Impeachment Witnesses
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schiff-bolton-lack-credibility-senate-impeachment-trial
I think reardless of Party Loyalty we can agree that the idea of fair trial is ridiculous in the first place. In my opinion if there are to be Witnesses there should be Witnesses for and against. I personally don't want to see everything devolve into a perjury trap like it did with white water but if it must with the geese and the ganders alike be sauced.
Second point that interfere a trial the jury is supposed to be impartial. I don't think anyone here would think that's the case in the senate or congress.
But my point here is that if these guys in the videos are your star Witnesses how much anxiety would you feel if you were the prosecuting attorney?
Try to keep it civil.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
The democrats in the House hurried the impeachment process and sent their shoddy impeachment over to the Senate expecting the Senate to do the work they didn't do. Pelosi thought they really had the goods on Trump over the phone call with the Ukrainian president but once Trump released the transcript it became apparent all those claims from the phony whistle blower were not true. If she would have waited a day or so to see the official transcript of the phone call she would have not have started impeachment proceedings but by then it was too late to turn back.
-
This so-called trial is a sham and the democrats are all too happy to drag it on as long as they can.
They have lied so much they actually believe there lies. In there tiny brains they have convinced themselves that they are doing this for ‘country’.
Jail time should bring them back to reality...
POTUS having to deal with this is unheard of, yet he continues to Make America Great Again.
-
truth is, Rand Paul READ HIS QUESTION ALOUD later...
good for him. I'd say, splash their dirty names all over the internet, dammit.
Rand Paul reads the question he was forbidden from asking in Senate trial
'I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked.'
"I can tell you," Paul continued, "my question made no reference to any whistleblower."
Paul read the question aloud, "so that," he said, "it could be part of the public record":
Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President: Are you aware that House Intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the president before the formal House impeachment proceedings?
"I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked," Paul told reporters. "It makes no reference to anybody who may or may not be a whistleblower."
-
truth is, Rand Paul READ HIS QUESTION ALOUD later...
good for him. I'd say, splash their dirty names all over the internet, dammit.
Rand Paul reads the question he was forbidden from asking in Senate trial
'I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked.'
"I can tell you," Paul continued, "my question made no reference to any whistleblower."
Paul read the question aloud, "so that," he said, "it could be part of the public record":
Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President: Are you aware that House Intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the president before the formal House impeachment proceedings?
"I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked," Paul told reporters. "It makes no reference to anybody who may or may not be a whistleblower."
truth is, Rand Paul READ HIS QUESTION ALOUD later...
good for him. I'd say, splash their dirty names all over the internet, dammit.
Rand Paul reads the question he was forbidden from asking in Senate trial
'I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked.'
"I can tell you," Paul continued, "my question made no reference to any whistleblower."
Paul read the question aloud, "so that," he said, "it could be part of the public record":
Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President: Are you aware that House Intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the president before the formal House impeachment proceedings?
"I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked," Paul told reporters. "It makes no reference to anybody who may or may not be a whistleblower."
PHOTO: Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella shakes hands with Barack Obama in Oval Office
-
Democrats are an emotional bunch of little communists. Pelosi's sham impeachment is going badly and now she is suggesting for the Trump legal team to be disbarred. Hahahaha
-
-
Media’s Trump Coverage Now 100% Negative During Impeachment Hysteria
https://bongino.com/medias-trump-coverage-now-100-negative-during-impeachment-hysteria/
**(journalism is dead)
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schiff-bolton-lack-credibility-senate-impeachment-trial
I think reardless of Party Loyalty we can agree that the idea of fair trial is ridiculous in the first place. In my opinion if there are to be Witnesses there should be Witnesses for and against. I personally don't want to see everything devolve into a perjury trap like it did with white water but if it must with the geese and the ganders alike be sauced.
Second point that interfere a trial the jury is supposed to be impartial. I don't think anyone here would think that's the case in the senate or congress.
But my point here is that if these guys in the videos are your star Witnesses how much anxiety would you feel if you were the prosecuting attorney?
Try to keep it civil.
WSS
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schiff-bolton-lack-credibility-senate-impeachment-trial
I think reardless of Party Loyalty we can agree that the idea of fair trial is ridiculous in the first place. In my opinion if there are to be Witnesses there should be Witnesses for and against. I personally don't want to see everything devolve into a perjury trap like it did with white water but if it must with the geese and the ganders alike be sauced.
Second point that interfere a trial the jury is supposed to be impartial. I don't think anyone here would think that's the case in the senate or congress.
But my point here is that if these guys in the videos are your star Witnesses how much anxiety would you feel if you were the prosecuting attorney?
Try to keep it civil.
WSS
Actually, there were 18 (IC IG Atkinson).
-
it's been a complete asinine farce, especially after all the Pres Trump admin cooperation with the dirty Mueller 3 yr investigation..
which found
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
so the dems had to invent fraudulent witnesses and fraudulent charges...
-
-
Pretty sure I've covered that Roberts is comped (O spying).
Basically everyone in DC is a victim ("The Hammer") of what O did.
Thing is, this isn't what I was aware of him being compromised on (there is something else) . . .
This just shows how close things are (corruption) :
No crimes.
One sided.
That is what Justice has become in this Country ?
Just like Flynn.
If they can do this to these people with the resources they (POTUS/Flynn) have, what chance does the average schmuck have ?
Truth.
"You're watching a Movie".
Why ?
This is all a Show to let people see the corruption and what Globalism is about.
This is not for the Right, they already see it.
The Left (far) are now Socialist/Communist, and are most lost.
The Centrist (major portion of the Country) are unaware of what has really been going on - this is for them.
It's can difficult too believe, it takes time.
That is why this is going as slow as it is.
The crimes are known and are on full display - time allows people time to adjust.
It's BIG.
Madman or not - you're witnessing History on an unimaginable scale.
-
-
-
Yep, nothing but Trumpettes left on this board.??????
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login