Browns to interview McCarthy
-
When two people on here go at it, I mean really go at it, and both insult Captain BoneSpurs, we all win.
-
Even though I said I wouldn't, I gotta respond.
So when St. Thomas Aquinas (FL) beat Saint Louis (HI) for a national championship, does that mean that Saint Louis isnt a champion? I mean they did win a state championship.
Or let's look at it in legal setting. OJ Simpson was acquitted in his criminal trial. Yet he lost his civil suit. That is like saying he is GUILTY of it BECAUSE of the civil suit.
And you obviously missed the point on Cleveland. "Why do we call any team champion that did not win the Super Bowl. So those AAFC championships don't qualify to you. And those NFL championships don't qualify for you.
See all you want to do is argue, or try and prove that you know something. Because you initially responding was to point out that Colts didn't win the SB, Ultimate championship, etc. Clue 1 prick, NOBODY EVER said they did.
Clue 2 Dunce, whether YOU want to believe it, accept it, etc. The Baltimore Colts are UNIVERSALLY recognized as the 1968 NFL CHAMPIONS. Nowhere in that statement does it say ANYTHING about winning another game, etc.
Clue 3 doofus, you are the ONLY one who would try and reach to call the NFL a conference. They were separate entities. In fact, those Colts won their CONFERENCE against the Vikings. Then they won their LEAGUE, the NFL against the Browns. One can now look back at it and say that it was essentially a Conference championship, yet that would be rewriting history.
Clue 4 ninnyhammer: so with your criteria/facts, then aren't the Colts CHAMPIONS since they won their last game in the NFL? Wouldn't that make them the NFL CHAMPIONS. Same with Chiefs, Raiders, Vikings?
Clue 5 simpleton: politics certainly aren't my thing, but it seems by that post you aren't a fan of Trump. While I don't care what you think of politics, and I find that ironic as some of your ways on here are Trumpian. You make some claim, yet when either called out on it, or proven wrong, you either deflect, play the victim, attack character or double down on the claim. So your "everyone deserves their opinion (when you don't respect others opinion) is "fake news, they hate me, etc. And your "well you misread, this is what I meant, etc" is "biggest crowd ever... well it was, but "they use the bad pictures, etc."
So yep, I apologize. Here I was calling you Ghool** Jr., when you remind me more of DJT. So with that in mind, all your posts are PERFECT, BIGLY, and GREATEST EVER.
Sure.....the fucking Colts were the Champions of creation. It doesn't matter that they lost....or that your own source called them Runnerups.
They were runnerups, like you.
And the Cleveland Browns AAFC style won their final game...they didn't lose it.
And your ignorance of politics is as massive as Trump's ego.
Sure.....the fucking Colts were the Champions of creation. It doesn't matter that they lost....or that your own source called them Runnerups.
They were runnerups, like you.
And the Cleveland Browns AAFC style won their final game...they didn't lose it.
And your ignorance of politics is as massive as Trump's ego.
Well, like usual you don't respond to the specific points mentioned, there's that deflection.
And again, as usual, you take what you want out of a post and try to spin it to where nothing was said to that point.
So here we go AGAIN.
Nobody said the Browns weren't the champions of the AAFC. What WAS said, that by the criteria that YOU posted, the why would any team not SB champion... then those AAFC or NFL championships wouldn't count. Me, I think they count.
My own source? I run Wikipedia? Dang, I must be rich, or really poor since they are always asking for money. If that is the source you refer to, let's do this since you keep bringing it up, IF they didn't win the NFL championship I will bow to your greatness and leave. And if they did you do the same. Or go even further numb skull, if I EVER said they did any of the following: won their last game, won the SB, won the Ultimate game, whatever else criteria you seem to allude that I said. If not, then do EVERYONE a favor and SHUT THE F**K UP.
As for politics, I never said I knew anything about it. But you responding like that makes me KNOW that I was spot on. I don't care if you like him or not (Dutch, I didn't know that I insulted him, but that doesn't bother me), but I will guarantee that there are A LOT of people here that would agree that the way you post Gipper resembles that.
As for being a runner up, I don't think I quite know what you are alluding to, but I will try to decipher it. Runner up to you in age, YEP. Runner up in career, Yep. Runner up in pissing people off, you betcha. Oh, runner up in number of posts. You betcha. Runner up in number of asinine comments on here, yep you win that one by a landslide. Runner up in number of subjects changed to try and grasp at straws. Yep, you got me, you win.
