Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Big Tech Assault on Free Speech

Big Tech Assault on Free Speech

Political Discussion
111 12 1.3k

  • Just add an open chat section to Farmers Only and Christian Mingle

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!

  • tiamat63T LogicIsForSquaresL 2 Replies
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    LOL.  What a fucking dweeb.

    This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB.  

    LogicIsForSquaresL OldBrownsFanO C 3 Replies
    😂
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    This guy just discover the internet? I hope he gets buried under trolls who know they can get a rise out of a public figure.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    LOL.  What a fucking dweeb.

    This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB.  

    @tiamat63 said:

    LOL.  What a fucking dweeb.

    This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB.  

    I bet he cried and begged kids not to call him a nerd....only to be called a nerd two seconds later.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    LOL.  What a fucking dweeb.

    This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB.  

    @tiamat63 said:

    LOL.  What a fucking dweeb.

    This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB.  

    "This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB"

    Quite a bit of difference between TBB and FB, Google and Twitter....this is not about trolling or insulting but censorship.

    F tiamat63T 2 Replies
    👍

  • This would be a good first step:

    "Most industries have some form of regulatory body that protects consumers and assists with complaints. These ombudsmen cover everything from telcos, to banking and even the NHS, with an independent team assisting in processing consumer queries. So why shouldn’t we have a similar process with tech businesses?

    A watchdog would serve to scrutinise the powers of the big tech giants, adjust market power to allow competition to thrive, and demand greater transparency to build trust, resulting in a more positive online environment for all. We’ve seen that self-regulation hasn’t worked. A governing body that is able to implement suitable regulations that are sensible and fair would be the only solution to keep unfair practices in check."

    https://www.techradar.com/news/why-its-high-time-we-regulated-big-tech

  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @tiamat63 said:

    LOL.  What a fucking dweeb.

    This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB.  

    "This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB"

    Quite a bit of difference between TBB and FB, Google and Twitter....this is not about trolling or insulting but censorship.

    w

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    "This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB"

    Quite a bit of difference between TBB and FB, Google and Twitter....this is not about trolling or insulting but censorship.

    yea - what I heard Nunes say was akin to getting punched and his arms are tied behind his back? 

    no voice because of his being shadowbanned -  but twitter has NO problem with the onslaught of biased responses...

    ❤
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @tiamat63 said:

    LOL.  What a fucking dweeb.

    This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB.  

    "This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB"

    Quite a bit of difference between TBB and FB, Google and Twitter....this is not about trolling or insulting but censorship.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    "This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB"

    Quite a bit of difference between TBB and FB, Google and Twitter....this is not about trolling or insulting but censorship.

    No, in this case it has nothing to do with censorship.  He's suing for slander and pointing out the multiple accounts trolling him.

    Did...did you actually listen to what you posted?

    edit:  Essentially he's crying because of parody accounts and critics online. 

    double edit:

    “As part of its agenda to squelch Nunes’ voice, cause him extreme pain and suffering, influence the 2018 Congressional election, and distract, intimidate and interfere with Nunes’ investigation into corruption and Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential Election, Twitter did absolutely nothing,” the complaint said.... 

    Now keep in mind Nunes account has not been suspended or muted in anyway so he is welcomed to respond to said tweets.    

    One tweet is from DevinNunes'Cow   (no need for explanation here)

    ""Devin's boots are full of manure. He's udder-ly worthless and its pasture time to move him to prison," reads one tweet from Devin Nunes' Cow."

    So if you're allowed to sue over that, then I'll be real when I say the President is going to be in a world of financial hurt really fucking quickly with his twitter antics.

    OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply

  • Haha this dork was crying over a Twitter account that uses cattle puns.

  • Nunes would put his head in an oven after a week on this forum. 

  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    "This is equivalent to being trolled and insulted on here, then suing TBB"

    Quite a bit of difference between TBB and FB, Google and Twitter....this is not about trolling or insulting but censorship.

    No, in this case it has nothing to do with censorship.  He's suing for slander and pointing out the multiple accounts trolling him.

    Did...did you actually listen to what you posted?

    edit:  Essentially he's crying because of parody accounts and critics online. 

    double edit:

    “As part of its agenda to squelch Nunes’ voice, cause him extreme pain and suffering, influence the 2018 Congressional election, and distract, intimidate and interfere with Nunes’ investigation into corruption and Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential Election, Twitter did absolutely nothing,” the complaint said.... 

