Some things will never change
-
That call on the 2 yard line where instead of having our stud Running Back(EITHER OF THEM!!!!!!!) take it straight up the gut, someone(Hue or Haley??) calls a trick play that results in a 4 yard loss.. that call right there was indefensible. I can't believe that isn't on every post today...
Going for 2 points ?? That 1 point cost us the game didn't it???? Those aren't player errors those are coaching errors.. BOTH COST US THE GAME... By the time we get to the 4th and 1 call, the game is already being lost by us.. Game should have been shut down long before..
That game pissed me off to high heaven.. Sure the dropped passes were key, but we bounced back from them.. You can't bounce back from leaving 5 points off the board(the net gain from running up the middle for the TD on the 1 and the single point instead of going for 2)...
Inexcusable.
BobPound
-
I'll never understand it. I just never will. The only way I can rationalize the stupid playcalls near the goal line is that people much smarter than me know what they're doing. It has to be that way, or else they wouldn't have a job in the freaking NFL. Right? RIGHT?!
You guys remember in the preseason when we got to the 1 yard line in a game, and then we tried like 3 or 4 ridiculous pass plays that ALL had no chance of scoring? We kind of chalked it up to it being preseason, and perhaps we were just working on things. Nope. We've still got some dumb juice running through our veins, and I'll never be able to explain why we do things like the Callaway reverse play.
It's a bit frustrating because I just saw that play work beautifully for the Bears. Or a close version of it. But anyway, why didn't we play to our strengths? Run the ball 3 straight times with Hyde? How many times has that failed us so far? Is there such a thing as going to the well too often? Would it not make sense to utilize our $80 million guards? Maybe even Duke Johnson over the top?
It's very easy to play Tuesday morning quarterback. To second guess decisions. But that Callaway call didn't sit right with me AT ALL, and Jim Donovan, who I greatly admire, said the same thing. There's a reason Hyde scored several rushing touchdowns already. It's because we're good at punching it in. Why go away from that? I honestly don't know. Perhaps Haley saw something in film that made the Raiders appear vulnerable to the reverse. Who knows. What I DO KNOW is that coaches have a tendency to get cute, and when they do and it doesn't work, it leaves a very sour taste in the mouth.
-
It's a coaches league.
It's a coaches league.
Vince Lombardi trophy.
Shula, Landry, Brown, are more legendary than players for this reason.... It's a coaches league!
It's a coaches league.
It's a coaches league.
Vince Lombardi trophy.
Shula, Landry, Brown, are more legendary than players for this reason.... It's a coaches league!
When I go to , or .. watch a game.. I don't go to see the coaches or the owner.. I go to see who is actually playing.. That means "the PLAYERS"
-
It's a coaches league.
It's a coaches league.
Vince Lombardi trophy.
Shula, Landry, Brown, are more legendary than players for this reason.... It's a coaches league!
When I go to , or .. watch a game.. I don't go to see the coaches or the owner.. I go to see who is actually playing.. That means "the PLAYERS"
When I go to , or .. watch a game.. I don't go to see the coaches or the owner.. I go to see who is actually playing.. That means "the PLAYERS"
Cool, I do too. But the game plan determines the game outcome. Why is it the Lombardi Trophy and not the Jim Brown trophy?
-
Cool, I do too. But the game plan determines the game outcome. Why is it the Lombardi Trophy and not the Jim Brown trophy?
He was popular at the time...
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
I've said they should have gone for it on 4th down. The refs prevented a Browns defensive TD ruling Carr "in the grasp". OTOH, Beast Mode wasn't down either. But should have gotten an unsportsmanlike penalty afterwards. They missed Baker taking a head shot, and plenty of offensive holds that didn't get called either. Lousy reffing all game.
Lousy reffing all game.
Yup. But that's not something that's new. It goes back to the leather helmet days. We now have MUCH better and MANY more cameras at games. Not to mention MANY more rules to enforce. I'm not saying that we shouldn't complain about the officiating. A bad call by a ref is the same as a bad play by a player. Worthy of noting. Rich Carlis missed!
