Skip to content

Democrats take the house

Political Discussion
64 17 2.0k
  • I missed cals little rant post before about those damn college kids and poor people.

    Top notch stuff. Grade A comedy.

    Sometimes I forget how radicalized Diffy Q's made me

  • according to Cal I'm a real American because I voted at 630

    @mld-woody said:

    according to Cal I'm a real American because I voted at 630

    june 30th? or did you mean 6:30 ? AM ? PM ?

    read up on communication.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Throws a budget at Trump that kills our military

    I guess you missed how the last one overwhelmingly passed then...?   

    @tiamat63 said:

    I guess you missed how the last one overwhelmingly passed then...?   

    ah, just now catching up, busy day yesterday - I guess you missed that I was referring to the incoming dem house? I was referring to the dem senate in the next few years. Of course it passed before the dems took the house - it was going to pass anyways. You watch the next time the military budget is up from the dem senate.

  • I missed cals little rant post before about those damn college kids and poor people.

    Top notch stuff. Grade A comedy.

    Sometimes I forget how radicalized Diffy Q's made me

    @mld-woody said:

    I missed cals little rant post before about those damn college kids and poor people.

    Top notch stuff. Grade A comedy.

    Sometimes I forget how radicalized Diffy Q's made me

    well, you aren't smart enough to be radicalized, you just don't believe in anything - that's your birdbrain schtick.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    I guess you missed how the last one overwhelmingly passed then...?   

    ah, just now catching up, busy day yesterday - I guess you missed that I was referring to the incoming dem house? I was referring to the dem senate in the next few years. Of course it passed before the dems took the house - it was going to pass anyways. You watch the next time the military budget is up from the dem senate.

    @calfoxwc said:

    ah, just now catching up, busy day yesterday - I guess you missed that I was referring to the incoming dem house? I was referring to the dem senate in the next few years. Of course it passed before the dems took the house - it was going to pass anyways. You watch the next time the military budget is up from the dem senate.

    Yes, I'll watch.  they'll pass it overwhelmingly again because they're every bit as fiscally irresponsible as the GOP claims they aren't.   

    Same same, old boy.  

  • @calfoxwc said:

    ah, just now catching up, busy day yesterday - I guess you missed that I was referring to the incoming dem house? I was referring to the dem senate in the next few years. Of course it passed before the dems took the house - it was going to pass anyways. You watch the next time the military budget is up from the dem senate.

    Yes, I'll watch.  they'll pass it overwhelmingly again because they're every bit as fiscally irresponsible as the GOP claims they aren't.   

    Same same, old boy.  

    @tiamat63 said:

    Yes, I'll watch.  they'll pass it overwhelmingly again because they're every bit as fiscally irresponsible as the GOP claims they aren't.   Same same, old boy.  

    Oh, Y'EAH? well, could be....

    but cutting our military budget to add more to the dynamically growing welfare/unearned benefits/dems buying votes isn't helping, and just cutting the military budget isn't going to help either.

    Rv5UHrNsvcucvflDwwz_pqEjjHnbQeE_HoAgEM44

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Yes, I'll watch.  they'll pass it overwhelmingly again because they're every bit as fiscally irresponsible as the GOP claims they aren't.   Same same, old boy.  

    Oh, Y'EAH? well, could be....

    but cutting our military budget to add more to the dynamically growing welfare/unearned benefits/dems buying votes isn't helping, and just cutting the military budget isn't going to help either.

    Rv5UHrNsvcucvflDwwz_pqEjjHnbQeE_HoAgEM44

    @calfoxwc said:

    Oh, Y'EAH? well, could be....

    but cutting our military budget to add more to the dynamically growing welfare/unearned benefits/dems buying votes isn't helping, and just cutting the military budget isn't going to help either.

    Rv5UHrNsvcucvflDwwz_pqEjjHnbQeE_HoAgEM44

    Brilliant.  Because if I say we've burned a ton of unnecessary money on an overinflated military budget including projects like the one we awarded Lockheed Martin - you know, the F35's that burn through money - 1.33b well over the budget - that MUST mean it goes to those damn welfare queens in Mississippi, huh?  

    😆    Seriously, man.  Use your head.    You can be capable of good ideas when you care to.  

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Oh, Y'EAH? well, could be....

    but cutting our military budget to add more to the dynamically growing welfare/unearned benefits/dems buying votes isn't helping, and just cutting the military budget isn't going to help either.