    Now keep in mind Nunes account has not been suspended or muted in anyway so he is welcomed to respond to said tweets.    

    One tweet is from DevinNunes'Cow   (no need for explanation here)

    ""Devin's boots are full of manure. He's udder-ly worthless and its pasture time to move him to prison," reads one tweet from Devin Nunes' Cow."

    So if you're allowed to sue over that, then I'll be real when I say the President is going to be in a world of financial hurt really fucking quickly with his twitter antics.

    @tiamat63 said:

    No, in this case it has nothing to do with censorship.  He's suing for slander and pointing out the multiple accounts trolling him.

    Did...did you actually listen to what you posted?

    edit:  Essentially he's crying because of parody accounts and critics online. 

    Shadow banning is just a more secretive form of censorship.

    LogicIsForSquaresL tiamat63T 2 Replies
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @tiamat63 said:

    No, in this case it has nothing to do with censorship.  He's suing for slander and pointing out the multiple accounts trolling him.

    Did...did you actually listen to what you posted?

    edit:  Essentially he's crying because of parody accounts and critics online. 

    Shadow banning is just a more secretive form of censorship.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Shadow banning is just a more secretive form of censorship.

    On their free, privately owned website? Ghoolie got a lawsuit in the works?

  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @tiamat63 said:

    No, in this case it has nothing to do with censorship.  He's suing for slander and pointing out the multiple accounts trolling him.

    Did...did you actually listen to what you posted?

    edit:  Essentially he's crying because of parody accounts and critics online. 

    Shadow banning is just a more secretive form of censorship.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Shadow banning is just a more secretive form of censorship.

    Only there is little to no evidence to back up this claim. It's a conspiracy theory in truth.  Even Nunes' and his followers on Twitter admit his content is fully accessible at his home page 24/7 and his tweets are visible to any and all of his followers.     

    So to make clear - No Censorship and this is about slander. 

    Public figures are subject to criticism and ridicule protected by law in this case. - So...  that lawsuit is DoA.

    Now you move to - "Shadow banning"...   or more accurately, a conspiracy theory term Nunes' heard and is propagating. Even though his followers admit there has been zero restriction to content posted to his twitter provided you follow him.     

    Sounds like he's mad that he isn't at the top of a recommend search result, in which case, neither am I.   Guess I should sue Google for that?

    Are we about done here?

    C OldBrownsFanO 2 Replies

  • Nunes is also suing newspapers over slander.

  • hey didnt u fucktwats post a thread here just last week highlighting an AOC parody account? would it be in anyway shsoe or form possible fir one of u to show the smallest most infintisimal minutiae of principle and consistency? because every day u validate every toxic utterance ive written about u. 

  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Shadow banning is just a more secretive form of censorship.

    Only there is little to no evidence to back up this claim. It's a conspiracy theory in truth.  Even Nunes' and his followers on Twitter admit his content is fully accessible at his home page 24/7 and his tweets are visible to any and all of his followers.     

    So to make clear - No Censorship and this is about slander. 

    Public figures are subject to criticism and ridicule protected by law in this case. - So...  that lawsuit is DoA.

    Now you move to - "Shadow banning"...   or more accurately, a conspiracy theory term Nunes' heard and is propagating. Even though his followers admit there has been zero restriction to content posted to his twitter provided you follow him.     

    Sounds like he's mad that he isn't at the top of a recommend search result, in which case, neither am I.   Guess I should sue Google for that?

    Are we about done here?

    @tiamat63 said:

    Are we about done here?

    no. They will swim to another unrelated faux grievance

  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Shadow banning is just a more secretive form of censorship.

    Only there is little to no evidence to back up this claim. It's a conspiracy theory in truth.  Even Nunes' and his followers on Twitter admit his content is fully accessible at his home page 24/7 and his tweets are visible to any and all of his followers.     

    So to make clear - No Censorship and this is about slander. 

    Public figures are subject to criticism and ridicule protected by law in this case. - So...  that lawsuit is DoA.

    Now you move to - "Shadow banning"...   or more accurately, a conspiracy theory term Nunes' heard and is propagating. Even though his followers admit there has been zero restriction to content posted to his twitter provided you follow him.     

    Sounds like he's mad that he isn't at the top of a recommend search result, in which case, neither am I.   Guess I should sue Google for that?

    Are we about done here?

