Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. the dirt to render a President weaker was started by J. Edgar Hoover

the dirt to render a President weaker was started by J. Edgar Hoover

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
12 Posts 5 Posters 306 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
    • 33k Posts
    • 3k Reputation
    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #2

    My God

    The deep state is so deep that it dug backwards in time.

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
      • 11k Posts
      • 3k Reputation
      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Legal Experts: NYT’s ‘Bombshell’ Report Casts Skepticism on FBI, Not Trump

      Legal experts and political strategists on both sides of the aisle said the Times‘ report showed the FBI was motivated by revenge for Comey’s firing rather than by any evidence Trump was acting on behalf of Russia.

      https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/14/legal-experts-nyts-bombshell-report-casts-skepticism-on-fbi-not-trump/

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
        • 11k Posts
        • 3k Reputation
        OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Watergate by Any Other Name

        https://pjmedia.com/rogerkimball/watergate-by-any-other-name/

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
          • 64k Posts
          • 8k Reputation
          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
          #5

          The deep state is a serious worry now.

          The correlation between the present deep state,

          and the bad guys entrenched in our gov on the show "Shooter"

          is just not by coincidence, I think.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
            • 13k Posts
            • 5k Reputation
            tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Did somebody say Hoover?  

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
              • 11k Posts
              • 3k Reputation
              OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Speaking of Hoover, Nixon wanted to replace him but Hoover had damaging information on Nixon. When Hoover was summoned to the White House to speak with Nixon he took his briefcase full of damaging tapes with him and Nixon was persuaded  blackmailed to allow Hoover to stay on as FBI Director.

              Chuck Schumer said something more recently I found interesting:  

              Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you' 

              https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/schumer-warns-trump-intel-officials-have-six-ways-from-sunday-at-getting-back-at-you

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                • 64k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                #8

                I figure schumer was in on the plans to negate Pres Trump's presidency efficiency as much as possible.

                OldBrownsFanO MLD WoodyM 2 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • C calfoxwc

                  I figure schumer was in on the plans to negate Pres Trump's presidency efficiency as much as possible.

                  OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                  • 11k Posts
                  • 3k Reputation
                  OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @calfoxwc said:

                  I figure schumer was in on the plans to negate Pres Trump's presidency efficiency as much as possible.

                  I believe history will reveal later something  that some of us already know today. Our media has ignored one of the biggest abuse of power scandals in our history . We had government agencies working to elect Hillary Clinton by white washing her investigation and the same agencies trying to keep Trump from being elected and after election trying to take him down which is still ongoing. We had a silent coup.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • C calfoxwc

                    I figure schumer was in on the plans to negate Pres Trump's presidency efficiency as much as possible.

                    MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                    • 33k Posts
                    • 3k Reputation
                    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @calfoxwc said:

                    I figure schumer was in on the plans to negate Pres Trump's presidency efficiency as much as possible.

                    Sure 

                    But isn't that exactly what the Republicans did for 8 years under Obama?

                    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                    W 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                      @calfoxwc said:

                      I figure schumer was in on the plans to negate Pres Trump's presidency efficiency as much as possible.

                      Sure 

                      But isn't that exactly what the Republicans did for 8 years under Obama?

                      Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                      • 39k Posts
                      • 9k Reputation
                      W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @mld-woody said:

                      Sure 

                      But isn't that exactly what the Republicans did for 8 years under Obama?

                      6

                      WSS

                      www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • W Westside Steve

                        @mld-woody said:

                        Sure 

                        But isn't that exactly what the Republicans did for 8 years under Obama?

                        6

                        WSS

                        calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                        • 64k Posts
                        • 8k Reputation
                        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @westside-steve said:

                        6

                        WSS

                        no - the msm loved obaMao commie - never ever contradicted him, asked him tough questions, never ridiculed him,

                        never happily ran with false negative stories. the list goes on.

                           And obviously, there was never nonsense contrived "investigations" of Pres Trump. "russian collusion" is a complete falsehood,

                        after two years of nothing on Pres Trump - they still hope for something to come up.

                          The deep staTe must continue this fake investigation of PRes Trump by any way necessary, to protect themselves.

                        Under ObaMao commie, there was NEVER an investigation over obaMao commies secret deal to iran.

                        NO investigation into URANIUM ONE. NO investigation into BEHGHAZI.

                            No calls for impeachment with no reason - related to obaMao commie.

                        They are trying desperately to keep their permanent power in our gov - and desperately are CYA over what they have done so far.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        👍
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate