Newtown families allowed to sue Remington
-
This makes two outlandish stories in 2 days that turned out to be bogus...the other being about cops being required to call in before using their firearms.
This one IS bogus right?
RIGHT??
This makes two outlandish stories in 2 days that turned out to be bogus...the other being about cops being required to call in before using their firearms.
This one IS bogus right?
RIGHT??
This one comes from the Washington post. Uc that right?
-
This one comes from the Washington post. Uc that right?
This is basically what AOC said of Wells Fargo...
"If there was a leak from the Dakota Access Pipeline," Ocasio-Cortez asked rhetorically, "why shouldn’t Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it, since it paid for the construction of the pipeline itself?”
"Because we don't operate the project," Sloan responded. "We provide financing to the company that’s operating the pipeline.”
This is getting embarrassing.
-
This one comes from the Washington post. Uc that right?
This is basically what AOC said of Wells Fargo...
"If there was a leak from the Dakota Access Pipeline," Ocasio-Cortez asked rhetorically, "why shouldn’t Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it, since it paid for the construction of the pipeline itself?”
"Because we don't operate the project," Sloan responded. "We provide financing to the company that’s operating the pipeline.”
This is getting embarrassing.
This is basically what AOC said of Wells Fargo...
"If there was a leak from the Dakota Access Pipeline," Ocasio-Cortez asked rhetorically, "why shouldn’t Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it, since it paid for the construction of the pipeline itself?”
"Because we don't operate the project," Sloan responded. "We provide financing to the company that’s operating the pipeline.”
This is getting embarrassing.
Yeah and? I wrote about it a few days ago and whst bullshit it was.
-
This is basically what AOC said of Wells Fargo...
"If there was a leak from the Dakota Access Pipeline," Ocasio-Cortez asked rhetorically, "why shouldn’t Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it, since it paid for the construction of the pipeline itself?”
"Because we don't operate the project," Sloan responded. "We provide financing to the company that’s operating the pipeline.”
This is getting embarrassing.
Yeah and? I wrote about it a few days ago and whst bullshit it was.
Yeah and? I wrote about it a few days ago and whst bullshit it was.
I'm happy for you!
-
Yeah and? I wrote about it a few days ago and whst bullshit it was.
I'm happy for you!
I'm happy for you!
U have noticed I don't care for her one bit right? Honestly not a single left leaning person here really does. That's the difference between the two sides here. One side still has some of its rationing and reasoning faculties intact. So someone like aoc doesnt get apologized for unlike.....
-
I'm happy for you!
U have noticed I don't care for her one bit right? Honestly not a single left leaning person here really does. That's the difference between the two sides here. One side still has some of its rationing and reasoning faculties intact. So someone like aoc doesnt get apologized for unlike.....
U have noticed I don't care for her one bit right? Honestly not a single left leaning person here really does. That's the difference between the two sides here. One side still has some of its rationing and reasoning faculties intact. So someone like aoc doesnt get apologized for unlike.....
I'm happy for you!
-
I've said for some time that military level weapons like the Bushmaster should not be in he hands of civilians any more than anti-tank weapons, grenades, Claymore mines, etc. If you have seen any of the advertisement Remington uses to peddle these things, then as a parent of one of the defenseless elementary school children in the shootings, you'd likely file suit on them too if you were being honest. The 2nd amendment was written even before repeating rifles, let alone this level of military weapon. They have no place other than the military and the "well organized militia" that is called The National Guard.
-
I've said for some time that military level weapons like the Bushmaster should not be in he hands of civilians any more than anti-tank weapons, grenades, Claymore mines, etc. If you have seen any of the advertisement Remington uses to peddle these things, then as a parent of one of the defenseless elementary school children in the shootings, you'd likely file suit on them too if you were being honest. The 2nd amendment was written even before repeating rifles, let alone this level of military weapon. They have no place other than the military and the "well organized militia" that is called The National Guard.
They have no place other than the military and the "well
organizedregulated militia" that is called The National Guard.No.
A militia is generally an army or some other fighting organization of non-professional soldiers, citizens of a nation, or subjects of a state, who can be called upon for military service during a time.
Bear in mind that when the 2nd Amendment was written, there *was* no National Guard. The militia was ‘every man willing and able to show up with a musket, powder and bullets.’ The term ‘Well-regulated’ is another point of contention and confusion; a ‘well-regulated militia’ is not one subject to reams of rules and paperwork, but rather one that is skilled and capable of carrying out its duties. It wasn’t enough to be a bunch of guys with muskets; they actually had to be able to fight as a small unit. In order for that to happen, they had to have their own firearms to practice with on their own time.
Even today, with all the various Federal regular and reserve forces and the National Guard units, there is still a legal body deemed “the unorganized militia” which is basically every male citizen 17–45 who doesn’t wear a military or first-responder uniform.
Another source:
-
Thanks for the correction. I meant to say well regulated, which the National Guard is. Guys with military level weapons unaffiliated/untrained together are not.
