Skip to content

Mueller's TV statement

Political Discussion
108 15 1.3k
  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Mueller looked, talked and walked feeble.  I think he is suffering from Dementia.

    Just put yourself in his shoes for "just a moment". I know that's hard for a lot of you guys. Imagine the stress that guy is under....50% of the country hates your guts because you're investigating their king. The other half hates your guts cause you did your job but didn't come to the conclusions THEY wanted you to. Nothing you've ever done in your life compares to what he went through the last 2 years..he's in his mid 70's btw. And i'll bet he looks back at these two years and says active combat wasn't this much horseshit. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    Just put yourself in his shoes for "just a moment". I know that's hard for a lot of you guys. Imagine the stress that guy is under....50% of the country hates your guts because you're investigating their king. The other half hates your guts cause you did your job but didn't come to the conclusions THEY wanted you to. Nothing you've ever done in your life compares to what he went through the last 2 years..he's in his mid 70's btw. And i'll bet he looks back at these two years and says active combat wasn't this much horseshit. 

    Mueller could have made it a bit easier on himself by having a more balanced group of prosecutors on his staff instead of packing it with partisan democrats:

    The Mueller Probe: A Year-Old Hyperpartisan Circus

    Team Mueller should be scrupulously nonpartisan (e.g. no donors to either party or 2016 nominee) or at least look like America (split dialectically between Democrats and Republicans). Instead, as the Daily Caller confirms, Mueller’s 17 prosecutors resemble a local Democratic club.

  • “Until today I have defended Mueller against accusations that he is a partisan; I have now changed my mind!” – Alan Dershowitz BLASTS Mueller’s statement

    THE HILL – Comey was universally criticized for going beyond his responsibility to state whether there was sufficient evidence to indict Clinton. Mueller, however, did even more. He went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump. By implying that President Trump may have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.

    Until today, I have defended Mueller against accusations that he is a partisan. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the role of a prosecutor in our justice system.

    Virtually everybody agrees that, in the normal case, a prosecutor should never go beyond publicly disclosing that there is insufficient evidence to indict. No responsible prosecutor should ever suggest that the subject of his investigation might be guilty even though there was insufficient evidence or other reasons not to indict. Supporters of Mueller will argue that this is not an ordinary case, that he is not an ordinary prosecutor, and that President Trump is not an ordinary subject of an investigation. They are wrong. The rules should not be different here.

    No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help the Democrats and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for partisan advantage.

    https://therightscoop.com/until-today-i-have-defended-mueller-against-accusations-that-he-is-a-partisan-i-have-now-changed-my-mind-alan-dershowitz-blasts-muellers-statement/

  • @clevfan4life said:

    Just put yourself in his shoes for "just a moment". I know that's hard for a lot of you guys. Imagine the stress that guy is under....50% of the country hates your guts because you're investigating their king. The other half hates your guts cause you did your job but didn't come to the conclusions THEY wanted you to. Nothing you've ever done in your life compares to what he went through the last 2 years..he's in his mid 70's btw. And i'll bet he looks back at these two years and says active combat wasn't this much horseshit. 

    Mueller could have made it a bit easier on himself by having a more balanced group of prosecutors on his staff instead of packing it with partisan democrats:

    The Mueller Probe: A Year-Old Hyperpartisan Circus

    Team Mueller should be scrupulously nonpartisan (e.g. no donors to either party or 2016 nominee) or at least look like America (split dialectically between Democrats and Republicans). Instead, as the Daily Caller confirms, Mueller’s 17 prosecutors resemble a local Democratic club.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Mueller could have made it a bit easier on himself by having a more balanced group of prosecutors on his staff instead of packing it with partisan democrats:

     

    What are you not able to digest here OBF? The guy didn't give the dems what they wanted so now they're turning on him. He made it "crystal" clear that this was the last time he would speak on this. I don't give a fuck anymore about you republicans and democrats...I think you're all swine. That guy is a grown ass man and I wish there was a way to nominate him as president. Cause the guy I saw in that video is precisely the kind of serious customer I think is long over due in this country. 

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    Mueller could have made it a bit easier on himself by having a more balanced group of prosecutors on his staff instead of packing it with partisan democrats:

     

    What are you not able to digest here OBF? The guy didn't give the dems what they wanted so now they're turning on him. He made it "crystal" clear that this was the last time he would speak on this. I don't give a fuck anymore about you republicans and democrats...I think you're all swine. That guy is a grown ass man and I wish there was a way to nominate him as president. Cause the guy I saw in that video is precisely the kind of serious customer I think is long over due in this country. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    What are you not able to digest here OBF? The guy didn't give the dems what they wanted so now they're turning on him. He made it "crystal" clear that this was the last time he would speak on this. I don't give a fuck anymore about you republicans and democrats...I think you're all swine. That guy is a grown ass man and I wish there was a way to nominate him as president. Cause the guy I saw in that video is precisely the kind of serious customer I think is long over due in this country. 

