"nobody is wanting to take your guns" "just common sense gun control"
-
I don't think she would win the nomination.
I don't think she would win the nomination.
I know even in democrat circles there are many who want the Clintons to go away but they still have a grip hold in the democrat party and she is looking like she is wanting to run again by staying in the public eye every chance she can get....even if she doesn't run this congressman Swalwell that Cal posted the thread about is being talked about as a presidential contender in 2020. Rest assured if any democrat wins in 2020 they will go after gun control even gun confiscation...
-
DANA LOESCH QUESTION ON GUN CONTROL STOPS ERIC SWALWELL IN HIS TRACKS
“Can you explain to me the difference between assault weapons and semi-automatic rifles?” Loesch asked. “Is .223 ok but 30.06 not? Why?”
https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/16/dana-loesch-eric-swalwell-gun-control/
-
the dems/leftists/marxists want PERMANENT control. It's what they do.
and you can't dominate a gov, "own" it, without disarming the civilians of the country.
-
the dems/leftists/marxists want PERMANENT control. It's what they do.
and you can't dominate a gov, "own" it, without disarming the civilians of the country.
the dems/leftists/marxists want PERMANENT control. It's what they do.
and you can't dominate a gov, "own" it, without disarming the civilians of the country.
One of the worst things I see if the dems ever start with gun confiscation there will be a huge portion of the country who will not surrender their legally purchased firearms and the dems will succeed in making hundreds of thousands of formerly law abiding citizens into new criminals..
-
the dems/leftists/marxists want PERMANENT control. It's what they do.
and you can't dominate a gov, "own" it, without disarming the civilians of the country.
One of the worst things I see if the dems ever start with gun confiscation there will be a huge portion of the country who will not surrender their legally purchased firearms and the dems will succeed in making hundreds of thousands of formerly law abiding citizens into new criminals..
One of the worst things I see if the dems ever start with gun confiscation there will be a huge portion of the country who will not surrender their legally purchased firearms and the dems will succeed in making hundreds of thousands of formerly law abiding citizens into new criminals..
and it's part of their move to owning America. Make your political opponents social outcasts, then get enough power to make the way they are ILLEGAL.
It would be eventual civil war. Our 2nd Amendment is a permanent emphasis on a permanent God-given RIGHT. To overturn that would be to render our entire Constitution and Bill of Rights meaningless.
Besides, if they really tried it - underground waterproof containers are big business. The left knows nothing of resistance until they try to own us like the British did. Buy more guns, a lot more ammo. The left is it's own worst enemy - they are openly and brazenly showing the UN-American filth that they are. They try to ban guns it won't be successful here.
I would start openly carrying my slingshot. The marxist fascist sombeitches won't mess with me. LOL
-
-
One of the worst things I see if the dems ever start with gun confiscation there will be a huge portion of the country who will not surrender their legally purchased firearms and the dems will succeed in making hundreds of thousands of formerly law abiding citizens into new criminals..
and it's part of their move to owning America. Make your political opponents social outcasts, then get enough power to make the way they are ILLEGAL.
It would be eventual civil war. Our 2nd Amendment is a permanent emphasis on a permanent God-given RIGHT. To overturn that would be to render our entire Constitution and Bill of Rights meaningless.
Besides, if they really tried it - underground waterproof containers are big business. The left knows nothing of resistance until they try to own us like the British did. Buy more guns, a lot more ammo. The left is it's own worst enemy - they are openly and brazenly showing the UN-American filth that they are. They try to ban guns it won't be successful here.
I would start openly carrying my slingshot. The marxist fascist sombeitches won't mess with me. LOL
and it's part of their move to owning America. Make your political opponents social outcasts, then get enough power to make the way they are ILLEGAL.
It would be eventual civil war. Our 2nd Amendment is a permanent emphasis on a permanent God-given RIGHT. To overturn that would be to render our entire Constitution and Bill of Rights meaningless.
Besides, if they really tried it - underground waterproof containers are big business. The left knows nothing of resistance until they try to own us like the British did. Buy more guns, a lot more ammo. The left is it's own worst enemy - they are openly and brazenly showing the UN-American filth that they are. They try to ban guns it won't be successful here.
I would start openly carrying my slingshot. The marxist fascist sombeitches won't mess with me. LOL
The emphasis really needs to be on how to keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them and respect the rights of the law abiding citizens. There isn't an easy answer. I saw the other day one dems idea was to go back on social media and if anyone had posted anything as hate speech than take away their gun rights. Of course then you have to define hate speech which many on the left describe as that which they don't agree with. Thankfully the founders put in the second amendment or we might be where Australia is right now with loss of gun rights.
