Skip to content

Baker Mayfield Thread

The Browns Board
976 82 48.5k 1
  • Has the douche been banned yet or is he still posting ?

  • Has the douche been banned yet or is he still posting ?

    @darren15 said:

    Has the douche been banned yet or is he still posting ?

    Not yet, but he's close to getting a warning...

  • Baking up Turnovers said:

    Playing fortnight isn't a big deal. Getting arrested and grabbing stuff on the sidelines and taunting coaches is. Grow up. 

    First off, What would you rather have Baker do? Get drunk like Manziel? I'd rather have him study film, bang his hot fiance, and play video games

    Secondly, I wasn't arrested, but I was walking home at a college with with two girls and went back to save my buddy who was drinking bud lights in the street dancing who i thought would get in trouble. A female cop tackles me and goes through my pocket and says what is this, and picks up a beer can out of my pocket. I get an underage, have to do community service, and then its knocked off my record. Baker made a mistake and manned upto it. No different then my situation.

    As for him grabbing his junk, that team mocked him and wouldn't shake his hand. Do you want him to cower like a little b@#$ or have a little competitiveness?

    Go ahead with choosing Rosen over Mayfield. Rosen was too cocky all of my friends at UCLA said, and he treated people he just met, coaches, and professors like he was above them. D'Arnold panics and tosses picks in clutch situations. Lamar is a running back who can't throw. Josh Allen is inaccurate. Sure some of them might grow, But Baker has heart. 

    Baker saw a girl who was dying of Cancer of never said a word about it. He cares, works his ass off, and he accepted our city and fans. All of these fans in their 80s, 70s, 60s, 50s, 40s, 30s, and even 20s like me are desperate for us to be competitive and win a superbowl since we're a football city. He gives us hope.

    If you want to attack a QB for character flaws, attack someone like Jameis Winston who steals crab legs and gets accused of raping girls. People like him need to "grow up", not Baker.

  • Asking Baker to mature a little is hardly an "attack".

    As for having a little "competitiveness"... you do what adults do... go play the game and beat the snot out of those who snubbed you and point to the scoreboard.

  • Baking up Turnovers said:

    The very thought! 

    A Brit???

    @tour2ma said:

    A Brit???

    That would explain the stupidity of some of his comparisons. Can't expect nothing good from a brit.

  • Baking up Turnovers said:

    Playing fortnight isn't a big deal. Getting arrested and grabbing stuff on the sidelines and taunting coaches is. Grow up. 

    First off, What would you rather have Baker do? Get drunk like Manziel? I'd rather have him study film, bang his hot fiance, and play video games

    Secondly, I wasn't arrested, but I was walking home at a college with with two girls and went back to save my buddy who was drinking bud lights in the street dancing who i thought would get in trouble. A female cop tackles me and goes through my pocket and says what is this, and picks up a beer can out of my pocket. I get an underage, have to do community service, and then its knocked off my record. Baker made a mistake and manned upto it. No different then my situation.

    As for him grabbing his junk, that team mocked him and wouldn't shake his hand. Do you want him to cower like a little b@#$ or have a little competitiveness?

    Go ahead with choosing Rosen over Mayfield. Rosen was too cocky all of my friends at UCLA said, and he treated people he just met, coaches, and professors like he was above them. D'Arnold panics and tosses picks in clutch situations. Lamar is a running back who can't throw. Josh Allen is inaccurate. Sure some of them might grow, But Baker has heart. 

    Baker saw a girl who was dying of Cancer of never said a word about it. He cares, works his ass off, and he accepted our city and fans. All of these fans in their 80s, 70s, 60s, 50s, 40s, 30s, and even 20s like me are desperate for us to be competitive and win a superbowl since we're a football city. He gives us hope.

    If you want to attack a QB for character flaws, attack someone like Jameis Winston who steals crab legs and gets accused of raping girls. People like him need to "grow up", not Baker.

    @stillmotion said:

    First off, What would you rather have Baker do? Get drunk like Manziel? I'd rather have him study film, bang his hot fiance, and play video games

    As for him grabbing his junk, that team mocked him and wouldn't shake his hand. Do you want him to cower like a little b@#$ or have a little competitiveness?

    Go ahead with choosing Rosen over Mayfield. Rosen was too cocky all of my friends at UCLA said, and he treated people he just met, coaches, and professors like he was above them. D'Arnold panics and tosses picks in clutch situations. Lamar is a running back who can't throw. Josh Allen is inaccurate. Sure some of them might grow, But Baker has heart. 