    What part are you not getting about Mueller packing his investigation with partisan democrats or now he is doing something no prosecutor ever does such as saying Trump might be guilty even though he did not have enough evidence to indict. 

    "Virtually everybody agrees that, in the normal case, a prosecutor should never go beyond publicly disclosing that there is insufficient evidence to indict. No responsible prosecutor should ever suggest that the subject of his investigation might be guilty even though there was insufficient evidence or other reasons not to indict. Supporters of Mueller will argue that this is not an ordinary case, that he is not an ordinary prosecutor, and that President Trump is not an ordinary subject of an investigation. They are wrong. The rules should not be different here.

    No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help the Democrats and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for partisan advantage."

    Alan Dershowitz

  • “If we had confidence that the president did not commit a crime we would have said so,” he said. Mueller cited a Department of Justice policy prohibiting a special prosecutor from charging sitting presidents: “Charging the president with a crime,” he said, “was therefore not an option we could consider.”

    this is exactly what was said when the report first came out. 

  • he clarified his position today to both sides. And it's the last time it happens. 

  • “If we had confidence that the president did not commit a crime we would have said so,” he said. Mueller cited a Department of Justice policy prohibiting a special prosecutor from charging sitting presidents: “Charging the president with a crime,” he said, “was therefore not an option we could consider.”

    this is exactly what was said when the report first came out. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    “If we had confidence that the president did not commit a crime we would have said so,” he said. Mueller cited a Department of Justice policy prohibiting a special prosecutor from charging sitting presidents: “Charging the president with a crime,” he said, “was therefore not an option we could consider.”

    this is exactly what was said when the report first came out. 

  • again, OBF..time to think for yourself....what has changed since the report was released? Nothing was said today that wasn't said weeks ago. Stop furnishing me talking head links and just think for yourself dammit. 

  • Image may contain: 1 person, text and outdoor

  • again, OBF..time to think for yourself....what has changed since the report was released? Nothing was said today that wasn't said weeks ago. Stop furnishing me talking head links and just think for yourself dammit. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    again, OBF..time to think for yourself....what has changed since the report was released? Nothing was said today that wasn't said weeks ago. Stop furnishing me talking head links and just think for yourself dammit. 

    That video by Andy McCarthy is from someone smarter than either you or me. You should take the time to watch it. Same with the article by Alan Dershowitz who defended Mueller as being non partisan up until today.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    again, OBF..time to think for yourself....what has changed since the report was released? Nothing was said today that wasn't said weeks ago. Stop furnishing me talking head links and just think for yourself dammit. 

    That video by Andy McCarthy is from someone smarter than either you or me. You should take the time to watch it. Same with the article by Alan Dershowitz who defended Mueller as being non partisan up until today.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    That video by Andy McCarthy is from someone smarter than either you or me. You should take the time to watch it. Same with the article by Alan Dershowitz who defended Mueller as being non partisan up until today.

    I don't listen to talking heads. And that's what he is. You wouldn't disagree with me if I posted a video from one of CNN's talking heads so im not going to indulge you on this discussion. 

    THINK

    FOR

    YOUR

    SELF

  • Cleve if you can't see this whole sham of an investigation was always about impeachment of Trump then stay blind. The silver lining is that the dems will overplay their hand and try to impeach Trump which will fail and guarantee Trump wins in 2020. 

  • Cleve if you can't see this whole sham of an investigation was always about impeachment of Trump then stay blind. The silver lining is that the dems will overplay their hand and try to impeach Trump which will fail and guarantee Trump wins in 2020. 

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Cleve if you can't see this whole sham of an investigation was always about impeachment of Trump then stay blind. The silver lining is that the dems will overplay their hand and try to impeach Trump which will fail and guarantee Trump wins in 2020. 

    This about "mueller" tho. This isn't about the origins of the investigations. Your all trying to libel a man that from my perspective comes across like the only man in the room in Washington. The guy made it clear he was obstructed, and he was. That evidence is not debateable. 

  • the Russians’ efforts to interfere in the 2016 election “deserves the attention of every American.”

    when the time comes that a democratic president has been "installed" by a foreign govt or theres circumstantial evidence for it, I will remind you all what this man said today. 

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    Cleve if you can't see this whole sham of an investigation was always about impeachment of Trump then stay blind. The silver lining is that the dems will overplay their hand and try to impeach Trump which will fail and guarantee Trump wins in 2020. 

