Rock n Roll Hall of Fame Inductees
-
All too similar. Nine Inch Nails represents the "heavy" set.
you are on either drain bamaged or more than likely never listened to their music except for the crap the radio feeds down your throat
-
-
All too similar. Nine Inch Nails represents the "heavy" set.
you are on either drain bamaged or more than likely never listened to their music except for the crap the radio feeds down your throat
you are on either drain bamaged or more than likely never listened to their music except for the crap the radio feeds down your throat
Right.... I am not familiar with the music of all those acts. I do see what I have been told is basically metal music: MC5, Judas Priest. I understand that Soundgarden was part of the Seattle grunge theme, which, to me, just seems a variation of metal music. Thin Lizzy, I think, can perhaps be considered somewhat pop...but with metal leanigs.
But, by all means, educate us on the differences between all those acts.
-
-
-
-
Thin Lizzy are more of a folk blues band not fucking metal and the true best band from Ireland they had their hits here in the us but were also so important because of their bandmates who were a mix of Protestants and Catholics and in that circa was unheard of
look man there is more than just music going on here
-
-
The R & R HOF is a fucking joke.
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
-
Why? Because a few metalheads think that their favorite monotonous band didn't get in?
Actually anybody's favorite bands regardless of genre. Including your own. And not necessarily because I love any of the bands that Atom possted you don't know the difference. I don't fault you for not knowing the difference only for blaring away about it with no knowledge.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
That never stops him, no matter the subject
If they want to call it the "Music Hall of Fame" then I'd have far less problem with that. But calling it the Rock n Roll HOF is ridiculous.
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
Why? Because a few metalheads think that their favorite monotonous band didn't get in?
Actually anybody's favorite bands regardless of genre. Including your own. And not necessarily because I love any of the bands that Atom possted you don't know the difference. I don't fault you for not knowing the difference only for blaring away about it with no knowledge.
WSS
Actually anybody's favorite bands regardless of genre. Including your own. And not necessarily because I love any of the bands that Atom possted you don't know the difference. I don't fault you for not knowing the difference only for blaring away about it with no knowledge.
WSS
Fair enough......they are monotonous bands of different genres. I will take your word of that.
-
That never stops him, no matter the subject
If they want to call it the "Music Hall of Fame" then I'd have far less problem with that. But calling it the Rock n Roll HOF is ridiculous.
That never stops him, no matter the subject
If they want to call it the "Music Hall of Fame" then I'd have far less problem with that. But calling it the Rock n Roll HOF is ridiculous.
If they want to call it the Rock n Roll HOF, then some could say they should have stopped inducting anyone after Buddy Holly, Bill Haley and Chuck Berry.
But what I take of this is that Rock n Roll will not be pigeon holed, and neither my standards nor yours will rein it in.
And you critcize me for not knowing the "genre" of some of the acts mentioned above? Their genre is Rock n Roll. No other distinction need be made.
-
That never stops him, no matter the subject
If they want to call it the "Music Hall of Fame" then I'd have far less problem with that. But calling it the Rock n Roll HOF is ridiculous.
If they want to call it the Rock n Roll HOF, then some could say they should have stopped inducting anyone after Buddy Holly, Bill Haley and Chuck Berry.
But what I take of this is that Rock n Roll will not be pigeon holed, and neither my standards nor yours will rein it in.
And you critcize me for not knowing the "genre" of some of the acts mentioned above? Their genre is Rock n Roll. No other distinction need be made.
But what I take of this is that Rock n Roll will not be pigeon holed, and neither my standards nor yours will rein it in.
I agree with that. I'm not going to sit here and say anyone who doesn't adhere strictly to a I,IV,V arrangement format or play Strats exclusively should be excluded. There are a dizzying number of sub genres for every genre. My point is (and I'm sure you've been to the R&R HOF) that there is an obvious disconnect at a certain point in the visit from Rock n Roll. THAT is why I say call it the "Music Hall of Fame" if you will but don't call it the R&R HOF. It's no longer that.
Allow me to add Frank Marino and Mahogany Rush along with Ted Nugent to the list WTF aren't they in?
