Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Our D just got a lot scarier..

Our D just got a lot scarier..

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
14 Posts 9 Posters 802 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
    • 13k Posts
    • 5k Reputation
    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #4

    I would expect Calhoun to take Randalls spot and given the performance in pre-season, I feel confident he'll man the spot well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • BobPOUND B
      • 270 Posts
      • 138 Reputation
      B BobPOUND wrote on last edited by
      #5

      For once our Next man up philosophy isn't all that bad.... I think we will really miss Randall in the middle though.... He is another game changer just in the fact that they don't throw his way.. he is a calming force out there....  I know this is football and people get hurt, but man wouldn't it be great to see ALL our starters out there at the same time. What a sight that would be 🙂 ...

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
        • 30k Posts
        • 6k Reputation
        Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Taylor was cleared to practice today.

        Couple other updates and seems Hue is now our GM... ?

        Jackson said he has no intention of trading Taylor, acquired by the Browns in March after he guided Buffalo to the playoffs last season.

        Browns safety Damarious Randall worked on the side during practice as he recovers from a heel injury. Linebacker James Burgess was out again with a knee injury.

        https://sports.yahoo.com/browns-qb-taylor-practices-concussion-losing-job-161232977--nfl.html

        "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Tour2maT Tour2ma

          Report from yesterday's practice was both Og and Kirk were "limited" participants, so not a done deal.

          Of more concern to me is that Burgess and Randall "did not participate".

          Also had heard nothing about MG and Landry dealing with a knee. Both were "full participants", so I guess they've just received treatment this week and so have to appear on the report.

          Cleveland Browns

          Day Player
          Wednesday James Burgess Jr., LB
          Did Not Participate in Practice (knee)
          Wednesday Seth DeValve, TE
          Limited Participation in Practice (hamstring)
          Wednesday Myles Garrett, DE
          Full Participation in Practice (knee)
          Wednesday Desmond Harrison, T
          Full Participation in Practice (shoulder)
          Wednesday Christian Kirksey, LB
          Limited Participation in Practice (shoulder, ankle)
          Wednesday Jarvis Landry, WR
          Full Participation in Practice (knee)
          Wednesday Emmanuel Ogbah, DE
          Limited Participation in Practice (ankle)
          Wednesday Damarious Randall, CB
          Did Not Participate in Practice (heel)
          Wednesday Tyrod Taylor, QB

          Did Not Participate in Practice (concussion, back)

          https://scores.nbcsports.com/fb/practice.asp

          jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 5k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @tour2ma said:

          Report from yesterday's practice was both Og and Kirk were "limited" participants, so not a done deal.

          Of more concern to me is that Burgess and Randall "did not participate".

          Also had heard nothing about MG and Landry dealing with a knee. Both were "full participants", so I guess they've just received treatment this week and so have to appear on the report.

          Cleveland Browns

          Day Player
          Wednesday James Burgess Jr., LB
          Did Not Participate in Practice (knee)
          Wednesday Seth DeValve, TE
          Limited Participation in Practice (hamstring)
          Wednesday Myles Garrett, DE
          Full Participation in Practice (knee)
          Wednesday Desmond Harrison, T
          Full Participation in Practice (shoulder)
          Wednesday Christian Kirksey, LB
          Limited Participation in Practice (shoulder, ankle)
          Wednesday Jarvis Landry, WR
          Full Participation in Practice (knee)
          Wednesday Emmanuel Ogbah, DE
          Limited Participation in Practice (ankle)
          Wednesday Damarious Randall, CB
          Did Not Participate in Practice (heel)
          Wednesday Tyrod Taylor, QB

          Did Not Participate in Practice (concussion, back)

          https://scores.nbcsports.com/fb/practice.asp

          Randall is likely to play, despite his lack of practice. He was in a medical boot immediately after the game, BUT he was also in a boot most of the previous week too. The boot is only to protect the injury from worsening, and he'll play Sunday. 

