Skip to content

Dear Quarterback, may I tackle you?

The Browns Board
47 23 1.5k 1
  • Rules are rules, and it is all about the QB in the NFL. Does anybody really want to watch 2 backups going head-to-head in a primetime late season matchup because the starters got injured?... NO!

    These guys are professionals and need to adapt instead of cry.

    Do I agree with all of the rules...? No. Do I like all of them?... No. But all 32 teams have to deal with it, so deal with it!

    I've gotten tired of all the crying. Especially Clay Matthews, and I respect the kid, but that last penalty he went too high... it was not good form, which led to the penalty. 

    I don't want my QB to get hurt, so these guys just need to suck it up and play by the rules... 

    Complaining about CTE, wanting lifelong health benefits, bitching about short careers, and suing the league all while not wanting to play by rules designed to protect themselves is rather hypocritical on the part of the players... just sayin'

    @thenew23 said:

    Rules are rules, and it is all about the QB in the NFL. Does anybody really want to watch 2 backups going head-to-head in a primetime late season matchup because the starters got injured?... NO!

    Yes, if they are the starters for the Steelers and Ravens.

    T

  • Yes and no, h... refs are protecting QBs on the hoof more than they used to as well...

    Watson's was a non-contact deal suffered in practice.

    One thing I did not see mentioned (apologies if I missed it) is we had our first case of a DL getting hurt trying to keep his body weight off of a QB.

    Miami Dolphins veteran defensive end William Hayes is done for the season after suffering an injury while trying to abide by a controversial NFL rule.

    Hayes tore the ACL in his right knee while sacking Oakland Raiders quarterback Derek Carr in the second quarter of Sunday’s 28-20 victory.

    Dolphins coach Adam Gase said Monday that Hayes sustained the injury while trying to not put his body weight on Carr to avoid drawing a flag as a result of the NFL’s point of emphasis on the roughing-the-passer penalty this season.

    “He was not trying to put body weight on the quarterback, so his foot got caught in the ground,” Gase said.

    Full article here: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/fl-sp-dolphins-gase-quick-hits-20180924-story.html#

    Carr essentially apologized to the DE after the game.

    Here's video: http://www.nfl.com/m/share?p=%2Fvideos%2Fnfl-game-highlights%2F0ap3000000966171%2FWilliam-Hayes-injured-on-sack

    Here's link to the NFL.com article with the video: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000966169/article/hayes-tore-acl-while-avoiding-putting-weight-on-qb

    This is going to start an even bigger backlash. Especially if "star" pass rushers start getting hurt.

    @tour2ma said:

    Yes and no, h... refs are protecting QBs on the hoof more than they used to as well...

    Watson's was a non-contact deal suffered in practice.

    One thing I did not see mentioned (apologies if I missed it) is we had our first case of a DL getting hurt trying to keep his body weight off of a QB.

    Full article here: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/fl-sp-dolphins-gase-quick-hits-20180924-story.html#

    Carr essentially apologized to the DE after the game.

    Here's video: http://www.nfl.com/m/share?p=%2Fvideos%2Fnfl-game-highlights%2F0ap3000000966171%2FWilliam-Hayes-injured-on-sack

    Here's link to the NFL.com article with the video: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000966169/article/hayes-tore-acl-while-avoiding-putting-weight-on-qb

    This is going to start an even bigger backlash. Especially if "star" pass rushers start getting hurt.

    Oh I get the rule, can't wait until a defender has the qb wrapped up in an arm tackle, and is trying to take him (gently) to the ground and the guy breaks free tossing a game winning TD. 😁  

  • @tour2ma said:

    Yes and no, h... refs are protecting QBs on the hoof more than they used to as well...

    Watson's was a non-contact deal suffered in practice.

    One thing I did not see mentioned (apologies if I missed it) is we had our first case of a DL getting hurt trying to keep his body weight off of a QB.

    Full article here: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/fl-sp-dolphins-gase-quick-hits-20180924-story.html#

    Carr essentially apologized to the DE after the game.

