Skip to content

***Official Browns @ Saints Game Day Thread***

The Browns Board
259 42 5.2k 1
  • Oh Gipper... So many falacies, so little time. I think covering that all a dozen times should be enough by now, but I know you're a lost cause. I shouldn't waste my time. 

  • Put more effort into your trolling, all of you.

    You can't let the Michigan fan be the only one whose posts are coherent.

    @unsympathetic said:

    Put more effort into your trolling, all of you.

    You can't let the Michigan fan be the only one whose posts are coherent.

    Awe shucks. Thanks. 

  • Oh Gipper... So many falacies, so little time. I think covering that all a dozen times should be enough by now, but I know you're a lost cause. I shouldn't waste my time. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Oh Gipper... So many falacies, so little time. I think covering that all a dozen times should be enough by now, but I know you're a lost cause. I shouldn't waste my time. 

    So many Truths that you cannot handle.  Why let the facts get in the way of your delusions.

  • Oh Gipper... So many falacies, so little time. I think covering that all a dozen times should be enough by now, but I know you're a lost cause. I shouldn't waste my time. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Oh Gipper... So many falacies, so little time. I think covering that all a dozen times should be enough by now, but I know you're a lost cause. I shouldn't waste my time. 

    You are catching on...

  • @mld-woody said:

    Oh Gipper... So many falacies, so little time. I think covering that all a dozen times should be enough by now, but I know you're a lost cause. I shouldn't waste my time. 

    You are catching on...

    @tour2ma said:

    You are catching on...

    You guys sure loves you some 69 together.

    So? Tour?  You buying into Woody's lies and delusions about Michigan/OSU?

  • But in general, is it just me or does the AFC simply look terrible this year.

    @marc1971 said:

    But in general, is it just me or does the AFC simply look terrible this year.

    Tell that to the Chief and Jags.

  • @browns52 said:

    bottom line is ramrod taylor will not lead any nfl team to the promise land....end of story...so why do we have yet another loser at qb...i see every friggin team playing their rookie qbs right away for the last several yrs...its the way things are now in the nfl...these clowns need to see if mayfield was worth the number 1 pick...why is he sitting behind yet another browns qb loser...he stinks...play the kid for christ sake....as far as i am concerned looking back last yr when baby huey was pumping the ever livin crap out of rg3 and now this crap with ramrod taylor......i am not sure if huey was pumping ramrod like he did the gimp, but if he did, then he needs to go. hue jackson's was pumped by the browns as being some guru  qb coach....pfffffft...yeah right....

    Yeah, just look at Mahommes!.... Wait... He sat his rookie year? Oh... nvm

    @mld-woody said:

    Yeah, just look at Mahommes!.... Wait... He sat his rookie year? Oh... nvm

    Haven't I been saying we should sit our rookie QB's all along?  Hmmm!

  • 19b5a6f8a58deeb3_custom_665xauto.jpg

  • @darren15 said:

    19b5a6f8a58deeb3_custom_665xauto.jpg

    I expect this team to kick the Raven's arses when they meet.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Yep, watched all of them. 

    And I'm an OSU fan that can acknowledge that OSU/TTUN is historically the best rivalry in college football, or right there, but the rivalry with Penn State means more now.

    By no means does that mean I think TTUN is dead or irrelevant. Not at all. Things can definitely change. and they are still a quality program with the ability to get back to national title contention.  

    All rivalries suffer when the results get and stay lopsided for a length of time.

    @tour2ma said:

    All rivalries suffer when the results get and stay lopsided for a length of time.

    Absolutely.

    News flash, the Steelers and their fans would laugh in our faces if we contended that the Browns are still their biggest rival. That boat sailed years ago.

  • @tour2ma said:

    All rivalries suffer when the results get and stay lopsided for a length of time.

    Absolutely.

    News flash, the Steelers and their fans would laugh in our faces if we contended that the Browns are still their biggest rival. That boat sailed years ago.

    @dutch-oven said:

    Absolutely.

    News flash, the Steelers and their fans would laugh in our faces if we contended that the Browns are still their biggest rival. That boat sailed years ago.

    The Browns ARE their biggest rival.   The fact that they have had to fight harder for the division title against the Ravens and the Bengals does not detract from that fact.

    Its just like the OSU/Michigan rivalry.   Penn State is a much bigger threat to OSU for the division/conference title, but that does not mean they replace FMU as the Buckeyeys biggest rival.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Absolutely.

    News flash, the Steelers and their fans would laugh in our faces if we contended that the Browns are still their biggest rival. That boat sailed years ago.

    The Browns ARE their biggest rival.   The fact that they have had to fight harder for the division title against the Ravens and the Bengals does not detract from that fact.

    Its just like the OSU/Michigan rivalry.   Penn State is a much bigger threat to OSU for the division/conference title, but that does not mean they replace FMU as the Buckeyeys biggest rival.

    @the-gipper said:

    The Browns ARE their biggest rival.   The fact that they have had to fight harder for the division title against the Ravens and the Bengals does not detract from that fact.

    Its just like the OSU/Michigan rivalry.   Penn State is a much bigger threat to OSU for the division/conference title, but that does not mean they replace FMU as the Buckeyeys biggest rival.

    The Ravens are the Steelers biggest rival. 

    It's not even close, Gip. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    The Browns ARE their biggest rival.   The fact that they have had to fight harder for the division title against the Ravens and the Bengals does not detract from that fact.

