Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Brady Quinn all smiles in the post game presser

Brady Quinn all smiles in the post game presser

The Browns Board
54 19 3.4k
  • LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on
    #32

    \ said:

    Not to mention Brady actually could get guys to the line, lined up, not false starting, not getting delay of games, and not having to burn time outs. A first time starter who didn't have to burn them to get a play off, while a 2nd year starter/4th year player can't.

    Sorry to take your blinders off for a moment, but Quinn had to burn a timeout in the 3rd quarter as he and Winslow screwed up the play alignment.

  • ? Masters wrote on
    #33

    \ said:

    \ said:

    Not to mention Brady actually could get guys to the line, lined up, not false starting, not getting delay of games, and not having to burn time outs. A first time starter who didn't have to burn them to get a play off, while a 2nd year starter/4th year player can't.

    Sorry to take your blinders off for a moment, but Quinn had to burn a timeout in the 3rd quarter as he and Winslow screwed up the play alignment.

    Wow, 1 play. As oppossed to how many false starts, burned timeouts, etc. w/ DA. The guy who practices with the starters every day since week 2 of last year?

    And your memory isn't what you try to portray it as. It was a personal match up TO. The kinds you see all the time. Not the old getting to the line and realizing you only got 5 seconds left on the play clock.

  • V Vegasdogg wrote on
    #34

    \ said:

    \ said:

    Sorry to take your blinders off for a moment, but Quinn had to burn a timeout in the 3rd quarter as he and Winslow screwed up the play alignment.

    So what? He took a timeout. The kid was starting his first game on 2 days practice - maybe 1. Did you see him run to the sidelines like a bumbling doofus looking for a play while wasting 32 fooking seconds on the last drive?

    You can't make this loss about Quinn and it is killing you. You're not smug, interesting, witty or sharp.

    You're as bitter a woman scorned.

    "I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley
  • ? Masters wrote on
    #35

    \ said:

    So what? He took a timeout. The kid was starting his first game on 2 days practice - maybe 1. Did you see him run to the sidelines like a bumbling doofus looking for a play while wasting 32 fooking seconds on the last drive?

    You can't make this loss about Quinn and it is killing you. You're not smug, interesting, witty or sharp.

    You're as bitter a woman scorned.

    You know Lum was watching that game hoping with each Quinn pass for an INT, possible INT, bad 3 and outs, or anything that would make Quinn look bad.

  • LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on
    #36

    \ said:

    So what? He took a timeout.

    If it ain't no big thang then maybe milkmaid shouldn't have tried to brag up the incorrect statement in the first place, what you say vegasdogg?

  • LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on
    #37

    \ said:

    You know Lum was watching that game hoping with each Quinn pass for an INT, possible INT, bad 3 and outs, or anything that would make Quinn look bad.

    No, you're thinking of yourself watching Anderson play.

  • ? Masters wrote on
    #38

    \ said:

    \ said:

    So what? He took a timeout.

    If it ain't no big thang then maybe milkmaid shouldn't have tried to brag up the incorrect statement in the first place, what you say vegasdogg?

    What's incorrect Lumturd?

    That BQ actually could get guys to the line? He did.

    Lined up? He did.

    Not false starting (notice plural)? He did.

    Not getting delay of games? They didn't.

    Not having to burn time outs (notice the plural)? He didn't

    But you keep spinning. Why don't you go respond to the thread about DA's contract and tell us some more how the guy at the Sporting News or Peter King are fresh out of college guys who don't know anything. Maybe you can tell Adam Shafter of NFL network that too.

  • ? Masters wrote on
    #39

    \ said:

    \ said:

    You know Lum was watching that game hoping with each Quinn pass for an INT, possible INT, bad 3 and outs, or anything that would make Quinn look bad.

    No, you're thinking of yourself watching Anderson play.

    Never have, because I am a Browns fan, not a fan of guys who played at ORE. Then again, with DA I never have to hope. He'll deliver those like clockwork anyway.

  • C chubb wrote on
    #40

    Three examples of how you love to over exaggerate in an attempt to express your butt loving infatuation with DA...