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 11k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
            #8

            https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2018/09/27/packers-fail-in-attempt-to-bring-back-dl-brian-price/  well, Mr.Price should get some looks at DT.. 

            Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 5k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by jiggins7919
              #9

              I'm ready for the official Browns at Raiders game thread, lol. Does someone usually start that? I don't wanna steal someone's thunder. 

              Anyway, it's perhaps strange to feel "concerned" like I do about this game, especially considering our opponent is 0-3, but as I go back and watch the Raiders play, they certainly don't LOOK like a winless team. I'm not gonna say they're the 85 Bears, but they don't give off the vibe of "sucking". To be honest, the biggest reason for their plight is their red zone touchdown percentage, which is around 45% I believe. 

              For example, Raiders had a 4th and goal from the 1 yard line recently, and instead of handing off to Beast Mode, they give it to the fullback, who promptly got stuffed. Lynch is one of the best short yardage backs I've seen, and it's plays like this where it really seems like coaches get too cute sometimes. I don't think that kind of mistake gets made again, so we'll need our stout defensive line to earn their wages. 

              My heart DESPERATELY wants to predict a win, and I might change my mind, but I envision us losing the game. I'm NOT trying to be a negative azz-hat like I was before, this is simply how I feel about the game. Why? First off, I believe a winless team is dangerous, and it's not like the Raiders are devoid of talent. Yes, they are without Mack (thank goodness), but their corners have played relatively well, and I want to say their defense has played decently the past two weeks. Raiders will be desperate, and they are obviously at home. A super big test for our rookie and our still-gelling offensive line. 

              Why else? Lynch kind of scares me a bit, and it seems that the few times our defense let their guard down recently, it was the ground game that hurt us. I don't expect the Raiders to line up 8 tight ends like the Jets did, but Lynch is relentless and will likely require multiple defenders to bring him down. This is a game where Mychal Kendricks' absence will be felt, as his power will be missed. 

              And now for the obvious reason:  SPECIAL TEAMS. Not so special, huh? Even in our recent win, we kicked a ball out of bounds, had a punt blocked, we had several obligatory block in the back/holding on return penalties, and our kicker was less than "automatic" despite a perfect stat line. I see this being a VERY close game, and in close games, special teams often make the difference. I don't trust ours for obvious reasons, and that's the main reason for my picking the Raiders to win. As much as it hurts, as much as I REALLY want us to win, I think Raiders win a close contest 27-24. 

              Prove me wrong again, boys! Honestly, if I felt better about our kicking situation I'd have no problem picking us to win. Perhaps I should give our young kicker a break? All he can do is make all of his kicks, and he did that. His "banana kick" was NOT confidence inspiring, but ultimately went in. It should be noted that his last extra point was PERFECT, and his last kickoff went completely through the end zone. Maybe he was shaking off the nerves, eh? 

              B Tour2maT 2 Replies Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 23k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
                #10

                Chucky's pre-game presser. Woody will like his comment of JP.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                  I'm ready for the official Browns at Raiders game thread, lol. Does someone usually start that? I don't wanna steal someone's thunder. 

                  Anyway, it's perhaps strange to feel "concerned" like I do about this game, especially considering our opponent is 0-3, but as I go back and watch the Raiders play, they certainly don't LOOK like a winless team. I'm not gonna say they're the 85 Bears, but they don't give off the vibe of "sucking". To be honest, the biggest reason for their plight is their red zone touchdown percentage, which is around 45% I believe. 

                  For example, Raiders had a 4th and goal from the 1 yard line recently, and instead of handing off to Beast Mode, they give it to the fullback, who promptly got stuffed. Lynch is one of the best short yardage backs I've seen, and it's plays like this where it really seems like coaches get too cute sometimes. I don't think that kind of mistake gets made again, so we'll need our stout defensive line to earn their wages. 