    Here's video: http://www.nfl.com/m/share?p=%2Fvideos%2Fnfl-game-highlights%2F0ap3000000966171%2FWilliam-Hayes-injured-on-sack

    Here's link to the NFL.com article with the video: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000966169/article/hayes-tore-acl-while-avoiding-putting-weight-on-qb

    This is going to start an even bigger backlash. Especially if "star" pass rushers start getting hurt.

    Oh I get the rule, can't wait until a defender has the qb wrapped up in an arm tackle, and is trying to take him (gently) to the ground and the guy breaks free tossing a game winning TD. 😁  

    @hoorta said:

    Oh I get the rule, can't wait until a defender has the qb wrapped up in an arm tackle, and is trying to take him (gently) to the ground and the guy breaks free tossing a game winning TD. 😁  

    Larry,

    with all due respect, do you think with all the execs and lifetime NFL minds working on this that they already know your exact scenario is going to happen? Dude, if you and I can imagine it, you can be sure, they already know it is coming. You always take the position that NFL bosses are idiots, and we know better, or their subordinates know better. 

    Larry, life doesn't work this way. Corporations don't work this way. This rule may in-fact find a V 2.0, but if and when a QB gets hurt, the rule is going to come back. Not only will it come back, but I promise you, before too long there will be even more protection for the Quarterback. For instance, I can see the NFL changing the offense to 13 players, adding two offensive linemen who play in the backfield, and can only block on passing plays. 

    Larry, as I said, the can of worms is open. You can stop, kick and scream all you want about "put them in dresses" but clearly, owners have been trying to elevate the protection on quarterbacks for decades. You will not see a return to what you consider proper football. The NFL already knows that extra touchdowns will be made, a lot of unpopular calls will be made, but at the end of this, Quarterbacks will be protected more than ever.

    It's all about money, Larry. The QB is THE only important position on the field. The QB is a franchise asset. Sorry pal, no more big QB hits. It is gone.

  • @hoorta said:

    Oh I get the rule, can't wait until a defender has the qb wrapped up in an arm tackle, and is trying to take him (gently) to the ground and the guy breaks free tossing a game winning TD. 😁  

    Larry,

    with all due respect, do you think with all the execs and lifetime NFL minds working on this that they already know your exact scenario is going to happen? Dude, if you and I can imagine it, you can be sure, they already know it is coming. You always take the position that NFL bosses are idiots, and we know better, or their subordinates know better. 

    Larry, life doesn't work this way. Corporations don't work this way. This rule may in-fact find a V 2.0, but if and when a QB gets hurt, the rule is going to come back. Not only will it come back, but I promise you, before too long there will be even more protection for the Quarterback. For instance, I can see the NFL changing the offense to 13 players, adding two offensive linemen who play in the backfield, and can only block on passing plays. 

    Larry, as I said, the can of worms is open. You can stop, kick and scream all you want about "put them in dresses" but clearly, owners have been trying to elevate the protection on quarterbacks for decades. You will not see a return to what you consider proper football. The NFL already knows that extra touchdowns will be made, a lot of unpopular calls will be made, but at the end of this, Quarterbacks will be protected more than ever.

    It's all about money, Larry. The QB is THE only important position on the field. The QB is a franchise asset. Sorry pal, no more big QB hits. It is gone.

    @ghoolie said:

    Larry,

    with all due respect, do you think with all the execs and lifetime NFL minds working on this that they already know your exact scenario is going to happen? Dude, if you and I can imagine it, you can be sure, they already know it is coming. You always take the position that NFL bosses are idiots, and we know better, or their subordinates know better. 

    Larry, life doesn't work this way. Corporations don't work this way. This rule may in-fact find a V 2.0, but if and when a QB gets hurt, the rule is going to come back. Not only will it come back, but I promise you, before too long there will be even more protection for the Quarterback. For instance, I can see the NFL changing the offense to 13 players, adding two offensive linemen who play in the backfield, and can only block on passing plays. 

