DRAFT DAY 2020 ! ! !
-
No, it doesn't. Sophomore starting year and he's already missing games regular season because of taking hits that his Oline allows. Long term trends don't side with that style of play. If KC feels their defense is adequate enough to get it done, then I'm cool with that. But they would be wise to address their Oline Day 2.
I don't disagree with day 2 OL pick. I'm just saying this is a quick release safety valve who can do wonders in that role. Don't want the big hit? Get rid of it to him.
Besides we all know those big fatties are a dime a dozen don't we???
EDIT: That is why I hope we take a similar player in Duvernay of UT-Austin as our comp pick in the 3rd.
I don't disagree with day 2 OL pick. I'm just saying this is a quick release safety valve who can do wonders in that role. Don't want the big hit? Get rid of it to him.
Besides we all know those big fatties are a dime a dozen don't we???
EDIT: That is why I hope we take a similar player in Duvernay of UT-Austin as our comp pick in the 3rd.
*Shudders at ghoolie*
I don't disagree with the strategy either. But if ECE was drafted as a 3rd down back and extra receiving option, I question the value of taking him in the 1st round. IOL could have been a pick there for them. And you know Andy Reid, he LOVES his vertical shots. Only way to secure that long term play style and preserve the health of your QB is to make sure he isn't taking unnecessary hits.
Like I said, I get the philosophy. I just disagree on the placement of the pick is all.
-
I don't disagree with day 2 OL pick. I'm just saying this is a quick release safety valve who can do wonders in that role. Don't want the big hit? Get rid of it to him.
Besides we all know those big fatties are a dime a dozen don't we???
EDIT: That is why I hope we take a similar player in Duvernay of UT-Austin as our comp pick in the 3rd.
*Shudders at ghoolie*
I don't disagree with the strategy either. But if ECE was drafted as a 3rd down back and extra receiving option, I question the value of taking him in the 1st round. IOL could have been a pick there for them. And you know Andy Reid, he LOVES his vertical shots. Only way to secure that long term play style and preserve the health of your QB is to make sure he isn't taking unnecessary hits.
Like I said, I get the philosophy. I just disagree on the placement of the pick is all.
*Shudders at ghoolie*?
Like I said, I get the philosophy. I just disagree on the placement of the pick is all.
Normally I might agree, but this draft is very deep in OLs and very short on this kind of player. Now if their second pick is not OL ................well another story completely.?
-
Jack’s go for the corner back from Florida. So both Wills and Wirfs are on the board
Jack’s go for the corner back from Florida. So both Wills and Wirfs are on the board
Who are the "Jack's?"
-
We have 8 viable lineman on the roster - guys that can start. We traded picks for Teller and everyone wants a better guy at that spot. Might be time to slow our roll with these sandwich eaters
how many lineman will be active each week? I think you may grab one late or do the Undrafted free agent route and let a group of guys compete for the last spot
-
I'm surprised at that one. I liked this draft - much faster.
Seems pretty consistent that character played a good part of the first round prospects drafted. A lot of great stories...
I'm not going to be surprised if Wills starts at LT - he's a great pick and has already been working on it. I'm good with that.
Second round- no idea. Safeties/lb/wr is my guess - might Mckinney fall to the Browns?
I said the same thing. The speed of the picks was great, wonder if they will consider the 10 minute time frame in the future.
-
Broncos take Jerry Judy Judy Judy Judy
As a Broncos fan I was elated with the pick. It's perfect for their new starting QB.
As a Broncos fan I was elated with the pick. It's perfect for their new starting QB.
You can shove the Broncos up your butthole. Please.
-
Jack’s go for the corner back from Florida. So both Wills and Wirfs are on the board
Who are the "Jack's?"
Who are the "Jack's?"
It was talk to text.......so it was meant to be JAX.
But hell yea, I like it... why not. Naming a team The Jacks. After Jack...or after the playing card. A lot better than some shitty team names.
-
Last time I shill for you.... bucko...
Here's a thought, h... sell a couple bottles...
I actually own a bottle of that '90 Petrus Tour, and I do have a friends & family buyer for it that I'm selling it to at a discount. At $145 dollars an ounce, too rich for my blood.
