking the generals "are we winning yet". I heard a direct eyewitness testimony from someone on television who was at that particular meeting and said that was not the impression he got from Trump at all. He said Trump asked the generals questions any president should ask such as what are our goals and exit strategy etc....so there you go as to second hand accounts about Trump likely from sources with an axe to grind. Also about all those I know of who have been quoted by second hand sources by Woodward have come out publicly and stated they never said the things quoted in his book.
In my opinion a more accurate assessment of Trump in the White House is likely that what you see in public is not much different than his behavior in the White House as those who know him have stated. If you think his public behavior is bad than you are not going to like his behavior in the White House.
-
the funniest part of all of this is that one can no longer be "politically shamed"
when there is nothing you or I can do about the theater in DC is doing!
I personally enjoy watching this hair on fire reaction to Trumps handling of his own narcissism
-
Given the choice of The Hangman's rope and admitting you actually witnessed witchcraft from the house next door which option do you think most citizens of Salem Massachusetts would have picked?
WSS
-
Texie is trolling - that surely is the explanation. He cannot possibly be serious. He gives "Trumped up charges" a
whole new emphasis. It's strange to celebrate the conviction of manafort -
on stuff he did back in 2005/2007.
When Did Trump run for pres? Oh, 2016. About ten years later. To pretend that is an indictment of Pres Trump, is worse
than worthless, whatever a word for that would be. The dems are the deep state - and they believe they are immune from the law - and, indeed, obaMao put them in charge of enforcing the law. The more the truth on them is out, the more names get added to the list - the more emotionally and irrationally the left vents against Pres Trump, and his second SCOTUS nominee.
Bill clinton's past as a sexual abuser as gov was nothing to the left - despite all the witnesses, lawsuits, investigative reporting of facts..."because the past doesn't matter".
But let an imaginary hs girl "write a letter" to leftists in Congress about Kavanaugh - some 30 years ago alleged something - and the left goes all in on "the past matters".
Like I keep saying - the left changes it's perception and stances based on their emotions at the time - which lends itself to flipflopping, lies, hypocrisy, and fraud all along the way - and they love it.
Like the zombie apocalypse movie - except it isn't "undead"...it's leftwing emotional venting and flippflopping as the epidemic.
-
cal is trolling.?
-
-
-
And here's some more just for Trumpettes.
-
And here's some more just for Trumpettes.
And here's some more just for Trumpettes.
Check out those headlines, “Manafort Guilty Plea COULD Reveal Truth About Trump Tower Meeting”.
Whenever you resort to using words like “could” in your header, it’s not news...it’s wishful thinking. ?
-
And here's some more just for Trumpettes.
Check out those headlines, “Manafort Guilty Plea COULD Reveal Truth About Trump Tower Meeting”.
Whenever you resort to using words like “could” in your header, it’s not news...it’s wishful thinking. ?
Check out those headlines, “Manafort Guilty Plea COULD Reveal Truth About Trump Tower Meeting”.
Whenever you resort to using words like “could” in your header, it’s not news...it’s wishful thinking. ?
So did you actually watch the interviews? It was far more than the headline. Hint: follow the Illegal E.European Money.
-
how out u all stfu since none of us and not even anyone in the media has a singular got damn clue where this is all headed. But u all, both on the right and the left... think u know sht cause ur msm of choice is givin ya the "inside scoop".
Ur all being bullshtted for click revenue, what the fuk us wrong with all of u for not realizing that fact? u go to ur main stream bullshtter of choice cause they stroke ur cok just the way u like it, and ur visit to their site garnered them ad revenue. They give no fuks about telli g u anything legitimate, cause if they did u might not check back in for a a day or so. They want u there constsntly tossing their salads just the way they like it
-
theater i tell ya..
-
Add in Kenneth Starr's view
-
Well, I say, in this book (buy it please)...........
-
Well, I say, in this book (buy it please)...........
Well, I say, in this book (buy it please)...........
If I'm putting Woodward up to pitch his, it's only fair I put Starr up to pitch his.?
-
mueller gave the guy this deal for a reason, lets just let it play out
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login