hydroxychloroquine
-
?
-
Worked for me.
-
Worked for me.
Worked for me.
Generally that's why we don't use a sample size of 1
(Still great you got better tho, obviously)
-
Worked for me.
Generally that's why we don't use a sample size of 1
(Still great you got better tho, obviously)
Generally that's why we don't use a sample size of 1
We should just start callin you BJ
Biden Junior.Â
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
Ho hum.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1260704141308915713.html
Note the precautions.
I'll post this in my main thread as well so it doesn't get lost.
-
Ho hum.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1260704141308915713.html
Note the precautions.
I'll post this in my main thread as well so it doesn't get lost.
Ho hum.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1260704141308915713.html
Note the precautions.
I'll post this in my main thread as well so it doesn't get lost.
well fuck, if.... ThinQing Anon said it then it MUST be true. I mean why even question it? I don't see any reason to perform any legitimate, unbiased research on my own. Hell, it was in all caps. It has to be true!
-
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
This is the crux of why I think both of these parties of shills are full of shit. They are in the winning elections and pocketing money business. They have to stick to the party line and cartoonishly disagree with each other no matter what.
-
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
 no shit. Let's just say there a lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of jokes out there.
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
and those could be excellent reasons if they didn't fall under the general category of "bulshit somebody made up so they could bitch about Trump."
WSS
-
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
 no shit. Let's just say there a lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of jokes out there.
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
and those could be excellent reasons if they didn't fall under the general category of "bulshit somebody made up so they could bitch about Trump."
WSS
WSS
So all three of those reasons you just chalk up to "anti Trump nonsense". Really?
-
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
wrong.
Âwww.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/fsp/drugs/Hydroxychloroquine.pdfBoth adults and children should take one dose of hydroxychloroquine per week starting at least 1 week before traveling to the area where malaria transmission occurs. They should take one dose per week while there, and for 4 consecutive weeks after leaving. The weekly dosage for adults is 310mg base (400mg salt).
go to that PDF and open. pretty interesting - the CDC says:
"Hydroxychloroquine can be prescribed to adults
and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by
pregnant women and nursing mothers." -
WSS
So all three of those reasons you just chalk up to "anti Trump nonsense". Really?
So all three of those reasons you just chalk up to "anti Trump nonsense". Really?
Yes thanks for asking.
1 the survey in the Washington Times said European and elsewhere doctors say it's the most effective of what they have to offer. Is preventative as well as a treatment for early-stage virus. PS doctor woodpecker it is an antiviral It just happens to have been used for malaria.
2 yes there are side effects to everything. Including aspirin acetaminophen and even more severely chemotherapy which is prescribed hundreds of times a day.
3 hoarding? What kind of a stupid ass reason is that? What is this fucking toilet paper?  The shit is commonly available and cheap and been tested for decades. By the way your side effects with your crying about are only present in mega doses. Or maybe I should say MAGA doses.
BaconHound would not give to shits about it unless Trump mentioned its name.
WSS
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-hydroxychloroq-idUSKBN21O2VO
That's from April but it's from Reuters so you can't squeal and cry about the source.
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
Have you never seen medication/drug ads on TV when they disclose the dangerous side affects?..after listening to that you wonder how they're allowed to be sold. Every damn thing has dangerous side affects.
Also, hydrox has been used for decades.
Also, it is not etched in stone that hydrox is not effective. Testing is still being conducted.
-
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
Have you never seen medication/drug ads on TV when they disclose the dangerous side affects?..after listening to that you wonder how they're allowed to be sold. Every damn thing has dangerous side affects.
Also, hydrox has been used for decades.
Also, it is not etched in stone that hydrox is not effective. Testing is still being conducted.
Have you never seen medication/drug ads on TV when they disclose the dangerous side affects?..after listening to that you wonder how they're allowed to be sold.
Also, hydrox has been used for decades.
Also, it is not etched in stone that hydrox is not effective. Testing is still being conducted.
 do a Google search for hydroxychloroquine success. The only one that said a small test found no benefit was from, Guess Who, CNN.
WSS
-
Have you never seen medication/drug ads on TV when they disclose the dangerous side affects?..after listening to that you wonder how they're allowed to be sold.
Also, hydrox has been used for decades.
Also, it is not etched in stone that hydrox is not effective. Testing is still being conducted.
 do a Google search for hydroxychloroquine success. The only one that said a small test found no benefit was from, Guess Who, CNN.
WSS
 do a Google search for hydroxychloroquine success. The only one that said a small test found no benefit was from, Guess Who, CNN.
WSS
but Doctor Woodpecker loves him some CNN. They are his Encyclopedia Britannica.
