What does the Chief Of Staff do?
-
Posting for the first time in years from my iPhone 11 Pro actually, and my pc is two years old.
sorry I just don’t want a freak weirdo on my team that takes male hormones. Mark my words but I guarantee that this woman eventually comes out as a female to male trans.
Who gives two shits then? You? Why bother?
What if he/she...TF ever actually benefits this coaching staff and becomes something of an invaluable resource?
Call me old fashion, I tend to focus on the shit that actually matters to what the subject is at hand.
Who gives two shits then? You? Why bother?
What if he/she...TF ever actually benefits this coaching staff and becomes something of an invaluable resource?
Call me old fashion, I tend to focus on the shit that actually matters to what the subject is at hand.
I’m skeptical that she was the best available option. If we win after all of this then I don’t care obviously. But it seems to me Stefanski is trying to construct a “progressive” staff instead of actually trying to assemble the best football minds available.
at least she’s unfuckable with that haircut and voice so she won’t be a locker room distraction I guess.
-
I keep searching her name and the same picture comes up. I don't mean to be insensitive to any group, but there is no way in hell that is a female.
-
Meanwhile back at the thread...
I'd never heard of an NFL HC having a "Chief of Staff", but then read Stef's comments about that was his role under Brad Childress. Turned out to be Stef's big career break and he swore he'd pass along the opportunity, if he ever got the chance... and now he has.
Duties? Sounds like a communications conduit basis with a fair amount of TBD on top. Person might hear a lot more than the Staff is willing to tell "the boss"... at least initially. Then assuming the info is handled the right way by Stef, it should open up greater direct lines of communication.
Interesting move creating the position and an interesting choice to fill it... even if she was rooting for the 'Canes...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Meanwhile back at the thread...
I'd never heard of an NFL HC having a "Chief of Staff", but then read Stef's comments about that was his role under Brad Childress. Turned out to be Stef's big career break and he swore he'd pass along the opportunity, if he ever got the chance... and now he has.
Duties? Sounds like a communications conduit basis with a fair amount of TBD on top. Person might hear a lot more than the Staff is willing to tell "the boss"... at least initially. Then assuming the info is handled the right way by Stef, it should open up greater direct lines of communication.
Interesting move creating the position and an interesting choice to fill it... even if she was rooting for the 'Canes...
-
My guess is, Tiam applied for the job and lost out.
Her book on football far exceeded his "x" and "x", and "o" and "o", which took him 45 seconds to elaborate on. He's just mad. Too bad. He'll get over it.
-
Well you were always impotent in any argument you had with me so why should this be different? Haha
Don't pat your back too hard.. Your humility might begin to swell
Don't pat your back too hard.. Your humility might begin to swell
Well then at least something of mine would
-
This thread's evolution is fascinating, especially considering calfox.
It starts with him obviously faking some confusion, to make a thinly veiled joke about a woman who looks "guyish".... but then his Browns RAH-RAH homerism kicked in, and HE LOVES THIS MOVE, IT IS OBVIOUSLY BRILLIANT!
Of course, the usual suspects have to frantically scroll their mouse over Confederate flag mouse pad on their 12 year old PC to RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE all over this thread, because their tender, masculine sensibilities have been ruffled.
Tia's bitch slap of cal is the cherry on top of Tour summing up the situation nicely.
Posting for the first time in years from my iPhone 11 Pro actually, and my pc is two years old.
sorry I just don’t want a freak weirdo on my team that takes male hormones. Mark my words but I guarantee that this woman eventually comes out as a female to male trans.
Posting for the first time in years from my iPhone 11 Pro actually, and my pc is two years old.
sorry I just don’t want a freak weirdo on my team that takes male hormones. Mark my words but I guarantee that this woman eventually comes out as a female to male trans.
So?
-
@dutch-oven said:
Be careful, or he'll storm off and demand to get banned from this board again!
TTFN
-
This thread's evolution is fascinating, especially considering calfox.
It starts with him obviously faking some confusion, to make a thinly veiled joke about a woman who looks "guyish".... but then his Browns RAH-RAH homerism kicked in, and HE LOVES THIS MOVE, IT IS OBVIOUSLY BRILLIANT!
Of course, the usual suspects have to frantically scroll their mouse over Confederate flag mouse pad on their 12 year old PC to RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE all over this thread, because their tender, masculine sensibilities have been ruffled.
Tia's bitch slap of cal is the cherry on top of Tour summing up the situation nicely.
Posting for the first time in years from my iPhone 11 Pro actually, and my pc is two years old.
sorry I just don’t want a freak weirdo on my team that takes male hormones. Mark my words but I guarantee that this woman eventually comes out as a female to male trans.
Posting for the first time in years from my iPhone 11 Pro actually, and my pc is two years old.
sorry I just don’t want a freak weirdo on my team that takes male hormones. Mark my words but I guarantee that this woman eventually comes out as a female to male trans.
Modern stuff owned by a Neanderthal?. Go figure.
