U.S. Posts Largest-Ever Monthly Budget Deficit in February
-
Speaking of budgets...
..... this is pathetic.
What is pathetic is the msm emotional knee jerk "take them out of context every time for political profit" crapola.
I know liberals don't go in for information, but here goes:
Speaking of budgets...
..... this is pathetic.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/27/us/politics/betsy-devos-special-olympics.html
In her statement on Wednesday, Ms. DeVos said that her department had allocated millions of dollars for students with disabilities.
“Make no mistake: we are focused every day on raising expectations and improving outcomes for infants and toddlers, children and youth with disabilities,” she said.
But the Special Olympics is a private organization — not a federal program — that raises millions each year, according to her statement. “Given our current budget realities,” she said, “the federal government cannot fund every worthy program, particularly ones that enjoy robust support from private donations.”
-
I'd say we should cut the teachers salaries. 5% , that should hey for a hell of a lot of Special Olympics and whatever the fuck else you guys are going to die without.
WSS
Die without? What does that even mean?
Die without? What does that even mean?
Come now you're not as dumb as Woody. A facetious reference to the cut in Special Olympics funding or any other program that could possibly suffer a decrease in funding that the opposition is going to, get ready for it, "die without."
Hope this helps.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
-
It is a lot of typical Steve's wrapped into one.
- Insinuating a "you guys" by tying posters to some kind of group
- Putting words/beliefs into other posters' mouths
- Hyperbole to make his side seem better
-
It is a lot of typical Steve's wrapped into one.
- Insinuating a "you guys" by tying posters to some kind of group
- Putting words/beliefs into other posters' mouths
- Hyperbole to make his side seem better
It is a lot of typical Steve's wrapped into one.
- Insinuating a "you guys" by tying posters to some kind of group
- Putting words/beliefs into other posters' mouths
- Hyperbole to make his side seem better
It was only the two of you that weren't able to understand what I said about the hand-wringing over the Special Olympics budget cut. Since it was only you two what is improper about using the term you guys in the situation?
And why would it be improper to say you guys if it was actually you guys who were hyperventilating over that particular budget cut? Oh wait I understand now. It's typical Woody which is whining about every fucking thing he hears. Okay got it. If Tia wants to join you on this one fair enough.
WSS
-
Die without? What does that even mean?
Come now you're not as dumb as Woody. A facetious reference to the cut in Special Olympics funding or any other program that could possibly suffer a decrease in funding that the opposition is going to, get ready for it, "die without."
Hope this helps.
WSS
Come now you're not as dumb as Woody. A facetious reference to the cut in Special Olympics funding or any other program that could possibly suffer a decrease in funding that the opposition is going to, get ready for it, "die without."
Hope this helps.
WSS
So because I have a fundamental issues with the targeting of a wonderful program, I am hyperventilating and going to 'die without it'...? Quite the ad hominem.
-
Come now you're not as dumb as Woody. A facetious reference to the cut in Special Olympics funding or any other program that could possibly suffer a decrease in funding that the opposition is going to, get ready for it, "die without."
Hope this helps.
WSS
So because I have a fundamental issues with the targeting of a wonderful program, I am hyperventilating and going to 'die without it'...? Quite the ad hominem.
So because I have a fundamental issues with the targeting of a wonderful program, I am hyperventilating and going to 'die without it'...? Quite the ad hominem.
Not necessarily but you were puzzled my my reference. I think I cleared that up and I'm surprised that you didn't understand. I'm not surprised that Woody pitched a bitch that I use the term you guys because it was in fact you two. I have no real problem with the Special Olympics but it's a private institution after all and it pays its employees a great deal of money whether or not it's nonprofit.
I have no concern whatsoever if you disagree on federal funding for it. Just that you should have understood my reference. As simple as that.
WSS
-
So because I have a fundamental issues with the targeting of a wonderful program, I am hyperventilating and going to 'die without it'...? Quite the ad hominem.
Not necessarily but you were puzzled my my reference. I think I cleared that up and I'm surprised that you didn't understand. I'm not surprised that Woody pitched a bitch that I use the term you guys because it was in fact you two. I have no real problem with the Special Olympics but it's a private institution after all and it pays its employees a great deal of money whether or not it's nonprofit.