-
So all three of those reasons you just chalk up to "anti Trump nonsense". Really?
Yes thanks for asking.
1 the survey in the Washington Times said European and elsewhere doctors say it's the most effective of what they have to offer. Is preventative as well as a treatment for early-stage virus. PS doctor woodpecker it is an antiviral It just happens to have been used for malaria.
2 yes there are side effects to everything. Including aspirin acetaminophen and even more severely chemotherapy which is prescribed hundreds of times a day.
3 hoarding? What kind of a stupid ass reason is that? What is this fucking toilet paper?  The shit is commonly available and cheap and been tested for decades. By the way your side effects with your crying about are only present in mega doses. Or maybe I should say MAGA doses.
BaconHound would not give to shits about it unless Trump mentioned its name.
WSS
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-hydroxychloroq-idUSKBN21O2VO
That's from April but it's from Reuters so you can't squeal and cry about the source.
Yes thanks for asking.
1 the survey in the Washington Times said European and elsewhere doctors say it's the most effective of what they have to offer. Is preventative as well as a treatment for early-stage virus. PS doctor woodpecker it is an antiviral It just happens to have been used for malaria.
2 yes there are side effects to everything. Including aspirin acetaminophen and even more severely chemotherapy which is prescribed hundreds of times a day.
3 hoarding? What kind of a stupid ass reason is that? What is this fucking toilet paper?  The shit is commonly available and cheap and been tested for decades. By the way your side effects with your crying about are only present in mega doses. Or maybe I should say MAGA doses.
BaconHound would not give to shits about it unless Trump mentioned its name.
WSS
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-hydroxychloroq-idUSKBN21O2VO
That's from April but it's from Reuters so you can't squeal and cry about the source.
You just can't make a single post without typical Steve bullshit, huh?
Saying "well chemo has side effects too"... Give me a break
And more "squeal and cry"... Smh
It just isn't worth the time if that is how you are going to attempt this back and forth. Say I'm "crying" here, IDC. You can't ever expect a reasonable conversation if you immediately load it up with hyperbole and fallacies.Â
FYI, the French study that showed positive results from hydroxychloroquine use has since been retracted.Â
-
Politics aside I have no idea why anybody would give fuck number one about this particular medication. I've said this before, if Donald Trump give a speech and said it was dangerous Nancy Pelosi would want to put it in our drinking water.
Just for the hell of it the President should start publicly smoking medical marijuana just so we can watch the Democrats demand that it be placed back on the list of drugs alongside heroin and crack.
WSS
This is the crux of why I think both of these parties of shills are full of shit. They are in the winning elections and pocketing money business. They have to stick to the party line and cartoonishly disagree with each other no matter what.
This is the crux of why I think both of these parties of shills are full of shit.
But Steve only mentioned democrats. Name a similar incident in which Republicans behaved like this.
They are in the winning elections and pocketing money business.
OK, that's fair and balanced.
They have to stick to the party line and cartoonishly disagree with each other no matter what.
Is disagreeing with the dems fraudulent attempt to remove a president from office "cartoonish"?
Is disagreeing with the underhanded and vile way the democrats tried to demonize Kavanaugh "cartoonish"?
Is disagreeing with everything a cartoon says (AOC) "cartoonish"?
Is disagreeing with an unworkable New Green Deal "cartoonish"?
Is disagreeing with reparations for blacks "cartoonish"?
Is to disagree with the idea of equal outcomes, and promoting equal opportunity "cartoonish"?
I can go on an on but I'll first give you an opportunity to counter each with the Republican version.
-
If someone was pro legalization of weed and then decided to be against it because Trump now supports it that person is a joke. They'd be the left wing version of stuff we see on here (either through posted articles or directly).Â
As for hydroxychloroquine, people might give a fuck because 1) it hasn't been clinically proven to make a difference, 2) it had dangerous side effects and 3) hoarding it limits it's available to people who actually need it for the diseases it's been proven to be effective against
Have you never seen medication/drug ads on TV when they disclose the dangerous side affects?..after listening to that you wonder how they're allowed to be sold. Every damn thing has dangerous side affects.
Also, hydrox has been used for decades.
Also, it is not etched in stone that hydrox is not effective. Testing is still being conducted.
Have you never seen medication/drug ads on TV when they disclose the dangerous side affects?..after listening to that you wonder how they're allowed to be sold. Every damn thing has dangerous side affects.
Also, hydrox has been used for decades.
Also, it is not etched in stone that hydrox is not effective. Testing is still being conducted.
I never said it has been proven to be ineffective. I said it hasn't been proven to be effective. That's different.Â
Those side effects come as a cost to a clinically proven benefit.Â
It has been used to treat different conditionsÂ
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better đ
Register Login