Musings for this week
-
Recall that I am the guy that frequently does a trivia post. Are you saying you do like it, or don't like it?
I love trivia, super old sports history is just something I've never been interested in researching, sadly.
I should have been an engineer, I'm obsessed with engines and how components come together to make a machine function.
alas... I'm in IT.
AdaM said:
I love trivia, super old sports history is just something I've never been interested in researching, sadly.I should have been an engineer, I'm obsessed with engines and how components come together to make a machine function.
alas... I'm in IT.
Maybe you are Darth Vader. Anakin Skywalker had the same obsession!
-
AdaM said:
I love trivia, super old sports history is just something I've never been interested in researching, sadly.I should have been an engineer, I'm obsessed with engines and how components come together to make a machine function.
alas... I'm in IT.
Maybe you are Darth Vader. Anakin Skywalker had the same obsession!
Maybe you are Darth Vader. Anakin Skywalker had the same obsession!
No shit? Looks like I need to turn my life around... although being the leader of an evil empire has its charms...
-
Random musings on various issues:
3. OK, I usually make an observation on these Fridays about a particular hot babe (and not necessarily just young hot babes). Last time I mentioned Jamie Lee Curtis and someone thought I must be gay because they claimed she was a hermaphrodite. Whatever! This weeks hot babe: Selma Hayek. Saw her in an older movie and she has T&A out the door.
An ass equal to Jennifer Lopez, but a far better rack. OK, now, I dare someone out there to call HER a dude!
8. As great a playright as William Shakespeare is, on occasion a few of his plot devices are totally absurd. Like in Twelfth Night where some of these people can't tell whether they are looking at a boy or a girl. Where the one guy marries the woman...and forgets to tell her that his name is Sebastian, not Cesario as she keeps calling him. Or in Othello where Othello kills his wife because he thinks she is cheating on him simply because she is holding some other guys handkerchief....and he never bothers to ask her about it. If he would just have come out and asked "where'd you get the fancy snotrag, bitch" she could have told him. Instead he whacks her for it? Dumb. Nevertheless, Shakespeare is great despite these few foibles.
Okay, the Jamie Lee Curtis thing is an urban legend, people. For God's sake, go watch True Lies again. She's all woman. As for Selma Hayek, I've been re-watching season three of 30 Rock on Hulu the last couple of days and...wow. One bit of dialogue seems especially appropriate:
Jack: Elisa is deeply religious.
Liz: If I had knockers like that, I'd thank God, too.
I'll take a shot at defending Shakespeare a bit, which I can hopefully do after spending the last three years working on a PhD in dramatic literature--which does seem a bit out of place here, but no more out of place than when I spend intermission at a play checking scores and my fantasy roster. Two points: first, he was writing for an audience that still believed that witches could fly into your house and steal your babies and that bathing made you sick. So a plot device like the bizarre cross-dressing stuff probably wouldn't seem that unbelievable to the audience at the time. Okay, some of it probably came across as a load of crap, like when Desdemona gives her dying words after being strangled (Stabbed? Okay, you can give final words as you bleed out. Poisoned? Sure, why not? Strangled? Really?). But he was still working with a pretty credulous audience. Second, he usually uses the prologue at the beginning of the play to establish that the play has a logic of its own--the stage is Verona, the stage is France, the guy you saw playing Falstaff last week is now someone's mom--so it's setting up a world where these things happen for an audience that probably believed that the could as well.
That's one of the reason I don't think Shakespeare translates all that well onto film; the audience has changed, and directors and producers try to bring the material up-to-date and make it into something that looks real-world, when it was never real-world to begin with.
Dennis
Okay, the Jamie Lee Curtis thing is an urban legend, people. For God's sake, go watch True Lies again. She's all woman. As for Selma Hayek, I've been re-watching season three of 30 Rock on Hulu the last couple of days and...wow. One bit of dialogue seems especially appropriate:
Jack: Elisa is deeply religious.
Liz: If I had knockers like that, I'd thank God, too.
