Pure Perfection
-
Facebook has that covered ...just censor it.
Unfortunately for you there are 0 other ways to share anything on the internet
Unfortunately for you there are 0 other ways to share anything on the internet
Not with the platform that reaches tens of millions..
-
LOL LOL LOL
-
Unfortunately for you there are 0 other ways to share anything on the internet
Not with the platform that reaches tens of millions..
Not with the platform that reaches tens of millions..
So that is the problem? Other platforms don’t have the same reach so Facebook should be regulated? Conservatives could migrate to other platforms but they are too whiny/lazy to buck up and do it.
-
Not with the platform that reaches tens of millions..
So that is the problem? Other platforms don’t have the same reach so Facebook should be regulated? Conservatives could migrate to other platforms but they are too whiny/lazy to buck up and do it.
So that is the problem? Other platforms don’t have the same reach so Facebook should be regulated? Conservatives could migrate to other platforms but they are too whiny/lazy to buck up and do it.
Like this whiny lazy triple amputee veteran who was kicked off Facebook?
-
So that is the problem? Other platforms don’t have the same reach so Facebook should be regulated? Conservatives could migrate to other platforms but they are too whiny/lazy to buck up and do it.
Like this whiny lazy triple amputee veteran who was kicked off Facebook?
Like this whiny lazy triple amputee veteran who was kicked off Facebook?
Emotional pleas don’t fly. The number of limbs he has or how he lost them has zero to do with his ability to seek out a different platform. It looks as if Facebook is fucking over consumers who can now move to a platform that accommodates their views. Facebook’s loss. The free market solves the problem.
-
Like this whiny lazy triple amputee veteran who was kicked off Facebook?
Emotional pleas don’t fly. The number of limbs he has or how he lost them has zero to do with his ability to seek out a different platform. It looks as if Facebook is fucking over consumers who can now move to a platform that accommodates their views. Facebook’s loss. The free market solves the problem.
Emotional pleas don’t fly. The number of limbs he has or how he lost them has zero to do with his ability to seek out a different platform. It looks as if Facebook is fucking over consumers who can now move to a platform that accommodates their views. Facebook’s loss. The free market solves the problem.
Well we agree that FB is discriminating against conservative voices. So what is the remedy? There is nothing to compare with FB particularly for advertisement. You talked about going to MeWe that is great for you selling a couple of guns but if you were selling product nationwide or even worldwide I don't think MeWe is going to do it for you. i would rather fight FB and force them not to discriminate:
xborg disqus_dDOVNnCOZH • 9 months ago
"I think there is fundamental problem with this common misnomer of 'private company'. Facebook is not a government agency (ostensibly at least) but any company that goes public by listing itself on public exchanges, overseen by public governmental agencies, and soliciting funds from any and all persons can no longer be said to be a private company. This should be self-evident yet there is a huge disconnect between the broad public access and benefits that 'going public' gives a corporation compared to its responsibilities as a corporate citizen. This needs to change. Public corporations need to be subject to the Constitution the same as public governmental institutions are. Corporations are now even regarded as persons under the law when it comes to rights but not when it comes to the responsibilities of citizenship. Publicly listed and traded corporations are getting a free ride, in too many cases while they rape the public, with malice, at the same time."
-
Emotional pleas don’t fly. The number of limbs he has or how he lost them has zero to do with his ability to seek out a different platform. It looks as if Facebook is fucking over consumers who can now move to a platform that accommodates their views. Facebook’s loss. The free market solves the problem.
Well we agree that FB is discriminating against conservative voices. So what is the remedy? There is nothing to compare with FB particularly for advertisement. You talked about going to MeWe that is great for you selling a couple of guns but if you were selling product nationwide or even worldwide I don't think MeWe is going to do it for you. i would rather fight FB and force them not to discriminate:
xborg disqus_dDOVNnCOZH • 9 months ago
"I think there is fundamental problem with this common misnomer of 'private company'. Facebook is not a government agency (ostensibly at least) but any company that goes public by listing itself on public exchanges, overseen by public governmental agencies, and soliciting funds from any and all persons can no longer be said to be a private company. This should be self-evident yet there is a huge disconnect between the broad public access and benefits that 'going public' gives a corporation compared to its responsibilities as a corporate citizen. This needs to change. Public corporations need to be subject to the Constitution the same as public governmental institutions are. Corporations are now even regarded as persons under the law when it comes to rights but not when it comes to the responsibilities of citizenship. Publicly listed and traded corporations are getting a free ride, in too many cases while they rape the public, with malice, at the same time."
Well we agree that FB is discriminating against conservative voices. So what is the remedy? There is nothing to compare with FB particularly for advertisement. You talked about going to MeWe that is great for you selling a couple of guns but if you were selling product nationwide or even worldwide I don't think MeWe is going to do it for you. i would rather fight FB and force them not to discriminate:
xborg disqus_dDOVNnCOZH • 9 months ago
"I think there is fundamental problem with this common misnomer of 'private company'. Facebook is not a government agency (ostensibly at least) but any company that goes public by listing itself on public exchanges, overseen by public governmental agencies, and soliciting funds from any and all persons can no longer be said to be a private company. This should be self-evident yet there is a huge disconnect between the broad public access and benefits that 'going public' gives a corporation compared to its responsibilities as a corporate citizen. This needs to change. Public corporations need to be subject to the Constitution the same as public governmental institutions are. Corporations are now even regarded as persons under the law when it comes to rights but not when it comes to the responsibilities of citizenship. Publicly listed and traded corporations are getting a free ride, in too many cases while they rape the public, with malice, at the same time."
So.... no discrimination against gays.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Going public =\= being public in the terms that person is thinking. If so, any company selling common stock could have every single thing they choose to do with their privately owned firm (shareholders are still not the government) manipulated by the will of people with no financial horse in the race.
If I own a men’s clothing store, should I be forced to carry kids clothes because my store is discriminating against kids by not making my services available for selling kids clothing?
-
Going public =\= being public in the terms that person is thinking. If so, any company selling common stock could have every single thing they choose to do with their privately owned firm (shareholders are still not the government) manipulated by the will of people with no financial horse in the race.
If I own a men’s clothing store, should I be forced to carry kids clothes because my store is discriminating against kids by not making my services available for selling kids clothing?
If I own a men’s clothing store, should I be forced to carry kids clothes because my store is discriminating against kids by not making my services available for selling kids clothing?
"We" own, comrade!
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
If a problem arises in the free market, create an alternative that wants your business. Why would conservatives even want to use Facebook knowing they don’t want them as users?
-
If I own a men’s clothing store, should I be forced to carry kids clothes because my store is discriminating against kids by not making my services available for selling kids clothing?
"We" own, comrade!
"We" own, comrade!
It is part of the collective, comrade!
-
Well we agree that FB is discriminating against conservative voices. So what is the remedy? There is nothing to compare with FB particularly for advertisement. You talked about going to MeWe that is great for you selling a couple of guns but if you were selling product nationwide or even worldwide I don't think MeWe is going to do it for you. i would rather fight FB and force them not to discriminate:
xborg disqus_dDOVNnCOZH • 9 months ago
"I think there is fundamental problem with this common misnomer of 'private company'. Facebook is not a government agency (ostensibly at least) but any company that goes public by listing itself on public exchanges, overseen by public governmental agencies, and soliciting funds from any and all persons can no longer be said to be a private company. This should be self-evident yet there is a huge disconnect between the broad public access and benefits that 'going public' gives a corporation compared to its responsibilities as a corporate citizen. This needs to change. Public corporations need to be subject to the Constitution the same as public governmental institutions are. Corporations are now even regarded as persons under the law when it comes to rights but not when it comes to the responsibilities of citizenship. Publicly listed and traded corporations are getting a free ride, in too many cases while they rape the public, with malice, at the same time."
So.... no discrimination against gays.
So.... no discrimination against gays.
Let me know when the first gay couple sues when they go to a Muslim bakery who won't make their wedding cake? I'll wait.
