Both Murray and Burris gone
-
-
I've always liked HaHa. But the price may be too high when we are coming up on a new Garrett contract soon. God forbid they use him for trade/money value instead of retaining him. But who knows?
-
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
-
Bold prediction...they will trade a 3rd round pick for Anthony Harris from MN...
-
Bold prediction...they will trade a 3rd round pick for Anthony Harris from MN...
Harris was just franchise tagged by MN, I believe.
-
Exactly why they would have to trade for him..I saw that MN would be willing to let him go for a mid-round pick...Not so sure now that they traded Diggs and got some draft picks back but they are still in salary cap hell.
-
Draft one like every other team does.
-
Draft one like every other team does.
One? We need like 3. In addition to that LT...and those few LBs we need.
Do you expect a 5th/6th/7th rounder to start?
-
Exactly why they would have to trade for him..I saw that MN would be willing to let him go for a mid-round pick...Not so sure now that they traded Diggs and got some draft picks back but they are still in salary cap hell.
Exactly why they would have to trade for him..I saw that MN would be willing to let him go for a mid-round pick...Not so sure now that they traded Diggs and got some draft picks back but they are still in salary cap hell.
Yes, I guess they just wanted to assure that they got something back for Harris instead of losing him for nothing:
https://sports.yahoo.com/vikings-tagged-anthony-harris-available-104659577.html
The issue there is that with the tag....comes an 11.5 million salary.
OR...question: If a player is given the franchise tag.....and then the team that tags him trades him....is the team that trades for him still obligated to pay him the Franchise Tag salary? Or, are they free to negotiate?
-
Exactly why they would have to trade for him..I saw that MN would be willing to let him go for a mid-round pick...Not so sure now that they traded Diggs and got some draft picks back but they are still in salary cap hell.
Yes, I guess they just wanted to assure that they got something back for Harris instead of losing him for nothing:
https://sports.yahoo.com/vikings-tagged-anthony-harris-available-104659577.html
The issue there is that with the tag....comes an 11.5 million salary.
OR...question: If a player is given the franchise tag.....and then the team that tags him trades him....is the team that trades for him still obligated to pay him the Franchise Tag salary? Or, are they free to negotiate?
Yes, I guess they just wanted to assure that they got something back for Harris instead of losing him for nothing:
https://sports.yahoo.com/vikings-tagged-anthony-harris-available-104659577.html
The issue there is that with the tag....comes an 11.5 million salary.
OR...question: If a player is given the franchise tag.....and then the team that tags him trades him....is the team that trades for him still obligated to pay him the Franchise Tag salary? Or, are they free to negotiate?
The team acquiring the player is still obligated to the franchise tag salary. However, they are able to negotiate a deal with them up until the July Franchise deadline. The seahawks traded for clowney last year and were unable to negotiate a long term deal but still paid him under the franchise tender. The 49ers traded for Clark last year and were able to sign him long term. Most of the time when a team is trading for a franchise player they have already had conversations with the agent so they have a general idea of what it is going to take to sign the player long term.
-
Exactly why they would have to trade for him..I saw that MN would be willing to let him go for a mid-round pick...Not so sure now that they traded Diggs and got some draft picks back but they are still in salary cap hell.
Yes, I guess they just wanted to assure that they got something back for Harris instead of losing him for nothing:
https://sports.yahoo.com/vikings-tagged-anthony-harris-available-104659577.html
The issue there is that with the tag....comes an 11.5 million salary.
OR...question: If a player is given the franchise tag.....and then the team that tags him trades him....is the team that trades for him still obligated to pay him the Franchise Tag salary? Or, are they free to negotiate?
Yes, I guess they just wanted to assure that they got something back for Harris instead of losing him for nothing:
https://sports.yahoo.com/vikings-tagged-anthony-harris-available-104659577.html
The issue there is that with the tag....comes an 11.5 million salary.
OR...question: If a player is given the franchise tag.....and then the team that tags him trades him....is the team that trades for him still obligated to pay him the Franchise Tag salary? Or, are they free to negotiate?
IIRC, they can renegotiate a deal, then trade him. We aren't giving up a first round pick for him.
-
Yes, I guess they just wanted to assure that they got something back for Harris instead of losing him for nothing:
https://sports.yahoo.com/vikings-tagged-anthony-harris-available-104659577.html
The issue there is that with the tag....comes an 11.5 million salary.
OR...question: If a player is given the franchise tag.....and then the team that tags him trades him....is the team that trades for him still obligated to pay him the Franchise Tag salary? Or, are they free to negotiate?
IIRC, they can renegotiate a deal, then trade him. We aren't giving up a first round pick for him.
IIRC, they can renegotiate a deal, then trade him. We aren't giving up a first round pick for him.
Oh, hell no. It was reported that they would take a mid round pick.
-
Oh, hell no. It was reported that they would take a mid round pick.
We have an extra third courtesy of the Patriots.
-
Oh, hell no. It was reported that they would take a mid round pick.
We have an extra third courtesy of the Patriots.
-
LMAO.... Funniest post of the YTD...
... but I had no reactions left for the day so I owe you one... at least one...
Remind me tomorrow?
===========================================================
Edit: Well it's tomorrow on the East Coast, so just paid the debt...
Still funny as hell...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
One? We need like 3.
New Defense you've invented?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Exactly why they would have to trade for him..I saw that MN would be willing to let him go for a mid-round pick...Not so sure now that they traded Diggs and got some draft picks back but they are still in salary cap hell.
Exactly why they would have to trade for him..I saw that MN would be willing to let him go for a mid-round pick...Not so sure now that they traded Diggs and got some draft picks back but they are still in salary cap hell.
The team acquiring the player is still obligated to the franchise tag salary. However, they are able to negotiate a deal with them up until the July Franchise deadline. The seahawks traded for clowney last year and were unable to negotiate a long term deal but still paid him under the franchise tender. The 49ers traded for Clark last year and were able to sign him long term. Most of the time when a team is trading for a franchise player they have already had conversations with the agent so they have a general idea of what it is going to take to sign the player long term.
Upvote worthy stuff... owe you one as well.
A lot of times contract length plus guaranteed money bring that annual salary down.
That said... we have some big paydays just 'round the corner.
Whatever we are paying our cap-master... he's going to be earning it these next few years.
-
One? We need like 3.
New Defense you've invented?
-
Redwine and Hassell...
Cranial-rectumnitis?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Redwine and Hassell...
Cranial-rectumnitis?
Yea, right....those two are really going to do it for us. Ya think?
Here are the facts: if Randall leaves, we will need two NFL quality starting safeties. Not sure if Redwine qualifies at this point. He could be a sufficient backup. Hassell was third string last year, basically filling out a roster spot.
But...if you believe that the Browns are in good shape with those two as our starting safeties this coming season....by all means, please expound as to why. It would be a more than pleasant surprise if you are right.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login