Official Jabrill Peppers Appreciation Thread
-
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Im assuming this is meant to symbolize ur tired of the thread, its easy, dont read it and dont post in it.
-
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Im assuming this is meant to symbolize ur tired of the thread, its easy, dont read it and dont post in it.
Im assuming this is meant to symbolize ur tired of the thread, its easy, dont read it and dont post in it.
Assume makes an ass of u and me.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Hey!! What happened to my JC Tretter Appreciation thread? I know I said to get rid of the Charlie Frye thread, but not the JC thread.
I think we needed to do an homage to a guy that came from a non-traditional football program (Cornell) instead of a football factory. And he sure had been doing a much steadier job for this team the last couple of years than Jabrill had been doing. If a guy can spew his obsession all over this board for a guy that went to a school he was affiliated with, can't the rest of us also get some love for some guys on this team who went to colleges that the rest of us have an affiliation with? And JC is, after all, a current starter for this team.
Or, was that thread becoming too "marinated" (as in, it was becoming all about Ed Marinaro, not JC Tretter)?
-
Im assuming this is meant to symbolize ur tired of the thread, its easy, dont read it and dont post in it.
Assume makes an ass of u and me.
Assume makes an ass of u and me.
Ah... but assuming makes an ass of u and ming...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Hey!! What happened to my JC Tretter Appreciation thread? I know I said to get rid of the Charlie Frye thread, but not the JC thread.
I think we needed to do an homage to a guy that came from a non-traditional football program (Cornell) instead of a football factory. And he sure had been doing a much steadier job for this team the last couple of years than Jabrill had been doing. If a guy can spew his obsession all over this board for a guy that went to a school he was affiliated with, can't the rest of us also get some love for some guys on this team who went to colleges that the rest of us have an affiliation with? And JC is, after all, a current starter for this team.
Or, was that thread becoming too "marinated" (as in, it was becoming all about Ed Marinaro, not JC Tretter)?
I think we needed to do an homage to a guy that came from a non-traditional football program (Cornell) instead of a football factory.
If Michigan was a factory it would produce Ford Pintos... ?
-
I’m just hoping Peppers has another stellar game this week. I could give a rats ass where he went to school. He’s in the land now and he’s ours. I’m looking forward to him wasting some of those bengal lancers Sunday now that he’s catching up to the pro game and has some decent one direction coaching
-
I am thinking ahead a bit....to the Ravens game.
It seems to me that one strategy that may have to be deployed is to put a "spy" on Lamar Jackson, because of his running ability...which you want to limit? You want Jackson to try to beat you with his arm, which is the weak part of his game, and not with his legs.
Is it fair to say that the guy perhaps either most expendable...and well equipped to be that spy is Peppers?
-
"Most expendable player".... that we'd task with shutting down their most explosive player
But I'm not sure who'd we task with that. Technically, since Kindred and Pep can both start, it might be one of them.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Assume makes an ass of u and me.
Ah... but assuming makes an ass of u and ming...
Ah... but assuming makes an ass of u and ming...
Ming was a good friend at Greenbriar.
-
Ming was a good friend at Greenbriar.
Death to Ming.
-
Ming was a good friend at Greenbriar.
Death to Ming.
-
"Most expendable player".... that we'd task with shutting down their most explosive player
But I'm not sure who'd we task with that. Technically, since Kindred and Pep can both start, it might be one of them.
"Most expendable player".... that we'd task with shutting down their most explosive player
But I'm not sure who'd we task with that. Technically, since Kindred and Pep can both start, it might be one of them.
Expendable in the sense that needed least in coverage. ...and as in most suited for the job if he is going to play that hybrid LB position
-
Yao!
Yao Ming. Made in China - stayed on sideline.
-
Jabril would absolutely be our best bet at spying Jackson.
My big concern with that (and Woody is going to get upset thinking I'm taking a shot but I'm not) is I still remember JT Barrett outrunning (bad angle by Pep) him on a pivotal big gainer in the second half of the overtime game in Columbus in 2016. Jackson is way faster, more elusive, and a better runner than JT but typically Peppers has a nose for the ball and i think is taking better angles at this point in his career so I still say he's our best bet to slowing Lamar down.
-
Jabril would absolutely be our best bet at spying Jackson.
My big concern with that (and Woody is going to get upset thinking I'm taking a shot but I'm not) is I still remember JT Barrett outrunning (bad angle by Pep) him on a pivotal big gainer in the second half of the overtime game in Columbus in 2016. Jackson is way faster, more elusive, and a better runner than JT but typically Peppers has a nose for the ball and i think is taking better angles at this point in his career so I still say he's our best bet to slowing Lamar down.
Jabril would absolutely be our best bet at spying Jackson.
My big concern with that (and Woody is going to get upset thinking I'm taking a shot but I'm not) is I still remember JT Barrett outrunning (bad angle by Pep) him on a pivotal big gainer in the second half of the overtime game in Columbus in 2016. Jackson is way faster, more elusive, and a better runner than JT but typically Peppers has a nose for the ball and i think is taking better angles at this point in his career so I still say he's our best bet to slowing Lamar down.
That was the exception, not the rule. Bad play by him at the time, but it was a rarity.
I also have a feeling he was doing everything he could to compensate for our slow LBs at the time.
-
Jabril would absolutely be our best bet at spying Jackson.
My big concern with that (and Woody is going to get upset thinking I'm taking a shot but I'm not) is I still remember JT Barrett outrunning (bad angle by Pep) him on a pivotal big gainer in the second half of the overtime game in Columbus in 2016. Jackson is way faster, more elusive, and a better runner than JT but typically Peppers has a nose for the ball and i think is taking better angles at this point in his career so I still say he's our best bet to slowing Lamar down.
Jabril would absolutely be our best bet at spying Jackson.
My big concern with that (and Woody is going to get upset thinking I'm taking a shot but I'm not) is I still remember JT Barrett outrunning (bad angle by Pep) him on a pivotal big gainer in the second half of the overtime game in Columbus in 2016. Jackson is way faster, more elusive, and a better runner than JT but typically Peppers has a nose for the ball and i think is taking better angles at this point in his career so I still say he's our best bet to slowing Lamar down.
Good idea but as the video below will remind us let's make sure we tackle Cincy first.
-
Playing very good on defense. I'd like to see him taken off special teams.
-
He's making a case for being our most impactful player on defense.
-
Playing very good on defense. I'd like to see him taken off special teams.
Playing very good on defense. I'd like to see him taken off special teams.
As he's been getting more plays on D they've been playing him less on special teams.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login