Skip to content

WTF!!

Political Discussion
74 12 2.4k
  • what a loser "president" obaMao was.

    Jul 6, 2010 - The head of the Nasa has said Barack Obama told him to make "reaching out to the Muslim world" one of the space agency's top priorities.

    @calfoxwc said:

    what a loser "president" obaMao was.

    Jul 6, 2010 - The head of the Nasa has said Barack Obama told him to make "reaching out to the Muslim world" one of the space agency's top priorities.

    Stuart

    A priority because Obama was embarrassed that his own people think the Earth is flat. This claim coming from a Muslim scientist.

    What morons.

    The Arab world will continue to suffer educational and cultural crises until it properly digests the different methodologies of science and religion

    https://gulfnews.com/opinion/thinkers/phd-thesis-the-earth-is-flat-1.2009202

  • Does it not register with people that if carbon sensitivity is somewhere between 1.5-4 C, that a rise of 6 C would imply a different atmospheric driver is at play here?

  • MMGW advocates love to use graphs to show rising temperatures, but they only focus on the areas in red on the chart below.

    They conveniently disregard the the record heat recorded back in the 1930’s & 40’s, when CO2 levels were only a fraction of what they are today.

    This is the biggest hole in their argument, and they don’t have a valid answer for it.

    C85BE498-AD76-4A52-9DC3-85B1E756D181.jpeg

  • https://www.dailywire.com/news/36904/uh-oh-environmentalists-un-climate-change-group-hank-berrien

    Again, no one really understands what "97%" of scientist actually agree on when it comes to climate change, other than climate change itself.  The cause of it, not so much.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Australia's Chief Scientist weighs in on climate change.

    https://cosmosmagazine.com/climate/the-science-is-clear-we-have-to-start-creating-our-low-carbon-future-today

    of course. Socialists desperately need wealth redistribution and taxation to support their flawed economic disasters.

     
    Mar 17, 2016 - Australia has a form of Democratic Socialism with increasing leanings toward Capitalism. ... The government is slowly trying to eridicate these benefits as they did with free university but it will be a struggle as the majority are very comfortable with the old socialist based system.
  • @texasag1969 said:

    Australia's Chief Scientist weighs in on climate change.

    https://cosmosmagazine.com/climate/the-science-is-clear-we-have-to-start-creating-our-low-carbon-future-today

    of course. Socialists desperately need wealth redistribution and taxation to support their flawed economic disasters.

     
    Mar 17, 2016 - Australia has a form of Democratic Socialism with increasing leanings toward Capitalism. ... The government is slowly trying to eridicate these benefits as they did with free university but it will be a struggle as the majority are very comfortable with the old socialist based system.

    @calfoxwc said:

    of course. Socialists desperately need wealth redistribution and taxation to support their flawed economic disasters.

     
     
    Mar 17, 2016 - Australia has a form of Democratic Socialism with increasing leanings toward Capitalism. ... The government is slowly trying to eridicate these benefits as they did with free university but it will be a struggle as the majority are very comfortable with the old socialist based system.

    He's talking to the science not the politics. Get on the science page for a change cal. 

    Edit: Just be cause your ignorant phony ? thinks it's bogus does not mean that it is.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    of course. Socialists desperately need wealth redistribution and taxation to support their flawed economic disasters.

     
     
    Mar 17, 2016 - Australia has a form of Democratic Socialism with increasing leanings toward Capitalism. ... The government is slowly trying to eridicate these benefits as they did with free university but it will be a struggle as the majority are very comfortable with the old socialist based system.

    He's talking to the science not the politics. Get on the science page for a change cal. 

    Edit: Just be cause your ignorant phony ? thinks it's bogus does not mean that it is.

    @texasag1969 said:

    He's talking to the science not the politics. Get on the science page for a change cal. 

    Edit: Just be cause your ignorant phony ? thinks it's bogus does not mean that it is.

    But his cherry picked science, and conclusion - lends itself directly to politics..it's an ulterior motive. Get on the truth train for a change.

       I've been declaring mmgw a crock for many years now. Old lefty Sheply used to go full outrage and foaming at the mouth when I kept bringing up the truth about it.

      That is many years before Trump, dude. Your outrage over Pres Trump is phony. All irrational - makes no sense, you can't back it up.

    I think it could be something you keep having for eats every day. You allergic to anything in your breakfast, lunch or dinner?

  • @texasag1969 said:

    He's talking to the science not the politics. Get on the science page for a change cal. 