New York Lawmakers To Propose Legislation To Check Gun Purchasers Online Activity For Hateful Or Offensive Speech
https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2018/11/16/new-york-lawmakers-propose-legislation-check-gun-purchasers-online-activity-three-years-hate-speech/
-
Very true. The left made the subject a political wmd, so some reasonable things that COULD be done, don't happen because the left would just use it as such. Too bad. Their belligerent and ignorant arrogance is letting crimes keep happening. I believe the left loves the crimes so they can launch political wmd's in conservative America's direction.
-
another ignorant meaningless one liner retort, woodpecccker? yep.
Let me add, preferably some privately purchased so little commies don't know who owns what.
I don't care if they know I own 'em cause they ain't gonna get 'em back. Gonna hang a Henry 22 LR Golden Boy on brass gun hooks at the top of my built in library shelves. Got this letter emailed from the CEO of the company this morning when I inquired whether I could pass it on with the lifetime guarantee to my underage grandson. That sealed the choice for me over the Czeck made CZ 455.
"Thank you very much for serving our Country, for your interest in Henry and for passing the shooting sports on to your grandson. We certainly appreciate it. Yes the lifetime guarantee will pass on.
Sincerely,
Anthony Imperato
President
Henry Repeating Arms
Henry – Made in America, Or Not Made At All
www.henryusa.com FREE CATALOG"
-
Thinking about getting the .22 mag.
-
.22 Mag would be my choice. Time to save up...
-
Thinking about getting the .22 mag.
Thinking about getting the .22 mag.
.22 Mag would be my choice. Time to save up...
Rounds are more expensive but they are nice. Since I have now been enlisted by my daughter to teach her, her husband and my other grandson in addition to my son's boy, I gotta go with the 22LR. Thought y'all would like this. ?
And this one too: LOL!
-
Thinking about getting the .22 mag.
Thinking about getting the .22 mag.
Look how easy the lever action on this is, one finger is enough to work it. The 22Mag Frontier and 22Mag Golden Boy, both with octagon barrels, run around $450 for either one with maybe a $5 difference higher for the Golden Boy at the local gun store here.
-
Thinking about getting the .22 mag.
Look how easy the lever action on this is, one finger is enough to work it. The 22Mag Frontier and 22Mag Golden Boy, both with octagon barrels, run around $450 for either one with maybe a $5 difference higher for the Golden Boy at the local gun store here.
Look how easy the lever action on this is, one finger is enough to work it. The 22Mag Frontier and 22Mag Golden Boy, both with octagon barrels, run around $450 for either one with maybe a $5 difference higher for the Golden Boy at the local gun store here.
That's the one I'm looking at. I want it for shooting, not hanging on the wall.
-
Look how easy the lever action on this is, one finger is enough to work it. The 22Mag Frontier and 22Mag Golden Boy, both with octagon barrels, run around $450 for either one with maybe a $5 difference higher for the Golden Boy at the local gun store here.
That's the one I'm looking at. I want it for shooting, not hanging on the wall.
That's the one I'm looking at. I want it for shooting, not hanging on the wall.
I'm doing both with it and the brass receiver can be replaced easily if it gets too scratched up by brush. Move more stealthily. You'll get better shots at squirrels, rabbits and varmints without marring the brass. LOL!
EDIT: BTW they were making the bands on the front stock and the end of the barrel/magazine of the Frontier out of plastic, but responded to customer complaints and switched to steel like the original Henry.
-
-
The juxtaposition of the far left screaming about racist police and right wing dictators with the mindset that only the police and government should have certain types of small arms will always baffle me.
-
Another Henry Frontier 22 vid with use of the speed-loader. ?
-
This is why I think the NRA has to take a proactive stance on actually helping legislators devise reasonable gun laws instead of just being bullheaded about stopping any new gun laws. Educate them, work with them in a reasonable manner. We all know machineguns and other sophisticated military weapons are outlawed, so it isn't like there are NO restrictions to the 2nd amendment already in place. So work with these yahoos to actually devise some negotiated, workable laws that might succeed or we get ridiculous attempts like this to legislate everything. I mean I like my Ruger 357 mag revolver, but don't be taking away my semi-automatic 9mm Ruger that I carry concealed legally. This law would do that, so NRA use it as an opportunity to work on something that has a chance to work and not a catch-all piece of crap.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login