I'll take a shot at defending Shakespeare a bit, which I can hopefully do after spending the last three years working on a PhD in dramatic literature--which does seem a bit out of place here, but no more out of place than when I spend intermission at a play checking scores and my fantasy roster. Two points: first, he was writing for an audience that still believed that witches could fly into your house and steal your babies and that bathing made you sick. So a plot device like the bizarre cross-dressing stuff probably wouldn't seem that unbelievable to the audience at the time. Okay, some of it probably came across as a load of crap, like when Desdemona gives her dying words after being strangled (Stabbed? Okay, you can give final words as you bleed out. Poisoned? Sure, why not? Strangled? Really?). But he was still working with a pretty credulous audience. Second, he usually uses the prologue at the beginning of the play to establish that the play has a logic of its own--the stage is Verona, the stage is France, the guy you saw playing Falstaff last week is now someone's mom--so it's setting up a world where these things happen for an audience that probably believed that the could as well.
That's one of the reason I don't think Shakespeare translates all that well onto film; the audience has changed, and directors and producers try to bring the material up-to-date and make it into something that looks real-world, when it was never real-world to begin with.
Dennis
OK, I was not trying to disparage the Bard's greatness at turning a plot. He is obviously one of the best ever in history at doing so. I am only saying that sometimes these twists were sometimes such that they stretched credulity, and that occasionally a little human logic could been brought into events to explain things....but then that would spoil everything, wouldn't it. (By the way, today's sitcom's and soaps probably suffer from the same fate at times....stretching credulity that is)
-
Oh to be a this baby.
-
You can see the wonder in the baby's eyes--"If she stays around, she can feed my entire daycare!"
Dennis
-
@hiwaygal said:
Shit. Do we have to call you doctor or something now?!?!?No, no, no. I still have a dissertation to write. Then I will demand to be called doctor. Until then, Sir Dennis is perfectly acceptable.
S. Dennis
-
@hiwaygal said:
Shit. Do we have to call you doctor or something now?!?!?No, no, no. I still have a dissertation to write. Then I will demand to be called doctor. Until then, Sir Dennis is perfectly acceptable.
S. Dennis
-
Zombo said:
Gipper, were you that ATTY guy on aol?Zombo
Yes. Though my e-mail address/screen name was Attys460 on AOL, (a reflection of my profession and business address at the time) I always signed my posts over there as The Gipper. I wasn't trying to fake anyone out with a false identity. Since this board didn't use e-mail addresses I just used my "Gipper" identity as my name here ( a derivation of my real name). I know longer have that AOL account.
-
@hiwaygal said:
That's fine.You can call me "YOUR MAJESTY"
lol
Are you "Queen of the Road"?
-
Oh to be a this baby.
Oh to be a this baby.
I was thinking of that clip as I was reading your post. Did you see Frida? Very, very hot movie (even with a unibrow)
-
Oh to be a this baby.
I was thinking of that clip as I was reading your post. Did you see Frida? Very, very hot movie (even with a unibrow)
I was thinking of that clip as I was reading your post. Did you see Frida? Very, very hot movie (even with a unibrow)
Salma Hayek and Penelope Cruz had a scene where they were in bed with a guy - can't remember the name of the movie but it was a western. Man those two ----- very nice.
-
-
@shepwrite said:
"Twilight" is "Dawson's Creek" with occasional fangs. Unbearably bad.If you dig vampires, "True Blood" is the coolest TV show ever produced in the history of forever.
I concur. I am completely addicted to True Blood. I'm not really a vampire buff, but True Blood is fantastic, particularly since it has all kinds of different characters - both human and supernatural.
-
Salma is a piece.
She's got a way of changing the wood factor from balsa to sekoya. If I didn't have the Warden's evil eye and extensive to do list, I wouldn't mind playing some night-night gymnastics with hot Salmas. She needs that pommel horse with the unicorn in the right place.
- Big Sexy
-
I was thinking of that clip as I was reading your post. Did you see Frida? Very, very hot movie (even with a unibrow)
Salma Hayek and Penelope Cruz had a scene where they were in bed with a guy - can't remember the name of the movie but it was a western. Man those two ----- very nice.
Salma Hayek and Penelope Cruz had a scene where they were in bed with a guy - can't remember the name of the movie but it was a western. Man those two ----- very nice.
Movie was BANDIDAS bedroom scene follows
-
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login