    Edit: Just be cause your ignorant phony ? thinks it's bogus does not mean that it is.

    But his cherry picked science, and conclusion - lends itself directly to politics..it's an ulterior motive. Get on the truth train for a change.

       I've been declaring mmgw a crock for many years now. Old lefty Sheply used to go full outrage and foaming at the mouth when I kept bringing up the truth about it.

      That is many years before Trump, dude. Your outrage over Pres Trump is phony. All irrational - makes no sense, you can't back it up.

    I think it could be something you keep having for eats every day. You allergic to anything in your breakfast, lunch or dinner?

    @calfoxwc said:

    But his cherry picked science, and conclusion - lends itself directly to politics..it's an ulterior motive. Get on the truth train for a change.

       I've been declaring mmgw a crock for many years now. Old lefty Sheply used to go full outrage and foaming at the mouth when I kept bringing up the truth about it.

      That is many years before Trump, dude. Your outrage over Pres Trump is phony. All irrational - makes no sense, you can't back it up.

    I think it could be something you keep having for eats every day. You allergic to anything in your breakfast, lunch or dinner?

    I can't prove phony Trump to a person who will not see regardless of all the evidence.

  • you have no evidence. you got a phoney dossier, a phony "investigation of russian collusion",

    your ObaMao was the fake American president. He trashed our country, failed our country.

    Pres Trump is excelling at being a GREAT AMERICAN PRESIDENT. He IS doing great things for America, and is succeeding in

    MAGA.

      you all lost the election. Get over it. Really.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    But his cherry picked science, and conclusion - lends itself directly to politics..it's an ulterior motive. Get on the truth train for a change.

       I've been declaring mmgw a crock for many years now. Old lefty Sheply used to go full outrage and foaming at the mouth when I kept bringing up the truth about it.

      That is many years before Trump, dude. Your outrage over Pres Trump is phony. All irrational - makes no sense, you can't back it up.

    I think it could be something you keep having for eats every day. You allergic to anything in your breakfast, lunch or dinner?

    I can't prove phony Trump to a person who will not see regardless of all the evidence.

    @texasag1969 said:

    I can't prove phony Trump to a person who will not see regardless of all the evidence.

    It's funny cuz, during the primaries, Cal didn't like Trump and called him a con man. Turns out, he ate that con up.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    I can't prove phony Trump to a person who will not see regardless of all the evidence.

    It's funny cuz, during the primaries, Cal didn't like Trump and called him a con man. Turns out, he ate that con up.

    @mld-woody said:

    It's funny cuz, during the primaries, Cal didn't like Trump and called him a con man. Turns out, he ate that con up.

    I didn't call him a con man or anything but he wasn't my first choice. Still Head and Shoulders above the alternatives on the other side. 

    WSS

  • @texasag1969 said:

    I can't prove phony Trump to a person who will not see regardless of all the evidence.

    It's funny cuz, during the primaries, Cal didn't like Trump and called him a con man. Turns out, he ate that con up.

    @mld-woody said:

    It's funny cuz, during the primaries, Cal didn't like Trump and called him a con man. Turns out, he ate that con up.

    Everybody here knows that I thought of Trump as a circus barker. A showman. Not a conman. And I didn't want him to be the nominee.

    But when I started LISTENING to what he was saying, and decided that he was sincere, I got on board. Now, it was the absolute correct decision. PRESIDENT TRUMP is being an excellent president. The things he is accomplishing is GREAT for OUR COUNTRY.

        I wasn't a huge fan of Reagan's movies, but when I started listening to him, I was all in. And he was elected and became a GREAT AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

    MAGA, Woody. Not bitching and trying to "transform" and belittle us all around the world, diss our Constitution, etc etc etc

    send arms to drug cartels on purpose, with no tracing, hiding facts about benghazi, fast and furious, the iran deal, the IRS scandal, doj scandal, fbi scandal....the list goes on and on.

  • @mld-woody said:

    It's funny cuz, during the primaries, Cal didn't like Trump and called him a con man. Turns out, he ate that con up.

    Everybody here knows that I thought of Trump as a circus barker. A showman. Not a conman. And I didn't want him to be the nominee.

    But when I started LISTENING to what he was saying, and decided that he was sincere, I got on board. Now, it was the absolute correct decision. PRESIDENT TRUMP is being an excellent president. The things he is accomplishing is GREAT for OUR COUNTRY.