    This about "mueller" tho. This isn't about the origins of the investigations. Your all trying to libel a man that from my perspective comes across like the only man in the room in Washington. The guy made it clear he was obstructed, and he was. That evidence is not debateable. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    This about "mueller" tho. This isn't about the origins of the investigations. Your all trying to libel a man that from my perspective comes across like the only man in the room in Washington. The guy made it clear he was obstructed, and he was. That evidence is not debateable. 

    What evidence?

    @clevfan4life said:

    I don't listen to talking heads. And that's what he is. You wouldn't disagree with me if I posted a video from one of CNN's talking heads so im not going to indulge you on this discussion. 

    THINK

    FOR

    YOUR

    SELF

    YOU

    AREN'T

    THINKING

    FOR

    YOURSELF

    If you were you  wouldn't believe what Maxine Waters is telling you.

  • the Russians’ efforts to interfere in the 2016 election “deserves the attention of every American.”

    when the time comes that a democratic president has been "installed" by a foreign govt or theres circumstantial evidence for it, I will remind you all what this man said today. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    the Russians’ efforts to interfere in the 2016 election “deserves the attention of every American.”

    Hey dumbass, Obammy knew about the fuckin’ Russkies before the election...why didn’t HE do something about it?

    ☕️

  • the Russians’ efforts to interfere in the 2016 election “deserves the attention of every American.”

    when the time comes that a democratic president has been "installed" by a foreign govt or theres circumstantial evidence for it, I will remind you all what this man said today. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    the Russians’ efforts to interfere in the 2016 election “deserves the attention of every American.”

    when the time comes that a democratic president has been "installed" by a foreign govt or theres circumstantial evidence for it, I will remind you all what this man said today. 

    OK, so how is it that Trump was installed by a foreign govt ?  What was the process?

    The only Russian collusion was that of Hillary and the DNC.

    THINK

    FOR

    YOUR

    SELF

    DUMB

    ASS.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    the Russians’ efforts to interfere in the 2016 election “deserves the attention of every American.”

    when the time comes that a democratic president has been "installed" by a foreign govt or theres circumstantial evidence for it, I will remind you all what this man said today. 

    OK, so how is it that Trump was installed by a foreign govt ?  What was the process?

    The only Russian collusion was that of Hillary and the DNC.

    THINK

    FOR

    YOUR

    SELF

    DUMB

    ASS.

    @gorka said:

    OK, so how is it that Trump was installed by a foreign govt ?  What was the process?

    The only Russian collusion was that of Hillary and the DNC.

    THINK

    FOR

    YOUR

    SELF

    MORON.

    First you open the border, next you overwhelm the border with Millions of illegal invaders and give them the right to vote in government elections.

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    That video by Andy McCarthy is from someone smarter than either you or me. You should take the time to watch it. Same with the article by Alan Dershowitz who defended Mueller as being non partisan up until today.

    I don't listen to talking heads. And that's what he is. You wouldn't disagree with me if I posted a video from one of CNN's talking heads so im not going to indulge you on this discussion. 

    THINK

    FOR

    YOUR

    SELF

    @clevfan4life said:

    I don't listen to talking heads. And that's what he is. You wouldn't disagree with me if I posted a video from one of CNN's talking heads so im not going to indulge you on this discussion. 

    You don't listen cause you're afraid. What do you listen to Clevis?  Your opinions and ideas are formulated by what you see, read or hear.

    Alan Dershowitz is a Harvard law professor and a liberal democrat...recently disowned by Trump hating liberal slimeballs  like you because decided he was gonna tell it like it is and you don't appreciate it much cause it aint what you want to hear. Fuck the truth.

     Listen to him and learn.

    Your ignorance and or denial is really showing now Clevis.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    I don't listen to talking heads. And that's what he is. You wouldn't disagree with me if I posted a video from one of CNN's talking heads so im not going to indulge you on this discussion. 

    You don't listen cause you're afraid. What do you listen to Clevis?  Your opinions and ideas are formulated by what you see, read or hear.

    Alan Dershowitz is a Harvard law professor and a liberal democrat...recently disowned by Trump hating liberal slimeballs  like you because decided he was gonna tell it like it is and you don't appreciate it much cause it aint what you want to hear. Fuck the truth.

     Listen to him and learn.

    Your ignorance and or denial is really showing now Clevis.

    @gorka said:

    You don't listen cause you're afraid. .

    afraid of being fed partisan rubbish, yes. When a liberal says something you guys are ok with, than we should listen to him...but when a U.S congressman says Trump should be impeached well clearly that guys a rino and deep state blah blah blah. 

    I just don't listen to any of them. That's why im demonstrably smarter than you. ?