We have a bad HC. I listen to Hue's press conferences sometimes on 92 The Fan.....and all I can think of is something Sam Rutigliano said recently, "Hue has a knack for saying the wrong thing at the right time." And some of the morning 92 The Fan guys are saying that Hue's evaluation started when Mayfield entered the game against the Jets. And that all that happened before was because of poor team talent. - Well, they should all go and read the game log of just before the 1st half ended in Hue's first game against Cincy. And then they can tell me how that stretch of incredibly dumb decisions was 'team talent's fault' !
-
I'll never understand it. I just never will. The only way I can rationalize the stupid playcalls near the goal line is that people much smarter than me know what they're doing. It has to be that way, or else they wouldn't have a job in the freaking NFL. Right? RIGHT?!
You guys remember in the preseason when we got to the 1 yard line in a game, and then we tried like 3 or 4 ridiculous pass plays that ALL had no chance of scoring? We kind of chalked it up to it being preseason, and perhaps we were just working on things. Nope. We've still got some dumb juice running through our veins, and I'll never be able to explain why we do things like the Callaway reverse play.
It's a bit frustrating because I just saw that play work beautifully for the Bears. Or a close version of it. But anyway, why didn't we play to our strengths? Run the ball 3 straight times with Hyde? How many times has that failed us so far? Is there such a thing as going to the well too often? Would it not make sense to utilize our $80 million guards? Maybe even Duke Johnson over the top?
It's very easy to play Tuesday morning quarterback. To second guess decisions. But that Callaway call didn't sit right with me AT ALL, and Jim Donovan, who I greatly admire, said the same thing. There's a reason Hyde scored several rushing touchdowns already. It's because we're good at punching it in. Why go away from that? I honestly don't know. Perhaps Haley saw something in film that made the Raiders appear vulnerable to the reverse. Who knows. What I DO KNOW is that coaches have a tendency to get cute, and when they do and it doesn't work, it leaves a very sour taste in the mouth.
I'll never understand it. I just never will. The only way I can rationalize the stupid playcalls near the goal line is that people much smarter than me know what they're doing. It has to be that way, or else they wouldn't have a job in the freaking NFL. Right? RIGHT?!
You guys remember in the preseason when we got to the 1 yard line in a game, and then we tried like 3 or 4 ridiculous pass plays that ALL had no chance of scoring? We kind of chalked it up to it being preseason, and perhaps we were just working on things. Nope. We've still got some dumb juice running through our veins, and I'll never be able to explain why we do things like the Callaway reverse play.
It's a bit frustrating because I just saw that play work beautifully for the Bears. Or a close version of it. But anyway, why didn't we play to our strengths? Run the ball 3 straight times with Hyde? How many times has that failed us so far? Is there such a thing as going to the well too often? Would it not make sense to utilize our $80 million guards? Maybe even Duke Johnson over the top?
It's very easy to play Tuesday morning quarterback. To second guess decisions. But that Callaway call didn't sit right with me AT ALL, and Jim Donovan, who I greatly admire, said the same thing. There's a reason Hyde scored several rushing touchdowns already. It's because we're good at punching it in. Why go away from that? I honestly don't know. Perhaps Haley saw something in film that made the Raiders appear vulnerable to the reverse. Who knows. What I DO KNOW is that coaches have a tendency to get cute, and when they do and it doesn't work, it leaves a very sour taste in the mouth.
No jiggins, they aren't smarter than you. IN FACT..............you are smart enough to have won this game for us. Pretty much everyone here is. THAT is the disgusting part.
Anytime the box is stacked running against it is not smart, but calling a trick play is even dumber. Especially a slow developing one.
I was a roll for wanting Jackson fired after 1 QTR of his first pre season....now I don't look so crazy. Hue Jackson is the worst coach in the NFL. Literally, he is a tard.
-
Cool, I do too. But the game plan determines the game outcome. Why is it the Lombardi Trophy and not the Jim Brown trophy?