-
Thanks for the correction. I meant to say well regulated, which the National Guard is. Guys with military level weapons unaffiliated/untrained together are not.
Thanks for the correction. I meant to say well regulated, which the National Guard is. Guys with military level weapons unaffiliated/untrained together are not.
Of course nowhere in the amendment is the National Guard or any of that specified. There's absolutely no reason that die hard couldn't put together a couple dozen men and consider them well regulated.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
same old ignorant talking point from texsag, same old no surprise.
outside of saying all anti-gun people have a profoundly low IQ, it's apparent
that it's a deliberate "in your face because you aren't like us" liberal move.
The bushmaster has a mean name that makes liberals wet their pants, I don't care.
It comes in semi-auto, lever action and bolt action. It's just like a regular gun. And the pistol grip doesn't fly off the gun and kill people like a pilotless drone.
just so willfully ignorant, liberals are.
-
Thanks for the correction. I meant to say well regulated, which the National Guard is. Guys with military level weapons unaffiliated/untrained together are not.
Of course nowhere in the amendment is the National Guard or any of that specified. There's absolutely no reason that die hard couldn't put together a couple dozen men and consider them well regulated.
WSS
Of course nowhere in the amendment is the National Guard or any of that specified. There's absolutely no reason that die hard couldn't put together a couple dozen men and consider them well regulated.
WSS
There are a lot of military retirees right here in Sun City near where I live. We could do that too, but you know we would be infiltrated by the FBI/H.S. in a NY minute to make sure we were not some kind of terrorist group.
-
especially in the obamao commie years texsag loved so much.....
-
Of course nowhere in the amendment is the National Guard or any of that specified. There's absolutely no reason that die hard couldn't put together a couple dozen men and consider them well regulated.
WSS
There are a lot of military retirees right here in Sun City near where I live. We could do that too, but you know we would be infiltrated by the FBI/H.S. in a NY minute to make sure we were not some kind of terrorist group.
There are a lot of military retirees right here in Sun City near where I live. We could do that too, but you know we would be infiltrated by the FBI/H.S. in a NY minute to make sure we were not some kind of terrorist group.
That's true but it also begs the question so what? It doesn't disprove the fact that would probably be a well regulated militia.
WSS
-
Thanks for the correction. I meant to say well regulated, which the National Guard is. Guys with military level weapons unaffiliated/untrained together are not.
Of course nowhere in the amendment is the National Guard or any of that specified. There's absolutely no reason that die hard couldn't put together a couple dozen men and consider them well regulated.
WSS
Of course nowhere in the amendment is the National Guard or any of that specified. There's absolutely no reason that die hard couldn't put together a couple dozen men and consider them well regulated.
WSS
Funny you should mention it. Here's my local militia:
-
I've said for some time that military level weapons like the Bushmaster should not be in he hands of civilians any more than anti-tank weapons, grenades, Claymore mines, etc. If you have seen any of the advertisement Remington uses to peddle these things, then as a parent of one of the defenseless elementary school children in the shootings, you'd likely file suit on them too if you were being honest. The 2nd amendment was written even before repeating rifles, let alone this level of military weapon. They have no place other than the military and the "well organized militia" that is called The National Guard.
I've said for some time that military level weapons like the Bushmaster should not be in he hands of civilians any more than anti-tank weapons, grenades, Claymore mines, etc. If you have seen any of the advertisement Remington uses to peddle these things, then as a parent of one of the defenseless elementary school children in the shootings, you'd likely file suit on them too if you were being honest. The 2nd amendment was written even before repeating rifles, let alone this level of military weapon. They have no place other than the military and the "well organized militia" that is called The National Guard.
We agreed on bumpstocks being banned. For me it was because I cannot support anything that will take a semi automatic and make it mimic an automatic. Although I agree with the slippery slope argument by Logic who disagreed with the ban it is a personal thing with me.
I have a huge disagreement with you on this issue. My battle has always been to keep semi automatic weapons legal. This is the real slippery slope when you start banning one type of a semi automatic that really opens that door to eventually banning all semi automatics. The fact of the matter is the so called assault military style rifles are not much different than other semi automatic hunting rifles in design except it is scary looking to some with the military look (which many of the features are cosmetic). It is not a real military automatic rifle. If someone for example is a veteran and likes the style of a military rifle because it is what they are used to and they are law abiding citizens why should that right be taken away?
-
If we're looking for Deep Pockets how about the architect the drew up the blueprints for the school?
WSS
-
I'll have to read what case they're trying to make.
I imagine it isn't "guns bad! Ban all guns!" like some here think.
Plus there was a law and order episode like this haha
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I'll have to read what case they're trying to make.
I imagine it isn't "guns bad! Ban all guns!" like some here think.
Plus there was a law and order episode like this haha
I'll have to read what case they're trying to make.
I imagine it isn't "guns bad! Ban all guns!" like some here think.
Plus there was a law and order episode like this haha
More like well we're probably going to miss the little fuckers but a few million simoleons apiece will certainly make that a lot more tolerable.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login