Supreme Court Considers Religious Schools Case
-
NPR: Supreme Court Considers Religious Schools Case
And the encroachment of religious doctrine on the government continues....
-
Before this country had no govt assistance for religious schools we had govt assistance for religious schools. I know it first hand as I was in Catholic school for a few years in elementary school and when they lost govt aid and started charging for tuition my parents switched me to public school (we had a large family and my parents couldn't afford to send us all).
-
Before this country had no govt assistance for religious schools we had govt assistance for religious schools. I know it first hand as I was in Catholic school for a few years in elementary school and when they lost govt aid and started charging for tuition my parents switched me to public school (we had a large family and my parents couldn't afford to send us all).
Before this country had no govt assistance for religious schools we had govt assistance for religious schools. I know it first hand as I was in Catholic school for a few years in elementary school and when they lost govt aid and started charging for tuition my parents switched me to public school (we had a large family and my parents couldn't afford to send us all).
The big question is. can the government NOT fund Christian schools, and ONLY fund atheist schools? The old hatred of God in schools because of "separation of church and state" is still extremely IGNORANT of what the Founders intended.
as most all the time - the left twists and redefines words and clauses and paragraphs and ideals - soley to fit their twisted emotions.
I believe it's a mental illness. Far too many people ride their emotions as the only thing in life that matters. Facts don't matter, definitions of words, etc don't matter. Reality doesn't matter. Morality doesn't matter - and the lives of unborn and born children don't matter. The economy doesn't matter - until you can be happy to use it as a weapon FOR THEIR cause.
"Mentall illness" is just my best guess at explaining how they can be so offensive and wrong, even violent/way over the edge of dishonesty - and somehow go talking loud and fast, or acting out every time they are shown to be wrong.
-
'You Don't Take Away My Faith': Fired Coach Vows to Fight for Constitutional Right to Pray
Fired for silently praying after a football game????
-
NPR: Supreme Court Considers Religious Schools Case
And the encroachment of religious doctrine on the government continues....
NPR: Supreme Court Considers Religious Schools Case
And the encroachment of religious doctrine on the government continues....
I'm not religious. I'm fine with it. The left doesn't really care they are like Vandals. The only aim is to tear down destroy anyting the previous generations hold sacred. Shock and offend.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
This is based on legislation from Montana. So not liberals at odds here.
Would you guys be pumped on your tax dollars going to Islamic elementary schools?
-
This is a Christian nation, not an Mooslem nation.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
This is a Christian nation, not an Mooslem nation.
This is a Christian nation, not an Mooslem nation.
The fairy tale just depends on the patch of dirt you were born on.
Religious institutions and schools can get their parishioners to cover the tab. Televangelists make it seem like there is money to spare.
-
NPR: Supreme Court Considers Religious Schools Case
And the encroachment of religious doctrine on the government continues....
I'm not religious. I'm fine with it. The left doesn't really care they are like Vandals. The only aim is to tear down destroy anyting the previous generations hold sacred. Shock and offend.
WSS
I'm not religious. I'm fine with it. The left doesn't really care they are like Vandals. The only aim is to tear down destroy anyting the previous generations hold sacred. Shock and offend.
WSS
From the article (BOLD = my commentary)
"The Montana constitutional amendment, however, is not some relic of the past. Though the no-aid provision was originally adopted in 1889, the state constitution was revised and rewritten in 1972. - This isn't a case of the left acting as "vandals [tearing down] anything the previous generations hold sacred". Quite the contrary; this is the ultra-religious of today attempting to instigate themselves into government policy and overturn a decision made by previous generations.
All but one of the surviving delegates to that convention have submitted a brief in this case discussing how the "no-aid" provision was debated and enacted 48 years ago.
They dispute Smith's claim that the 1972 convention's "no-aid" provision was just a rubber stamp of the 1889 provision.
"There was clearly some interest being expressed on behalf of the parochial schools to open up the no-aid provision," recalls Mae Nan Ellingson, one of the delegates. She says a daylong hearing was held, with some 100 witnesses presenting written and oral testimony. Following the hearing, "the debate at the convention" on the "no-aid" provision "was extensive," she says.
