Trump bump stock ban
-
The left hates supressors because they want to use noise as an excuse to ban hunting within then miles of a town......
The left hates supressors because they want to use noise as an excuse to ban hunting within then miles of a town......
Subsonic rounds are quieter in 22LR and cost far less than adding suppressors anyway. Damn suppressor costs as much or more as most 22 rifles.
-
yeah, but a suppressor makes a gun shoot totally quiet, you can't even hear it. That is a bad thing.
-
The left hates supressors because they want to use noise as an excuse to ban hunting within then miles of a town......
The left hates supressors because they want to use noise as an excuse to ban hunting within then miles of a town......
Europe has pretty strict gun laws and they even see the value in suppressors. Some countries don't legislate them because they see it as a reduction in "noise pollution".
-
Subsonic rounds are quieter in 22LR and cost far less than adding suppressors anyway. Damn suppressor costs as much or more as most 22 rifles.
Ever had a chance to run a suppressed 22LR with subsonic? It is fun and extremely quiet haha.
-
Subsonic rounds are quieter in 22LR and cost far less than adding suppressors anyway. Damn suppressor costs as much or more as most 22 rifles.
Ever had a chance to run a suppressed 22LR with subsonic? It is fun and extremely quiet haha.
Ever had a chance to run a suppressed 22LR with subsonic? It is fun and extremely quiet haha.
Nope. Never fired a suppressed round. But here is a test of CCI Quiet vs Aguila Colibri. The CCI is quiet and also very accurate even at 50 yds. Looks like an excellent squirrel round for cal & his farm forest friends.
-
What liberals dont undetstand is that supressors cannit do shit to the sound generated by the round exceeding the sound barrier. Id be ok with keeping suppressors for small rounds on the class3 as there would be value to shooting subsonic rounds there for silent robbery's or murders or whatever, but none of these mass shooters would have gotten dick out if loading their AR's with subsomuc rounds. The level of bullet drop the vegas shooter would have had to adjust fir would have been comical. The concert prob wouldnt have even noticed and kept going. Dude would have given up and gobe downstairs to continue drinking/gambling his life away
-
I have .22 shorts - they are great fun. But that single shot .22 that shot .22 lr or shorts... I gave to my niece - it was my Dad's.
Interesting question - my semi-auto .22 says only .22 LR so I'd have to not use the magazine and ...
nah. lol
-
I have .22 shorts - they are great fun. But that single shot .22 that shot .22 lr or shorts... I gave to my niece - it was my Dad's.
Interesting question - my semi-auto .22 says only .22 LR so I'd have to not use the magazine and ...
nah. lol
I have .22 shorts - they are great fun. But that single shot .22 that shot .22 lr or shorts... I gave to my niece - it was my Dad's.
Interesting question - my semi-auto .22 says only .22 LR so I'd have to not use the magazine and ...
nah. lol
Can you tell the difference between a suppressed CCI Quiet and a non-suppressed CCI Quiet? Me neither.
-
I have 12 gauge Remington with a suppresser. It still can be heard with ear plugs.
I also have a .270 Remington 783 rifle. And it is loud as hell without a supperser But it sure as hell isn’t queit with a suppresser
-
"why you all don't need magazines that hold over ten shots"
yep. It will never end. They will always demand more and more and more, because their
fight is political.
-
"why you all don't need magazines that hold over ten shots"
yep. It will never end. They will always demand more and more and more, because their
fight is political.
"why you all don't need magazines that hold over ten shots"
yep. It will never end. They will always demand more and more and more, because their
fight is political.
"The majority, in an opinion by Judge Shwartz and joined by Judge Greenaway, both appointed by President Obama, held that the ban did not violate the Second Amendment because it reasonably advanced the State’s interest in reducing mass shootings without severely burdening the rights of law-abiding citizens."********************
In 8 years Obama got many of his liberal anti 2A judicial nominees on the bench and these are the expected types of rulings. It makes me happier Trump is president today as he is fulfilling his campaign promise to place constitutional judges on the bench and this will help in the future when these cases go to the courts.
-
-
-
-
Let another bad shooting occur and the NRA and the just recently conservative president will start to roll over on ARs. Conservatives will be telling me about how it is a good idea. Liberals will be high fiving .
-
https://www.apnews.com/6c1af80fb290472c89fb930e223505af
Illegal to possess them after March. Trump turned a bunch of people who did nothing wrong into a bunch of felons if they don’t bend to the crown by March.
He will ban fingers and shoulders later for the public safety.
-
https://www.apnews.com/6c1af80fb290472c89fb930e223505af
Illegal to possess them after March. Trump turned a bunch of people who did nothing wrong into a bunch of felons if they don’t bend to the crown by March.
He will ban fingers and shoulders later for the public safety.
https://www.apnews.com/6c1af80fb290472c89fb930e223505af
Illegal to possess them after March. Trump turned a bunch of people who did nothing wrong into a bunch of felons if they don’t bend to the crown by March.
He will ban fingers and shoulders later for the public safety.
Agree. This sets a bad precedent.
-
well, off hand, I am fine with banning bump stocks, on the point that machine guns are also illegal.
But on the point of precedent - the left gets any victory, and they foam at the mouth for another one, of any kind.
It will never end - and any victory sends them into desperation for more and more wins on the subject.
-
well, off hand, I am fine with banning bump stocks, on the point that machine guns are also illegal.
But on the point of precedent - the left gets any victory, and they foam at the mouth for another one, of any kind.
It will never end - and any victory sends them into desperation for more and more wins on the subject.
well, off hand, I am fine with banning bump stocks, on the point that machine guns are also illegal.
But on the point of precedent - the left gets any victory, and they foam at the mouth for another one, of any kind.
It will never end - and any victory sends them into desperation for more and more wins on the subject.
If you couldn’t mimic the same results as a bumpstock with your hand and shoulder, I could hear you on that. But this is feel good legislation that just turns law abiding citizens into felons and makes no one safer.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login