I have no concern whatsoever if you disagree on federal funding for it. Just that you should have understood my reference. As simple as that.
WSS
Not necessarily but you were puzzled my my reference. I think I cleared that up and I'm surprised that you didn't understand. I'm not surprised that Woody pitched a bitch that I use the term you guys because it was in fact you two. I have no real problem with the Special Olympics but it's a private institution after all and it pays its employees a great deal of money whether or not it's nonprofit.
I have no concern whatsoever if you disagree on federal funding for it. Just that you should have understood my reference. As simple as that.
WSS
I understood the reference plenty well. It was just incredibly unwarranted, I was clarifying the need for the alarmist language. If you want to treat Woody with the kid glove adjectives, you're welcomed to. I'd appreciate they avoid me.
-
Not necessarily but you were puzzled my my reference. I think I cleared that up and I'm surprised that you didn't understand. I'm not surprised that Woody pitched a bitch that I use the term you guys because it was in fact you two. I have no real problem with the Special Olympics but it's a private institution after all and it pays its employees a great deal of money whether or not it's nonprofit.
I have no concern whatsoever if you disagree on federal funding for it. Just that you should have understood my reference. As simple as that.
WSS
I understood the reference plenty well. It was just incredibly unwarranted, I was clarifying the need for the alarmist language. If you want to treat Woody with the kid glove adjectives, you're welcomed to. I'd appreciate they avoid me.
I understood the reference plenty well. It was just incredibly unwarranted. If you want to treat Woody with the kid glove adjectives, you're welcomed to. I'd appreciate they avoid me.
And as we have discussed before I do. Just in this particular instance it was only the two of you and the term you guys was not at all inappropriate.
I guess if you completely understood the reference but were just being facetious you should have typed it in pink. ?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Plus, Tia, if I need to invoke the Fairness Doctrine every time any money is cut from anybodys pet project one side or the other is going to shit the bed over it.
WSS
-
Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit.
-
Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit.
Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit.
Sorry you are so oppressed. Funny nobody wants to be lumped in with you in the first place.
WSS
-
Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit.
Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit.
woodpecker translation: "Tia, would you please come out and play with me? chirp chirp"
-
I understood the reference plenty well. It was just incredibly unwarranted. If you want to treat Woody with the kid glove adjectives, you're welcomed to. I'd appreciate they avoid me.
And as we have discussed before I do. Just in this particular instance it was only the two of you and the term you guys was not at all inappropriate.
I guess if you completely understood the reference but were just being facetious you should have typed it in pink. ?
WSS
And as we have discussed before I do. Just in this particular instance it was only the two of you and the term you guys was not at all inappropriate.
I guess if you completely understood the reference but were just being facetious you should have typed it in pink. ?
WSS
What do you mean " You guys"
Plus, Tia, if I need to invoke the Fairness Doctrine every time any money is cut from anybodys pet project one side or the other is going to shit the bed over it.
WSS
While fair, I would hardly call the Special Olympics a "pet project". Given their numbers, the cut does little to nothing in terms of balancing the budget. Especially given the executive salary raises that far outpace the cost of inflation.
In short, it looks like a soul-less, greedy move.
-
And as we have discussed before I do. Just in this particular instance it was only the two of you and the term you guys was not at all inappropriate.
I guess if you completely understood the reference but were just being facetious you should have typed it in pink. ?
WSS
What do you mean " You guys"
Plus, Tia, if I need to invoke the Fairness Doctrine every time any money is cut from anybodys pet project one side or the other is going to shit the bed over it.
WSS
While fair, I would hardly call the Special Olympics a "pet project". Given their numbers, the cut does little to nothing in terms of balancing the budget. Especially given the executive salary raises that far outpace the cost of inflation.
In short, it looks like a soul-less, greedy move.
What do you mean " You guys"
While fair, I would hardly call the Special Olympics a "pet project". Given their numbers, the cut does little to nothing in terms of balancing the budget. Especially given the executive salary raises that far outpace the cost of inflation.
In short, it looks like a soul-less, greedy move.
Well you have a checkbook right?
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login