Bloomberg and Memes
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/13/style/michael-bloomberg-memes-jerry-media.html
https://www.vox.com/2020/2/14/21137102/mike-bloomberg-instagram-meme-ad-campaign-backfiring
Using your massive wealth to try and force support through memes on social media. Also skirting around political advertising rules on social media sites be going straight to the "influencers". Coming off as completely disingenuous, but your name is out there. Trying to copy the internet meme support Trump benefited from in 2016.
The future of political advertising? Seems like most of the younger crowd these mems are trying to influence are seeing right through it. Even calling out the accounts as sellouts.
Some of this stuff seems to work better on older folks on Facebook, especially when you're using demographic data to pinpoint people more likely to support you. I think they have less understanding to question it.
The meme army support needs to be more organic to grab a foothold.
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/13/style/michael-bloomberg-memes-jerry-media.html
https://www.vox.com/2020/2/14/21137102/mike-bloomberg-instagram-meme-ad-campaign-backfiring
Using your massive wealth to try and force support through memes on social media. Also skirting around political advertising rules on social media sites be going straight to the "influencers". Coming off as completely disingenuous, but your name is out there. Trying to copy the internet meme support Trump benefited from in 2016.
The future of political advertising? Seems like most of the younger crowd these mems are trying to influence are seeing right through it. Even calling out the accounts as sellouts.
Some of this stuff seems to work better on older folks on Facebook, especially when you're using demographic data to pinpoint people more likely to support you. I think they have less understanding to question it.
The meme army support needs to be more organic to grab a foothold.
The meme army support needs to be more organic to grab a foothold.
pick one?
organic
(ɔːˈɡænɪk)
adj1. (Biology) of, relating to, derived from, or characteristic of living plants and animals2. (Biology) of or relating to animal or plant constituents or products having a carbon basis3. (Biology) of or relating to one or more organs of an animal or plant4. (Chemistry) of, relating to, or belonging to the class of chemical compounds that are formed from carbon: an organic compound. Compare inorganic25. constitutional in the structure of something; fundamental; integral6. of or characterized by the coordination of integral parts; organized7. developing naturally: organic change through positive education.8. (Law) of or relating to the essential constitutional laws regulating the government of a state: organic law.9. (Agriculture) of, relating to, or grown with the use of fertilizers or pesticides deriving from animal or vegetable matter, rather than from chemicalsn10. (Agriculture) any substance, such as a fertilizer or pesticide, that is derived from animal or vegetable matter11. organic food collectivelyorˈganically adv -
Are.....are you serious?
-
pick one, word abuser.
go ahead, make my hay.
-
"developing naturally"
The support needs to be more organic.
Organic support
Support developing naturally
Individuals online choosing to support candidate through memes they're developing on their own (organic support) vs Bloomberg paying influencers to shoehorn in memes about him.
-
given the artificial membership of political activism on the left, there is nothing "natural" about developing memes for group hatred on their own.
it's kkk/nazi/arabic terrorist groupthink.
-
Oh, so you're backing off now? Did you learn something new about the definition of organic?
Not to mention organic internet/meme support was huge for Trump. Remember, YOUR guy?
I get it you're in one of your moods where you're going to try and attack literally anything I post but come on, just pay attention a little here.
-
Oh, so you're backing off now? Did you learn something new about the definition of organic?
Not to mention organic internet/meme support was huge for Trump. Remember, YOUR guy?
I get it you're in one of your moods where you're going to try and attack literally anything I post but come on, just pay attention a little here.
blah blah blah sissy pinko birdbrain woodpecker blah
see? you can't stop. It seems to me you're a sick bird, You can't take part in any discussion because you are too ignorant, then you go to personal attacks and personal arguments. You just have to peck at other people, belittle other people, for no good reason, to make you look like you are taking part in serious discussions.
the entire board can see it, woodypeckerhead.
-
.... What are you talking about????
You came into my thread trying to go after me on a word I used correctly, made some anti-left comment (where I replied Trump objectively benefited from meme support too), and then proceeded to call me "sissy", "sick", "ignorant" while claiming I was the one participating in personal attacks.
I honestly don't know what to say. Even for you this is pretty sporadic and nonsensical.
I imagine some others will get a kick out of this tomorrow.
-
gosh. how many threads have you screwed up in most of the years?
and now you don't like somebody messing up your ...one? thread?
but you are "entitled" to be special because you always got participation trophies....
-
-
here is an organically "developed" ad campaign highlighting mini mike
Id say the "foothold" has become a stronghold haha
-
here is an organically "developed" ad campaign highlighting mini mike
Id say the "foothold" has become a stronghold haha
here is an organically "developed" ad campaign highlighting mini mike
Id say the "foothold" has become a stronghold haha
No fan of Bloomberg at all except I have to give him credit for starting a business 30 years ago that has made him one of the richest men in the country. The guy throws around millions of dollars in campaign ads like the rest of us do with spending quarters. He is just getting started and has already spend 350 million dollars of his own bankroll on campaign ads. I think he will end up buying the democrat nomination now that Biden looks like he is toast.
-
here is an organically "developed" ad campaign highlighting mini mike
Id say the "foothold" has become a stronghold haha
No fan of Bloomberg at all except I have to give him credit for starting a business 30 years ago that has made him one of the richest men in the country. The guy throws around millions of dollars in campaign ads like the rest of us do with spending quarters. He is just getting started and has already spend 350 million dollars of his own bankroll on campaign ads. I think he will end up buying the democrat nomination now that Biden looks like he is toast.
