Skip to content

Trivia Questions and Answers

The Browns Board
1.6k 36 27.7k
  • I'm starting to think someone might be looking these up.... ?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @dutch-oven said:

    I'm starting to think someone might be looking these up.... ?

    I would hope not.   Those extra clues I gave should have turned the light bulb on for someone who has been around a While.  Example....he got Jim McMahon who described himself as the "funky QB"  on the Bears  1985 Super Bowl Shuffle video.  And Lamonica's nickname was The Mad Bomber....ergo the Ted Kaczinski reference.  

    @browns149 said:

    Jim McMahon

    @browns149 said:

    Daryl Lamonica

    Check and Check. 

    So....fess up....did you look them up, or did the clues I gave ring the bell for you? 

  • ATOMA ATOM wrote on last edited by

    kenny the snake stabler

    billy kilmer

    joe thiesman

    bernie kosar

  • kenny the snake stabler

    billy kilmer

    joe thiesman

    bernie kosar

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @atom said:

    kenny the snake stabler

    billy kilmer

    joe thiesman

    bernie kosar

    No on all of those

  • ATOMA ATOM wrote on last edited by

    damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

  • @dutch-oven said:

    I'm starting to think someone might be looking these up.... ?

    I would hope not.   Those extra clues I gave should have turned the light bulb on for someone who has been around a While.  Example....he got Jim McMahon who described himself as the "funky QB"  on the Bears  1985 Super Bowl Shuffle video.  And Lamonica's nickname was The Mad Bomber....ergo the Ted Kaczinski reference.  

    @browns149 said:

    Jim McMahon

    @browns149 said:

    Daryl Lamonica

    Check and Check. 

    So....fess up....did you look them up, or did the clues I gave ring the bell for you? 

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    I would hope not.   Those extra clues I gave should have turned the light bulb on for someone who has been around a While.  Example....he got Jim McMahon who described himself as the "funky QB"  on the Bears  1985 Super Bowl Shuffle video.  And Lamonica's nickname was The Mad Bomber....ergo the Ted Kaczinski reference.  

    Check and Check. 

    So....fess up....did you look them up, or did the clues I gave ring the bell for you? 

    The clues gave it away

  • ATOMA ATOM wrote on last edited by

    len dawson

  • damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @atom said:

    damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

  • len dawson

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    @atom said:

    len dawson

    No

  • @atom said:

    damn

    matt ryan ? 

    he was a answer before

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

    ATOMA ATOM wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

    plunkett

  • @the-gipper said:

    NO....but, wrong Ryan!!

    plunkett

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    @atom said:

    plunkett

    Nope...I am about to give the answers.  

  • @atom said:

    plunkett

    Nope...I am about to give the answers.  

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    Nope...I am about to give the answers.  

    This is turning into a trumpy show now.?

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    Here is today's trivia Question:

    In NFL history, there have been a dozen (12)  Quarterbacks  who have a career winning pct. of winning 2/3rds of their games.    .666 pct.  or better. 

    Name these 12 QBs.    (Note:  in one case anyway, it includes the record as an AFL starting QB). 

    Answers:

    Otto Graham   .814....and that is just in the NFL years,  with AAFC he was like  .853 win pct.

    Darryl Lamonica   .801

    Tom Brady  .774

    Roger Staubach  .746

    Joe Montana  .714

    Peyton Manning  .702

    Jim McMahon  .691  with 6 teams !!

    Terry Bradshaw  .677

    Russell Wilson  .676

    Danny White   .674

    Ben Roethlisberger   .669

    Frank Ryan    .667  with 3 teams   (but he was over .700 with the Browns)

    Stabler, Steve Young, Aaron Rodgers, Unitas and Elway follow the above. 

    The guys in blue are NOT in the HOF, even though they all have been eligible for years.  (A few are active, and IMO will make HOF....and Peyton Manning is  a clear shoo in)  Isn't winning the name of the game?  So why should these guys be given no consideration ?   Ryan, White, McMahon, Lamonica. 

    Maybe simply longevity is an issue there:  Ryan  57 career wins,  White:  62, Lamonica  66, McMahon 67.  

    But:  Norm Van Brocklin only had 61 wins, he is in.  Kurt Warner  67, he is in.    Ryan and McMahon have the same number of titles as NVB and Warner:  1 each.  (and Ryan, like Warner, lost another title game).  George Blanda only had 53 career wins...but he is sort of a special case.   Sonny Jurgenson only had  69....and he had no titles, and never even played in a title game. 