-
Side note: OBF I know we don’t agree on much but you are a reasonable guy to debate with. So no malice even if I ball bust a little with the comrade talk.
-
Side note: OBF I know we don’t agree on much but you are a reasonable guy to debate with. So no malice even if I ball bust a little with the comrade talk.
Side note: OBF I know we don’t agree on much but you are a reasonable guy to debate with. So no malice even if I ball bust a little with the comrade talk.
Not a problem but I don't consider that triple amputee veteran fighting Facebook any kind of a commie..
-
So.... no discrimination against gays.
Let me know when the first gay couple sues when they go to a Muslim bakery who won't make their wedding cake? I'll wait.
Let me know when the first gay couple sues when they go to a Muslim bakery who won't make their wedding cake? I'll wait.
It was shenanigans that the bakery was forced to do that in my opinion. The couple should have taken their money to another baker. I wouldn’t want to eat anything that was prepared by people who don’t want me consuming their food.
-
Side note: OBF I know we don’t agree on much but you are a reasonable guy to debate with. So no malice even if I ball bust a little with the comrade talk.
Not a problem but I don't consider that triple amputee veteran fighting Facebook any kind of a commie..
Not a problem but I don't consider that triple amputee veteran fighting Facebook any kind of a commie..
He is at least a socialist if he wants a private company to accommodate his views when he could move to other platforms or push for the creation of a Conservative social media platform. Facebook won’t change unless they feel the pinch from losing ad dollars geared towards conservative users.
-
Let me know when the first gay couple sues when they go to a Muslim bakery who won't make their wedding cake? I'll wait.
It was shenanigans that the bakery was forced to do that in my opinion. The couple should have taken their money to another baker. I wouldn’t want to eat anything that was prepared by people who don’t want me consuming their food.
It was shenanigans that the bakery was forced to do that in my opinion. The couple should have taken their money to another baker. I wouldn’t want to eat anything that was prepared by people who don’t want me consuming their food.
That is why I wouldn't wear a MAGA hat to a restaurant either.
-
It was shenanigans that the bakery was forced to do that in my opinion. The couple should have taken their money to another baker. I wouldn’t want to eat anything that was prepared by people who don’t want me consuming their food.
That is why I wouldn't wear a MAGA hat to a restaurant either.
That is why I wouldn't wear a MAGA hat to a restaurant either.
I have had friends on both ends of the political spectrum get their cars keyed by people pissed about political stickers.
-
That is why I wouldn't wear a MAGA hat to a restaurant either.
I have had friends on both ends of the political spectrum get their cars keyed by people pissed about political stickers.
I have had friends on both ends of the political spectrum get their cars keyed by people pissed about political stickers.
That is also why I don't have any political bumper stickers either although I saw this bumper sticker the other day I liked:
-
Well we agree that FB is discriminating against conservative voices. So what is the remedy? There is nothing to compare with FB particularly for advertisement. You talked about going to MeWe that is great for you selling a couple of guns but if you were selling product nationwide or even worldwide I don't think MeWe is going to do it for you. i would rather fight FB and force them not to discriminate:
xborg disqus_dDOVNnCOZH • 9 months ago
"I think there is fundamental problem with this common misnomer of 'private company'. Facebook is not a government agency (ostensibly at least) but any company that goes public by listing itself on public exchanges, overseen by public governmental agencies, and soliciting funds from any and all persons can no longer be said to be a private company. This should be self-evident yet there is a huge disconnect between the broad public access and benefits that 'going public' gives a corporation compared to its responsibilities as a corporate citizen. This needs to change. Public corporations need to be subject to the Constitution the same as public governmental institutions are. Corporations are now even regarded as persons under the law when it comes to rights but not when it comes to the responsibilities of citizenship. Publicly listed and traded corporations are getting a free ride, in too many cases while they rape the public, with malice, at the same time."
So.... no discrimination against gays.
So.... no discrimination against gays.
Don't worry Woody, you and Cleve came out a long time ago.....
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login