Skip to content

Mueller report coming in, confirms russia reached out to trump back in 2015

Political Discussion
357 15 3.8k
  • There was some moron on Fox yesterday who said Manafort deserve to go free, because if it wasn't for the Russian investigate they would have never known about his money laundering, fraud and tax evasion. I guess they are practicing for when CJ gets charged.

  • You realize that they cannot indict a standing President?☕

  • You realize that they cannot indict a standing President?☕

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    You realize that they cannot indict a standing President?☕

    You can indict an ex-president. 

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    You realize that they cannot indict a standing President?☕

    You can indict an ex-president. 

    @cccjwh said:

    You can indict an ex-president. 

    Trump will be President for life.  MAGA.☕

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    You realize that they cannot indict a standing President?☕

    You can indict an ex-president. 

    @cccjwh said:

    You can indict an ex-president. 

    ??

  • 3E85AC32-70A3-4D90-82CE-6F85078FD8DC.jpeg

  • @cccjwh said:

    You can indict an ex-president. 

    Trump will be President for life.  MAGA.☕

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Trump will be President for life.  MAGA.☕

    Well he is old,fat and stupid it's possible he could drop died before 2020. Then he would have been President for life. I wouldn't expect the ceremonies the Bush got.

  • Trump will be on Mt. Rushmore.  Have a monument built to him in Washington, DC that dwarfs  the Washington Monument.  

  • Unless ofc they find he was treasonously communicating with russians post election, there goes ur mt rushmore fantasy....

    ☕

  • 286B22A6-C47A-4FB8-8820-E51E3DCACD8A.jpeg

  • @canton-dawg said:

    I'm still waiting for Hillary to be locked up. Or at each an indictment of some sort. Still zero indictments for Obama's administration, I'm sure it will be any time soon.

    ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F3f%2F9c%2F8bbb02084be4be8110e826ee27d9%2F9-tom-toles-washington-post-and-andrews-mcmeel-syndicate.jpg

  • EDF43785-4B35-412D-93ED-58E1CBE2A076.jpeg

  • As much as i loathe hillary and would actually not mind seeing her locked up, donald is starting to make a strong case that he might need dealt with first. Theres beginning to be more "smoke" pointing to his involvement with russians than smoke pointing to hillarys "whatever". Ideally id "love" to see them both get submarined on the same day.

    Anyway, hope u guys understand that mueller aint wrappin shit up. Its taken him till now just to get the minor players to belly up. Now he's lookin at the meat.....

  • As much as i loathe hillary and would actually not mind seeing her locked up, donald is starting to make a strong case that he might need dealt with first. Theres beginning to be more "smoke" pointing to his involvement with russians than smoke pointing to hillarys "whatever". Ideally id "love" to see them both get submarined on the same day.

    Anyway, hope u guys understand that mueller aint wrappin shit up. Its taken him till now just to get the minor players to belly up. Now he's lookin at the meat.....

    @clevfan4life said:

    As much as i loathe hillary and would actually not mind seeing her locked up, donald is starting to make a strong case that he might need dealt with first. Theres beginning to be more "smoke" pointing to his involvement with russians than smoke pointing to hillarys "whatever". Ideally id "love" to see them both get submarined on the same day.

    Anyway, hope u guys understand that mueller aint wrappin shit up. Its taken him till now just to get the minor players to belly up. Now he's lookin at the meat.....

    We will eventually see what Mueller has but I will go on record right now and say Mueller will find no criminal collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. The biggest offense they have right now is something I think most people knew already that Trump had Cohen pay off Porny Daniels for her to keep quiet. Is that a campaign violation? Yes if Trump did it to effect the election but intent has to be proven and Trump simply has to say he paid off Daniels to keep his family from embarrassment. Remember the word of Cohen as a convicted liar is not worth much to begin with. 

  • What I have said all along:

    No collusion with Russia but the investigation was never about that anyway. It was a fishing expedition to get dirt on Trump to impeach him. The hush money paid to Porny Daniels and Karen McDougal are the ones they will hang their hat on. I don't think they will be successful but we will see, time will tell..

    Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andrew-c-mccarthy-why-trump-is-likely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney

    from the article our two tiered justice system:

    Moreover, campaign finance infractions are often settled by payment of an administrative fine, not turned into felony prosecutions. To be sure, federal prosecutors in New York City have charged them as felonies before – most notably in 2014 against Dinesh D’Souza, whom Trump later pardoned.