    Larry, as I said, the can of worms is open. You can stop, kick and scream all you want about "put them in dresses" but clearly, owners have been trying to elevate the protection on quarterbacks for decades. You will not see a return to what you consider proper football. The NFL already knows that extra touchdowns will be made, a lot of unpopular calls will be made, but at the end of this, Quarterbacks will be protected more than ever.

    It's all about money, Larry. The QB is THE only important position on the field. The QB is a franchise asset. Sorry pal, no more big QB hits. It is gone.

    All reason that the newer startup leagues have a chance of succeeding. The NPFL, non pussy football league will be welcomed. Perhaps that’s XFL 

  • @hoorta said:

    Oh I get the rule, can't wait until a defender has the qb wrapped up in an arm tackle, and is trying to take him (gently) to the ground and the guy breaks free tossing a game winning TD. 😁  

    Larry,

    with all due respect, do you think with all the execs and lifetime NFL minds working on this that they already know your exact scenario is going to happen? Dude, if you and I can imagine it, you can be sure, they already know it is coming. You always take the position that NFL bosses are idiots, and we know better, or their subordinates know better. 

    Larry, life doesn't work this way. Corporations don't work this way. This rule may in-fact find a V 2.0, but if and when a QB gets hurt, the rule is going to come back. Not only will it come back, but I promise you, before too long there will be even more protection for the Quarterback. For instance, I can see the NFL changing the offense to 13 players, adding two offensive linemen who play in the backfield, and can only block on passing plays. 

    Larry, as I said, the can of worms is open. You can stop, kick and scream all you want about "put them in dresses" but clearly, owners have been trying to elevate the protection on quarterbacks for decades. You will not see a return to what you consider proper football. The NFL already knows that extra touchdowns will be made, a lot of unpopular calls will be made, but at the end of this, Quarterbacks will be protected more than ever.

    It's all about money, Larry. The QB is THE only important position on the field. The QB is a franchise asset. Sorry pal, no more big QB hits. It is gone.

    @ghoolie said:

     The QB is a franchise asset. 

    Man, i knew if i waited long enough? Shoolie would get to dropping some real football knowledge ..  OcP3.gif    

  • @ghoolie said:

     The QB is a franchise asset. 

    Man, i knew if i waited long enough? Shoolie would get to dropping some real football knowledge ..  OcP3.gif    

    @gumby73 said:

    Man, i knew if i waited long enough? Shoolie would get to dropping some real football knowledge ..  OcP3.gif    

    Nice try, snapper head. I didn't make that as a discovery, merely a reminder of why the NFL is not going to go back on the QB tackling rule. Thanks for playing, try again. But really, if you want to war with me, try putting some ammo in your gun. Dismissed..........snapper head.

  • This isn't going away, either. It's not a stretch to say these calls have cost two teams wins. The Garrett call against the Steelers, and the Clay Matthews call against the Packers. Ironically, both teams tied, which is kind of weird, lol. 

    Garrett will have a couple more of these, and it's just a function of his speed and immense power. He's not a dirty player, never been called that. He's just better. 

  • Or...with the popularity of soccer among our youth and the dumbass NFL owners thinking they're invincible and tweaking the rules for profit, the NFL goes the way of NASCAR. 

  • Or...with the popularity of soccer among our youth and the dumbass NFL owners thinking they're invincible and tweaking the rules for profit, the NFL goes the way of NASCAR. 

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    Or...with the popularity of soccer among our youth and the dumbass NFL owners thinking they're invincible and tweaking the rules for profit, the NFL goes the way of NASCAR. 

    NFL fans are going to start mating with their cousins? 

    Gross. 

  • With all due respect, I have heard 1,000 times over my life "I will stop watching"    Like the Kaeperdick issue. I have everything about this movement, but I still watch.

    Think about what you just said, " There is a limit to this and the NFL has exceeded it"  LMAO.............seriously? Tell me about this limit. Who set the limit? Who has the limit setting authority that the NFL must abide by? Do you follow me here? The "NFL" answers to themselves. They, and they alone set the "limit" They don't answer to anyone else. If they want to make it hard to tackle the Quarterback, then that's what they will do. They don't give a schidt about what the fans want. If you were an NFL owner, would you? Dude, the NFL could force each player to wear a strap-on dildo and the fans, like bulldogs on a meat truck, will flock en masse.