        I wasn't a huge fan of Reagan's movies, but when I started listening to him, I was all in. And he was elected and became a GREAT AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

    MAGA, Woody. Not bitching and trying to "transform" and belittle us all around the world, diss our Constitution, etc etc etc

    send arms to drug cartels on purpose, with no tracing, hiding facts about benghazi, fast and furious, the iran deal, the IRS scandal, doj scandal, fbi scandal....the list goes on and on.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Everybody here knows that I thought of Trump as a circus barker. A showman. Not a conman. And I didn't want him to be the nominee.

    But when I started LISTENING to what he was saying, and decided that he was sincere, I got on board. Now, it was the absolute correct decision. PRESIDENT TRUMP is being an excellent president. The things he is accomplishing is GREAT for OUR COUNTRY.

        I wasn't a huge fan of Reagan's movies, but when I started listening to him, I was all in. And he was elected and became a GREAT AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

    MAGA, Woody. Not bitching and trying to "transform" and belittle us all around the world, diss our Constitution, etc etc etc

    send arms to drug cartels on purpose, with no tracing, hiding facts about benghazi, fast and furious, the iran deal, the IRS scandal, doj scandal, fbi scandal....the list goes on and on.

    /topic/39998

    Mmhmm

    he's

     a farce of a nominee. and he doesn't care.

    A circus barker/con man/celebrity/businessman.

    I really want a brokered convention. Trump isn't conservative...

    or liberal, he's whatever happens to be benefitting him at the moment.

    NO. I honestly think I won't vote for him, even if higgardly is his opponent.

    If she wins, she'll go down in flames... the problem is if the reps lose Congress the last

    two years....

  • Adults can admit they're wrong and move on.    Children can't.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Everybody here knows that I thought of Trump as a circus barker. A showman. Not a conman. And I didn't want him to be the nominee.

    But when I started LISTENING to what he was saying, and decided that he was sincere, I got on board. Now, it was the absolute correct decision. PRESIDENT TRUMP is being an excellent president. The things he is accomplishing is GREAT for OUR COUNTRY.

        I wasn't a huge fan of Reagan's movies, but when I started listening to him, I was all in. And he was elected and became a GREAT AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

    MAGA, Woody. Not bitching and trying to "transform" and belittle us all around the world, diss our Constitution, etc etc etc

    send arms to drug cartels on purpose, with no tracing, hiding facts about benghazi, fast and furious, the iran deal, the IRS scandal, doj scandal, fbi scandal....the list goes on and on.

    /topic/39998

    Mmhmm

    he's

     a farce of a nominee. and he doesn't care.

    A circus barker/con man/celebrity/businessman.

    I really want a brokered convention. Trump isn't conservative...

    or liberal, he's whatever happens to be benefitting him at the moment.

    NO. I honestly think I won't vote for him, even if higgardly is his opponent.

    If she wins, she'll go down in flames... the problem is if the reps lose Congress the last

    two years....

    @mld-woody said:

    /topic/39998

    Mmhmm

    Well, you got me there. LOL. I don't remember the con man part, but that came second after "circus barker".

    Another mistake well over 34,000 posts. It's gonna happen. I was wrong about Trump then, I became right about him when I really started listening to him on the campaign trail. And he has become far more an excellent president more and more.

    I think Logic edited it and put it there.....

  • In the absence of Newt Gingrich I supported John Kasich. I am much less fond of him now only because I believe that he's let his personal Vendetta get in the way of what's best for the country. Hopefully he would have stayed on his original course had he nomination but who knows?

    WSS

  • I was in for Trump from his announcement on the Escalator.  I remember some in here saying he had a snowballs chance in hell of ever getting the nomination.

  • In the absence of Newt Gingrich I supported John Kasich. I am much less fond of him now only because I believe that he's let his personal Vendetta get in the way of what's best for the country. Hopefully he would have stayed on his original course had he nomination but who knows?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    In the absence of Newt Gingrich I supported John Kasich. I am much less fond of him now only because I believe that he's let his personal Vendetta get in the way of what's best for the country. Hopefully he would have stayed on his original course had he nomination but who knows?

    WSS

     JOhn Kasich was a terrific gov, I think. But now, he's gone azzwise leftish. I figure he's close to becoming a centrist democrat, except they won't have him. I wouldn't be surprised if he becomes a  hero independent candidate for pres - a new "goofball" party.

  • The funny part is Cal had Trump figured out 2.5 years ago. He then proceeded to fall for it