-
Ask Bob Haldeman what the chief of staff does
-
My concern for her in this position would be the same for any female in this position - no matter her looks, voice, haircut or sexual orientation - the respect factor.
I didn't read all the links in the thread, but if this is a true chief of staff position then this individual is the gateway to the HC. That means not everything gets to the head coach from the staff but everything from the head coach gets to the staff, that means juggling egos on the staff, mediating, counseling both the head coach and the staff and commanding the room when needed. Does the staff need a chief? I thought that was the head coaches job.
Here's a real world scenario the Browns faced in the last two seasons: Todd Haley, the OC with a 20 year NFL resume, and Gregg Williams, the DC with a 30 year NFL resume, could not stand each other. They got chippy in practice. They got chippy on Hard Knocks. We can only imagine the the verbal exchanges not seen once the cameras left and the losing started. The chief of staff would mediate through disagreements with those two. How would that have gone?
According to Browns.com, I did see she was an assistant coach high in school football as late as 2017. Imagine the cynicism from this board if the Browns hired a 30 year old man that two and a half years previous was an assistant coach and algebra teacher. I remember cynicism towards Mike Pettine and he had nearly 15 years of NFL experience since leaving North Penn when the Browns hired him.
From my standpoint, looks, hair, voice, and sexual preference do not matter. She will have the respect of ownership - they have no choice, she will have the respect of the Front Office - they will have no choice. I hope she has the respect of the staff and the locker room, or this will go nowhere.
And, much like my opinion of the Browns' structure when it comes to the chain of command, the more layers added complicate the burden of responsibility and finding the root cause of problems.
-
My concern for her in this position would be the same for any female in this position - no matter her looks, voice, haircut or sexual orientation - the respect factor.
I didn't read all the links in the thread, but if this is a true chief of staff position then this individual is the gateway to the HC. That means not everything gets to the head coach from the staff but everything from the head coach gets to the staff, that means juggling egos on the staff, mediating, counseling both the head coach and the staff and commanding the room when needed. Does the staff need a chief? I thought that was the head coaches job.
Here's a real world scenario the Browns faced in the last two seasons: Todd Haley, the OC with a 20 year NFL resume, and Gregg Williams, the DC with a 30 year NFL resume, could not stand each other. They got chippy in practice. They got chippy on Hard Knocks. We can only imagine the the verbal exchanges not seen once the cameras left and the losing started. The chief of staff would mediate through disagreements with those two. How would that have gone?
According to Browns.com, I did see she was an assistant coach high in school football as late as 2017. Imagine the cynicism from this board if the Browns hired a 30 year old man that two and a half years previous was an assistant coach and algebra teacher. I remember cynicism towards Mike Pettine and he had nearly 15 years of NFL experience since leaving North Penn when the Browns hired him.
From my standpoint, looks, hair, voice, and sexual preference do not matter. She will have the respect of ownership - they have no choice, she will have the respect of the Front Office - they will have no choice. I hope she has the respect of the staff and the locker room, or this will go nowhere.
And, much like my opinion of the Browns' structure when it comes to the chain of command, the more layers added complicate the burden of responsibility and finding the root cause of problems.
And, much like my opinion of the Browns' structure when it comes to the chain of command, the more layers added complicate the burden of responsibility and finding the root cause of problems.
One caveat however. Stefanski has successfully served in that position and knows what it entails. He wanted someone to have that same function for the Browns. Given how well everything has NOT gone here, I say give it a chance. It cannot be worse than what we have had in the past, so nothing to lose and everything to gain the way the new HC wants to try it.?
-
And, much like my opinion of the Browns' structure when it comes to the chain of command, the more layers added complicate the burden of responsibility and finding the root cause of problems.
One caveat however. Stefanski has successfully served in that position and knows what it entails. He wanted someone to have that same function for the Browns. Given how well everything has NOT gone here, I say give it a chance. It cannot be worse than what we have had in the past, so nothing to lose and everything to gain the way the new HC wants to try it.?
One caveat however. Stefanski has successfully served in that position and knows what it entails. He wanted someone to have that same function for the Browns. Given how well everything has NOT gone here, I say give it a chance. It cannot be worse than what we have had in the past, so nothing to lose and everything to gain the way the new HC wants to try it.?
I cannot argue that.
-
And, much like my opinion of the Browns' structure when it comes to the chain of command, the more layers added complicate the burden of responsibility and finding the root cause of problems.
One caveat however. Stefanski has successfully served in that position and knows what it entails. He wanted someone to have that same function for the Browns. Given how well everything has NOT gone here, I say give it a chance. It cannot be worse than what we have had in the past, so nothing to lose and everything to gain the way the new HC wants to try it.?
One caveat however. Stefanski has successfully served in that position and knows what it entails. He wanted someone to have that same function for the Browns. Given how well everything has NOT gone here, I say give it a chance. It cannot be worse than what we have had in the past, so nothing to lose and everything to gain the way the new HC wants to try it.?
I'm fine with it also since Stefanski wanted it but when it comes to our owner I would rather see someone with a vision and a plan for this team for the present and the future and then stick with it and not seemingly using the throwing something against the wall and hoping it sticks approach.