But runner up in these debates/arguments, why don't we let the other people on here decide who "wins" or shows more knowledge. Or do we mean actually football knowledge?
You like to result in impugning my character, or make unsubstantiated claims often. Yet when pressed about it, you never show even the 1st piece of evidence.
So its VERY simple loud mouth, unless you want to be looked at as a complete joke on here (or more so than you already do), since you have said both of these things in last 2 weeks: provide one iota of either: A POOR OPINION, or an IGNORANCE ON POLITICS.
Because I can substantiate every things I have said about you. Case in point, you got into a pages long debate about JOE BRADY. And instead of thinking to yourself (hmm, why do these idiots keep referring to someone as Coach) you just keep on arguing about it. While we knew EVERY SECOND WHO WE WERE TALKING ABOUT. And then the resemblance to DJT, you BLAMED @flugel and myself for how it was written.
Or how about this discussion, you keep referring to all these other things. Exactly where did I (or ANYONE) else say that is what the Colts won?
Or do we want to go back to last college season, where you again wrong yet blamed others. To refresh your memory, since you can't seem to keep track yourself.
Paraphrasing the 1st part. Stupid Clemson bragging about being 1st team to go 15-0. Then "How is it that they... and no one else was allowed to schedule an extra regular season game?" And we the other posters are supposed to know that you meant that it could have been Alabama, or OSU in 2014, etc. So again that wasn't YOUR fault.
Maybe we should put up a poll and ask a few things. 1. Who shows more knowledge on here 2. Who is a more likeable person 3. Who makes excuses when they say something incorrectly 4. Does Gipper give off a resemblance of traits to someone else
-
Here is a clue for you: you are talking to yourself. Why? Because you have not talked football the last month or so. You seem to be only on here to whinge about me. But, sorry, I don't love you like you want me to. And no one else cares about your obsession of me. Whatever life you have outside of thinking about everything I say....good luck to you.
-
Sure.....the fucking Colts were the Champions of creation. It doesn't matter that they lost....or that your own source called them Runnerups.
They were runnerups, like you.
And the Cleveland Browns AAFC style won their final game...they didn't lose it.
And your ignorance of politics is as massive as Trump's ego.
Well, like usual you don't respond to the specific points mentioned, there's that deflection.
And again, as usual, you take what you want out of a post and try to spin it to where nothing was said to that point.
So here we go AGAIN.
Nobody said the Browns weren't the champions of the AAFC. What WAS said, that by the criteria that YOU posted, the why would any team not SB champion... then those AAFC or NFL championships wouldn't count. Me, I think they count.
My own source? I run Wikipedia? Dang, I must be rich, or really poor since they are always asking for money. If that is the source you refer to, let's do this since you keep bringing it up, IF they didn't win the NFL championship I will bow to your greatness and leave. And if they did you do the same. Or go even further numb skull, if I EVER said they did any of the following: won their last game, won the SB, won the Ultimate game, whatever else criteria you seem to allude that I said. If not, then do EVERYONE a favor and SHUT THE F**K UP.
As for politics, I never said I knew anything about it. But you responding like that makes me KNOW that I was spot on. I don't care if you like him or not (Dutch, I didn't know that I insulted him, but that doesn't bother me), but I will guarantee that there are A LOT of people here that would agree that the way you post Gipper resembles that.
As for being a runner up, I don't think I quite know what you are alluding to, but I will try to decipher it. Runner up to you in age, YEP. Runner up in career, Yep. Runner up in pissing people off, you betcha. Oh, runner up in number of posts. You betcha. Runner up in number of asinine comments on here, yep you win that one by a landslide. Runner up in number of subjects changed to try and grasp at straws. Yep, you got me, you win.
But runner up in these debates/arguments, why don't we let the other people on here decide who "wins" or shows more knowledge. Or do we mean actually football knowledge?
You like to result in impugning my character, or make unsubstantiated claims often. Yet when pressed about it, you never show even the 1st piece of evidence.
So its VERY simple loud mouth, unless you want to be looked at as a complete joke on here (or more so than you already do), since you have said both of these things in last 2 weeks: provide one iota of either: A POOR OPINION, or an IGNORANCE ON POLITICS.
Because I can substantiate every things I have said about you. Case in point, you got into a pages long debate about JOE BRADY. And instead of thinking to yourself (hmm, why do these idiots keep referring to someone as Coach) you just keep on arguing about it. While we knew EVERY SECOND WHO WE WERE TALKING ABOUT. And then the resemblance to DJT, you BLAMED @flugel and myself for how it was written.