                  My heart DESPERATELY wants to predict a win, and I might change my mind, but I envision us losing the game. I'm NOT trying to be a negative azz-hat like I was before, this is simply how I feel about the game. Why? First off, I believe a winless team is dangerous, and it's not like the Raiders are devoid of talent. Yes, they are without Mack (thank goodness), but their corners have played relatively well, and I want to say their defense has played decently the past two weeks. Raiders will be desperate, and they are obviously at home. A super big test for our rookie and our still-gelling offensive line. 

                  Why else? Lynch kind of scares me a bit, and it seems that the few times our defense let their guard down recently, it was the ground game that hurt us. I don't expect the Raiders to line up 8 tight ends like the Jets did, but Lynch is relentless and will likely require multiple defenders to bring him down. This is a game where Mychal Kendricks' absence will be felt, as his power will be missed. 

                  And now for the obvious reason:  SPECIAL TEAMS. Not so special, huh? Even in our recent win, we kicked a ball out of bounds, had a punt blocked, we had several obligatory block in the back/holding on return penalties, and our kicker was less than "automatic" despite a perfect stat line. I see this being a VERY close game, and in close games, special teams often make the difference. I don't trust ours for obvious reasons, and that's the main reason for my picking the Raiders to win. As much as it hurts, as much as I REALLY want us to win, I think Raiders win a close contest 27-24. 

                  Prove me wrong again, boys! Honestly, if I felt better about our kicking situation I'd have no problem picking us to win. Perhaps I should give our young kicker a break? All he can do is make all of his kicks, and he did that. His "banana kick" was NOT confidence inspiring, but ultimately went in. It should be noted that his last extra point was PERFECT, and his last kickoff went completely through the end zone. Maybe he was shaking off the nerves, eh? 

                  blowe B
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 127 Reputation
                  B blowe wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @jiggins7919 said:

                  I'm ready for the official Browns at Raiders game thread, lol. Does someone usually start that? I don't wanna steal someone's thunder. 

                  Anyway, it's perhaps strange to feel "concerned" like I do about this game, especially considering our opponent is 0-3, but as I go back and watch the Raiders play, they certainly don't LOOK like a winless team. I'm not gonna say they're the 85 Bears, but they don't give off the vibe of "sucking". To be honest, the biggest reason for their plight is their red zone touchdown percentage, which is around 45% I believe. 

                  For example, Raiders had a 4th and goal from the 1 yard line recently, and instead of handing off to Beast Mode, they give it to the fullback, who promptly got stuffed. Lynch is one of the best short yardage backs I've seen, and it's plays like this where it really seems like coaches get too cute sometimes. I don't think that kind of mistake gets made again, so we'll need our stout defensive line to earn their wages. 

                  My heart DESPERATELY wants to predict a win, and I might change my mind, but I envision us losing the game. I'm NOT trying to be a negative azz-hat like I was before, this is simply how I feel about the game. Why? First off, I believe a winless team is dangerous, and it's not like the Raiders are devoid of talent. Yes, they are without Mack (thank goodness), but their corners have played relatively well, and I want to say their defense has played decently the past two weeks. Raiders will be desperate, and they are obviously at home. A super big test for our rookie and our still-gelling offensive line. 

                  Why else? Lynch kind of scares me a bit, and it seems that the few times our defense let their guard down recently, it was the ground game that hurt us. I don't expect the Raiders to line up 8 tight ends like the Jets did, but Lynch is relentless and will likely require multiple defenders to bring him down. This is a game where Mychal Kendricks' absence will be felt, as his power will be missed. 

                  And now for the obvious reason:  SPECIAL TEAMS. Not so special, huh? Even in our recent win, we kicked a ball out of bounds, had a punt blocked, we had several obligatory block in the back/holding on return penalties, and our kicker was less than "automatic" despite a perfect stat line. I see this being a VERY close game, and in close games, special teams often make the difference. I don't trust ours for obvious reasons, and that's the main reason for my picking the Raiders to win. As much as it hurts, as much as I REALLY want us to win, I think Raiders win a close contest 27-24. 