"...Ellingson notes that "a number of ministers" who were convention delegates "spoke very ardently in favor of public funds not going to religious education." Indeed, Montana argues that the delegates to its 1972 constitutional convention adopted the "no-aid" amendment in part "to protect religious liberty" and to prevent the state from attaching conditions to its aid. - This here is an important point that the religous didn't take into consideration. Once you open the door for federal funding of religious schools, you also open the door for conditions coming with said aid; such as what the religious schools may or may not teach in their classes. So, if this passes, I hope Catholic schools and other religious institutions enjoy teaching evolution in their classes; "Teaching the Controversy", as it were. The whole point of "freedom of religion" is to be able to have religious beliefs and practice them without government interference; suing the government to make it a requirement for them to fund religious schools is just them opening their own doors for government interference.
"...In the end, the 1972 constitutional redo passed by a vote of 80-17. During the ratification campaign that followed, Ellingson says, the "no-aid" provision was "never even a threshold issue." And she notes that the no-aid measure included a provision specifically allowing private religious schools to receive available federal funds through a state pass-through mechanism."
-
This is a Christian nation, not an Mooslem nation.
This is a Christian nation, not an Mooslem nation.
Show me where in the Constitution that it says the United States is a Christian nation. Take your time, i'll wait.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Before this country had no govt assistance for religious schools we had govt assistance for religious schools. I know it first hand as I was in Catholic school for a few years in elementary school and when they lost govt aid and started charging for tuition my parents switched me to public school (we had a large family and my parents couldn't afford to send us all).
Before this country had no govt assistance for religious schools we had govt assistance for religious schools. I know it first hand as I was in Catholic school for a few years in elementary school and when they lost govt aid and started charging for tuition my parents switched me to public school (we had a large family and my parents couldn't afford to send us all).
Ok, so lets suppose that the people suing Montana win their case and, by extension, federal and state governments are then required to fund religious schools.You, presumably, would be happy with this since, as a Christian yourself, you'd see your fellow Christian's schools recieve tax-dollars to support their schools and religious teachings. Fair enough, but i'm afraid that is a narrow-minded view.
To start, Christianity - although the largest religious group represented - isn't the only religion practiced in the US. Current estimates are that there are over 300 different religions and denominations practiced in the United States. So, it's safe to assume that these religions would also be open to receiveing federal funding for their own schools of religious ideology. Tell me, how would you feel about your tax dollars funding an Islamic madrassa? Or how about a school extolling the virtues of the Church of Scientology? How about bankrolling a school teaching the lessons of Odin and Thor and other Norse gods, for the neo-pagans? Better yet, what if your tax-dollars went into funding for building a multi-million dollar school teaching about Lucifer for the Chruch of Satan? All of these -and many others - are religions recoginized by the United States government, so they'd naturally be eligible for federal and state funding as well, not just Christianity or other Judeo-Christian religions. Once you open the door for federal funding of one religious instituiton, you open the door for funding all of them.
Secondly, in case you missed it in my response to Steve earlier in the thread, so i'll repeat it here: Once you open the door for federal funding of religious schools, you also open the door for conditions coming with said aid; such as what the religious schools may or may not teach in their classes. So, if this passes, I hope Catholic schools and other religious institutions enjoy teaching evolution in their classes; "Teaching the Controversy", as it were. The whole point of "freedom of religion" is to be able to have religious beliefs and practice them without government interference; suing the government to make it a requirement for them to fund religious schools is just them opening their own doors for government interference.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
This is based on legislation from Montana. So not liberals at odds here.
Would you guys be pumped on your tax dollars going to Islamic elementary schools?
Would you guys be pumped on your tax dollars going to Islamic elementary schools?
You think they don't?
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
Would you guys be pumped on your tax dollars going to Islamic elementary schools?
You think they don't?
-
For sure, but it'll be more widespread if this passes.
Based on the fallacy of your previous statement perhaps you can excuse us if we question the factual basis of this one as well.
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
-
Here's my take. It is absolutely essential to provide funds to private Christian schools. People against it act like Christian parents don't pay taxes, so why should they get aid to THEIR schools?
The the point about government interference is not a bad point - it just isn't valid to prevent our gov also getting some funds to private Christian schools. The government is not allowed to establish an official accepted religion, and it cannot act to prevent a Christian school from existing. Those Christian parents PAY TAXES TOO.
So, we have a bit of a quandary there. A simple solution is tax credits for the money paid in tuition to schools. Why should a poor Christian family not be able to pursure their hopes/dreams/Christian beliefs because they are too poor?
What about THEIR "Life, Liberty, and PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ?" Why demand that Christian parents go to public schools, only to have those kids educated to not accept Christian teachings?