    Sorry to go on.  Maybe that should be a different thread. 

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    Even though I may be sorry to go on....I will, nevertheless, go on. 

    It seems that it is simply  longevity that kept the  Forgotten Four or some of them   out of the HOF.

    I noted their number of wins above.

    As for career TD passes

    Frank Ryan had  149 career TD passes.....but his contemporary....Bart Starr, only had  152,   and Roger Staubach only had 153 career TDs. 

    Roger gave up part of his potential career to the Navy....Ryan game up part of his potential career to his PhD in Math. 

    Danny White had  155.    (but he had the misfortune of following up  SB champ Staubach...and of running into Joe Montana....who he lost to in a few NFC title games...bad luck there)

    Darryl Lamonica  had 164 TDs.     Norm VAn Brocklin had only 173, as did Joe Namath.   And Troy Aikman had just 165....but he had 3 titles. 

    Jim McMahon  had only 100 career TD passes.   His huge SB win was not greatly attributed to him, but to the team around him   So, he would be the least HOF worthy of the Forgotten 4. 

    Total passing yards is also a factor.  Neither of the 4 had big numbers:   White  21, 959,  Lamonica  19,154, McMahon  18,148, Ryan  16, 042

    But then these guys 60s/70s counterparts did not put up the big gaudy passing yard numbers that QBs do today.: Staubach had only about 22K yards, Van Brocklin  23K, Bart Starr  24K,  Namath 27K, Bradshaw  28K, Dawson 28K.   Guys these days are getting double and in some case triple that in career numbers. 

    I will not do another question today.  Wait until tomorrow.

    OK to merge.  Thanks.

  • Even though I may be sorry to go on....I will, nevertheless, go on. 

    It seems that it is simply  longevity that kept the  Forgotten Four or some of them   out of the HOF.

    I noted their number of wins above.

    As for career TD passes

    Frank Ryan had  149 career TD passes.....but his contemporary....Bart Starr, only had  152,   and Roger Staubach only had 153 career TDs. 

    Roger gave up part of his potential career to the Navy....Ryan game up part of his potential career to his PhD in Math. 

    Danny White had  155.    (but he had the misfortune of following up  SB champ Staubach...and of running into Joe Montana....who he lost to in a few NFC title games...bad luck there)

    Darryl Lamonica  had 164 TDs.     Norm VAn Brocklin had only 173, as did Joe Namath.   And Troy Aikman had just 165....but he had 3 titles. 

    Jim McMahon  had only 100 career TD passes.   His huge SB win was not greatly attributed to him, but to the team around him   So, he would be the least HOF worthy of the Forgotten 4. 

    Total passing yards is also a factor.  Neither of the 4 had big numbers:   White  21, 959,  Lamonica  19,154, McMahon  18,148, Ryan  16, 042

    But then these guys 60s/70s counterparts did not put up the big gaudy passing yard numbers that QBs do today.: Staubach had only about 22K yards, Van Brocklin  23K, Bart Starr  24K,  Namath 27K, Bradshaw  28K, Dawson 28K.   Guys these days are getting double and in some case triple that in career numbers. 

    I will not do another question today.  Wait until tomorrow.

    OK to merge.  Thanks.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    Even though I may be sorry to go on....I will, nevertheless, go on. 

    It seems that it is simply  longevity that kept the  Forgotten Four or some of them   out of the HOF.

    I noted their number of wins above.

    As for career TD passes

    Frank Ryan had  149 career TD passes.....but his contemporary....Bart Starr, only had  152,   and Roger Staubach only had 153 career TDs. 

    Roger gave up part of his potential career to the Navy....Ryan game up part of his potential career to his PhD in Math. 

    Danny White had  155.    (but he had the misfortune of following up  SB champ Staubach...and of running into Joe Montana....who he lost to in a few NFC title games...bad luck there)

    Darryl Lamonica  had 164 TDs.     Norm VAn Brocklin had only 173, as did Joe Namath.   And Troy Aikman had just 165....but he had 3 titles. 

    Jim McMahon  had only 100 career TD passes.   His huge SB win was not greatly attributed to him, but to the team around him   So, he would be the least HOF worthy of the Forgotten 4. 

