Skip to content

Josh Gordon Traded to Pats

The Browns Board
853 73 21.3k 2
  • Kendricks who?  The guy who's going to jail?

    Who fucking cares about him.   He's gone.

  • Kendricks who?  The guy who's going to jail?

    Who fucking cares about him.   He's gone.

    @mark-o said:

    Kendricks who?  The guy who's going to jail?

    Who Shmucking cares about him.   He's gone.

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

  • The Browns offense isn’t as good right now as it was at 8am this morning.  Callaway, Landry and Higgins aren’t as good as Callaway, Landry and Gordon.  Gordon had baggage for sure and was an unknown commodity but he has ability that other players on the Browns current roster don’t.

    Talent wins.  Chemistry is a fun concept that winners talk about and losers never have.  When the Browns end up 2-14 we can post a thread about what a great atmosphere the team has.  Fooking Joke

  • The Browns offense isn’t as good right now as it was at 8am this morning.  Callaway, Landry and Higgins aren’t as good as Callaway, Landry and Gordon.  Gordon had baggage for sure and was an unknown commodity but he has ability that other players on the Browns current roster don’t.

    Talent wins.  Chemistry is a fun concept that winners talk about and losers never have.  When the Browns end up 2-14 we can post a thread about what a great atmosphere the team has.  Fooking Joke

    @baconhound said:

    The Browns offense isn’t as good right now as it was at 8am this morning.  Callaway, Landry and Higgins aren’t as good as Callaway, Landry and Gordon.  Gordon had baggage for sure and was an unknown commodity but he has ability that other players on the Browns current roster don’t.

    Talent wins.  Chemistry is a fun concept that winners talk about and losers never have.  When the Browns end up 2-14 we can post a thread about what a great atmosphere the team has.  Fooking Joke

    Thank you, perfectly said. 

  • That talent doesn't mean shit when he doesn't play.

  • @mark-o said:

    Kendricks who?  The guy who's going to jail?

    Who Shmucking cares about him.   He's gone.

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    @poeticg said:

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    You’re talking to the wall on this one.  The love it or leave, cheer for the Browns regardless, Guy has no problem bitching about 1-31 but could care less about fixing it cause he got dem orange jersey to cheer fo each Sunde

  • That talent doesn't mean shit when he doesn't play.

    @mark-o said:

    That talent doesn't mean Sheet when he doesn't play.

    He's going to play in NE this weekend...

  • @mark-o said:

    That talent doesn't mean Sheet when he doesn't play.

    He's going to play in NE this weekend...

    @poeticg said:

    He's going to play in NE this weekend...

    Wonderful... I'm sure you'll be wacking off watching him play too.    Tell us all how great Carl Hogan looks for Denver this week, and how many wins Barfley has led the Giants to this year as well. 

    Enjoy it.   I'll be flying back home from Cleveland after watching the Browns play the Jets and then going to watch OSU and Tulane on Saturday. 

  • @vagitron said:

    Not true. I want the rivalry restored and we drafted mason Rudolph and have a developing Dobbs that we cut Landry jones over. Are they going to be Ben good? Who knows but they aren't chopped liver and they had a first round grade on Rudolph AND drafted his stud receiver in washington.

    I see that as over projecting. So in your estimation there, you not only have 1 good QB, but 3.

    Good QBs dont just come along, so thinking you have 3 seems off to me.

    @gunz41 said:

    I see that as over projecting. So in your estimation there, you not only have 1 good QB, but 3.

    Good QBs dont just come along, so thinking you have 3 seems off to me.

    We drafted Rudolph to replace Ben, maybe neither pan out but I feel pretty good about Rudolph as do the steelers. 

    And yes to your previous poimt I do care that he's a patriot, as should the Browns. It was a dumb f*ckinh move. It's randy moss all over again. Malcotent in Oakland, goes.to the pats for.pretty much free and scores 23 touchdowns.

  • Hm, imagine if our first pick of the draft was actually playing on Sunday instead of watching helpless from the sideline like Gordon. Sheet, we should just release Baker since we can't trust him to win games or show up on gameday. It's not like we're paying him millions of dollars to watch Tie-rod lose on Sunday... oh, wait....

  • Good lord.  I can barely touch my phone there are so many hot takes here.

  • I'll take Barkley and Gordon on Sunday and you can have May-never-see-the-field and Rashard Higgins- wonder who would win? lol

  • I'll take Barkley and Gordon on Sunday and you can have May-never-see-the-field and Rashard Higgins- wonder who would win? lol

    @poeticg said:

    I'll take Barkley and Gordon on Sunday and you can have May-never-see-the-field and Rashard Higgins- wonder who would win? lol

    Who said this?  

    Ill take Jerry Rice and Emmitt Smith, you can take Mohammed Massaquoi.  Is this how this works?

  • The flip flopping attitudes crack me up.  Calling for dorseys head now?  Lol.  I guess its part of being a fan...constantly flip flopping.

    If you cant see any improvement in the team or talent then you have blinders on.  

    This isnt a pain free process.  Patience is a virtue.  Ill prefer to stay positive instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

  • @mark-o said:

    Kendricks who?  The guy who's going to jail?