    In marked contrast, though, when it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

  • I find it funny the Dems are looking at ANYTHING Trump May have done to hang his ass, but they’re doing it under the ruse of “election tampering”. Which is something the Libs are experts at doing.

  • What I have said all along:

    No collusion with Russia but the investigation was never about that anyway. It was a fishing expedition to get dirt on Trump to impeach him. The hush money paid to Porny Daniels and Karen McDougal are the ones they will hang their hat on. I don't think they will be successful but we will see, time will tell..

    Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andrew-c-mccarthy-why-trump-is-likely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney

    from the article our two tiered justice system:

    Moreover, campaign finance infractions are often settled by payment of an administrative fine, not turned into felony prosecutions. To be sure, federal prosecutors in New York City have charged them as felonies before – most notably in 2014 against Dinesh D’Souza, whom Trump later pardoned.

    In marked contrast, though, when it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    What I have said all along:

    No collusion with Russia but the investigation was never about that anyway. It was a fishing expedition to get dirt on Trump to impeach him. The hush money paid to Porny Daniels and Karen McDougal are the ones they will hang their hat on. I don't think they will be successful but we will see, time will tell..

    Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andrew-c-mccarthy-why-trump-is-likely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney

    from the article our two tiered justice system:

    Moreover, campaign finance infractions are often settled by payment of an administrative fine, not turned into felony prosecutions. To be sure, federal prosecutors in New York City have charged them as felonies before – most notably in 2014 against Dinesh D’Souza, whom Trump later pardoned.

    In marked contrast, though, when it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

    So I'll ask this - suppose you're investigating a murder and you only stumble upon a kidnapping charge...  I guess that means you should just let it go?

  • So, I'll ask THIS - how the hell did we get to a point where the law gets hammer on republicans and conservatives, but the left deep state cronies are scott free no reason to prosecute...

    WHAT?

    The "no reason" side is the dems/leftists/deep state/socialist sombeitches.

    Like the communists - the law only applies to non-communists.

    Which, btw, Van Jones, avowed commie, was in ObaMao's top advisor group.

    and dirty corrupt brennan?

    https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2018/jul/19/ron-desantis/was-john-brennan-once-member-communist-party/

    Brennan said he was apprehensive — he had voted for Gus Hall for president in 1976, which was while the Cold War was underway. (The Cold War is generally defined as running from 1947 to 1991.)

    The New York Times reported Hall earned more support from American voters in his 1976 presidential campaign than in his other three. He won 58,992 votes, putting him in eighth place, behind candidates from the Democratic, Republican, Independent, Libertarian, American Independent, American and Socialist Workers parties.

    "I froze, because I was getting so close to coming into CIA and said, 'OK, here's the choice, John. You can deny that, and the machine is probably going to go, you know, wacko, or I can acknowledge it and see what happens,'" CNN has quoted Brennan as saying. (We searched for video but did not find it.)

    Brennan told the polygraph operator that he had voted for Hall, but added that he was never a member of the Communist Party. Speaking at the conference, Brennan said he was relieved to have been accepted into the CIA, because he worried about having compromised his chances by being forthcoming.

    "I said I was neither Democratic or Republican, but it was my way, as I was going to college, of signaling my unhappiness with the system, and the need for change. I said I'm not a member of the Communist Party, so the polygrapher looked at me and said, 'OK,' and when I was finished with the polygraph and I left and said, 'Well, I'm screwed.'"

  • what was the end result? The very dangerous politicization of the CIA, that's what. Obamao did the same with the DOJ and FBI.

    And EPA. He put radicals into positions of "transforming America"

    Now, we are left with a cold civil war.

    https://thenewsrep.com/21395/john-brennans-political-purges-within-the-cia/

  • I find it funny the Dems are looking at ANYTHING Trump May have done to hang his ass, but they’re doing it under the ruse of “election tampering”. Which is something the Libs are experts at doing.

    @canton-dawg said:

    I find it funny the Dems are looking at ANYTHING Trump May have done to hang his ass, but they’re doing it under the ruse of “election tampering”. Which is something the Libs are experts at doing.

    Sorry kid, having ur campaign folks...not trumps business people....CAMPAIGN employees talking with russian agents, means it aint no ruse. It isnt no matter how dearly u wish it not to be.