So many public schools are sold out to liberalism. Part of the reason is - the lawsuits against property taxes being the funding for our schools. Know why? Because with property taxes - the school system is completely beholden to parents/property owners - for their activities/teachings in schools. and those citizens sure as heyl won't put up with a constant barrage of liberal perverted teachings in their schools.
So, eventually, lawsuits prevailed, and now funds come from higher up - the state - and those obaMao inspired/leaned on schools can teach outrageous anti-Christian truths at will, and parents have no way out - except to get their kids into a private Christian school...
or home school.
And guess how the nea, state "ea"s and teachers unions feel about that. THEY HATE IT. They can't control/groom the minds of young children if they don't go to their school. And the left is self-defined - as justified in controlling. and grooming a new generation away from Real American parents.
So, Christian families PAY THE TAXES TOO, and that means they cannot, often, afford to pay for public schools, and still, to pursure their own Happiness, and Life/LIberty - have their kids go to the expensive Christian schools they choose.
God already knows - that home schoolers are already under the watchful eye and basic regulations by the state education associations/state legislators anyways.
So. The money paid by parents to send their kids to schools that don't teach constant violations of their faith, that don't put their kids at risk of physical harm, etc.... should be tax exempt - a tax deduction.
The silly argument about "what if your tax dollars go to mooslim fundamentalist schools" ?
If Muslim parents want their own school, I'm fine with it. But some of them - they branch off into terrorist teachings, etc.
Then they should be immediately shut down, the perps arrested, lose citizenship, and sent to gitmo.
I think you will never find Christian schools that branch off and teach kids to blow themselves and "infidels" up, etc etcetc.
SO, two parents, obviously a man and a woman, in REAL AMERICA - make 60,000 bucks a year together. They pay ...well, I forget how expensive it is - let's say... average cost per year to the school is 7000 bucks. So, they pay taxes on 50,000 bucks with no other deductions.
So, 60,000 x .15 (15% tax rate (just throwing out a number here) $9000
50,000 x .15 $7500.
of course, there are other deductions.
2% of tax dollars goes to education. So, change the 50000 calc to .13. Now it's 6500. That saves about 3000 bucks right there.
Per each parent- you would pay $6000 less a year. Single parent homes would have an extra deduction - getting them to the $6000 dollars saved mark.
That's just a dumb calc off the top of my head.
Anyways, CHRISTIAN PARENTS PAY JUST AS MUCH IN TAXES. They should get the same benefit in their children's education.
-
This is a Christian nation, not an Mooslem nation.
Show me where in the Constitution that it says the United States is a Christian nation. Take your time, i'll wait.
Show me where in the Constitution that it says the United States is a Christian nation. Take your time, i'll wait.
-
Show me where in the Constitution that it says the United States is a Christian nation. Take your time, i'll wait.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
This is based on legislation from Montana. So not liberals at odds here.
Would you guys be pumped on your tax dollars going to Islamic elementary schools?
Would you guys be pumped on your tax dollars going to Islamic elementary schools?
Me? Actually I wouldn't mind. Reason? Unless a Catholic school or a Muslim school or Hebrew school is teaching sedition I assume that the kids are getting a better and probably more conservative education than they might in a public school. I went to a Catholic School kindergarten and first grade. Really gave me a step up for when I got to public school.
PS while I hate Islamic terrorism I have absolutely nothing against Muslims. Unlike the animosity that some folks show towards Christians.
WSS
-
Would you guys be pumped on your tax dollars going to Islamic elementary schools?
Me? Actually I wouldn't mind. Reason? Unless a Catholic school or a Muslim school or Hebrew school is teaching sedition I assume that the kids are getting a better and probably more conservative education than they might in a public school. I went to a Catholic School kindergarten and first grade. Really gave me a step up for when I got to public school.
PS while I hate Islamic terrorism I have absolutely nothing against Muslims. Unlike the animosity that some folks show towards Christians.
WSS
Me? Actually I wouldn't mind. Reason? Unless a Catholic school or a Muslim school or Hebrew school is teaching sedition I assume that the kids are getting a better and probably more conservative education than they might in a public school.
That's debatable. One of the major reasons why public school in the United States came about in the first place was because of the poor or non-existent quality of education by private religious institutions and home-schools. Public education was founded, in part, to provide a standardized level of educational instruction. You can look back and compare such metrics as literacy rate, before and after implementation of public education, and its not even close.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login