My opinion on that- I could enjoy it for an hour or so, or have it pay for my Browns season tickets. Not a tough decision. FWIW, I've been fortunate enough to be able to taste on several occasions (and not on my nickel) wines that were in the four figure range if they had been sold instead. Trust me, they weren't 10 times better than $100 dollar bottles, or in some cases not even better than $50 wines. At that rarefied level you're drinking rarity and "prestige". Or you're not too bright. A great example of that is "Ace of Spades" champagne owned by Jay Z. At $300+ bucks a bottle one expert taster said you could do as well for $70.
On a personal level, I was asked to do a Christmas champagne tasting for the local American Wine Society. So I pulled Dom Perignon and Moet's one step down Vintage Brut- at 1\3 the price, served them side by side- but the folks didn't know which was which, or even the producer. Which do you like better? It split right down the middle- so at three times the price, wasn't worth it. I even have a name for it when I teach a wine class. Larry's Logarithmic Law of diminishing returns.
I actually own a bottle of that '90 Petrus Tour, and I do have a friends & family buyer for it that I'm selling it to at a discount. At $145 dollars an ounce, too rich for my blood.
My opinion on that- I could enjoy it for an hour or so, or have it pay for my Browns season tickets. Not a tough decision. FWIW, I've been fortunate enough to be able to taste on several occasions (and not on my nickel) wines that were in the four figure range if they had been sold instead. Trust me, they weren't 10 times better than $100 dollar bottles, or in some cases not even better than $50 wines. At that rarefied level you're drinking rarity and "prestige". Or you're not too bright. A great example of that is "Ace of Spades" champagne owned by Jay Z. At $300+ bucks a bottle one expert taster said you could do as well for $70.
On a personal level, I was asked to do a Christmas champagne tasting for the local American Wine Society. So I pulled Dom Perignon and Moet's one step down Vintage Brut- at 1\3 the price, served them side by side- but the folks didn't know which was which, or even the producer. Which do you like better? It split right down the middle- so at three times the price, wasn't worth it. I even have a name for it when I teach a wine class. Larry's Logarithmic Law of diminishing returns.
Larry. Where do you put the 1990 Chateau Montrose? That’s my benchmark.
-
We have 8 viable lineman on the roster - guys that can start. We traded picks for Teller and everyone wants a better guy at that spot. Might be time to slow our roll with these sandwich eaters
how many lineman will be active each week? I think you may grab one late or do the Undrafted free agent route and let a group of guys compete for the last spot
We have 8 viable lineman on the roster - guys that can start. We traded picks for Teller and everyone wants a better guy at that spot. Might be time to slow our roll with these sandwich eaters
how many lineman will be active each week? I think you may grab one late or do the Undrafted free agent route and let a group of guys compete for the last spot
I don't know: Our depth chart:
LT Wills......Hubbard
LG Bito....Malcolm Pridgeon
OC Tretter.....Evan Brown
RG Teller.....Drew Forbes
RT Conklin....Hubbard (double duty)
Right now on the roster also are Kendall Lamm, Colby Gosset and Willie Wright at spots along the OL.
Are any of you fully and completely satisfied with this roster such that you believe that we do not lead to look any further at OL in this draft? I can't really say that I think we are there.
-
We have 8 viable lineman on the roster - guys that can start. We traded picks for Teller and everyone wants a better guy at that spot. Might be time to slow our roll with these sandwich eaters
how many lineman will be active each week? I think you may grab one late or do the Undrafted free agent route and let a group of guys compete for the last spot
I don't know: Our depth chart:
LT Wills......Hubbard
LG Bito....Malcolm Pridgeon
OC Tretter.....Evan Brown
RG Teller.....Drew Forbes
RT Conklin....Hubbard (double duty)
Right now on the roster also are Kendall Lamm, Colby Gosset and Willie Wright at spots along the OL.
Are any of you fully and completely satisfied with this roster such that you believe that we do not lead to look any further at OL in this draft? I can't really say that I think we are there.
I don't know: Our depth chart:
LT Wills......Hubbard
LG Bito....Malcolm Pridgeon
OC Tretter.....Evan Brown
RG Teller.....Drew Forbes
RT Conklin....Hubbard (double duty)
Right now on the roster also are Kendall Lamm, Colby Gosset and Willie Wright at spots along the OL.
Are any of you fully and completely satisfied with this roster such that you believe that we do not lead to look any further at OL in this draft? I can't really say that I think we are there.
I am. And we threw a lot of cash and even some picks to get this unit to where it is right now. I say no more
i want some hungry undrafted FAs and maybe a 6th or 7th dueling it out for the last roster spot. Truthfully do you see the #9 being active?