    Total passing yards is also a factor.  Neither of the 4 had big numbers:   White  21, 959,  Lamonica  19,154, McMahon  18,148, Ryan  16, 042

    But then these guys 60s/70s counterparts did not put up the big gaudy passing yard numbers that QBs do today.: Staubach had only about 22K yards, Van Brocklin  23K, Bart Starr  24K,  Namath 27K, Bradshaw  28K, Dawson 28K.   Guys these days are getting double and in some case triple that in career numbers. 

    I will not do another question today.  Wait until tomorrow.

    OK to merge.  Thanks.

    The fact that they didn’t pass much back then, doesn’t mean they didn’t win. 

    I’d take Bart Starr and his titles over Marino and his records ANYDAY

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    Here is Today's Trivia Question.

    My son has gotten me into "birding  (don't call it birdwatching) " lately.  It gives me something to do and helps me get some exercise.   So the question is simple:

    Name all the teams in the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB  that have bird nicknames. I think there are anywhere from 12-15 teams. 

  • Here is Today's Trivia Question.

    My son has gotten me into "birding  (don't call it birdwatching) " lately.  It gives me something to do and helps me get some exercise.   So the question is simple:

    Name all the teams in the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB  that have bird nicknames. I think there are anywhere from 12-15 teams. 

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969

    @the-gipper said:

    Here is Today's Trivia Question.

    My son has gotten me into "birding  (don't call it birdwatching) " lately.  It gives me something to do and helps me get some exercise.   So the question is simple:

    Name all the teams in the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB  that have bird nicknames. I think there are anywhere from 12-15 teams. 

    Seahawks, Falcons, Hawks, Cardinals, Penguins, Blue Jays

    EDIT: Consolidating with the next 4 I posted

    Eagles Orioles Blackhawks Ravens

  • @the-gipper said:

    Here is Today's Trivia Question.

    My son has gotten me into "birding  (don't call it birdwatching) " lately.  It gives me something to do and helps me get some exercise.   So the question is simple:

    Name all the teams in the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB  that have bird nicknames. I think there are anywhere from 12-15 teams. 

    Seahawks, Falcons, Hawks, Cardinals, Penguins, Blue Jays

    EDIT: Consolidating with the next 4 I posted

    Eagles Orioles Blackhawks Ravens

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @texasag1969 said:

    Seahawks, Falcons, Hawks, Cardinals, Penguins, Blue Jays

    EDIT: Consolidating with the next 4 I posted

    Eagles Orioles Blackhawks Ravens

    I did not include Blackhawks, because, in theory, they are named after an Indian Tribe, not a bird....but, clearly the tribe name includes a bird...so that is good. 

    There still could be 3-5 more

  • Here is Today's Trivia Question.

    My son has gotten me into "birding  (don't call it birdwatching) " lately.  It gives me something to do and helps me get some exercise.   So the question is simple:

    Name all the teams in the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB  that have bird nicknames. I think there are anywhere from 12-15 teams. 

    ATOMA ATOM wrote on last edited by ATOM

    @the-gipper said:

    Here is Today's Trivia Question.

    My son has gotten me into "birding  (don't call it birdwatching) " lately.  It gives me something to do and helps me get some exercise.   So the question is simple:

    Name all the teams in the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB  that have bird nicknames. I think there are anywhere from 12-15 teams. 

    bird battles in the sky are always fun to watch and humingbird battles are cool damn they are territorial 

    toronto blue jays which are the most hated bird of all

  • @the-gipper said:

    Here is Today's Trivia Question.

    My son has gotten me into "birding  (don't call it birdwatching) " lately.  It gives me something to do and helps me get some exercise.   So the question is simple:

    Name all the teams in the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB  that have bird nicknames. I think there are anywhere from 12-15 teams. 

    bird battles in the sky are always fun to watch and humingbird battles are cool damn they are territorial 

    toronto blue jays which are the most hated bird of all

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @atom said:

    bird battles in the sky are always fun to watch and humingbird battles are cool damn they are territorial 

    toronto blue jays which are the most hated bird of all

    Toronto Blue Jays already named. 

  • @atom said:

    bird battles in the sky are always fun to watch and humingbird battles are cool damn they are territorial 

    toronto blue jays which are the most hated bird of all

    Toronto Blue Jays already named. 

    ATOMA ATOM wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    Toronto Blue Jays already named. 

    that wasnt the point of my post

    it was about birds