Skip to content

***Official Browns @ Steelers Game Day Thread***

The Browns Board
198 46 5.1k 1
  • @jrb12711 said:

    Why would you assume I think that? I never said it and I agree with you. Coaches are refusing to change though.

    But what’s the change in scheme that solves it?  I think it’s easy to say make adjustments but what on earth are those?  If I thought there was an answer I’d be with  you but there best blocking back was Hyde.  The TEs that can block are basically useless in most other facets of the game and if you go one dimensional you’ll get nowhere.  I can’t believe an NFL GM thought Harrison was the answer at LT

    @baconhound said:

    But what’s the change in scheme that solves it?  I think it’s easy to say make adjustments but what on earth are those?  If I thought there was an answer I’d be with  you but there best blocking back was Hyde.  The TEs that can block are basically useless in most other facets of the game and if you go one dimensional you’ll get nowhere.  I can’t believe an NFL GM thought Harrison was the answer at LT

    Not trying to be a jerk but theres literally dozens of options that involve scheme. Slide protections, TE overloads, max protect schemes,  wide angles, bunch WR inside and that's just off the top of my head. Its hubris not to move to something else when it obviously isnt working.

    Blocking TE may be useless but letting dudes run unblocked at your QB is way, way worse.

  • Seth Devalve another player inexplicably out of the offense despite us being short of bodies at the WR position. 

  • @londonbrown said:

    We’re throwing the ball to Landry at the line of scrimmage for YAC purposes LOL he runs a 4.7

    lmao...thats sorta what Landry specialized in for several seasons in miami.  For better and mostlyworse, thats what he is/does

    @tacosman said:

    lmao...thats sorta what Landry specialized in for several seasons in miami.  For better and mostlyworse, thats what he is/does

    landry Shmucking stinks.....

  • @londonbrown said:

    We’re throwing the ball to Landry at the line of scrimmage for YAC purposes LOL he runs a 4.7

    lmao...thats sorta what Landry specialized in for several seasons in miami.  For better and mostlyworse, thats what he is/does

    @tacosman said:

    lmao...thats sorta what Landry specialized in for several seasons in miami.  For better and mostlyworse, thats what he is/does

    On the outside ?? Don’t think so. He’s an over the middle possession guy like I said all off season. 

    No team is scared of Jarvis Landry. 

  • Well at least the Giants with a stellar receiver and a stellar RB and a very experienced QB are even more miserable on offense than we. But of course they also have an Ex-Browns HC so there's that.

  • Hopefully Haslam fires him when they come in the locker room.  This gives us time to regroup and start looking for a new coach behind the scenes.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Hopefully Haslam fires him when they come in the locker room.  This gives us time to regroup and start looking for a new coach behind the scenes.

    They better have been looking since week 1

  • @tacosman said:

    lmao...thats sorta what Landry specialized in for several seasons in miami.  For better and mostlyworse, thats what he is/does

    On the outside ?? Don’t think so. He’s an over the middle possession guy like I said all off season. 

    No team is scared of Jarvis Landry. 

    @londonbrown said:

    On the outside ?? Don’t think so. He’s an over the middle possession guy like I said all off season. 

    No team is scared of Jarvis Landry. 

    no look at the tape.  He must have caught 35 bubble type screens last year in miami.  And of course you are right about no team being scared of landry, but the last 4 games has been pretty much exactly the reciever he was in Miami last year.  Short ineffiicient not very productive catches

  • @tacosman said:

    lmao...thats sorta what Landry specialized in for several seasons in miami.  For better and mostlyworse, thats what he is/does

    On the outside ?? Don’t think so. He’s an over the middle possession guy like I said all off season. 

    No team is scared of Jarvis Landry. 

    @londonbrown said:

    On the outside ?? Don’t think so. He’s an over the middle possession guy like I said all off season. 

    No team is scared of Jarvis Landry. 

    Yeah, he’s not going to get deep. He’s a 100 catch 11 yards a catch guy. Which is good but not scary 

  • And the damn Bengal avoided an epic meltdown vs the Bucs and won on a last second field goal. 

  • The Kool aid flavor is swill. And kinda tepid. The players don’t seem to care much for it. 

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    The Kool aid flavor is swill. And kinda tepid. The players don’t seem to care much for it. 

    you know what...i'm going to enjoy watching the chiefs next weekend...Shmuck this team....not going to root for the chiefs but they are going to kick the ever livin Shmucking Sheet out of the clowns....the chiefs are a fun and really good team...this kind of reminds me of the atlanta hawks of yrs past...they were and i guess they still are horrible...the fans went to the home games only to watch the other team and their stars.....that's the way i will watch next week.....

  • @londonbrown said:

    On the outside ?? Don’t think so. He’s an over the middle possession guy like I said all off season. 

    No team is scared of Jarvis Landry. 

    Yeah, he’s not going to get deep. He’s a 100 catch 11 yards a catch guy. Which is good but not scary 

    @browns149 said:

    Yeah, he’s not going to get deep. He’s a 100 catch 11 yards a catch guy. Which is good but not scary 

    Shmucking landry is not a top notch receiver...he is a second or maybe even a third option wr....and right now we have him as our best receiver...phwaaaaap....poor baker....ayeeeeee...

  • Well at least the Giants with a stellar receiver and a stellar RB and a very experienced QB are even more miserable on offense than we. But of course they also have an Ex-Browns HC so there's that.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Well at least the Giants with a stellar receiver and a stellar RB and a very experienced QB are even more miserable on offense than we. But of course they also have an Ex-Browns HC so there's that.

    you are correcto mundo....piece of Sheet head coach....i can't believe they hired shurmur....must be slim ipickens out there....

  • @browns149 said:

    Yeah, he’s not going to get deep. He’s a 100 catch 11 yards a catch guy. Which is good but not scary 

    Shmucking landry is not a top notch receiver...he is a second or maybe even a third option wr....and right now we have him as our best receiver...phwaaaaap....poor baker....ayeeeeee...

    @browns52 said:

    Shmucking landry is not a top notch receiver...he is a second or maybe even a third option wr....and right now we have him as our best receiver...phwaaaaap....poor baker....ayeeeeee...

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

  • @browns52 said:

    Shmucking landry is not a top notch receiver...he is a second or maybe even a third option wr....and right now we have him as our best receiver...phwaaaaap....poor baker....ayeeeeee...

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    very good analogy......could not agree more....

  • @browns52 said:

    Shmucking landry is not a top notch receiver...he is a second or maybe even a third option wr....and right now we have him as our best receiver...phwaaaaap....poor baker....ayeeeeee...

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    He talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk

  • so who did hue throw under the bus at today's presser ?

  • @dutch-oven said:

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    He talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk

    @7moses7 said:

    He talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk

    A big problem is he needs someone who can open things up deeper so the underneath is open for him.

    Defenses now just dare the Browns to throw downfield. They aren't worried about it happening, and they shouldn't. 

  • @browns52 said:

    Shmucking landry is not a top notch receiver...he is a second or maybe even a third option wr....and right now we have him as our best receiver...phwaaaaap....poor baker....ayeeeeee...

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    didnt you say that last week 🙂

  • @dutch-oven said:

    If he was a baseball player, he'd be a guy who can hit around .300 but almost exclusively singles. Little to no extra base power.

    Useful, but not in any way a difference-maker. 

    didnt you say that last week 🙂

    @atom said:

    didnt you say that last week 🙂

    ? It IS a good analogy for Landry though!