                  Prove me wrong again, boys! Honestly, if I felt better about our kicking situation I'd have no problem picking us to win. Perhaps I should give our young kicker a break? All he can do is make all of his kicks, and he did that. His "banana kick" was NOT confidence inspiring, but ultimately went in. It should be noted that his last extra point was PERFECT, and his last kickoff went completely through the end zone. Maybe he was shaking off the nerves, eh? 

                  Pussy

                  "The purpose of the military is to kill people and break things " - mike huckabee
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                    • 14k Posts
                    • 5k Reputation
                    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Chrissy Kirksey doesnt scare anyone....

                    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                      I'm ready for the official Browns at Raiders game thread, lol. Does someone usually start that? I don't wanna steal someone's thunder. 

                      Anyway, it's perhaps strange to feel "concerned" like I do about this game, especially considering our opponent is 0-3, but as I go back and watch the Raiders play, they certainly don't LOOK like a winless team. I'm not gonna say they're the 85 Bears, but they don't give off the vibe of "sucking". To be honest, the biggest reason for their plight is their red zone touchdown percentage, which is around 45% I believe. 

                      For example, Raiders had a 4th and goal from the 1 yard line recently, and instead of handing off to Beast Mode, they give it to the fullback, who promptly got stuffed. Lynch is one of the best short yardage backs I've seen, and it's plays like this where it really seems like coaches get too cute sometimes. I don't think that kind of mistake gets made again, so we'll need our stout defensive line to earn their wages. 

                      My heart DESPERATELY wants to predict a win, and I might change my mind, but I envision us losing the game. I'm NOT trying to be a negative azz-hat like I was before, this is simply how I feel about the game. Why? First off, I believe a winless team is dangerous, and it's not like the Raiders are devoid of talent. Yes, they are without Mack (thank goodness), but their corners have played relatively well, and I want to say their defense has played decently the past two weeks. Raiders will be desperate, and they are obviously at home. A super big test for our rookie and our still-gelling offensive line. 

                      Why else? Lynch kind of scares me a bit, and it seems that the few times our defense let their guard down recently, it was the ground game that hurt us. I don't expect the Raiders to line up 8 tight ends like the Jets did, but Lynch is relentless and will likely require multiple defenders to bring him down. This is a game where Mychal Kendricks' absence will be felt, as his power will be missed. 

                      And now for the obvious reason:  SPECIAL TEAMS. Not so special, huh? Even in our recent win, we kicked a ball out of bounds, had a punt blocked, we had several obligatory block in the back/holding on return penalties, and our kicker was less than "automatic" despite a perfect stat line. I see this being a VERY close game, and in close games, special teams often make the difference. I don't trust ours for obvious reasons, and that's the main reason for my picking the Raiders to win. As much as it hurts, as much as I REALLY want us to win, I think Raiders win a close contest 27-24. 

                      Prove me wrong again, boys! Honestly, if I felt better about our kicking situation I'd have no problem picking us to win. Perhaps I should give our young kicker a break? All he can do is make all of his kicks, and he did that. His "banana kick" was NOT confidence inspiring, but ultimately went in. It should be noted that his last extra point was PERFECT, and his last kickoff went completely through the end zone. Maybe he was shaking off the nerves, eh? 

                      Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                      • 30k Posts
                      • 6k Reputation
                      Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @jiggins7919 said:

                      I'm ready for the official Browns at Raiders game thread, lol. Does someone usually start that? I don't wanna steal someone's thunder.  

                      Please, be our guest...

                      Usual starter is a once-a-week visitor that started dropping in a year or two ago. Seems like either an NFL or CB shill.

                      Until then one of a couple of us started the weekly game thread.

                      "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
                        • 13k Posts
                        • 5k Reputation
                        tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        BC listed as the starter in place of Demarius.

                        Do us proud.  

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate