Browns analysis: Top needs and players to watch at NFL Scouting Combine
-
I agree that of a day 1 impact offensive talent is there at 17, thats better than reaching on a defensive project that would be a 2nd rounder in a normal year. All the best DT's save perhaps for the clemson kid who got ped'd out of the championship, will be gone by 17.
I agree that of a day 1 impact offensive talent is there at 17, thats better than reaching on a defensive project that would be a 2nd rounder in a normal year. All the best DT's save perhaps for the clemson kid who got ped'd out of the championship, will be gone by 17.
That is my worry right now. Were sitting at 17 and Bosa, William's, Oliver, and Wilkins are all off the board, what do you do? I think Dorsey goes top rated Olineman, but I think the value in this draft is in the top 60 or so picks. I think this is an ideal draft to trade back. I know alot of people aren't a fan of that, but I seriously do not see a big gap in the players outside of the top 10 in the first round and the guys in the 2nd round.
-
I agree that of a day 1 impact offensive talent is there at 17, thats better than reaching on a defensive project that would be a 2nd rounder in a normal year. All the best DT's save perhaps for the clemson kid who got ped'd out of the championship, will be gone by 17.
I agree that of a day 1 impact offensive talent is there at 17, thats better than reaching on a defensive project that would be a 2nd rounder in a normal year. All the best DT's save perhaps for the clemson kid who got ped'd out of the championship, will be gone by 17.
Timmy Jernigan DT Philly just cut...nice work Berry..
-
I agree that of a day 1 impact offensive talent is there at 17, thats better than reaching on a defensive project that would be a 2nd rounder in a normal year. All the best DT's save perhaps for the clemson kid who got ped'd out of the championship, will be gone by 17.
That is my worry right now. Were sitting at 17 and Bosa, William's, Oliver, and Wilkins are all off the board, what do you do? I think Dorsey goes top rated Olineman, but I think the value in this draft is in the top 60 or so picks. I think this is an ideal draft to trade back. I know alot of people aren't a fan of that, but I seriously do not see a big gap in the players outside of the top 10 in the first round and the guys in the 2nd round.
That is my worry right now. Were sitting at 17 and Bosa, William's, Oliver, and Wilkins are all off the board, what do you do? I think Dorsey goes top rated Olineman, but I think the value in this draft is in the top 60 or so picks. I think this is an ideal draft to trade back. I know alot of people aren't a fan of that, but I seriously do not see a big gap in the players outside of the top 10 in the first round and the guys in the 2nd round.
What about trading up? They have 10 picks in this draft:
1st round
172nd round
493rd round
80
95 (via Patriots)4th round
1195th round
144 (via Jaguars)
155
170 (via Patriots)6th round
189I don't know if giving up any of these could put the Browns in a higher slot....but it should be considered and investigated. Dorsey WILL do that...even if no move can be made.
7th round
221 (via Jaguars) -
I agree that of a day 1 impact offensive talent is there at 17, thats better than reaching on a defensive project that would be a 2nd rounder in a normal year. All the best DT's save perhaps for the clemson kid who got ped'd out of the championship, will be gone by 17.
That is my worry right now. Were sitting at 17 and Bosa, William's, Oliver, and Wilkins are all off the board, what do you do? I think Dorsey goes top rated Olineman, but I think the value in this draft is in the top 60 or so picks. I think this is an ideal draft to trade back. I know alot of people aren't a fan of that, but I seriously do not see a big gap in the players outside of the top 10 in the first round and the guys in the 2nd round.
That is my worry right now. Were sitting at 17 and Bosa, William's, Oliver, and Wilkins are all off the board, what do you do? I think Dorsey goes top rated Olineman, but I think the value in this draft is in the top 60 or so picks. I think this is an ideal draft to trade back. I know alot of people aren't a fan of that, but I seriously do not see a big gap in the players outside of the top 10 in the first round and the guys in the 2nd round.
I’m not sold on Dorsey spending a #17 pick on an O-lineman.
The interior of the line is pretty solid, and the Browns just re-signed Greg Robinson today.
-
That is my worry right now. Were sitting at 17 and Bosa, William's, Oliver, and Wilkins are all off the board, what do you do? I think Dorsey goes top rated Olineman, but I think the value in this draft is in the top 60 or so picks. I think this is an ideal draft to trade back. I know alot of people aren't a fan of that, but I seriously do not see a big gap in the players outside of the top 10 in the first round and the guys in the 2nd round.
What about trading up? They have 10 picks in this draft:
1st round
172nd round
493rd round
80
95 (via Patriots)4th round
1195th round
144 (via Jaguars)
155
170 (via Patriots)6th round
189I don't know if giving up any of these could put the Browns in a higher slot....but it should be considered and investigated. Dorsey WILL do that...even if no move can be made.
7th round
221 (via Jaguars)What about trading up? They have 10 picks in this draft:
1st round
172nd round
493rd round
80
95per draft value charts. Trading pick #80 gets us to pick #14 Atlanta. Trading #95 gets us to pick #15 Skins..the rebuilders looking for picks imo are #1Zona,#4Oak,#5TB,#8Det.#9Bills, #11Cinn, & #12Mia. so we have higher trade options if 2 of 3 still sit on board b-4 #17..QB's could go off board at #1 Zona(murray with Klingsberry?) #6 NYG & #7 Jags.
4th round
1195th round
144 (via Jaguars)
155
170 (via Patriots)6th round
189I don't know if giving up any of these could put the Browns in a higher slot....but it should be considered and investigated. Dorsey WILL do that...even if no move can be made.
7th round
221 (via Jaguars)different approach is selling Zona pick #95 & #119 could get us from #17 in 2nd round to picking 1st in RD 2..AlSo* Giving Oakland #144,155 & 189 gives us 2nd pick in 3rd round..we would still own picks #17,get top pick in 2nd(Zona) ,2nd pick in 3rd (Oak.).. 5th #170(gordon trade) & 7th #221(Kessler trade).. 5 picks..
-
Thanks for the input Slugger. I do keep seeing you talk about need. To me the draft isn't all that much about need. No doubt that plays a part, but in the end it is about stocking the roster with the best players possible.
I think need has to play a big part. We don't need a QB or RB so they aren't getting taken at #17. I'd think you can cross TE off that list as well since Njoku is so young. You don't draft K or P in the first round so they're out as well. To me that leaves every other position on the field as a position of need on this team and should be considered in round 1.
I think need has to play a big part. We don't need a QB or RB so they aren't getting taken at #17. I'd think you can cross TE off that list as well since Njoku is so young. You don't draft K or P in the first round so they're out as well. To me that leaves every other position on the field as a position of need on this team and should be considered in round 1.
Like I said, it plays a part. Sure, we aren't going to draft a QB in round 1 just like we aren't going to draft a punter in round 1. There comes a point where drafting a player at some position is just silly. We don't need to discuss that
You also look at needs if you have 2-3 players you more or less rank the same. I am sure players grade out in "ties" all the time, so you might rank them according to need.
You also have times there is a clear cut best player on the board. IMO you are best served taking that player.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
Thanks for the input Slugger. I do keep seeing you talk about need. To me the draft isn't all that much about need. No doubt that plays a part, but in the end it is about stocking the roster with the best players possible.
To an extent. Were not taking a RB at 17 even if Jim Brown Jr was there. I try to look for the sweet spot of value, talent, and need.
To an extent. Were not taking a RB at 17 even if Jim Brown Jr was there. I try to look for the sweet spot of value, talent, and need.
Maybe we won't. I contend that would be a big mistake.
-
I think need has to play a big part. We don't need a QB or RB so they aren't getting taken at #17. I'd think you can cross TE off that list as well since Njoku is so young. You don't draft K or P in the first round so they're out as well. To me that leaves every other position on the field as a position of need on this team and should be considered in round 1.
Like I said, it plays a part. Sure, we aren't going to draft a QB in round 1 just like we aren't going to draft a punter in round 1. There comes a point where drafting a player at some position is just silly. We don't need to discuss that
You also look at needs if you have 2-3 players you more or less rank the same. I am sure players grade out in "ties" all the time, so you might rank them according to need.
You also have times there is a clear cut best player on the board. IMO you are best served taking that player.
Like I said, it plays a part. Sure, we aren't going to draft a QB in round 1 just like we aren't going to draft a punter in round 1. There comes a point where drafting a player at some position is just silly. We don't need to discuss that
You also look at needs if you have 2-3 players you more or less rank the same. I am sure players grade out in "ties" all the time, so you might rank them according to need.
You also have times there is a clear cut best player on the board. IMO you are best served taking that player.
I think even the clear cut best player also depends on what position he plays. If the "clear cut best player" is a QB, RB or TE, there's really no point drafting him. Better to trade back some to get something in return and then pick the best player available that is also at a position of need. At RB, we already have Chubb and Hunt (pending suspension), there just aren't enough carries to go around for both of these guys to be effective long term so there would be no point adding a 3rd high draft pick RB to that mix. We have bigger holes to fill than a RB.
-
Like I said, it plays a part. Sure, we aren't going to draft a QB in round 1 just like we aren't going to draft a punter in round 1. There comes a point where drafting a player at some position is just silly. We don't need to discuss that
You also look at needs if you have 2-3 players you more or less rank the same. I am sure players grade out in "ties" all the time, so you might rank them according to need.
You also have times there is a clear cut best player on the board. IMO you are best served taking that player.
I think even the clear cut best player also depends on what position he plays. If the "clear cut best player" is a QB, RB or TE, there's really no point drafting him. Better to trade back some to get something in return and then pick the best player available that is also at a position of need. At RB, we already have Chubb and Hunt (pending suspension), there just aren't enough carries to go around for both of these guys to be effective long term so there would be no point adding a 3rd high draft pick RB to that mix. We have bigger holes to fill than a RB.
I think even the clear cut best player also depends on what position he plays. If the "clear cut best player" is a QB, RB or TE, there's really no point drafting him. Better to trade back some to get something in return and then pick the best player available that is also at a position of need. At RB, we already have Chubb and Hunt (pending suspension), there just aren't enough carries to go around for both of these guys to be effective long term so there would be no point adding a 3rd high draft pick RB to that mix. We have bigger holes to fill than a RB.
I only said RB because the other poster said even if Jim Brown was there. No, I don't think we will draft a RB mostly because none are better than what we have. If Jim Brown was there, you'd be stupid to not take him. Trade the others.
My point is I would love a DT. I think we need defensive players and want us to draft several, but if Metcalf is the best guy on the board, take him. I'll leave that up to Dorsey to decide.
At no point do we not need great players.
-
RB Football drafts for the old timers.(trade Jim Brown?).#1) The Houston Oilers once sat in our draft position back in 1978..The Oilers traded from #17 to #1 for Earl Campbell..Cost to Buccaneers? #17-Doug Williams. #44-Brett Moritz. a 1979 3rd(Reggie Lewis) & 1979 5th(Chuck Fusina)..#2) In 1977 the Cowboys traded up from #14 to #2 to choose? Tony Dorsett..Seahawks received #14 & 3 2nd rounders #30,41 & 54..#3) In 1999, the Saints trade up from #12 to #5 to grab?..Ricky Williams..The Skins received a 2000 1st & 3rd, 1999 picks 71,107,144,179 & 218(3rd thru 7th) man, that had to hurt
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login