Bell done in Pittsburgh
-
Keep dreaming all the TV money goes directly to the players.
Didn't say that at all. You're debating your own imagination - and losing.
Nfl owners have enough cash from their other business interests.
So what? This has ZERO bearing on negotiations regarding new money. And if they won't sweat it, then they'll quickly give the players 70% of ESPN's money.
Didn't say that at all. You're debating your own imagination - and losing.
So what? This has ZERO bearing on negotiations regarding new money. And if they won't sweat it, then they'll quickly give the players 70% of ESPN's money.
That's pretty much what you said.
Not even worth debating you if you think the owners will ever split the revenue 70\30.
-
Keep dreaming all the TV money goes directly to the players.
Didn't say that at all. You're debating your own imagination - and losing.
Nfl owners have enough cash from their other business interests.
So what? This has ZERO bearing on negotiations regarding new money. And if they won't sweat it, then they'll quickly give the players 70% of ESPN's money.
Didn't say that at all. You're debating your own imagination - and losing.
So what? This has ZERO bearing on negotiations regarding new money. And if they won't sweat it, then they'll quickly give the players 70% of ESPN's money.
You should check records. This stuff you’re making up is all wrong. Google a clue already
-
Keep dreaming all the TV money goes directly to the players.
Didn't say that at all. You're debating your own imagination - and losing.
Nfl owners have enough cash from their other business interests.
So what? This has ZERO bearing on negotiations regarding new money. And if they won't sweat it, then they'll quickly give the players 70% of ESPN's money.
Didn't say that at all. You're debating your own imagination - and losing.
So what? This has ZERO bearing on negotiations regarding new money. And if they won't sweat it, then they'll quickly give the players 70% of ESPN's money.
Maybe they’ll split ESPN money 7030 year but then they’ll turn around and keep 70% of the NBC and Fox and CBS money
-
Didn't say that at all. You're debating your own imagination - and losing.
So what? This has ZERO bearing on negotiations regarding new money. And if they won't sweat it, then they'll quickly give the players 70% of ESPN's money.
That's pretty much what you said.
Not even worth debating you if you think the owners will ever split the revenue 70\30.
Not even worth debating you if you think the owners will ever split the revenue 70\30.
Using your logic of deliberately ignoring words.. it's not worth debating you since you actually think the owners have all the power and the players have none.
It doesn't matter how any owner postures -- it matters what specifically they offer and what the players are willing to accept. Google a clue - players don't just accept the first or second thing that was proposed.
And back to what I linked the first time.. players are going over 50% at the end of the current CBA, and they will shut it down until they get it. The phrase used was "ready for war." So, yes, they're telling players to save money.
Might want to read the current deal.. there's over 10 pages defining revenue and the calculations by which the salary cap is determined. The reason the cap keeps going up is.. the media income is going up. If the owners had all the power.. that cap wouldn't be increasing.
-
Not even worth debating you if you think the owners will ever split the revenue 70\30.
Using your logic of deliberately ignoring words.. it's not worth debating you since you actually think the owners have all the power and the players have none.
It doesn't matter how any owner postures -- it matters what specifically they offer and what the players are willing to accept. Google a clue - players don't just accept the first or second thing that was proposed.
And back to what I linked the first time.. players are going over 50% at the end of the current CBA, and they will shut it down until they get it. The phrase used was "ready for war." So, yes, they're telling players to save money.
Might want to read the current deal.. there's over 10 pages defining revenue and the calculations by which the salary cap is determined. The reason the cap keeps going up is.. the media income is going up. If the owners had all the power.. that cap wouldn't be increasing.
Using your logic of deliberately ignoring words.. it's not worth debating you since you actually think the owners have all the power and the players have none.
It doesn't matter how any owner postures -- it matters what specifically they offer and what the players are willing to accept. Google a clue - players don't just accept the first or second thing that was proposed.
And back to what I linked the first time.. players are going over 50% at the end of the current CBA, and they will shut it down until they get it. The phrase used was "ready for war." So, yes, they're telling players to save money.
Might want to read the current deal.. there's over 10 pages defining revenue and the calculations by which the salary cap is determined. The reason the cap keeps going up is.. the media income is going up. If the owners had all the power.. that cap wouldn't be increasing.
Duh, Exactly. I'm done, this is all hypothetical posturing until the current CBA runs out. 99.9% of all NFL fans could currently give a rats azz what might happen down the road. The Earth could get hit by an asteroid before it happens.
It's damn hard to be sympathetic to an athlete that flipped the bird to a one year franchise tag that's at least 5 times more than the average fan will ever make in a lifetime.
Keep spouting, and I'm locking the thread.
-
Not even worth debating you if you think the owners will ever split the revenue 70\30.
Using your logic of deliberately ignoring words.. it's not worth debating you since you actually think the owners have all the power and the players have none.
It doesn't matter how any owner postures -- it matters what specifically they offer and what the players are willing to accept. Google a clue - players don't just accept the first or second thing that was proposed.
And back to what I linked the first time.. players are going over 50% at the end of the current CBA, and they will shut it down until they get it. The phrase used was "ready for war." So, yes, they're telling players to save money.
Might want to read the current deal.. there's over 10 pages defining revenue and the calculations by which the salary cap is determined. The reason the cap keeps going up is.. the media income is going up. If the owners had all the power.. that cap wouldn't be increasing.
Using your logic of deliberately ignoring words.. it's not worth debating you since you actually think the owners have all the power and the players have none.
It doesn't matter how any owner postures -- it matters what specifically they offer and what the players are willing to accept. Google a clue - players don't just accept the first or second thing that was proposed.
And back to what I linked the first time.. players are going over 50% at the end of the current CBA, and they will shut it down until they get it. The phrase used was "ready for war." So, yes, they're telling players to save money.
Might want to read the current deal.. there's over 10 pages defining revenue and the calculations by which the salary cap is determined. The reason the cap keeps going up is.. the media income is going up. If the owners had all the power.. that cap wouldn't be increasing.
What you foolishly ignore is the fact that all of what you say is a matter of collective bargaining. The players and owners must negotiate the terms of the various things you refer to: percentage of revenue that goes to players...increases in salary cap...etc.
And, as I said....the player's union can strike...or be locked out...all they want. They still must negotiate....and they will still give up their first born for a slightly larger slice of the pie.
And if you don't think that "replacement" players would be a possibility.....remember, the Alliance of American Football is starting up this spring....as may be a new either USFL or XFL. All propose to be feeder leagues to the NFL....which is exactly what could happen if the players think they can shut the game down.
-
. You seriously think Jimmy Haslam (net worth $3 billion) would sweat it with a players strike having cash coming in from Pilot\Flying J?
Remember though, Jimmuh sold Pilot/FJ to Warren Buffett earlier... so he is replete with cash at this point. Perhaps you heard that he bought the MLS Columbus Crew.
-
Using your logic of deliberately ignoring words.. it's not worth debating you since you actually think the owners have all the power and the players have none.
It doesn't matter how any owner postures -- it matters what specifically they offer and what the players are willing to accept. Google a clue - players don't just accept the first or second thing that was proposed.
And back to what I linked the first time.. players are going over 50% at the end of the current CBA, and they will shut it down until they get it. The phrase used was "ready for war." So, yes, they're telling players to save money.
Might want to read the current deal.. there's over 10 pages defining revenue and the calculations by which the salary cap is determined. The reason the cap keeps going up is.. the media income is going up. If the owners had all the power.. that cap wouldn't be increasing.
What you foolishly ignore is the fact that all of what you say is a matter of collective bargaining. The players and owners must negotiate the terms of the various things you refer to: percentage of revenue that goes to players...increases in salary cap...etc.
And, as I said....the player's union can strike...or be locked out...all they want. They still must negotiate....and they will still give up their first born for a slightly larger slice of the pie.
And if you don't think that "replacement" players would be a possibility.....remember, the Alliance of American Football is starting up this spring....as may be a new either USFL or XFL. All propose to be feeder leagues to the NFL....which is exactly what could happen if the players think they can shut the game down.
What you foolishly ignore is the fact that all of what you say is a matter of collective bargaining. The players and owners must negotiate the terms of the various things you refer to: percentage of revenue that goes to players...increases in salary cap...etc.
And, as I said....the player's union can strike...or be locked out...all they want. They still must negotiate....and they will still give up their first born for a slightly larger slice of the pie.
And if you don't think that "replacement" players would be a possibility.....remember, the Alliance of American Football is starting up this spring....as may be a new either USFL or XFL. All propose to be feeder leagues to the NFL....which is exactly what could happen if the players think they can shut the game down.
Didn’t the players actually decertify their union the last time? Regardless, they’re not exactly a tight knit bunch
-
It by no means weakens the Steelers. Aside from Connor being better, the Steelers have 14.6 mil in cap space for next year.
That along with Shaziers contract being gone, it can only strengthen the Steelers...they need a top notch DB.
Heard that Jalen Ramsey wans out of Jax !
Well I think it is debatable whether or not Connor is better but he certainly is not much worse. And as I have said it may be more about the system than the players talent it’s self that is the key there
Well I think it is debatable whether or not Connor is better but he certainly is not much worse. And as I have said it may be more about the system than the players talent it’s self that is the key there
they have a friggin mack truck ol....just about any rb would do well behind it.....
-
Using your logic of deliberately ignoring words.. it's not worth debating you since you actually think the owners have all the power and the players have none.
It doesn't matter how any owner postures -- it matters what specifically they offer and what the players are willing to accept. Google a clue - players don't just accept the first or second thing that was proposed.
And back to what I linked the first time.. players are going over 50% at the end of the current CBA, and they will shut it down until they get it. The phrase used was "ready for war." So, yes, they're telling players to save money.
Might want to read the current deal.. there's over 10 pages defining revenue and the calculations by which the salary cap is determined. The reason the cap keeps going up is.. the media income is going up. If the owners had all the power.. that cap wouldn't be increasing.
Duh, Exactly. I'm done, this is all hypothetical posturing until the current CBA runs out. 99.9% of all NFL fans could currently give a rats azz what might happen down the road. The Earth could get hit by an asteroid before it happens.
It's damn hard to be sympathetic to an athlete that flipped the bird to a one year franchise tag that's at least 5 times more than the average fan will ever make in a lifetime.
Keep spouting, and I'm locking the thread.
Duh, Exactly. I'm done, this is all hypothetical posturing until the current CBA runs out. 99.9% of all NFL fans could currently give a rats azz what might happen down the road. The Earth could get hit by an asteroid before it happens.
It's damn hard to be sympathetic to an athlete that flipped the bird to a one year franchise tag that's at least 5 times more than the average fan will ever make in a lifetime.
Keep spouting, and I'm locking the thread.
Unless your name is Unsympathetic.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login