Midweek Musings
-
3. Saw a good part of "White Chicks" on TV last night. I have always said that movie is a lot funnier than it has a right to be.
I'd be curious to see the riots that would ensue if a couple of white guys, say Owen and Luke Wilson, dressed up in a bunch of darker make-up in a comedy called "Black Chicks."
I'd be curious to see the riots that would ensue if a couple of white guys, say Owen and Luke Wilson, dressed up in a bunch of darker make-up in a comedy called "Black Chicks."
Did you see Tropic Thunder? Robert Downey Jr.'s role in that film is similar to what the Wayans brothers did in White Chicks.
-
1. So? We now have "Co-starters". In my book, that equals "No-starters".
Yippers gipper that about sums it up ,the qb controversy in cleveland will never end next years starter competition..Introducing Rattboy!
Yippers gipper that about sums it up ,the qb controversy in cleveland will never end next years starter competition..Introducing Rattboy!
Hey, I know two guys who better start looking over their shoulder this year. Only one week in a 4 preseason games leaves plenty of time for Ratliff to prove he is at least the #2 guy.
Mangini loves the underdog and loves giving unknowns a chance..........................Our two prima-donnas are in a continual battle to show who is less inconsistent.
Ratliff is taking snaps with the #1s.........................ooooooops
-
Yippers gipper that about sums it up ,the qb controversy in cleveland will never end next years starter competition..Introducing Rattboy!
Hey, I know two guys who better start looking over their shoulder this year. Only one week in a 4 preseason games leaves plenty of time for Ratliff to prove he is at least the #2 guy.
Mangini loves the underdog and loves giving unknowns a chance..........................Our two prima-donnas are in a continual battle to show who is less inconsistent.
Ratliff is taking snaps with the #1s.........................ooooooops
Ratliff is taking snaps with the #1s.........................ooooooops
I don't read much into that, since the other dude got work yesterday too. It was about getting them time in the 2 minute drill. I'd also image it was to give both DA and BQ arms a rest with just having the scrimage and a game on Saturday.
I do think the odd man out will be gone by next camp and Rattliff will be the back up next year. Mangini didn't bring him here to be just #3.
-
I'd be curious to see the riots that would ensue if a couple of white guys, say Owen and Luke Wilson, dressed up in a bunch of darker make-up in a comedy called "Black Chicks."
I think the answer is that if it were funny, like White Chicks was, it would probably go over.
Bruno showed that you can be completely politically incorrect and get a movie made. The biggest crime about Bruno was that it sucked and wasn't a bit funny.
I think the answer is that if it were funny, like White Chicks was, it would probably go over.
Bruno showed that you can be completely politically incorrect and get a movie made. The biggest crime about Bruno was that it sucked and wasn't a bit funny.
Ehh.. I don't know if Bruno really was accepted all that well. In most reviews, people are absolutely appauled by it and I think it has actually stirred some controversy.
-
1. So? We now have "Co-starters". In my book, that equals "No-starters".
Propaganda.
We all know who the starter is. RAC told us at the end of the year.
Ratcliff may be a fine QB but the domer gets his shot first.
Anymore time on the bench and you for sure will say that Quinn is the most mismanged player in the history of the Browns. Its not like he's a 6th round pick, his pedigree is 1st round. Besides, the more i hear DA speak the more i feel like he couldn't really give a crap whether he's a backup or a starter.
Ratcliff will be content to make the roster, Bartell-- please.
-
I think the answer is that if it were funny, like White Chicks was, it would probably go over.
Bruno showed that you can be completely politically incorrect and get a movie made. The biggest crime about Bruno was that it sucked and wasn't a bit funny.
Ehh.. I don't know if Bruno really was accepted all that well. In most reviews, people are absolutely appauled by it and I think it has actually stirred some controversy.
Ehh.. I don't know if Bruno really was accepted all that well. In most reviews, people are absolutely appauled by it and I think it has actually stirred some controversy.
Well, being rude and crude as it was would be forgiveable....if it were funny. It wasn't.
OK, here is a penis talking.....but the talking penis has to say something funny, not just be a talking penis.
-
@hiwaygal said:
I don't know, that could be pretty freaking amazing, actually.
Well then, you should hear the tales mine can spit out.
-
@hiwaygal said:
I don't know, that could be pretty freaking amazing, actually.Well then, you should hear the tales mine can spit out.
Well then, you should hear the tales mine can spit out.
Mine barks like a squirrel.
-
1. So? We now have "Co-starters". In my book, that equals "No-starters".
Propaganda.
We all know who the starter is. RAC told us at the end of the year.
Ratcliff may be a fine QB but the domer gets his shot first.
Anymore time on the bench and you for sure will say that Quinn is the most mismanged player in the history of the Browns. Its not like he's a 6th round pick, his pedigree is 1st round. Besides, the more i hear DA speak the more i feel like he couldn't really give a crap whether he's a backup or a starter.
Ratcliff will be content to make the roster, Bartell-- please.
We all know who the starter is. RAC told us at the end of the year.
I'm struggling to understand the significance of what the old coach's opinion on who the QB for his old team should be. We have a new regime; I'm quite certain they don't really put much thought or care into what the old (and unsuccessful) coach thought about the QB situation 8 months ago.
-
We all know who the starter is. RAC told us at the end of the year.
I'm struggling to understand the significance of what the old coach's opinion on who the QB for his old team should be. We have a new regime; I'm quite certain they don't really put much thought or care into what the old (and unsuccessful) coach thought about the QB situation 8 months ago.
I'm struggling to understand the significance of what the old coach's opinion on who the QB for his old team should be. We have a new regime; I'm quite certain they don't really put much thought or care into what the old (and unsuccessful) coach thought about the QB situation 8 months ago.
I can tell your struggling if you don't understand my post.
-
@hiwaygal said:
I don't know, that could be pretty freaking amazing, actually.You should go see Bruno then.
Though, I guess I could confess and tell you that my penis talks to me, but I don't know if anyone else can hear it.
Would you like to try and listen in on our conversation?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login