    Baker saw a girl who was dying of Cancer never said a word about it. He cares, works his ass off, and he accepted our city and fans. All of these fans in their 80s, 70s, 60s, 50s, 40s, 30s, and even 20s like me are desperate for us to be competitive and win a superbowl since we're a football city. He gives us hope.

    If you want to attack a QB for character flaws, attack someone like Jameis Winston who steals crab legs and gets accused of raping girls. People like him need to "grow up", not Baker.

    Baking has nothing but an opinion about the other 2018 QBs. We all know the odds of him being right are approaching 1,000:1 against.    

    Regarding Winston, he still hasn't grown up, groping an Uber driver. 

    @tour2ma said:

    Asking Baker to mature a little is hardly an "attack".

    Sorry Tour, then Baker wouldn't be Baker. 

  • @tour2ma said:

    A Brit???

    That would explain the stupidity of some of his comparisons. Can't expect nothing good from a brit.

    @nero said:

    That would explain the stupidity of some of his comparisons. Can't expect nothing good from a brit.

    Especially after the "Armada incident". LOL!??⚓

  • @stillmotion said:

    First off, What would you rather have Baker do? Get drunk like Manziel? I'd rather have him study film, bang his hot fiance, and play video games

    As for him grabbing his junk, that team mocked him and wouldn't shake his hand. Do you want him to cower like a little b@#$ or have a little competitiveness?

    Go ahead with choosing Rosen over Mayfield. Rosen was too cocky all of my friends at UCLA said, and he treated people he just met, coaches, and professors like he was above them. D'Arnold panics and tosses picks in clutch situations. Lamar is a running back who can't throw. Josh Allen is inaccurate. Sure some of them might grow, But Baker has heart. 

    Baker saw a girl who was dying of Cancer never said a word about it. He cares, works his ass off, and he accepted our city and fans. All of these fans in their 80s, 70s, 60s, 50s, 40s, 30s, and even 20s like me are desperate for us to be competitive and win a superbowl since we're a football city. He gives us hope.

    If you want to attack a QB for character flaws, attack someone like Jameis Winston who steals crab legs and gets accused of raping girls. People like him need to "grow up", not Baker.

    Baking has nothing but an opinion about the other 2018 QBs. We all know the odds of him being right are approaching 1,000:1 against.    

    Regarding Winston, he still hasn't grown up, groping an Uber driver. 

    @tour2ma said:

    Asking Baker to mature a little is hardly an "attack".

    Sorry Tour, then Baker wouldn't be Baker. 

    @hoorta said:

    Sorry Tour, then Baker wouldn't be Baker. 

    Bullshit, h...

    He can still run down the field, jumping and yelling and clapping, in celebration of a TD pass...

    He can still "jaw" with defenders in the moment after a big hit or nearly missed one...

    That's the good stuff. That's how he channels 95+% of his emotion as it is.

    Just can the brat-shit. That last couple percent will never be missed.

  • @nero said:

    That would explain the stupidity of some of his comparisons. Can't expect nothing good from a brit.

    Especially after the "Armada incident". LOL!??⚓

    @texasag1969 said:

    Especially after the "Armada incident". LOL!??⚓

    Yea....at one time it was thought that those people known as "Black Irish"  descended from the remnants of the Spanish Armada who ended up being castaway on Ireland after the defeat of the Armada.   But I believe I can attest to the fact that that is not the case because:   My mother was "Black Irish" ...and I have since had my DNA tested, and there is no trace of Iberian blood in me.   So I would conclude that wherever the Black Irish came from, it was not from the Spaniards.

  • @hoorta said:

    Sorry Tour, then Baker wouldn't be Baker. 

    Bullshit, h...

    He can still run down the field, jumping and yelling and clapping, in celebration of a TD pass...

    He can still "jaw" with defenders in the moment after a big hit or nearly missed one...

    That's the good stuff. That's how he channels 95+% of his emotion as it is.

    Just can the brat-shit. That last couple percent will never be missed.

    @tour2ma said:

    Bullshit, h...

    He can still run down the field, jumping and yelling and clapping, in celebration of a TD pass...

    He can still "jaw" with defenders in the moment after a big hit or nearly missed one...

    That's the good stuff. That's how he channels 95+% of his emotion as it is.

    Just can the brat-shit. That last couple percent will never be missed.

    But...it is so much fun!

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Especially after the "Armada incident". LOL!??⚓

    Yea....at one time it was thought that those people known as "Black Irish"  descended from the remnants of the Spanish Armada who ended up being castaway on Ireland after the defeat of the Armada.   But I believe I can attest to the fact that that is not the case because:   My mother was "Black Irish" ...and I have since had my DNA tested, and there is no trace of Iberian blood in me.   So I would conclude that wherever the Black Irish came from, it was not from the Spaniards.

    @the-gipper said:

    Yea....at one time it was thought that those people known as "Black Irish"  descended from the remnants of the Spanish Armada who ended up being castaway on Ireland after the defeat of the Armada.   But I believe I can attest to the fact that that is not the case because:   My mother was "Black Irish" ...and I have since had my DNA tested, and there is no trace of Iberian blood in me.   So I would conclude that wherever the Black Irish came from, it was not from the Spaniards.

    Aha-but me great grandmother was pure Irish , but I do not know about me Brit great-grandfather. Me DNA was 28% Spain/SW France and me black strait hair and a bit darker skin tone might just be a verification. So there's that.  LOL!? Flamenco anyone!?

  • @the-gipper said:

    Yea....at one time it was thought that those people known as "Black Irish"  descended from the remnants of the Spanish Armada who ended up being castaway on Ireland after the defeat of the Armada.   But I believe I can attest to the fact that that is not the case because:   My mother was "Black Irish" ...and I have since had my DNA tested, and there is no trace of Iberian blood in me.   So I would conclude that wherever the Black Irish came from, it was not from the Spaniards.

    Aha-but me great grandmother was pure Irish , but I do not know about me Brit great-grandfather. Me DNA was 28% Spain/SW France and me black strait hair and a bit darker skin tone might just be a verification. So there's that.  LOL!? Flamenco anyone!?

    @texasag1969 said:

    Aha-but me great grandmother was pure Irish , but I do not know about me Brit great-grandfather. Me DNA was 28% Spain/SW France and me black strait hair and a bit darker skin tone might just be a verification. So there's that.  LOL!? Flamenco anyone!?

    You had basically a Spanish grandparent.  You don't have to go back to any great grandparents for it likely.

    My Dad thought that we had native American blood in us.  DNA tests showed none at all. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Aha-but me great grandmother was pure Irish , but I do not know about me Brit great-grandfather. Me DNA was 28% Spain/SW France and me black strait hair and a bit darker skin tone might just be a verification. So there's that.  LOL!? Flamenco anyone!?

    You had basically a Spanish grandparent.  You don't have to go back to any great grandparents for it likely.

    My Dad thought that we had native American blood in us.  DNA tests showed none at all. 

    @the-gipper said:

    You had basically a Spanish grandparent.  You don't have to go back to any great grandparents for it likely.

    My Dad thought that we had native American blood in us.  DNA tests showed none at all. 

    I think I got it from my 1/4 Irish wife. It's catching you know.?

    Funny thing is that our son had 28% Iberian, so he got some from each of our Irish backgrounds.

    EDIT: With my hair/skin I thought Native American would show too. Not a trace.

  • @the-gipper said:

    You had basically a Spanish grandparent.  You don't have to go back to any great grandparents for it likely.

    My Dad thought that we had native American blood in us.  DNA tests showed none at all. 

    I think I got it from my 1/4 Irish wife. It's catching you know.?

    Funny thing is that our son had 28% Iberian, so he got some from each of our Irish backgrounds.

    EDIT: With my hair/skin I thought Native American would show too. Not a trace.

    @texasag1969 said:

    I think I got it from my 1/4 Irish wife. It's catching you know.?

    Ah.....NO

    Funny thing is that our son had 28% Iberian, so he got some from each of our Irish backgrounds.

    Ah...NO  again.  Iberian means Spanish/Portugese, not Irish.   You may be thinking about "Hibernian"..which is Irish.

    EDIT: With my hair/skin I thought Native American would show too. Not a trace.

  • @hoorta said:

    Sorry Tour, then Baker wouldn't be Baker. 

    Bullshit, h...

    He can still run down the field, jumping and yelling and clapping, in celebration of a TD pass...

    He can still "jaw" with defenders in the moment after a big hit or nearly missed one...

    That's the good stuff. That's how he channels 95+% of his emotion as it is.

    Just can the brat-shit. That last couple percent will never be missed.

    @tour2ma said:

    Bullshit, h...

    He can still run down the field, jumping and yelling and clapping, in celebration of a TD pass...

    He can still "jaw" with defenders in the moment after a big hit or nearly missed one...

    That's the good stuff. That's how he channels 95+% of his emotion as it is.

    Just can the brat-shit. That last couple percent will never be missed.

    LOL, are you sure you're not related to Colin Cowherd somehow? I'm positive if you took a poll of Browns fans, that opinion would be way in the minority.  We just have a different opinion of what's acceptable on field behavior Tour. Bratty? Well, he's our brat. When he starts kicking guys like Suh did, you've got something to complain about.  🙂

  • @texasag1969 said:

    I think I got it from my 1/4 Irish wife. It's catching you know.?

    Ah.....NO

    Funny thing is that our son had 28% Iberian, so he got some from each of our Irish backgrounds.

    Ah...NO  again.  Iberian means Spanish/Portugese, not Irish.   You may be thinking about "Hibernian"..which is Irish.

    EDIT: With my hair/skin I thought Native American would show too. Not a trace.

    @the-gipper said:

    Ah...NO  again.  Iberian means Spanish/Portugese, not Irish.   You may be thinking about "Hibernian"..which is Irish.

    No that is exactly what I meant. We both have 25% and 28% DNA respectively in common with the people from the Iberian peninsula which includes Spain, Portugal and far SW France. None of our relatives came from there, but we certainly had a lot of Irish close relatives. So I was making my point that perhaps the Irish ones we came from were in fact originally off the Spanish Armada. Almost all of the rest of our DNA came from the British Isles (along with our relative) with a very small bit of Denmark/Norway/Finland area of Europe thrown in. It should be noted that people living in the British Isles also have a bit of that SW Europe, but not near as high as ours was.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Ah...NO  again.  Iberian means Spanish/Portugese, not Irish.   You may be thinking about "Hibernian"..which is Irish.

    No that is exactly what I meant. We both have 25% and 28% DNA respectively in common with the people from the Iberian peninsula which includes Spain, Portugal and far SW France. None of our relatives came from there, but we certainly had a lot of Irish close relatives. So I was making my point that perhaps the Irish ones we came from were in fact originally off the Spanish Armada. Almost all of the rest of our DNA came from the British Isles (along with our relative) with a very small bit of Denmark/Norway/Finland area of Europe thrown in. It should be noted that people living in the British Isles also have a bit of that SW Europe, but not near as high as ours was.

    @texasag1969 said:

    No that is exactly what I meant. We both have 25% and 28% DNA respectively in common with the people from the Iberian peninsula which includes Spain, Portugal and far SW France. None of our relatives came from there, but we certainly had a lot of Irish close relatives. So I was making my point that perhaps the Irish ones we came from were in fact originally off the Spanish Armada. Almost all of the rest of our DNA came from the British Isles (along with our relative) with a very small bit of Denmark/Norway/Finland area of Europe thrown in. It should be noted that people living in the British Isles also have a bit of that SW Europe, but not near as high as ours was.

    25-28% means that your Spanish ancestry is much, much more recent than if you are the descendant of someone from off the Spanish Armada..which was  1588.  That would have likely been about  17-18 generations ago....and you would have at most about 5% Iberian.

     Let's assume you were born in 1990, and that the average length of a generation is 25 years. It would take, on average, 13 generations to get back to 1690, which would be your 10th great-grandparents. 

    1990 - 1 - you 
    1965 - 2 - parents 
    1940 - 3 - grandparents 
    1915 - 4 - great-grandparents 
    1890 - 5 - 2nd great-grandparents 
    1865 - 6 - 3rd great-grandparents 
    1840 - 7 - 4th great-grandparents 
    1815 - 8 - 5th great-grandparents 
    1790 - 9 - 6th great-grandparents 
    1765 - 10 - 7th great-grandparents 
    1740 - 11 - 8th great-grandparents 
    1715 - 12 - 9th great-grandparents 
    1690 - 13 - 10th great-granparents 
    1665 - 14 - 11th great-grandparents 
    1640 - 15 - 12th great-grandparents 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    No that is exactly what I meant. We both have 25% and 28% DNA respectively in common with the people from the Iberian peninsula which includes Spain, Portugal and far SW France. None of our relatives came from there, but we certainly had a lot of Irish close relatives. So I was making my point that perhaps the Irish ones we came from were in fact originally off the Spanish Armada. Almost all of the rest of our DNA came from the British Isles (along with our relative) with a very small bit of Denmark/Norway/Finland area of Europe thrown in. It should be noted that people living in the British Isles also have a bit of that SW Europe, but not near as high as ours was.

    25-28% means that your Spanish ancestry is much, much more recent than if you are the descendant of someone from off the Spanish Armada..which was  1588.  That would have likely been about  17-18 generations ago....and you would have at most about 5% Iberian.

     Let's assume you were born in 1990, and that the average length of a generation is 25 years. It would take, on average, 13 generations to get back to 1690, which would be your 10th great-grandparents. 

    1990 - 1 - you 
    1965 - 2 - parents 
    1940 - 3 - grandparents 
    1915 - 4 - great-grandparents 
    1890 - 5 - 2nd great-grandparents 
    1865 - 6 - 3rd great-grandparents 
    1840 - 7 - 4th great-grandparents 
    1815 - 8 - 5th great-grandparents 
    1790 - 9 - 6th great-grandparents 
    1765 - 10 - 7th great-grandparents 
    1740 - 11 - 8th great-grandparents 
    1715 - 12 - 9th great-grandparents 
    1690 - 13 - 10th great-granparents 
    1665 - 14 - 11th great-grandparents 
    1640 - 15 - 12th great-grandparents 

    @the-gipper said:

    25-28% means that your Spanish ancestry is much, much more recent than if you are the descendant of someone from off the Spanish Armada..which was  1588.  That would have likely been about  17-18 generations ago....and you would have at most about 5% Iberian.

     Let's assume you were born in 1990, and that the average length of a generation is 25 years. It would take, on average, 13 generations to get back to 1690, which would be your 10th great-grandparents. 

    1990 - 1 - you 
    1965 - 2 - parents 
    1940 - 3 - grandparents 
    1915 - 4 - great-grandparents 
    1890 - 5 - 2nd great-grandparents 
    1865 - 6 - 3rd great-grandparents 
    1840 - 7 - 4th great-grandparents 
    1815 - 8 - 5th great-grandparents 
    1790 - 9 - 6th great-grandparents 
    1765 - 10 - 7th great-grandparents 
    1740 - 11 - 8th great-grandparents 
    1715 - 12 - 9th great-grandparents 
    1690 - 13 - 10th great-granparents 
    1665 - 14 - 11th great-grandparents 
    1640 - 15 - 12th great-grandparents 

    I think it would be worthwhile for you to research the national Geographic DNA study called Helix Geno 2.0 which is an ongoing project. You will find that people native to the British Isles multiple generations back share a lot of DNA with Iberian peoples, so it's not as simple as you may think.

  • @the-gipper said:

    25-28% means that your Spanish ancestry is much, much more recent than if you are the descendant of someone from off the Spanish Armada..which was  1588.  That would have likely been about  17-18 generations ago....and you would have at most about 5% Iberian.

     Let's assume you were born in 1990, and that the average length of a generation is 25 years. It would take, on average, 13 generations to get back to 1690, which would be your 10th great-grandparents. 

    1990 - 1 - you 
    1965 - 2 - parents 
    1940 - 3 - grandparents 
    1915 - 4 - great-grandparents 
    1890 - 5 - 2nd great-grandparents 
    1865 - 6 - 3rd great-grandparents 
    1840 - 7 - 4th great-grandparents 
    1815 - 8 - 5th great-grandparents 
    1790 - 9 - 6th great-grandparents 
    1765 - 10 - 7th great-grandparents 
    1740 - 11 - 8th great-grandparents 
    1715 - 12 - 9th great-grandparents 
    1690 - 13 - 10th great-granparents 
    1665 - 14 - 11th great-grandparents 
    1640 - 15 - 12th great-grandparents 

    I think it would be worthwhile for you to research the national Geographic DNA study called Helix Geno 2.0 which is an ongoing project. You will find that people native to the British Isles multiple generations back share a lot of DNA with Iberian peoples, so it's not as simple as you may think.

    @texasag1969 said:

    I think it would be worthwhile for you to research the national Geographic DNA study called Helix Geno 2.0 which is an ongoing project. You will find that people native to the British Isles multiple generations back share a lot of DNA with Iberian peoples, so it's not as simple as you may think.

    Everybody wants a bit of Spaniard on themselves ?

  • @texasag1969 said:

    I think it would be worthwhile for you to research the national Geographic DNA study called Helix Geno 2.0 which is an ongoing project. You will find that people native to the British Isles multiple generations back share a lot of DNA with Iberian peoples, so it's not as simple as you may think.

    Everybody wants a bit of Spaniard on themselves ?

    @nero said:

    Everybody wants a bit of Spaniard on themselves ?

    Si', co'mo no!?