He was popular at the time...
He was popular at the time...
1) Jim Brown only won 1 championship
2) Jim Brown quit football
3) Jim Brown is STILL the only NFL player actually indicted and charged with Rape, and attempted 2nd degree manslaughter.
Not the guy you want as the pinnacle of your organization. Although, Donald Trump loves the guy, as do I.
-
99.9% of the coaches in the league having an 8 point league at the end of the game , less then 2 minutes to play with 3rd and inches on our own 18 would have punted too. The 00.1% of the coaches would have punted 99.99% of the time LOL. That is a minute amount of the time someone would have went for it.
-
99.9% of the coaches in the league having an 8 point league at the end of the game , less then 2 minutes to play with 3rd and inches on our own 18 would have punted too. The 00.1% of the coaches would have punted 99.99% of the time LOL. That is a minute amount of the time someone would have went for it.
99.9% of the coaches in the league having an 8 point league at the end of the game , less then 2 minutes to play with 3rd and inches on our own 18 would have punted too. The 00.1% of the coaches would have punted 99.99% of the time LOL. That is a minute amount of the time someone would have went for it.
bill b would've gone for it.
-
99.9% of the coaches in the league having an 8 point league at the end of the game , less then 2 minutes to play with 3rd and inches on our own 18 would have punted too. The 00.1% of the coaches would have punted 99.99% of the time LOL. That is a minute amount of the time someone would have went for it.
bill b would've gone for it.
bill b would've gone for it.
Maybe 0.1% of the time lol, Statiscally sound to punt there, our D simply didnt hold
-
99.9% of the coaches in the league having an 8 point league at the end of the game , less then 2 minutes to play with 3rd and inches on our own 18 would have punted too. The 00.1% of the coaches would have punted 99.99% of the time LOL. That is a minute amount of the time someone would have went for it.
99.9% of the coaches in the league having an 8 point league at the end of the game , less then 2 minutes to play with 3rd and inches on our own 18 would have punted too. The 00.1% of the coaches would have punted 99.99% of the time LOL. That is a minute amount of the time someone would have went for it.
The QB sneak is an almost guaranteed first down. (and I'm sure you meant 4th down and inches)
How much did we spend on our two guards (and throw in the center)? But we didn't think we could QB sneak a 4th and inches?
-
99.9% of the coaches in the league having an 8 point league at the end of the game , less then 2 minutes to play with 3rd and inches on our own 18 would have punted too. The 00.1% of the coaches would have punted 99.99% of the time LOL. That is a minute amount of the time someone would have went for it.
The QB sneak is an almost guaranteed first down. (and I'm sure you meant 4th down and inches)
How much did we spend on our two guards (and throw in the center)? But we didn't think we could QB sneak a 4th and inches?
The QB sneak is an almost guaranteed first down. (and I'm sure you meant 4th down and inches)
How much did we spend on our two guards (and throw in the center)? But we didn't think we could QB sneak a 4th and inches?
haha yes meant 4th and inches, now we know why I don't coach. I still think statistically punting was the right thing to do. They not only had to get a TD but also convert a 2pt play. I know they did but odds were on our side.
Secondly based on the officiating just how confident are you that we wouldnt have got screwed on the spot again turning the ball over on the 18??
-
The QB sneak is an almost guaranteed first down. (and I'm sure you meant 4th down and inches)
How much did we spend on our two guards (and throw in the center)? But we didn't think we could QB sneak a 4th and inches?
haha yes meant 4th and inches, now we know why I don't coach. I still think statistically punting was the right thing to do. They not only had to get a TD but also convert a 2pt play. I know they did but odds were on our side.
Secondly based on the officiating just how confident are you that we wouldnt have got screwed on the spot again turning the ball over on the 18??
They not only had to get a TD but also convert a 2pt play.
....whether we went for it (& failed) or not. And with Mitchell gone and our DB's moving positions to cover for him, we couldn't stop the pass.
At the time, I wanted to sneak it for the inches required. Then we could all shake hands and go take a shower.
-
They not only had to get a TD but also convert a 2pt play.
....whether we went for it (& failed) or not. And with Mitchell gone and our DB's moving positions to cover for him, we couldn't stop the pass.
At the time, I wanted to sneak it for the inches required. Then we could all shake hands and go take a shower.
....whether we went for it (& failed) or not. And with Mitchell gone and our DB's moving positions to cover for him, we couldn't stop the pass.
At the time, I wanted to sneak it for the inches required. Then we could all shake hands and go take a shower.
I couldn't find anywhere else, and it could have been changed slightly in either direction, but since you KEEP bringing it up.
Down by 6 with 1:00 to go, 9% probability rate. So down by 8 would probably come close to cut that in half, say 5%.
4th and inches probability. The data I could find says around 65%. Just in case, say there has been a 10% increase, that is STILL 20 less likely to succeed. That is just getting it, not failing, giving the other team a shorter field.
So the data obviously shows that punting results in a higher percentage. So think all you want, but dont give out wrong information to try and prove a point, degrade the coaching for making the statistical decision, and then say they lost the game because of that.
And as I pointed out earlier and so did someone else, completely rail on the officials and say it was rigged, cheaters, etc and that the Browns were robbed on the spot and then turn around, expect the team to gather themselves seconds after such a terrible call and think they then would get the best spot ever when 22 players are in the exact same place.
-
....whether we went for it (& failed) or not. And with Mitchell gone and our DB's moving positions to cover for him, we couldn't stop the pass.
At the time, I wanted to sneak it for the inches required. Then we could all shake hands and go take a shower.
I couldn't find anywhere else, and it could have been changed slightly in either direction, but since you KEEP bringing it up.
Down by 6 with 1:00 to go, 9% probability rate. So down by 8 would probably come close to cut that in half, say 5%.
4th and inches probability. The data I could find says around 65%. Just in case, say there has been a 10% increase, that is STILL 20 less likely to succeed. That is just getting it, not failing, giving the other team a shorter field.
So the data obviously shows that punting results in a higher percentage. So think all you want, but dont give out wrong information to try and prove a point, degrade the coaching for making the statistical decision, and then say they lost the game because of that.
And as I pointed out earlier and so did someone else, completely rail on the officials and say it was rigged, cheaters, etc and that the Browns were robbed on the spot and then turn around, expect the team to gather themselves seconds after such a terrible call and think they then would get the best spot ever when 22 players are in the exact same place.
I couldn't find anywhere else, and it could have been changed slightly in either direction, but since you KEEP bringing it up.
Down by 6 with 1:00 to go, 9% probability rate. So down by 8 would probably come close to cut that in half, say 5%.
4th and inches probability. The data I could find says around 65%. Just in case, say there has been a 10% increase, that is STILL 20 less likely to succeed. That is just getting it, not failing, giving the other team a shorter field.
So the data obviously shows that punting results in a higher percentage. So think all you want, but dont give out wrong information to try and prove a point, degrade the coaching for making the statistical decision, and then say they lost the game because of that.
And as I pointed out earlier and so did someone else, completely rail on the officials and say it was rigged, cheaters, etc and that the Browns were robbed on the spot and then turn around, expect the team to gather themselves seconds after such a terrible call and think they then would get the best spot ever when 22 players are in the exact same place.
With the track record this year of ST.... I think going for it on 4th and 5 from our own goal line might have better odds.
Only semi kidding
-
....whether we went for it (& failed) or not. And with Mitchell gone and our DB's moving positions to cover for him, we couldn't stop the pass.
At the time, I wanted to sneak it for the inches required. Then we could all shake hands and go take a shower.
I couldn't find anywhere else, and it could have been changed slightly in either direction, but since you KEEP bringing it up.
Down by 6 with 1:00 to go, 9% probability rate. So down by 8 would probably come close to cut that in half, say 5%.