No fan of Bloomberg at all except I have to give him credit for starting a business 30 years ago that has made him one of the richest men in the country. The guy throws around millions of dollars in campaign ads like the rest of us do with spending quarters. He is just getting started and has already spend 350 million dollars of his own bankroll on campaign ads. I think he will end up buying the democrat nomination now that Biden looks like he is toast.
unrelated (but maybe related) is Bidens role and its diminishment
given the script that the dems used for the impeachment hoax, the one that said that Trump tried to get the goods on his "rival" or opponent Biden
they (the dims) were counting on the name appeal of Biden to create the fakery of such a claim- that Biden was a "strong" political force and was compromised
by Trumps line of questioning.
that in reality was no where near true - and now the DNC no longer needs that story to bolster the hoax... and therefore. Biden can go pound sand jmo
(can be completely in line with most conspiratorial views though?)
-
No fan of Bloomberg at all except I have to give him credit for starting a business 30 years ago that has made him one of the richest men in the country. The guy throws around millions of dollars in campaign ads like the rest of us do with spending quarters. He is just getting started and has already spend 350 million dollars of his own bankroll on campaign ads. I think he will end up buying the democrat nomination now that Biden looks like he is toast.
unrelated (but maybe related) is Bidens role and its diminishment
given the script that the dems used for the impeachment hoax, the one that said that Trump tried to get the goods on his "rival" or opponent Biden
they (the dims) were counting on the name appeal of Biden to create the fakery of such a claim- that Biden was a "strong" political force and was compromised
by Trumps line of questioning.
that in reality was no where near true - and now the DNC no longer needs that story to bolster the hoax... and therefore. Biden can go pound sand jmo
(can be completely in line with most conspiratorial views though?)
unrelated (but maybe related) is Bidens role and its diminishment
given the script that the dems used for the impeachment hoax, the one that said that Trump tried to get the goods on his "rival" or opponent Biden
they (the dims) were counting on the name appeal of Biden to create the fakery of such a claim- that Biden was a "strong" political force and was compromised
by Trumps line of questioning.
that in reality was no where near true - and now the DNC no longer needs that story to bolster the hoax... and therefore. Biden can go pound sand jmo
(can be completely in line with most conspiratorial views though?)
The dems will sabotage Bernie Sanders for sure. They are in a catch 22 though when they sabotage Bernie that will turn the Sanders voters away from the democrats and if they don't sabotage Sanders there is no way a socialist like Sanders will win in November and they know it. Bill Maher just got booed by his own audience the other day for supporting Bloomberg so if Bloomberg gets the nomination there will be lots of democrats not supporting the multi billionaire buying the nomination. Get the popcorn out, this is going to get interesting how this plays out on the democrat side. All the division though on the dems side is good for our side.
I think the dems knew they were throwing Biden under the bus with impeaching Trump but by impeaching Trump even if they didn't remove him from office they thought they could ding him up and make it more difficult for him to win in Nov. They were only right about one thing. When they threw Biden under the bus Hunter Biden became a household word and everyone can see the corruption. The Bidens were exposed for their corruption .Their attempts to harm Trump in Nov also backfired as Trumps approval went up 10 points after his impeachment.
-
unrelated (but maybe related) is Bidens role and its diminishment
given the script that the dems used for the impeachment hoax, the one that said that Trump tried to get the goods on his "rival" or opponent Biden
they (the dims) were counting on the name appeal of Biden to create the fakery of such a claim- that Biden was a "strong" political force and was compromised
by Trumps line of questioning.
that in reality was no where near true - and now the DNC no longer needs that story to bolster the hoax... and therefore. Biden can go pound sand jmo
(can be completely in line with most conspiratorial views though?)
The dems will sabotage Bernie Sanders for sure. They are in a catch 22 though when they sabotage Bernie that will turn the Sanders voters away from the democrats and if they don't sabotage Sanders there is no way a socialist like Sanders will win in November and they know it. Bill Maher just got booed by his own audience the other day for supporting Bloomberg so if Bloomberg gets the nomination there will be lots of democrats not supporting the multi billionaire buying the nomination. Get the popcorn out, this is going to get interesting how this plays out on the democrat side. All the division though on the dems side is good for our side.
I think the dems knew they were throwing Biden under the bus with impeaching Trump but by impeaching Trump even if they didn't remove him from office they thought they could ding him up and make it more difficult for him to win in Nov. They were only right about one thing. When they threw Biden under the bus Hunter Biden became a household word and everyone can see the corruption. The Bidens were exposed for their corruption .Their attempts to harm Trump in Nov also backfired as Trumps approval went up 10 points after his impeachment.
The dems will sabotage Bernie Sanders for sure. They are in a catch 22 though when they sabotage Bernie that will turn the Sanders voters away from the democrats and if they don't sabotage Sanders there is no way a socialist like Sanders will win in November and they know it. Bill Maher just got booed by his own audience the other day for supporting Bloomberg so if Bloomberg gets the nomination there will be lots of democrats not supporting the multi billionaire buying the nomination. Get the popcorn out, this is going to get interesting how this plays out on the democrat side. All the division though on the dems side is good for our side.
YEP ! It seems likely that whoever the dem nominee is, a sizeable percentage of dem voters will just stay home.
I hope so - I hope the election is so lopsided the socailist movement will fade away, and the corruption will fade away. It might take that to happen before many see the truth about how low the dem party has gone.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login