Or how about this discussion, you keep referring to all these other things. Exactly where did I (or ANYONE) else say that is what the Colts won?
Or do we want to go back to last college season, where you again wrong yet blamed others. To refresh your memory, since you can't seem to keep track yourself.
Paraphrasing the 1st part. Stupid Clemson bragging about being 1st team to go 15-0. Then "How is it that they... and no one else was allowed to schedule an extra regular season game?" And we the other posters are supposed to know that you meant that it could have been Alabama, or OSU in 2014, etc. So again that wasn't YOUR fault.
Maybe we should put up a poll and ask a few things. 1. Who shows more knowledge on here 2. Who is a more likeable person 3. Who makes excuses when they say something incorrectly 4. Does Gipper give off a resemblance of traits to someone else
-
Here is a clue for you: you are talking to yourself. Why? Because you have not talked football the last month or so. You seem to be only on here to whinge about me. But, sorry, I don't love you like you want me to. And no one else cares about your obsession of me. Whatever life you have outside of thinking about everything I say....good luck to you.
Here is a clue for you: you are talking to yourself. Why? Because you have not talked football the last month or so. You seem to be only on here to whinge about me. But, sorry, I don't love you like you want me to. And no one else cares about your obsession of me. Whatever life you have outside of thinking about everything I say....good luck to you.
Wrong again. Does it hurt to be wrong so many times and look foolish. For one, when I responded in THIS thread, it wasn't to you, so that blows that theory about it being about you out the water.
Two, talking about the Colts is football. Talking about Joe Brady and Joe Burrow is football. I wouldn't expect you to know that though since you thought they were the same person
-
Here is a clue for you: you are talking to yourself. Why? Because you have not talked football the last month or so. You seem to be only on here to whinge about me. But, sorry, I don't love you like you want me to. And no one else cares about your obsession of me. Whatever life you have outside of thinking about everything I say....good luck to you.
Wrong again. Does it hurt to be wrong so many times and look foolish. For one, when I responded in THIS thread, it wasn't to you, so that blows that theory about it being about you out the water.
Two, talking about the Colts is football. Talking about Joe Brady and Joe Burrow is football. I wouldn't expect you to know that though since you thought they were the same person
Wrong again. Does it hurt to be wrong so many times and look foolish. For one, when I responded in THIS thread, it wasn't to you, so that blows that theory about it being about you out the water.
Two, talking about the Colts is football. Talking about Joe Brady and Joe Burrow is football. I wouldn't expect you to know that though since you thought they were the same person
-
Here is a clue for you: you are talking to yourself. Why? Because you have not talked football the last month or so. You seem to be only on here to whinge about me. But, sorry, I don't love you like you want me to. And no one else cares about your obsession of me. Whatever life you have outside of thinking about everything I say....good luck to you.
Here is a clue for you: you are talking to yourself. Why? Because you have not talked football the last month or so. You seem to be only on here to whinge about me. But, sorry, I don't love you like you want me to. And no one else cares about your obsession of me. Whatever life you have outside of thinking about everything I say....good luck to you.
He only brings it up- because there's somefact in what he's saying.
Absolutely- and that's you perennially chasing your tail spinning history to suit your view of it.
-
Here is a clue for you: you are talking to yourself. Why? Because you have not talked football the last month or so. You seem to be only on here to whinge about me. But, sorry, I don't love you like you want me to. And no one else cares about your obsession of me. Whatever life you have outside of thinking about everything I say....good luck to you.
He only brings it up- because there's somefact in what he's saying.
Absolutely- and that's you perennially chasing your tail spinning history to suit your view of it.
He only brings it up- because there's somefact in what he's saying.
There may be, if you can get through 9 paragraphs of BS.
Absolutely- and that's you perennially chasing your tail spinning history to suit your view of it.
Larry, I haven't even read like his last 5 posts. That is why I put the memes on there. All he had been doing is worrying and obsessing about what I say.
I will stick by my view of history....Bottom line, if you and he think the Colts in 1968 are considered to have been the Champions of Football.....go ask Don Shula, Unitas, Morrall, etc. if they think the same thing. (Shula turned 90 yesterday....at least he is still alive to ask. I think I know what his answer would be)
-
When two people on here go at it, I mean really go at it, and both insult Captain BoneSpurs, we all win.
