Greedy Williams

Vagitron

@nickers said:

Fuck you ass muncher... Do your own homework

Come on now nickers, I know what his college number is hence the point. He wore 26 in college.

Vagitron

@the-gipper said:

I think the concerns if you will are all totally football. If someone is felt to be weak on the run that will drop his football value. If he’s tackling is questionable that will drop his football value. I think that is all that we are seeing here but as I said many or most cornerbacks have similar concerns.

He is an unwilling participant in run support and that is listed as a character concern. He "lacks the character" to get his hands dirty and make hard tackles. He's also listed as a "ankle biter" from more than just Walter football who I don't care for much myself but they are recognizable name. I could link a bunch of stuff from scouts that follow the steelers from months before the draft but some of you despite the dates I'd link would call it "hate" or a negative bias. If you flat out avoid making plays in the run game you lack character, not the kicking your gf kind of character or breaking your kids arm but still lacking in character. Take it or leave it.

Vagitron

@tour2ma said:

It always pains me when the one making sense is the Steeler fan...

Not all concerns materialize...

Not all things that should be of concern are recognized.

In Greedy's case Walter's is simply reporting rumblings they have heard from scouts here and there.

"(H)ow Williams is going to respond to getting a multi-million dollar contract" plus "family pressure and those around him being a distraction," are non-football concerns.

While one can argue that these off-field concerns are present to some extent within every instant millionaire the NFL makes clearly that concern does not rise to a level that drops a prospect a round or more in a draft. In Greedy's case it may have.

Tour where the hell were you 5 days ago? You could have saved me some time. ??

tiamat63

Been through the Miami game, SEL game and now onto the Auburn game. Wouldn't call Greedy and "unwilling" tackler. But like I said before, it's going to be important for him to put on some upper body strength and to work on his form a bit. There are times where he goes for the legs and it reminds me of Antoine Winfield in the technique. Other times? Not so much.

That being said - for anybody wondering how our safety situation will roll for the next year, this Delpit kid from LSU flashes off the screen when I'm watching GW and he reminds me of Jamal Adams.

nickers

@vagitron said:

Come on now nickers, I know what his college number is hence the point. He wore 26 in college.

Again.. go fuck yourself steeler homo...

TexasAg1969

@vagitron said:

Come on now nickers, I know what his college number is hence the point. He wore 26 in college.

Andraez Williams

Look out for that #26.?

nickers

@texasag1969 said:

Look out for that #26.?

I think he posts just to read his own ignorant posts.. Why someone wants to hangout in a Browns forum whose not a Browns fan just behooves me.. . Go hang with your own.. I have 0 desire to stalk a steelers board...

tiamat63

@nickers said:

I think he posts just to read his own ignorant posts.. Why someone wants to hangout in a Browns forum whose not a Browns fan just behooves me.. . Go hang with your own.. I have 0 desire to stalk a steelers board...

nickers

@tiamat63 said:

Since you're the resident genius.. please tell us dick face...

tiamat63

@nickers said:

Since you're the resident genius.. please tell us dick face...

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=behoove

calfoxwc

@vagitron said:

He is an unwilling participant in run support and that is listed as a character concern. He "lacks the character" to get his hands dirty and make hard tackles. He's also listed as a "ankle biter" from more than just Walter football who I don't care for much myself but they are recognizable name. I could link a bunch of stuff from scouts that follow the steelers from months before the draft but some of you despite the dates I'd link would call it "hate" or a negative bias. If you flat out avoid making plays in the run game you lack character, not the kicking your gf kind of character or breaking your kids arm but still lacking in character. Take it or leave it.

"he doesn't like cheerios for breakfast, and I list that as a character concern". LOL

moron. On one play, he was on coverage, recogized the run, avoided the block by the wr, and went for the tackle, except the wr blocked him in the back and he still nearly got there.

He didn't have to tackle much, veg, but you're a squealer fan, that means nothing around here.

Dutch Oven

@texasag1969 said:

t

Look out for that #26.?

He was talking about the RB Snell from Kentucky, wasn't he?

Dutch Oven

@tiamat63 said:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=behoove

There's an old saying that some around here should heed:

"Better to be quiet and be thought to be an idiot than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt."

tiamat63

@dutch-oven said:

There's an old saying that some around here should heed:

"Better to be quiet and be thought to be an idiot than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt."

I wasn't even trying to be a dick, I was just having a laugh. I think nickers is just having a rough day.

nickers

@tiamat63 said:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=behoove

Lame!

TexasAg1969

@dutch-oven said:

He was talking about the RB Snell from Kentucky, wasn't he?

The thread was on Greedy, so who cares how this circular argument got from here to there and back again.?

Vagitron

@nickers said:

I think he posts just to read his own ignorant posts.. Why someone wants to hangout in a Browns forum whose not a Browns fan just behooves me.. . Go hang with your own.. I have 0 desire to stalk a steelers board...

I already explained this dip shit but apparently you can't read. I don't spend that much time here nickers.

Vagitron

@calfoxwc said:

"he doesn't like cheerios for breakfast, and I list that as a character concern". LOL

moron. On one play, he was on coverage, recogized the run, avoided the block by the wr, and went for the tackle, except the wr blocked him in the back and he still nearly got there.

He didn't have to tackle much, veg, but you're a squealer fan, that means nothing around here.

Westside isn't a steeler fan, nor is Tour and they both read the same thing I did. Now what?

calfoxwc

@vagitron said:

Westside isn't a steeler fan, nor is Tour and they both read the same thing I did. Now what?

They are fine disagreeing with me, I could be wrong, just my opinion, but you are still a dickhead squealer squid. Although, I met a steeler fan yesterday - at the grocery, he said "How about your Browns !" we had a great conversation.

He says when Brown up and left, that was a sign that all is not well in Pittsburg, said that he and his son have barfsonhisbooger tshirts but barfs is such an ASS, they think they'll throw them away. He said the time Barf was on his motorcycle, and flipped off the police...

that was the end of rooting for him. Said the Browns may very well win the division, the steelers are going to have tough time.

Real good guy. Not like you - you always were a dickhead.

And, btw, I don't have time to watch whole game films, i'm making dandelion, blackberry jam in the kitchen, and a bunch of other stuff.

(did I mention that you are a dickhead?) LOL

Comeonman

@nickers said:

I think he posts just to read his own ignorant posts.. Why someone wants to hangout in a Browns forum whose not a Browns fan just behooves me.. . Go hang with your own.. I have 0 desire to stalk a steelers board...

I hear ya. At the same time.... if ol’ Vag has the balls to stick around if/when the Browns start beating the shit out of the Squeelers on the reg, good on him.