    \ said:

    he could care less about the L

    the Browns were left hoping Quinn could complete 14 six yard passes in a row to pull out the win

    a screamer over Winslow's head on 4th and 1

    Yeah, that "screamer" was WAY over Winslows head... duchebag. The pass was thrown high to keep it away from the defenders that were surrounding him. It went right through his hands, not BQ's fault but K2's.

    You make it sound like he threw it 150 mph and 10 feet over his head.

    You're just upset because your days of watching DA strut around in his cute little tights are numbered.

  • R ReginaBrownsFan wrote on
    #41

    \ said:

    \ said:

    Also... BQ is all we got so you better embrace his ass.

    Actually there's a Pro Bowler on the bench that probably woulda put up 40 against that D last night.

    icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif

  • R ReginaBrownsFan wrote on
    #42

    \ said:

    and a screamer over Winslow's head on 4th and 1, the game was lost.

    icon_lol.gificon_lol.gificon_lol.gif

    That was a perfect pass.

  • S Sturim wrote on
    #43

    Lum had his clipboard out last night with his little notepad on it trying to find anything he could use here on Quinn. Someone tell me how to put him on ignore please, I can't take him anymore. I want to talk browns football here, not listen to Lum keep trying to sell us all on DA and try to somehow put a bad spin on BQ's first game. He's sellin' shit and I'm not buying. Seriously, someone tell me how I can put him on ignore...I don't need to see anymore from this assclown.

  • ? Masters wrote on
    #44

    \ said:

    Lum had his clipboard out last night with his little notepad on it trying to find anything he could use here on Quinn. Someone tell me how to put him on ignore please, I can't take him anymore. I want to talk browns football here, not listen to Lum keep trying to sell us all on DA and try to somehow put a bad spin on BQ's first game. He's sellin' shit and I'm not buying. Seriously, someone tell me how I can put him on ignore...I don't need to see anymore from this assclown.

    Go to User Control Panel, then Friends & Foes, then Foes, and enter his name.

  • S Sturim wrote on
    #45

    thanks Masters

  • ? Masters wrote on
    #46

    \ said:

    thanks Masters

    Hopefully that is how it fully works. I have never actually used it, only checked it out.

  • S Sturim wrote on
    #47

    The less I see, the better it is....he's pretty much a DA troll to me...only thing he talks about. I don't recall him talking about anything to do with the browns other than DA.

  • R rr59eagle wrote on
    #48

    \ said:

    this seems like deja vu....

    DA rolls in here and lights it up for 8 games.....coaches get film on him and shut him down....

    lets see what happens the next few weeks, see if he's consistent, see if he handles adversity. once the books out on him, it'll be more interesting to see if he can continue to play well.

    it does look promising, but im not ready to proclaim him a franchise QB.

    EXACTLY ...BQ came into a good situation playing against a terrible defense ...Elation by the masses is fine ...support the kid . but see how he manages the next 8 games and is tested before you anoint him KING>>> icon_rolleyes.gif

    The same kind of thing was being said on this board about DA last year at this time icon_rolleyes.gif

  • G Greythan wrote on
    #49

    \ said:

    The same kind of thing was being said on this board about DA last year at this time

    Speak for yourself. Many of us weren't sold on DA at all.

    As for Quinn, all we saw was a VERY promising debut; Denver's defense and all.

    The disappointing this is we could have seen this debut late last year and cashed in DA for a 1st and 3rd. Oh well.

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on
    #50

    Just what we need, another fooking Shitzburgh troll. Here is something to make you feel at home. You getting your first "new" car.

    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
  • ? Masters wrote on
    #51

    \ said:

    \ said:

    The same kind of thing was being said on this board about DA last year at this time

    Speak for yourself. Many of us weren't sold on DA at all.

    As for Quinn, all we saw was a VERY promising debut; Denver's defense and all.

    The disappointing this is we could have seen this debut late last year and cashed in DA for a 1st and 3rd. Oh well.

    No kidding. I wanted his head after the OAK start (and called him for what he is during the 2006 season when he filled in for Frye. Sure, I got suckered in for hope on DA betwen week 3 and 11 last year, but never saw in him what I saw in Quinn in 1 game, a leader.

    What Quinn does in the next 7 games is certainly critical. But I think he is gonna do fine. Keep in mind I wan't high on him coming out of the draft either.

Log in to reply