    The times are changing. There will be no meaningful retraction of this. Even if the NFL thought they went to far, they can't now, after providing new protection for the QB, retract their statement and say.. " we were wrong, we want to allow more QB hits than before. Ain't gonna happen man. People talking the QB are going to have to learn to refrain. It does make the #1 #1 Garrett look more and more like a dumb pick, doesn't it?

    @ghoolie said:

    With all due respect, I have heard 1,000 times over my life "I will stop watching"  

    Especially when the first 999 came from you.

  • @ghoolie said:

     The QB is a franchise asset. 

    Man, i knew if i waited long enough? Shoolie would get to dropping some real football knowledge ..  OcP3.gif    

    @gumby73 said:

    Man, i knew if i waited long enough? Shoolie would get to dropping some real football knowledge ..  OcP3.gif    

    Some gifs are just better than others...

    This one's a "10"...

  • @ghoolie said:

    With all due respect, I have heard 1,000 times over my life "I will stop watching"  

    Especially when the first 999 came from you.

    @flugel said:

    Especially when the first 999 came from you.

    I thought he quit the NFL and was going over to the XFL? 

  • @ghoolie said:

    With all due respect, I have heard 1,000 times over my life "I will stop watching"  

    Especially when the first 999 came from you.

    @flugel said:

    Especially when the first 999 came from you.

    Dude I have never threatened to stop watcing. I already don't watch that much, It is YOU homos who are doing all the complaining and wasting your money going to games.

  • @flugel said:

    Especially when the first 999 came from you.

    I thought he quit the NFL and was going over to the XFL? 

    @dutch-oven said:

    I thought he quit the NFL and was going over to the XFL? 

    I never said I was quitting the NFL, I said all along, the NFL is bullschidt. I have blasted you homosexuals over and over for having a ridiculous emotional attachment to a fake Browns team and a thug sport. I am not the one crying about rules. I am not the one going to a Browns game with the board owner and ruining his day by crying in his ear about Ghoolie all game long.............. ONLY to be told they are gay (Stan's words, not mine).

    FINALLY..................... talk about being a bunch of pussies, The Moderators come in here and admonish you dildoes for addressing THE POSTER and not the POST... and you CHEER IT............BUT THEN GO RIGHT BACK TO MAKING THIS BOARD ABOUT GHOOLIE.  Hey, Penis Puffers.. it is not me who monopolizes the board with Ghoolie, IT IS YOU.

    Seriously, I am the most read, most responded to, most respected and talked about poster on this board. The FUNNIEST PART.....is all you jackoffs who soapbox about having me on ignore....only to quote my posts verbatim. Hell, in your own fukcking threads you mention me.

    Dudes..........I don't just own the board, I own you. I am so deep into your heads you don't know whether to crap or go blind, so you fart and blink your eyes.

    GHOOLIE IS KING...........................

  • who went to a game with stan and ruined his day talking about ghoolie? that actually sounds pretty funny if u thonk about it. Id prob snap too if i had to hear about fukking ghoolie all day at first energy

  • who went to a game with stan and ruined his day talking about ghoolie? that actually sounds pretty funny if u thonk about it. Id prob snap too if i had to hear about fukking ghoolie all day at first energy

    @clevfan4life said:

    who went to a game with stan and ruined his day talking about ghoolie? that actually sounds pretty funny if u thonk about it. Id prob snap too if i had to hear about fukking ghoolie all day at first energy

    Says the guy who met Stan in Vegas after he was thrown off the board and he cried, pleaded and begged to Stan to let him back on.

    That's hella gay.  

  • @dutch-oven said:

    I thought he quit the NFL and was going over to the XFL? 