    Its just like the OSU/Michigan rivalry.   Penn State is a much bigger threat to OSU for the division/conference title, but that does not mean they replace FMU as the Buckeyeys biggest rival.

    The Ravens are the Steelers biggest rival. 

    It's not even close, Gip. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    The Ravens are the Steelers biggest rival. 

    It's not even close, Gip. 

    They have been their closest competitor/challenger for the division title, not their biggest rival.

    Understand the distinction  (even if you don't, it won't change the fact)

  • @the-gipper said:

    The Browns ARE their biggest rival.   The fact that they have had to fight harder for the division title against the Ravens and the Bengals does not detract from that fact.

    Its just like the OSU/Michigan rivalry.   Penn State is a much bigger threat to OSU for the division/conference title, but that does not mean they replace FMU as the Buckeyeys biggest rival.

    The Ravens are the Steelers biggest rival. 

    It's not even close, Gip. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    The Ravens are the Steelers biggest rival. 

    It's not even close, Gip. 

    Don't take the bait.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    The Ravens are the Steelers biggest rival. 

    It's not even close, Gip. 

    Don't take the bait.

    @tour2ma said:

    Don't take the bait.

    It's not trolling, or baiting... (Or 'GO AWAY, I'M BATING!' either)

    I know many Steelers fans from the SW corner of PA... Butler-area specifically. 

    They aren't telling me this just to be mean. (Maybe a little, but not entirely ?)

  • I was talking to you, not about you.

    As I see it the list of PTG's AFCN rivals in order is:

    1. BLT
    2. CIN
    3. ...
    4. ...
    5. ...
    6. Us
  • I was talking to you, not about you.

    As I see it the list of PTG's AFCN rivals in order is:

    1. BLT
    2. CIN
    3. ...
    4. ...
    5. ...
    6. Us

    @tour2ma said:

    I was talking to you, not about you.

    As I see it the list of PTG's AFCN rivals in order is:

    1. BLT
    2. CIN
    3. ...
    4. ...
    5. ...
    6. Us

    I guess we have a different concept of what a rivalry is.  For you guys, apparently, a rivalry is simply a momentary thing.   Whomever is good at the same time and competing for titles are the biggest rivals.    I say bollox to that.    If that is the measure, then the biggest rivalry in the AFC is the New England Patriots vs. the Jacksonville Jaguars.    After all, those are the two teams that are vying for the AFC crown.

    To me, rivalry is tradition, history.  It is something that has been built up over decades and decades, not just the current thing. 

    The Browns and the Steelers have one of the most historic rivals in football.....even if one team has not been good and the other has.

    The New England Patriots biggest rival is the New York Jets....going back to AFC days....even though the Jets have been about as bad against the Pats as the Browns have been against the Steelers.   The Packers and the Bears are one of the biggest rivals in NFL history....even though the Packers have dominated for years now.

    This is not to say that the Steelers vs. Bengals or Ravens isn't a rivalry.....those are just NOT the historic rivalry that the Browns and Steelers are.  Given their entwined pasts,  the Browns  should have minor rivalries with both Cincy and Baltimore.    I call both teams the bastard stepchildren of the Browns,  because of the circumstances under which each franchise was formed.  But THE major historical rivalry in the AFCN is Browns/Steelers, as it goes back to 1950, and it don't matter who is good or not, it is a huge rivalry.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Don't take the bait.

    It's not trolling, or baiting... (Or 'GO AWAY, I'M BATING!' either)

    I know many Steelers fans from the SW corner of PA... Butler-area specifically. 

    They aren't telling me this just to be mean. (Maybe a little, but not entirely ?)

    @dutch-oven said:

    It's not trolling, or baiting... (Or 'GO AWAY, I'M BATING!' either)

    I know many Steelers fans from the SW corner of PA... Butler-area specifically. 

    They aren't telling me this just to be mean. (Maybe a little, but not entirely ?)

    I noticed in the under 40 (+/-) diehard steelrz fans almost a pity.  They just don't remember the Joe turkey Jones planting Bradshaw and all those good memories. 

    It's mainly we older boomers keeping those memories alive.

  • @bjh2130 said:

    Still didn't acknowledge the fact that he was talking about he wanted both teams to be relevant in the playoffs talks and you jump the gun and got all mad and assumed he was talking about they weren't close games. Yeah you're right the only found two pairs from players the other 20 players have the number 52, one of the only numbers that they don't have on the roster... That's convenient

    Oh champ, I'm not mad at all. Don't give yourself too much credit. 

    Sigh

    #52 was one of our OL last year that went to the draft and the other #52 was a disgruntled linebacker the got kicked off / left the team. These shoes popped up after they both were gone.

    But when my entire institution is protecting a domestic abuser and then the guy that got caught covering it up, I can see why you'd be grasping at straws about shoes to feel better. 

    @mld-woody said:

    But when my entire institution is protecting a domestic abuser and then the guy that got caught covering it up, I can see why you'd be grasping at straws about shoes to feel better. 

    Urban Meyer is 6-0 against Michigan...so that would make him a domestic abuser.

  • @mld-woody said:

    But when my entire institution is protecting a domestic abuser and then the guy that got caught covering it up, I can see why you'd be grasping at straws about shoes to feel better. 

    Urban Meyer is 6-0 against Michigan...so that would make him a domestic abuser.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Urban Meyer is 6-0 against Michigan...so that would make him a domestic abuser.

    And Jim Tressel was 9-1 including 7 in a row, he owned "m".  

    The only NCAA coach to win over 100 wins with two different schools, nasty.