Skip to content

Survival

The Browns Board
223 22 6.7k
  • @mjp28 said:

    ATL 23-20, Hue looked like a genius compared to the NYG brain trust.

    I knew they had no brains when they hired Shure-loss....  

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @hoorta said:

    I knew they had no brains when they hired Shure-loss....  

    I often like to follow the money when you have issues no matter what business you're in, HC jobs pay well, and speaking of well......

    ....... Ironically enough, the deal the Giants gave their former head coach Ben McAdoo was for four years. McAdoo clearly didn’t make it to the end of that deal since the Giants fired him in the second year of his contract.

    Shurmur is also the first Giants head coach to receive a five-year deal since Dan Reeves when he was hired in 1993 to replace Ray Handley, who was also fired after two seasons........

    Hmmmmm, stuck with him?

  • @hoorta said:

    I knew they had no brains when they hired Shure-loss....  

    I often like to follow the money when you have issues no matter what business you're in, HC jobs pay well, and speaking of well......

    ....... Ironically enough, the deal the Giants gave their former head coach Ben McAdoo was for four years. McAdoo clearly didn’t make it to the end of that deal since the Giants fired him in the second year of his contract.

    Shurmur is also the first Giants head coach to receive a five-year deal since Dan Reeves when he was hired in 1993 to replace Ray Handley, who was also fired after two seasons........

    Hmmmmm, stuck with him?

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    @mjp28 said:

    I often like to follow the money when you have issues no matter what business you're in, HC jobs pay well, and speaking of well......

    ....... Ironically enough, the deal the Giants gave their former head coach Ben McAdoo was for four years. McAdoo clearly didn’t make it to the end of that deal since the Giants fired him in the second year of his contract.

    Shurmur is also the first Giants head coach to receive a five-year deal since Dan Reeves when he was hired in 1993 to replace Ray Handley, who was also fired after two seasons........

    Hmmmmm, stuck with him?

    Nah, they'll just owe him more money when they can him after two years. 🙂

    I don't see Dan Reeves in this guy, I see the same guy who was a terrible coach for the Browns. Pat says he learned from his mistakes in Cleveland, remains to be seen.

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28

    Shurmer a Ph.D in mistakes like clock and extra point management?  😆  Oh yeah.

  • Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    Curious to see who everyone picks this week.  

  • Curious to see who everyone picks this week.  

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    Curious to see who everyone picks this week.  

    I click my fantasy bookmark as soon as they kick it off on Thursdays just for that.

  • @mark-o said:

    Curious to see who everyone picks this week.  

    I click my fantasy bookmark as soon as they kick it off on Thursdays just for that.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @d-bone said:

    I click my fantasy bookmark as soon as they kick it off on Thursdays just for that.

    I usually check right around then as well.    Everyone has made picks so at least no one goes down this week for forgetting.    I like my choice and the reasoning behind it, just have to hope it works out.

  • Curious to see who everyone picks this week.  

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    Curious to see who everyone picks this week.  

    LOL. top super secret on my end. I have no reasoning. Go with the flow. 

  • @d-bone said:

    I click my fantasy bookmark as soon as they kick it off on Thursdays just for that.

    I usually check right around then as well.    Everyone has made picks so at least no one goes down this week for forgetting.    I like my choice and the reasoning behind it, just have to hope it works out.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    I usually check right around then as well.    Everyone has made picks so at least no one goes down this week for forgetting.    I like my choice and the reasoning behind it, just have to hope it works out.

    Well one winner already and all pretty solid picks so far.

    Screenshot_2018-10-26-02-17-05.png

  • Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    The Texans were my 2nd choice.   Just couldn't bring myself to pick them even though they were at home against Brick Cockwhistler.   I like my choice and I still have the Rams, Patriots and Chiefs available. 

  • @mark-o said:

    Curious to see who everyone picks this week.  

    LOL. top super secret on my end. I have no reasoning. Go with the flow. 

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @hoorta said:

    LOL. top super secret on my end. I have no reasoning. Go with the flow. 

    ......"The trend is your friend".  Or something like that -or- do you go bold and blow everyone away?  😕

  • Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    I am not feeling good about the choices this weekend at all.  

  • I am not feeling good about the choices this weekend at all.  

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    I am not feeling good about the choices this weekend at all.  

    Interesting..... well 4 different teams.

    Screenshot_2018-11-01-20-32-45.png

  • Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    I had Dallas till about an hour ago and just can't trust them.   I also had New England but I just can't bring myself to pick against Rodgers, even against the Patriots.   I considered Oakland when I heard there is some QB for SF starting that I've never heard of, kinda glad I didn't go that route since the raiders defense just let this kid go 75 yards in about 5 plays.

  • I had Dallas till about an hour ago and just can't trust them.   I also had New England but I just can't bring myself to pick against Rodgers, even against the Patriots.   I considered Oakland when I heard there is some QB for SF starting that I've never heard of, kinda glad I didn't go that route since the raiders defense just let this kid go 75 yards in about 5 plays.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    I had Dallas till about an hour ago and just can't trust them.   I also had New England but I just can't bring myself to pick against Rodgers, even against the Patriots.   I considered Oakland when I heard there is some QB for SF starting that I've never heard of, kinda glad I didn't go that route since the raiders defense just let this kid go 75 yards in about 5 plays.

    HOU started bad but 5-0 and hot now. The better teams are slowly getting thinned down.

  • I had Dallas till about an hour ago and just can't trust them.   I also had New England but I just can't bring myself to pick against Rodgers, even against the Patriots.   I considered Oakland when I heard there is some QB for SF starting that I've never heard of, kinda glad I didn't go that route since the raiders defense just let this kid go 75 yards in about 5 plays.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    I had Dallas till about an hour ago and just can't trust them.   I also had New England but I just can't bring myself to pick against Rodgers, even against the Patriots.   I considered Oakland when I heard there is some QB for SF starting that I've never heard of, kinda glad I didn't go that route since the raiders defense just let this kid go 75 yards in about 5 plays.

    That quarterback for San Francisco has them up by 14 to 3 score right now 

  • @mark-o said:

    I had Dallas till about an hour ago and just can't trust them.   I also had New England but I just can't bring myself to pick against Rodgers, even against the Patriots.   I considered Oakland when I heard there is some QB for SF starting that I've never heard of, kinda glad I didn't go that route since the raiders defense just let this kid go 75 yards in about 5 plays.

    That quarterback for San Francisco has them up by 14 to 3 score right now 

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    That quarterback for San Francisco has them up by 14 to 3 score right now 

    That coach for Oak wants them to lose

  • @mark-o said:

    I had Dallas till about an hour ago and just can't trust them.   I also had New England but I just can't bring myself to pick against Rodgers, even against the Patriots.   I considered Oakland when I heard there is some QB for SF starting that I've never heard of, kinda glad I didn't go that route since the raiders defense just let this kid go 75 yards in about 5 plays.

    That quarterback for San Francisco has them up by 14 to 3 score right now 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by hoorta

    @the-gipper said:

    That quarterback for San Francisco has them up by 14 to 3 score right now 

    He has them up 31-3, game over. 

    PS, I like my Panthers pick meaning they're probably going to lose....  

  • Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    One of us remaining is really sweating out this game tonight....

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by

    GOING INTO WEEK 10, the easy fruit on the bottom branches is getting thin.

    Screenshot_2018-11-06-03-05-27.png

  • Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    I've got lots of easy fruit left.    I've got Rams, Chiefs, Saints, Patriots, and even the evil Shittsburgh Squeelers left to play.   Not sure I'm using any of them this week either.   Made my initial pick just to be sure I don't get a strike for not picking.  🙂