    Who Shmucking cares about him.   He's gone.

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    @poeticg said:

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    Ahh, I thought I watched the Super Bowl, I guess I didnt since apparently Kendricks won the game for them.

    I actually have zero problem with you liking certain players. And even less problem with looking at a player for his talent level. That is what fans do. Me, while I try to remember to think of the man first and try not to I look at it with a coaches eyes, which isnt nearly as fun.

    But what I dont understand, not like I have a real problem with it, is overvaluing players and just completely talking bad about a team you supposedly like. It's just like saying Barkley was the best ever, and now so much about Gordon. They have A LOT of talent, but Barkley cant single handedly win a game (which has been shown), and Gordon cant be relied upon. Yes he played a few games last year, and the 1st game this year. Before that it had been over 2 years, and then he misses last week. 

    So in the coaches mind, whether a great or terrible coach, has designs on prep that they put in. And you said how much better he is than the others, which is true, but exactly how do you replace what you have worked on all week when he suddenly cant play, whether 1 game or the year?

    Unfortunately, things arent always on who has the most talent. There are a whole lot of other things to consider

  • Hm, imagine if our first pick of the draft was actually playing on Sunday instead of watching helpless from the sideline like Gordon. Sheet, we should just release Baker since we can't trust him to win games or show up on gameday. It's not like we're paying him millions of dollars to watch Tie-rod lose on Sunday... oh, wait....

    @poeticg said:

    Hm, imagine if our first pick of the draft was actually playing on Sunday instead of watching helpless from the sideline like Gordon. Sheet, we should just release Baker since we can't trust him to win games or show up on gameday. It's not like we're paying him millions of dollars to watch Tie-rod lose on Sunday... oh, wait....

    Why are you all so hell bent on ruining qb's? Baker doesn't need to start as tyrod is plenty capable.  Do you think baker is going to go out and perform substantially better than tyrod as a rookie? Let the f*cking kid develop behind tyrod so when he does start he's actually ready for a change.

  • @poeticg said:

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    Ahh, I thought I watched the Super Bowl, I guess I didnt since apparently Kendricks won the game for them.

    I actually have zero problem with you liking certain players. And even less problem with looking at a player for his talent level. That is what fans do. Me, while I try to remember to think of the man first and try not to I look at it with a coaches eyes, which isnt nearly as fun.

    But what I dont understand, not like I have a real problem with it, is overvaluing players and just completely talking bad about a team you supposedly like. It's just like saying Barkley was the best ever, and now so much about Gordon. They have A LOT of talent, but Barkley cant single handedly win a game (which has been shown), and Gordon cant be relied upon. Yes he played a few games last year, and the 1st game this year. Before that it had been over 2 years, and then he misses last week. 

    So in the coaches mind, whether a great or terrible coach, has designs on prep that they put in. And you said how much better he is than the others, which is true, but exactly how do you replace what you have worked on all week when he suddenly cant play, whether 1 game or the year?

    Unfortunately, things arent always on who has the most talent. There are a whole lot of other things to consider

    @gunz41 said:

    Ahh, I thought I watched the Super Bowl, I guess I didnt since apparently Kendricks won the game for them.

    I actually have zero problem with you liking certain players. And even less problem with looking at a player for his talent level. That is what fans do. Me, while I try to remember to think of the man first and try not to I look at it with a coaches eyes, which isnt nearly as fun.

    But what I dont understand, not like I have a real problem with it, is overvaluing players and just completely talking bad about a team you supposedly like. It's just like saying Barkley was the best ever, and now so much about Gordon. They have A LOT of talent, but Barkley cant single handedly win a game (which has been shown), and Gordon cant be relied upon. Yes he played a few games last year, and the 1st game this year. Before that it had been over 2 years, and then he misses last week. 

    So in the coaches mind, whether a great or terrible coach, has designs on prep that they put in. And you said how much better he is than the others, which is true, but exactly how do you replace what you have worked on all week when he suddenly cant play, whether 1 game or the year?

    Unfortunately, things arent always on who has the most talent. There are a whole lot of other things to consider

    No there really isn’t.  The Jags are better than the Browns because position by position they have more talent.  Are there positions that are more important, sure, but don’t fool yourself into thinking culture means more than talent.

  • Per Ian Rappaport, Josh had an MRI on his hamstring today and it's totally fine and he will play/start on Sunday.  How the Shmuck does he get ruled out TWO DAYS ago, and then in TWO DAYS TIME his hamstring is totally fine?

  • And his hamstring was totally fine on FRIDAY?  And how the Shmuck do you injure a hamstring at a photo shoot anyhow?

  • Per Ian Rappaport, Josh had an MRI on his hamstring today and it's totally fine and he will play/start on Sunday.  How the Shmuck does he get ruled out TWO DAYS ago, and then in TWO DAYS TIME his hamstring is totally fine?

    @onkyoreceiver said:

    Per Ian Rappaport, Josh had an MRI on his hamstring today and it's totally fine and he will play/start on Sunday.  How the Shmuck does he get ruled out TWO DAYS ago, and then in TWO DAYS TIME his hamstring is totally fine?

    Hue and his power trip. This team HATES him.