    I never said I was quitting the NFL, I said all along, the NFL is bullschidt. I have blasted you homosexuals over and over for having a ridiculous emotional attachment to a fake Browns team and a thug sport. I am not the one crying about rules. I am not the one going to a Browns game with the board owner and ruining his day by crying in his ear about Ghoolie all game long.............. ONLY to be told they are gay (Stan's words, not mine).

    FINALLY..................... talk about being a bunch of pussies, The Moderators come in here and admonish you dildoes for addressing THE POSTER and not the POST... and you CHEER IT............BUT THEN GO RIGHT BACK TO MAKING THIS BOARD ABOUT GHOOLIE.  Hey, Penis Puffers.. it is not me who monopolizes the board with Ghoolie, IT IS YOU.

    Seriously, I am the most read, most responded to, most respected and talked about poster on this board. The FUNNIEST PART.....is all you jackoffs who soapbox about having me on ignore....only to quote my posts verbatim. Hell, in your own fukcking threads you mention me.

    Dudes..........I don't just own the board, I own you. I am so deep into your heads you don't know whether to crap or go blind, so you fart and blink your eyes.

    GHOOLIE IS KING...........................

    @ghoolie said:

    .GHOOLIE IS KING...........................

    I'm sorry but that spot has already been taken on the poly board, at least until 2020.??

  • @dutch-oven said:

    I thought he quit the NFL and was going over to the XFL? 

    I never said I was quitting the NFL, I said all along, the NFL is bullschidt. I have blasted you homosexuals over and over for having a ridiculous emotional attachment to a fake Browns team and a thug sport. I am not the one crying about rules. I am not the one going to a Browns game with the board owner and ruining his day by crying in his ear about Ghoolie all game long.............. ONLY to be told they are gay (Stan's words, not mine).

    FINALLY..................... talk about being a bunch of pussies, The Moderators come in here and admonish you dildoes for addressing THE POSTER and not the POST... and you CHEER IT............BUT THEN GO RIGHT BACK TO MAKING THIS BOARD ABOUT GHOOLIE.  Hey, Penis Puffers.. it is not me who monopolizes the board with Ghoolie, IT IS YOU.

    Seriously, I am the most read, most responded to, most respected and talked about poster on this board. The FUNNIEST PART.....is all you jackoffs who soapbox about having me on ignore....only to quote my posts verbatim. Hell, in your own fukcking threads you mention me.

    Dudes..........I don't just own the board, I own you. I am so deep into your heads you don't know whether to crap or go blind, so you fart and blink your eyes.

    GHOOLIE IS KING...........................

    @ghoolie said:

    I never said I was quitting the NFL, I said all along, the NFL is bullschidt. I have blasted you homosexuals over and over for having a ridiculous emotional attachment to a fake Browns team and a thug sport. I am not the one crying about rules. I am not the one going to a Browns game with the board owner and ruining his day by crying in his ear about Ghoolie all game long.............. ONLY to be told they are gay (Stan's words, not mine).

    FINALLY..................... talk about being a bunch of pussies, The Moderators come in here and admonish you dildoes for addressing THE POSTER and not the POST... and you CHEER IT............BUT THEN GO RIGHT BACK TO MAKING THIS BOARD ABOUT GHOOLIE.  Hey, Penis Puffers.. it is not me who monopolizes the board with Ghoolie, IT IS YOU.

    Seriously, I am the most read, most responded to, most respected and talked about poster on this board. The FUNNIEST PART.....is all you jackoffs who soapbox about having me on ignore....only to quote my posts verbatim. Hell, in your own fukcking threads you mention me.

    Dudes..........I don't just own the board, I own you. I am so deep into your heads you don't know whether to crap or go blind, so you fart and blink your eyes.

    GHOOLIE IS KING...........................

    Nobody gives you a second thought 

  • And people keep feeding his ego, priceless.

  • The Steelers are 6 time SB champs. They are, without doubt, the greatest franchise in the history of the NFL. Not the Browns, Packers, Bears, 9 ers, or anyone else can match their greatness and accomplishments. They own BOTH the original Browns, and the Fake Browns.