We need defense badly. The last month was a disgusting display of football. Watch the Cardinal game or second Steeler game or the bengal game
I don’t like any of our backers. We have Redwine as 3rd safety. We have a DE that is going to be one more year (maybe) and he’s always hurt.
-
I don't know: Our depth chart:
LT Wills......Hubbard
LG Bito....Malcolm Pridgeon
OC Tretter.....Evan Brown
RG Teller.....Drew Forbes
RT Conklin....Hubbard (double duty)
Right now on the roster also are Kendall Lamm, Colby Gosset and Willie Wright at spots along the OL.
Are any of you fully and completely satisfied with this roster such that you believe that we do not lead to look any further at OL in this draft? I can't really say that I think we are there.
I am. And we threw a lot of cash and even some picks to get this unit to where it is right now. I say no more
i want some hungry undrafted FAs and maybe a 6th or 7th dueling it out for the last roster spot. Truthfully do you see the #9 being active?
We need defense badly. The last month was a disgusting display of football. Watch the Cardinal game or second Steeler game or the bengal game
I don’t like any of our backers. We have Redwine as 3rd safety. We have a DE that is going to be one more year (maybe) and he’s always hurt.
I am. And we threw a lot of cash and even some picks to get this unit to where it is right now. I say no more
i want some hungry undrafted FAs and maybe a 6th or 7th dueling it out for the last roster spot. Truthfully do you see the #9 being active?
We need defense badly. The last month was a disgusting display of football. Watch the Cardinal game or second Steeler game or the bengal game
I don’t like any of our backers. We have Redwine as 3rd safety. We have a DE that is going to be one more year (maybe) and he’s always hurt.
Well, no doubt, to me, the safely and LB is what we gotta go get now.
Backup OL is now a much lower priority.
-
- Not surprising especially since I am sure that most teasms who talked to him at the Combine likely asked him how he felt about a move to LT... where 1st round OTs are generally tabbed to play.
-
FIFY... no charge...
- Hard to know if anything went on behind the scene, but it looks like MIA went for "upside" they thought they saw in the case of Jackson and TN saw in Wilson a man/gap guy bull-dozing for Henry. I still see Jones as having the higher floor, but he's not a scheme fit for TN. I think Jackson is going to get Fitz/Tua killed and while Wilson will blow open some holes he's going to get Tannehill dented a few times.
- The way things got scrambled up in the bottom half of Round 1... who knows? McKinney might fall thru us...
Edit... and Wirfs is going to supply TB12 with more "look out" blocks than he'll want.
Well said.
Aside from Jones not being a scheme fit for TN, they're very happy with Taylor Lewan at LT. I wouldn't understand the redundancy if they chose Jones. TN lost their RT in FA to us so they drafted a RT (Wilson). Makes sense...
My guess with Jones, isn't that he's raw (4 year starter at LT). It could be the old school concerns of what type of competition was he up against most of the time. I think it's more than a coincidence that all of the 1st round Tackles came from the major Conferences (SEC, Big 10, Pac 12, ACC). Most of the teams with the urgency to draft a LT in round 1 seem to want an immediate starter. That said, Aus-tone Jackson seems like he's less polished than Jones IMO.
In the 2 Draft Guides I have, Lindy's has Jones rated as the 9th best Tackle while Athlon's rates him as the 7th best (these guides merged RTs into their ratings so Isaiah Wilson was listed ahead of him in both publications). Both sources have Jones going in round 2.
The draft doesn't end on Thursday... There's going to be a lot of successful players drafted tonight and tomorrow with no reason Jones can't be one of them. FWIW, we've also found some Undrafted FAs that became reliable starters like LT Tony (T-Bone) Jones and RT Orlando Brown (the 1st time he was here). When we used to make the playoffs, we did well in the later rounds. For example, RT Cody Risien from TAMU in round 7 who was a Second Team All Pro in 83 and made Pro Bowls in 86 and 87. The era we're in doesn't have as many buried treasures that late - but guys like Peart and Jones should be good draft picks for someone...
In the 2 Draft Guides I have, Lindy's has Jones rated as the 9th best Tackle while Athlon's rates him as the 7th best (these guides merged RTs into their ratings so Isaiah Wilson was listed ahead of him in both publications). Both sources have Jones going in round 2.
PFF had him #2 to Wirfs.... so that's a mixed endorsement if there ever was one. DraftScout had him #6 with a late 1st grade IIRC... site has crashed so can't verify ATM.While NFL.com graded him out at #5, but only a couple hundredths of a point (if you can believe that"precision") atop a 2nd tier group.