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
But what I take of this is that Rock n Roll will not be pigeon holed, and neither my standards nor yours will rein it in.
I agree with that. I'm not going to sit here and say anyone who doesn't adhere strictly to a I,IV,V arrangement format or play Strats exclusively should be excluded. There are a dizzying number of sub genres for every genre. My point is (and I'm sure you've been to the R&R HOF) that there is an obvious disconnect at a certain point in the visit from Rock n Roll. THAT is why I say call it the "Music Hall of Fame" if you will but don't call it the R&R HOF. It's no longer that.
Allow me to add Frank Marino and Mahogany Rush along with Ted Nugent to the list WTF aren't they in?
I agree with that. I'm not going to sit here and say anyone who doesn't adhere strictly to a I,IV,V arrangement format or play Strats exclusively should be excluded. There are a dizzying number of sub genres for every genre. My point is (and I'm sure you've been to the R&R HOF) that there is an obvious disconnect at a certain point in the visit from Rock n Roll. THAT is why I say call it the "Music Hall of Fame" if you will but don't call it the R&R HOF. It's no longer that.
Allow me to add Frank Marino and Mahogany Rush along with Ted Nugent to the list WTF aren't they in?
Wow I had forgotten about Frank saw em once open for Heart The Joe Perry Project was also there damn that was a long time ago
and i agree the rrhof is fucked up
-
But what I take of this is that Rock n Roll will not be pigeon holed, and neither my standards nor yours will rein it in.
I agree with that. I'm not going to sit here and say anyone who doesn't adhere strictly to a I,IV,V arrangement format or play Strats exclusively should be excluded. There are a dizzying number of sub genres for every genre. My point is (and I'm sure you've been to the R&R HOF) that there is an obvious disconnect at a certain point in the visit from Rock n Roll. THAT is why I say call it the "Music Hall of Fame" if you will but don't call it the R&R HOF. It's no longer that.
Allow me to add Frank Marino and Mahogany Rush along with Ted Nugent to the list WTF aren't they in?
I agree with that. I'm not going to sit here and say anyone who doesn't adhere strictly to a I,IV,V arrangement format or play Strats exclusively should be excluded. There are a dizzying number of sub genres for every genre. My point is (and I'm sure you've been to the R&R HOF) that there is an obvious disconnect at a certain point in the visit from Rock n Roll. THAT is why I say call it the "Music Hall of Fame" if you will but don't call it the R&R HOF. It's no longer that.
Allow me to add Frank Marino and Mahogany Rush along with Ted Nugent to the list WTF aren't they in?
It never was that. Really. From the very first class. From Ray Charles to James Brown to Buddy Holly etc. you had what I think were primarily blues guys, soul music, rockabilly, "pop" idols etc.
And to answer your second question: I guess they are not in because they have not been felt to have been either good enough, or popular enough, or influential enough.
It like saying: why aren't the Monkees in? Herman's Hermits? These acts were far, far more popular in their time than the guys you mention. I don't think I know who Frank Marino is....related to Dan? So, you see.
-
Nugent is political, plain and simple.
I have Frank Marino's recently released 6hr show dvd from The Agora. The man has been around since the mid 70s..
-
-
That never stops him, no matter the subject
If they want to call it the "Music Hall of Fame" then I'd have far less problem with that. But calling it the Rock n Roll HOF is ridiculous.
That never stops him, no matter the subject
If they want to call it the "Music Hall of Fame" then I'd have far less problem with that. But calling it the Rock n Roll HOF is ridiculous.
Then again rock and roll specifically referred to the style of music pioneer by bill haley and the comets. That style is pretty much gone by the wayside except for a few modern revival. And remember that The Rock and Roll movement was also about rebellion which I think is closely aligned with the Hip Hop movement of more modern music. Even if I hated like my grandparents hated rock and roll. That's part of the reason it exists.
But I agree with you it doesn't seem like there's any hard-and-fast standard to get into this stupid Hall of Fame. Just a bunch of pompous assholes sitting around nominating guys they personally like or disrespecting the ones they don't know anything about.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login