    @tiamat63 said:

    Only there is little to no evidence to back up this claim. It's a conspiracy theory in truth.  Even Nunes' and his followers on Twitter admit his content is fully accessible at his home page 24/7 and his tweets are visible to any and all of his followers.     

    So to make clear - No Censorship and this is about slander. 

    Now you move to - "Shadow banning"...   or more accurately, a conspiracy theory term Nunes' heard and even his followers admit doesn't restrict ANY access to his tweets provided you follow him.  

    Are we about done here?

    Nunes did not say his tweets were visible to any and all of his followers, he said the opposite. 

    "look, they don't want to call it shadow banning, that's fine. They can call it whatever they want to call it. But the fact of the matter is people could not see my tweets."

    Shadow banning is not just some conspiracy theory:

     Twitter Shadow Banned Me This Week & I Have the Proof

    https://medium.com/@deathd0tcom/twitter-shadow-banned-me-this-week-i-have-the-proof-39a826ca6d03

    tiamat63T C 2 Replies
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @tiamat63 said:

    Only there is little to no evidence to back up this claim. It's a conspiracy theory in truth.  Even Nunes' and his followers on Twitter admit his content is fully accessible at his home page 24/7 and his tweets are visible to any and all of his followers.     

    So to make clear - No Censorship and this is about slander. 

    Now you move to - "Shadow banning"...   or more accurately, a conspiracy theory term Nunes' heard and even his followers admit doesn't restrict ANY access to his tweets provided you follow him.  

    Are we about done here?

    Nunes did not say his tweets were visible to any and all of his followers, he said the opposite. 

    "look, they don't want to call it shadow banning, that's fine. They can call it whatever they want to call it. But the fact of the matter is people could not see my tweets."

    Shadow banning is not just some conspiracy theory:

     Twitter Shadow Banned Me This Week & I Have the Proof

    https://medium.com/@deathd0tcom/twitter-shadow-banned-me-this-week-i-have-the-proof-39a826ca6d03

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Nunes did not say his tweets were visible to any and all of his followers, he said the opposite. 

    "look, they don't want to call it shadow banning, that's fine. They can call it whatever they want to call it. But the fact of the matter is people could not see my tweets."

    Shadow banning is not just some conspiracy theory:

     Twitter Shadow Banned Me This Week & I Have the Proof

    https://medium.com/@deathd0tcom/twitter-shadow-banned-me-this-week-i-have-the-proof-39a826ca6d03

    Yes and his followers confirmed all content on his page (as he later did) is and has been completely visible. 

    You're welcomed to go start a Twitter, follow the man and report back.  If he tweets something and it randomly goes missing (while being within the ToS) then you have an argument.  But if I go there right now, you can see all of his posts with zero restriction. 

    So.... What exactly has been banned? The term is almost a contradiction in and of itself. 

    OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @tiamat63 said:

    Only there is little to no evidence to back up this claim. It's a conspiracy theory in truth.  Even Nunes' and his followers on Twitter admit his content is fully accessible at his home page 24/7 and his tweets are visible to any and all of his followers.     

    So to make clear - No Censorship and this is about slander. 

    Now you move to - "Shadow banning"...   or more accurately, a conspiracy theory term Nunes' heard and even his followers admit doesn't restrict ANY access to his tweets provided you follow him.  

    Are we about done here?

    Nunes did not say his tweets were visible to any and all of his followers, he said the opposite. 

    "look, they don't want to call it shadow banning, that's fine. They can call it whatever they want to call it. But the fact of the matter is people could not see my tweets."

    Shadow banning is not just some conspiracy theory:

     Twitter Shadow Banned Me This Week & I Have the Proof

    https://medium.com/@deathd0tcom/twitter-shadow-banned-me-this-week-i-have-the-proof-39a826ca6d03

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Nunes did not say his tweets were visible to any and all of his followers, he said the opposite. 

    "look, they don't want to call it shadow banning, that's fine. They can call it whatever they want to call it. But the fact of the matter is people could not see my tweets."

    Shadow banning is not just some conspiracy theory:

     Twitter Shadow Banned Me This Week & I Have the Proof

    https://medium.com/@deathd0tcom/twitter-shadow-banned-me-this-week-i-have-the-proof-39a826ca6d03

    i feel as if u lack a certain amt of core "tech" knowledge so what Tia is trying to convey to u may not be taking. So either read what Tia is saying to u and go verify it urself......or stfu. 

Log in to reply