-
SF has a WR coach that's a female. Does that make John Lynch and Kyle Shanahan stupid? Tampa has a strength training coach that's a female that Bruce Arians brought with him.
It's not their fault they have more testosterone than Austin Corbett.
-
As a coach of a female only sport for the last 18yrs, I say it's pretty fucking awesome and am all for it.
As a coach of a female only sport for the last 18yrs, I say it's pretty fucking awesome and am all for it.
OK, so I've been waiting for more hires like this for a while. The ONLY concern I have is whether or not the process is carried out correctly. What do I mean? Well, for one I'm not sure about her title. I would NOT have given her an ambiguous title that doesn't clearly define her role. To me, that's setting her up for failure. She needs to be "defensive backs coach" or "quality control analyst" or something like that.
They haven't done that, instead they made her "Chief of Staff", which to fans, sounds like a concocted attempt to give her an artificially inflated title. I worked for the government for over a decade in 3 different agencies, and Chief of Staff was a VERY big deal. Now, obviously football and government are two totally different things, but how does she fit into the infrastructure of the team?
Perhaps the fans and media don't NEED to know, but again, I think that would be another error in helping females infiltrate the manliest of sports. They should also be cautious not to give her more authority than she's possibly earned. Other players and especially other coaches will sniff that out immediately and you will definitely have internal discord. Most of all, that wouldn't be fair to HER. She strikes me as a person who is willing to do whatever it takes to reach her goal of working in the NFL. She's young, let her work her way up.
Again, this is all speculation on my part. For all I know she's getting coffee for everyone, but I seriously doubt it. I think it's past time for women to have a role in the NFL. They can love football as much as us even if they can't really play the game. That might sound a little harsh, but it's true. I hope she does well, and I REALLY hope it's done right. Don't make her a story, let her work her way up, and let's make some history while winning a shitload of football games.
-
As a coach of a female only sport for the last 18yrs, I say it's pretty fucking awesome and am all for it.
OK, so I've been waiting for more hires like this for a while. The ONLY concern I have is whether or not the process is carried out correctly. What do I mean? Well, for one I'm not sure about her title. I would NOT have given her an ambiguous title that doesn't clearly define her role. To me, that's setting her up for failure. She needs to be "defensive backs coach" or "quality control analyst" or something like that.
They haven't done that, instead they made her "Chief of Staff", which to fans, sounds like a concocted attempt to give her an artificially inflated title. I worked for the government for over a decade in 3 different agencies, and Chief of Staff was a VERY big deal. Now, obviously football and government are two totally different things, but how does she fit into the infrastructure of the team?
Perhaps the fans and media don't NEED to know, but again, I think that would be another error in helping females infiltrate the manliest of sports. They should also be cautious not to give her more authority than she's possibly earned. Other players and especially other coaches will sniff that out immediately and you will definitely have internal discord. Most of all, that wouldn't be fair to HER. She strikes me as a person who is willing to do whatever it takes to reach her goal of working in the NFL. She's young, let her work her way up.
Again, this is all speculation on my part. For all I know she's getting coffee for everyone, but I seriously doubt it. I think it's past time for women to have a role in the NFL. They can love football as much as us even if they can't really play the game. That might sound a little harsh, but it's true. I hope she does well, and I REALLY hope it's done right. Don't make her a story, let her work her way up, and let's make some history while winning a shitload of football games.
OK, so I've been waiting for more hires like this for a while. The ONLY concern I have is whether or not the process is carried out correctly. What do I mean? Well, for one I'm not sure about her title. I would NOT have given her an ambiguous title that doesn't clearly define her role. To me, that's setting her up for failure. She needs to be "defensive backs coach" or "quality control analyst" or something like that.
They haven't done that, instead they made her "Chief of Staff", which to fans, sounds like a concocted attempt to give her an artificially inflated title. I worked for the government for over a decade in 3 different agencies, and Chief of Staff was a VERY big deal. Now, obviously football and government are two totally different things, but how does she fit into the infrastructure of the team?
Perhaps the fans and media don't NEED to know, but again, I think that would be another error in helping females infiltrate the manliest of sports. They should also be cautious not to give her more authority than she's possibly earned. Other players and especially other coaches will sniff that out immediately and you will definitely have internal discord. Most of all, that wouldn't be fair to HER. She strikes me as a person who is willing to do whatever it takes to reach her goal of working in the NFL. She's young, let her work her way up.
Again, this is all speculation on my part. For all I know she's getting coffee for everyone, but I seriously doubt it. I think it's past time for women to have a role in the NFL. They can love football as much as us even if they can't really play the game. That might sound a little harsh, but it's true. I hope she does well, and I REALLY hope it's done right. Don't make her a story, let her work her way up, and let's make some history while winning a shitload of football games.
in the famous words of the ghoul
she's a coffee fetcher
damnit it was supposed to be pink
-
cant escape PC ism
Show proof that she's bad at policy.
I happen to think she might be good at her role.
Are you just another Republican who thinks all women are incompetent?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login