    Rv5UHrNsvcucvflDwwz_pqEjjHnbQeE_HoAgEM44

    Brilliant.  Because if I say we've burned a ton of unnecessary money on an overinflated military budget including projects like the one we awarded Lockheed Martin - you know, the F35's that burn through money - 1.33b well over the budget - that MUST mean it goes to those damn welfare queens in Mississippi, huh?  

    😆    Seriously, man.  Use your head.    You can be capable of good ideas when you care to.  

    @tiamat63 said:

    Brilliant.  Because if I say we've burned a ton of unnecessary money on an overinflated military budget including projects like the one we awarded Lockheed Martin - you know, the F35's that burn through money - 1.33b well over the budget - that MUST mean it goes to those damn welfare queens in Mississippi, huh?  

    😆    Seriously, man.  Use your head.    You can be capable of good ideas when you care to.  

    okie dokey - will do.

    Why Democrats Voted Against A Military Pay Raise | Speaker.gov

    May 18, 2015 - Increasing troop pay and benefits. Funding our ... Democrats voted against the defense bill because they want more domestic spending. As The ...
     
    Far sadder:
     

    A final effort by Senate Republicans to halt cuts to pensions of military retirees failed late Tuesday, after Democrats blocked an amendment to the controversial budget bill.

    The two-year budget agreement, which cleared a key test vote earlier in the day, was expected to get a final vote no later than Wednesday.

    Ahead of the final vote, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., tried unsuccessfully to use a parliamentary tactic to force a vote on the amendment, which he wrote to undo the cuts for military retirees.

    A provision in the already House-passed bill would cut retirement benefits for military retirees by $6 billion over 10 years.

    Sessions wanted to instead eliminate an estimated $4.2 billion in annual spending by reining in an IRS credit that illegal immigrants have claimed.

    He and fellow senators argued the bill unfairly sticks veterans and other military retirees with the cost of new spending.

    “It’s not correct, and it should not happen,” Sessions said on the floor.

    "By blocking my amendment, they voted to cut pensions for wounded warriors," he said afterwards. "Senators in this chamber have many valid ideas for replacing these pension cuts, including my proposal to close the tax welfare loophole for illegal filers, and all deserved a fair and open hearing. But they were denied.”

    Sessions’ office claimed the vote Tuesday to block the amendment was a vote to "cut military pensions instead of cutting welfare for illegal immigrants."

  • Ryan hits Democrats for holding the military 'hostage' over immigration ...

    Jan 18, 2018 - "The defense budget is being held hostage for DACA, which is not a deadline ... Specifically, he pointed to long Navy work hours, high percentages of planes that can't fly because of maintenance issues and cuts in the size of the Army. .... We have been in unending wars since 2001 and are adding more ...
  • @calfoxwc said:

    Oh, Y'EAH? well, could be....

    but cutting our military budget to add more to the dynamically growing welfare/unearned benefits/dems buying votes isn't helping, and just cutting the military budget isn't going to help either.

    Rv5UHrNsvcucvflDwwz_pqEjjHnbQeE_HoAgEM44

    Brilliant.  Because if I say we've burned a ton of unnecessary money on an overinflated military budget including projects like the one we awarded Lockheed Martin - you know, the F35's that burn through money - 1.33b well over the budget - that MUST mean it goes to those damn welfare queens in Mississippi, huh?  

    😆    Seriously, man.  Use your head.    You can be capable of good ideas when you care to.  

    @tiamat63 said:

    Brilliant.  Because if I say we've burned a ton of unnecessary money on an overinflated military budget including projects like the one we awarded Lockheed Martin - you know, the F35's that burn through money - 1.33b well over the budget - that MUST mean it goes to those damn welfare queens in Mississippi, huh?  

    😆    Seriously, man.  Use your head.    You can be capable of good ideas when you care to.  

    Come, on, Man ! I was in the military. I've read plenty in the past about $200 toilet seats... seen waste like crazy. Read plenty about it in the past. One time, I think it was Charleston AFB, S. Carolina? A commander had a major inspection coming up, so he ordered jeeps, new typewriters, etc etc etc, buried underground. I would hope the military would have been donating all the food that gets left over - to food banks, homeless shelters, etc. all over our country. The F35 - way, way too expensive.