From the calves up he was overall the most polished OT I saw in this draft (Thomas' hands were better)... but again that just means high floor. Just makes Jones one of two OT "steals" left in the draft...
... and then there's Ezra...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
I'm surprised at that one. I liked this draft - much faster.
Seems pretty consistent that character played a good part of the first round prospects drafted. A lot of great stories...
I'm not going to be surprised if Wills starts at LT - he's a great pick and has already been working on it. I'm good with that.
Second round- no idea. Safeties/lb/wr is my guess - might Mckinney fall to the Browns?
I said the same thing. The speed of the picks was great, wonder if they will consider the 10 minute time frame in the future.
I said the same thing. The speed of the picks was great, wonder if they will consider the 10 minute time frame in the future.
Plus if I am not mistaken didn't the clock used to start for a team when the prior team's pick was announced? Last nite it was when the pick was turned in...
Unless the pick was sent out to all the teams immediately... and it well may have been... the time for teams to do deals would be both reduced and highly variable as I saw times on the clock ranging from 7 minutes down to 2 minutes when Roger read the pick.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
I know FO's say this all the time about whomever they take, but somehow I believe DePo.
Me too! Here's why. Jedrick Wills was also the Tackle Joe Thomas picked for us in the NFL Channel's mock draft - despite the fact Andrew Thomas was also available at the time he did so.
I get the feeling Joe was a consulting/influential part of Wills being "the top tackle on our board from the beginning" consensus within.
Me too! Here's why. Jedrick Wills was also the Tackle Joe Thomas picked for us in the NFL Channel's mock draft - despite the fact Andrew Thomas was also available at the time he did so.
I get the feeling Joe was a consulting/influential part of Wills being "the top tackle on our board from the beginning" consensus within.
I would hope the Browns had Joe doing some film work for them.
Normally I might agree, but this draft is very deep in OLs and very short on this kind of player. Now if their second pick is not OL ................well another story completely.?
Regarding those four OTs going off the the board in the top half of the first round, too bad we don't have Ghoolie to kick around anymore. Those GMs obviously don't have a clue. ???
-
I know FO's say this all the time about whomever they take, but somehow I believe DePo.
When the "pick is in" went up I told my Son in Law that, as fast as they announced the pick was in, he HAD to be the Browns absolute #1 guy. I don't know WHEN I ever saw a quicker decision. The young man, Fletcher, introducing the Browns' pick was a nice touch.
Mike
The young man, Fletcher, introducing the Browns' pick was a nice touch.
Agree, but I have to admit that I worried that this arrangement would influence any trade down decision...
... at least until I realized Fletch was pre-recorded...
Kid ought to do the coin toss at our home opener as well.
-
32. Jalen Hurts CB Utah.
32. Jalen Johnson CB Utah....
EDIT-- There are some great video phone player reactions out there, that I hope the nfl keeps moving these legit home video cameras around to next rounds..It's been great, but the media guys we've heard from for months, just ain't doing it for me anymore ?... Let these kids get a breather than let them speak.. The reaction of Joe Thomas reacting to Wills pick? Yep! I Cried in laughter ?
-
Chiefs take Clyde Edwards-Helaire RB LSU with #32 pick.
This was one of the really great picks in the draft. He has so much ability catching out of the backfield and so many "getaway" moves in the open field and power to finish off the play. He is a perfect fit for Mahomes's style of play. They are going to be even better than last year with that pick alone.
This was one of the really great picks in the draft. He has so much ability catching out of the backfield and so many "getaway" moves in the open field and power to finish off the play. He is a perfect fit for Mahomes's style of play. They are going to be even better than last year with that pick alone.
That was one impressive highlight reel played at the pick....
Yeah... until that Oline play catches up with them again like it did in the regular season.
I am predicting a break-out year for the Camster...
Normally I might agree, but this draft is very deep in OLs and very short on this kind of player. Now if their second pick is not OL ................well another story completely.?
Which Draft is that? The 2020 Draft?
There are some decent IOL to be sure, including a couple with great potential, but most are man/gap types and that's not KC's attack.
-
I actually own a bottle of that '90 Petrus Tour, and I do have a friends & family buyer for it that I'm selling it to at a discount. At $145 dollars an ounce, too rich for my blood.