When two people on here go at it, I mean really go at it, and both insult Captain BoneSpurs, we all win.
Clearly they are not polyboard material.?
BTW McCarthy is off the board - headed for Dallas NFL Net reports this morning.
-
So now who is out there with head coaching experience? I'm sick of coordinators. So here we go again.
-
I've actually coming around to the idea of McCarthy being the head coach. Saw his interview and it appears the year off ...
The year off bothers me... it wasn't as if it was by his choice. Plus he sat around with his coordinators??? Not much demand for them either?
Did you read about how Eric studies every play in so much detail that he knows every player's role for every play? He said he does this so he doesn't let anyone down. Freddie did nothing along the sort. Browns mirrored Freddie - loosey goosey, sloppy, ghastly short on attention to detail. A complete joke. As the season went along, it became painfully obvious just how sloppy FK was.
While you may be right about Freddie (although I doubt it), Bienemy's approach s the norm, not the exceptional. Most plays have strategic goals be it attacking a weakness, or flooding a zone or pounding a DL and from that goal all the tactical moves fall... blocking assignments, routes, etc. It ain't rocket science and it doesn't require memorization.
Ever seen a QB white board session like what Gruden used to do with the top prospects in each Draft and wonder how the prospect could regurgitate a pass play he was shown 15 minutes earlier? It starts with recognizing the goal of the play.
The year off bothers me... it wasn't as if it was by his choice. Plus he sat around with his coordinators??? Not much demand for them either?
While you may be right about Freddie (although I doubt it), Bienemy's approach s the norm, not the exceptional. Most plays have strategic goals be it attacking a weakness, or flooding a zone or pounding a DL and from that goal all the tactical moves fall... blocking assignments, routes, etc. It ain't rocket science and it doesn't require memorization.
Ever seen a QB white board session like what Gruden used to do with the top prospects in each Draft and wonder how the prospect could regurgitate a pass play he was shown 15 minutes earlier? It starts with recognizing the goal of the play.
I actually see the year off as a benefit.
Cooling off period. Mental reset. He coached 13 years with one team.
He didn’t just take any job either. He’s weighed options obviously. Followed football from a different perspective.
-
-
We figured that wasn't happening when he stayed a couple days down there. So we are fighting with Carolina for Mike Daniels? After that it's Mike Pettine volume two
WSS
-
We figured that wasn't happening when he stayed a couple days down there. So we are fighting with Carolina for Mike Daniels? After that it's Mike Pettine volume two
WSS
We figured that wasn't happening when he stayed a couple days down there. So we are fighting with Carolina for Mike Daniels? After that it's Mike Pettine volume two
WSS
Yep. This.
Although.... I will say I think I like Mike as a coach the most out of the last 6 we had.... dude got saddled with that drunk midget and Farmer.
-
McCarthy to the Boys...wow that was quick
McCarthy to the Boys...wow that was quick
Starting to get a little nervous now.
-
McCarthy to the Boys...wow that was quick
Starting to get a little nervous now.
Starting to get a little nervous now.
Chill, although McCarthy studied analytics for a year I don't think he would've aligned well in this organization. McDaniels is a better fit among the former head coaches and I read he's interviewing today.
-
Starting to get a little nervous now.
Chill, although McCarthy studied analytics for a year I don't think he would've aligned well in this organization. McDaniels is a better fit among the former head coaches and I read he's interviewing today.
Chill, although McCarthy studied analytics for a year I don't think he would've aligned well in this organization. McDaniels is a better fit among the former head coaches and I read he's interviewing today.
Yeah, that's kind of what I'm thinking too. I guess my worry with a younger coach is whether or not he can command the locker room. Being a Bill disciple, perhaps McDaniels knows a thing or two about discipline and keeping a team together...at least that's my hope. I have a feeling that our team was a bigger cluster chicken than we even thought, so perhaps the right coach can unlock our potential.
-
So now who is out there with head coaching experience? I'm sick of coordinators. So here we go again.
So now who is out there with head coaching experience? I'm sick of coordinators. So here we go again.
McDaniel. Two years in Denver, Remember.
-
McCarthy to the Boys...wow that was quick
Starting to get a little nervous now.
Starting to get a little nervous now.
I was nervous after the Haslem press conference. Secretly there has to be a lot of self doubt entering his mind.
He’s running out of excuses- if you keep hiring the wrong guy it eventually comes back on you and it’s not a shame on them as much as it becomes a shame on you.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login