4th and inches probability. The data I could find says around 65%. Just in case, say there has been a 10% increase, that is STILL 20 less likely to succeed. That is just getting it, not failing, giving the other team a shorter field.
So the data obviously shows that punting results in a higher percentage. So think all you want, but dont give out wrong information to try and prove a point, degrade the coaching for making the statistical decision, and then say they lost the game because of that.
And as I pointed out earlier and so did someone else, completely rail on the officials and say it was rigged, cheaters, etc and that the Browns were robbed on the spot and then turn around, expect the team to gather themselves seconds after such a terrible call and think they then would get the best spot ever when 22 players are in the exact same place.
I couldn't find anywhere else,
Sports On Earth:
You can hate the quarterback sneak all you want. It works, and it is battle-tested enough that the 80% success rate is no data blip. Assuming that it is 4th-and-inches, the sneak is such a good percentage play that it should be used far more often:
-
I couldn't find anywhere else,
Sports On Earth:
You can hate the quarterback sneak all you want. It works, and it is battle-tested enough that the 80% success rate is no data blip. Assuming that it is 4th-and-inches, the sneak is such a good percentage play that it should be used far more often:
Sports On Earth:
Ok, so I was 5% off. Still less than 91-95%. I am sure there is also data somewhere showing the difference in doing that with Cam Newton or Big Ben vs Baker sized player.
Whatever. It doesn't matter what someone says, some people are going to believe what they want and nothing is going to change their mind. So have at it boys, it was fixed, the coach is the dumbest ever, everyone on here would have won that game, etc.
-
In all honesty, in all my days I have never seen a bunch of hapless misanthropes blaming their shiddy losses on the refs. 2 weeks ago it was the kicker.
The BIG LOSER? Marty HaleyStiener and his Bernie Kosar philosophy of sitting on a lead and having no balls to close a game out. Seriously, 2 yards to end the game. Raider had 126 men in the box...SALIVATING for a run. Had the Browns called a play-action pass, the Raiders D would have bitten with full force, and a little flip over the middle would have broken their backs.
The bigger question is, why are the Browns constantly in a position where a last-minute bad call causes them to lose? It is bad coaching, and I stress this again...........a TOTAL lack of discipline among the players. Fumbles, penalties, Running kickoffs, out to the 12-yard line, not kicking extra points................The issue is not the bad calls, the issue is why do the Browns continue to be the least organized, focused, smart and disciplined team in the NFL?
I wanted Hue Jackson fired after 1 quarter of his first pre-season game. I called for this based on the same things we keep seeing week after week. The only shame there is in losing if the reasons for the losing are not lack of talent, but instead because of a lack of fundamentals, coaching, and discipline.
Hue Jackson blows.
In all honesty, in all my days I have never seen a bunch . . . . .
Thanks for that sir. You are perfectly correct. I don't have to write anything because you said it perfectly.
How many times have the Browns 2.0 scored 45 or more? Once in 2007?
Todd Haley is doing for the Browns what he did for PIT. Scoring points.
We thought that defense was fine and it was the offense that was questionable.
What happened? I only watched the highlights. The fool game is downloading now. I may have more to not say later.
Thanks Ghoolie.
-
In all honesty, in all my days I have never seen a bunch . . . . .
Thanks for that sir. You are perfectly correct. I don't have to write anything because you said it perfectly.
How many times have the Browns 2.0 scored 45 or more? Once in 2007?
Todd Haley is doing for the Browns what he did for PIT. Scoring points.
We thought that defense was fine and it was the offense that was questionable.
What happened? I only watched the highlights. The fool game is downloading now. I may have more to not say later.
Thanks Ghoolie.
Thanks for that sir. You are perfectly correct. I don't have to write anything because you said it perfectly.
How many times have the Browns 2.0 scored 45 or more? Once in 2007?
Todd Haley is doing for the Browns what he did for PIT. Scoring points.
We thought that defense was fine and it was the offense that was questionable.
What happened? I only watched the highlights. The fool game is downloading now. I may have more to not say later.
Thanks Ghoolie.
My pleasure
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login