    But state of the art super-technology costs a lot. Over years, btw, what does NOT go over budget, eh?

    Belgium reportedly picks F-35 for future fighter jet - Defense News

    Oct 22, 2018 - WASHINGTON and LIÈGE, Belgium — Belgium appears poised to select Lockheed Martin's F-35 over the Eurofighter Typhoon as its ...
    Oct 12, 2018 - The U.S. Navy, Air Force and Marines — as well as 11 international partners who participated in the program — grounded all F-35 fighters on ...

    Easiest aircraft I've ever flown': Taking the F-35 for a spin - and a fight ...

    https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/.../f35-fighter-jet-pilot-flying-what-it-s-like-1...
    Oct 25, 2018 - In the second of a three-part series on the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, ... Lockheed Martin's F-35 chief test pilot Paul Hattendorf in the Sockpit of an F-35B. ..... Get the news that matters in your inbox every morning!
    Oct 25, 2018 - In the first of a three-part series on the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, Channel NewsAsia's Aqil Haziq Mahmud visited Lockheed Martin's .
  • if the F-35 could just make every other country on the planet terrified of fighting a war with us,I'm a happy camper over the burdensome cost.

    On  a very small scale, I worked in R&D - scientific programmer/analyst for years - the only one. R&D is very, very expensive. On a giant scale - I can't even imagine.

  • if the F-35 could just make every other country on the planet terrified of fighting a war with us,I'm a happy camper over the burdensome cost.

    On  a very small scale, I worked in R&D - scientific programmer/analyst for years - the only one. R&D is very, very expensive. On a giant scale - I can't even imagine.

    @calfoxwc said:

    if the F-35 could just make every other country on the planet terrified of fighting a war with us,I'm a happy camper over the burdensome cost.

    On  a very small scale, I worked in R&D - scientific programmer/analyst for years - the only one. R&D is very, very expensive. On a giant scale - I can't even imagine.

    And China has been happy for years to allow the United States to spend a ton of money in research and development and then steal the technology costing the United States hundreds of billions of dollars annually. 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    if the F-35 could just make every other country on the planet terrified of fighting a war with us,I'm a happy camper over the burdensome cost.

    On  a very small scale, I worked in R&D - scientific programmer/analyst for years - the only one. R&D is very, very expensive. On a giant scale - I can't even imagine.

    And China has been happy for years to allow the United States to spend a ton of money in research and development and then steal the technology costing the United States hundreds of billions of dollars annually. 

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    And China has been happy for years to allow the United States to spend a ton of money in research and development and then steal the technology costing the United States hundreds of billions of dollars annually. 

    I hate that - it's sadly true. China can go to hell, for all I care.

  • if the F-35 could just make every other country on the planet terrified of fighting a war with us,I'm a happy camper over the burdensome cost.

    On  a very small scale, I worked in R&D - scientific programmer/analyst for years - the only one. R&D is very, very expensive. On a giant scale - I can't even imagine.

    @calfoxwc said:

    if the F-35 could just make every other country on the planet terrified of fighting a war with us,I'm a happy camper over the burdensome cost.

    What makes every other country terrified of war with us is - economic downfall, our military/ economic alliances AND nuclear warfare/mass destruction.      Nothing more, and especially not a poorly developed, underachieving, barely functional aircraft project. 

    edit:  Only felt the need to bold this and add the .gif because it has been years since I've seen The Godfather and I forgot just how god damn good it was.

    R2vJ.gif 

  • never saw it - no outdoor wilderness scenes....

  • never saw it - no outdoor wilderness scenes....

    @calfoxwc said:

    never saw it - no outdoor wilderness scenes....

    First scene has a cat... does that count?

  • @calfoxwc said:

    if the F-35 could just make every other country on the planet terrified of fighting a war with us,I'm a happy camper over the burdensome cost.

    On  a very small scale, I worked in R&D - scientific programmer/analyst for years - the only one. R&D is very, very expensive. On a giant scale - I can't even imagine.

    And China has been happy for years to allow the United States to spend a ton of money in research and development and then steal the technology costing the United States hundreds of billions of dollars annually. 

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    And China has been happy for years to allow the United States to spend a ton of money in research and development and then steal the technology costing the United States hundreds of billions of dollars annually. 

    Sure but we only have this technology because Megatron crash landed in the Arctic