My opinion on that- I could enjoy it for an hour or so, or have it pay for my Browns season tickets. Not a tough decision. FWIW, I've been fortunate enough to be able to taste on several occasions (and not on my nickel) wines that were in the four figure range if they had been sold instead. Trust me, they weren't 10 times better than $100 dollar bottles, or in some cases not even better than $50 wines. At that rarefied level you're drinking rarity and "prestige". Or you're not too bright. A great example of that is "Ace of Spades" champagne owned by Jay Z. At $300+ bucks a bottle one expert taster said you could do as well for $70.
On a personal level, I was asked to do a Christmas champagne tasting for the local American Wine Society. So I pulled Dom Perignon and Moet's one step down Vintage Brut- at 1\3 the price, served them side by side- but the folks didn't know which was which, or even the producer. Which do you like better? It split right down the middle- so at three times the price, wasn't worth it. I even have a name for it when I teach a wine class. Larry's Logarithmic Law of diminishing returns.
Larry. Where do you put the 1990 Chateau Montrose? That’s my benchmark.
Larry. Where do you put the 1990 Chateau Montrose? That’s my benchmark.
Sorry for the draft OT Reply.....
I was lucky enough to get 6 bottles of the Montrose before the price went crazy. When you get to that level, it's nit picking and personal preference. A couple other 90s I liked better, Figeac and Beausejour. I thought the 90 Leoville Barton was equally as good. Many of the top '82s I'd rank higher. FWIW, I've never given the 90 Montrose Parker's perfect 100 rating each time I've tried it. Close, no cigar.
There's a saying "there are no great wines, just great bottles of wine". When they get old, bottle variation becomes a factor. Probably the greatest wine I've ever been lucky enough to try was a 1959 Chateau Mouton Rothschild. It was at least 30 years ago, and I still remember it like it was yesterday. When they pulled the cork, it was like someone opened a bottle of perfume and sprayed it across the room. You could smell it from 10 feet away. One of the guys said it rated around 150 on a 100 point scale. Definitely a once in a lifetime experience. That's why millionaire collectors are willing to shell out a fortune in search of the exceedingly rare Holy Grail of winedom.
-
Larry. Where do you put the 1990 Chateau Montrose? That’s my benchmark.
Sorry for the draft OT Reply.....
I was lucky enough to get 6 bottles of the Montrose before the price went crazy. When you get to that level, it's nit picking and personal preference. A couple other 90s I liked better, Figeac and Beausejour. I thought the 90 Leoville Barton was equally as good. Many of the top '82s I'd rank higher. FWIW, I've never given the 90 Montrose Parker's perfect 100 rating each time I've tried it. Close, no cigar.
There's a saying "there are no great wines, just great bottles of wine". When they get old, bottle variation becomes a factor. Probably the greatest wine I've ever been lucky enough to try was a 1959 Chateau Mouton Rothschild. It was at least 30 years ago, and I still remember it like it was yesterday. When they pulled the cork, it was like someone opened a bottle of perfume and sprayed it across the room. You could smell it from 10 feet away. One of the guys said it rated around 150 on a 100 point scale. Definitely a once in a lifetime experience. That's why millionaire collectors are willing to shell out a fortune in search of the exceedingly rare Holy Grail of winedom.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
I said the same thing. The speed of the picks was great, wonder if they will consider the 10 minute time frame in the future.
Plus if I am not mistaken didn't the clock used to start for a team when the prior team's pick was announced? Last nite it was when the pick was turned in...
Unless the pick was sent out to all the teams immediately... and it well may have been... the time for teams to do deals would be both reduced and highly variable as I saw times on the clock ranging from 7 minutes down to 2 minutes when Roger read the pick.
Plus if I am not mistaken didn't the clock used to start for a team when the prior team's pick was announced? Last nite it was when the pick was turned in...
Unless the pick was sent out to all the teams immediately... and it well may have been... the time for teams to do deals would be both reduced and highly variable as I saw times on the clock ranging from 7 minutes down to 2 minutes when Roger read the pick.
Technically, the clock starts on the team as soon as the other team officially submits their pick to the NFL people. If there is a trade, the clock restarts for the other team. It's always been that way. The reason things moved a little quicker is because we didn't have all the fluff interviews and on-stage with RG. For example, it looked as though the Browns pick came in super quick, but because of the delay for everything else I think the pick wasn't submitted until the 5 or 6 minute mark. I wish they would shorten it to 7 minutes in the first.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login