Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Quinn highlights from Packers game

Quinn highlights from Packers game

The Browns Board
47 18 2.5k
  • OconReconO OconRecon

    OBR now reporting Quinn is the man and continuing the QB competition is an exercise in futility at this point.

    http://cle.scout.com/2/889173.html (sorry, it won't copy and paste)

    @oconrecon said:

    OBR now reporting Quinn is the man and continuing the QB competition is an exercise in futility at this point.

    http://cle.scout.com/2/889173.html (sorry, it won't copy and paste)

    That's a rant by an amateur columnist, not something from their "insider" reporting staff.

  • I wish Brady Quinn was our QB when Byner fumbled.

    Thank the football gods that we have Stan and Zombo to educate us on the fundamentals of football and that discussing the QB position is pointless.

    You know, I've had an epiphany based on their infinite wisdom: we should cut both DA and Quinn to save money and bring back Frye.

  • G Greythan
    I wish Brady Quinn was our QB when Byner fumbled.

    Thank the football gods that we have Stan and Zombo to educate us on the fundamentals of football and that discussing the QB position is pointless.

    You know, I've had an epiphany based on their infinite wisdom: we should cut both DA and Quinn to save money and bring back Frye.

    @greythan said:

    Thank the football gods that we have Stan and Zombo to educate us on the fundamentals of football and that discussing the QB position is pointless.

    You know, I've had an epiphany based on their infinite wisdom: we should cut both DA and Quinn to save money and bring back Frye.

    Brilliant! My whole goal here was to inform everyone that discussing the QB position is pointless.

    Do you people even know how to fucking read?

    Don't look now but Earl's nice thread about everything but the QB position is sinking to the bottom of the front page.

    freaking posers.

  • Read his thread. I just came from there.

    Poser.

    EDIT: Thought you meant Sony's thread on our lack of talent. Either way, I added my thoughts on a topic that's of bigger concern to me than the QB position.

  • Someone pointed out the lack of separation the WR's are getting. Factor that in, and some of those completions were damn impressive.

    Quinn to win. Let's get on with it.

  • OconReconO OconRecon

    Someone pointed out the lack of separation the WR's are getting. Factor that in, and some of those completions were damn impressive.

    Quinn to win. Let's get on with it.

    @oconrecon said:

    Someone pointed out the lack of separation the WR's are getting. Factor that in, and some of those completions were damn impressive.

    That would have been me ... and to think that it was my opening post in this thread that started all the hating.

    Actually, I'd rather not see us force those throws, but if it is all we got, it was a damn good way to move the chains, and nice catches btw too. Several diving-type catches ... how do we factor those in the QB rating re-calculation?

    OconReconO 1 Reply

  • There are no positives to take from this game cos there was no touchdowns.

    For a team that has been chocking on touchdowns for the final quarter of the previous season, the emphasis for the preseason should not just be on testing out rookies, clearing the QB competition and winning the game, it must be about getting that touchdown. Even in a defeat the one moment that we celebrate are the touchdowns that our teams score and this game did not have any.

  • ATENEARSA ATENEARS

    @oconrecon said:

    Someone pointed out the lack of separation the WR's are getting. Factor that in, and some of those completions were damn impressive.

    That would have been me ... and to think that it was my opening post in this thread that started all the hating.

    Actually, I'd rather not see us force those throws, but if it is all we got, it was a damn good way to move the chains, and nice catches btw too. Several diving-type catches ... how do we factor those in the QB rating re-calculation?

    @atenears said:

    ... how do we factor those in the QB rating re-calculation?

    Hmm yes, add 20? Sounds good.

    Now, count the TD, subtract the INT and attempt, add 20 for no WR separation, another 10 for only getting half the starter snaps since spring, 5 cuz chicks dig him, and he comes out at a 162.

    Winner, winner, chicken dinner.

    😉

  • Watching that video, I see that our WR's sure don't get a lot of seperation. Only Edwards on his drop beat his man enough for a clean look. Cribbs slant wasn't too bad, and although the TE's aren't getting away from their coverage, they are at least getting into their patterns without all the backyard zig-zagging from Winslow in recent years.

    I still don't like Quinn's short-arm release. It has no zip on the ball. That INT was horrible, Braylon was blanketed on that play. The Packers stuffed seven men into the end zone on the drop, a little better play calling could have been utilized on that next play.

    This was your opening post in this thread.

    Find me one positive thing you said about Quinn in there. Oh, the "wasn't too bad" comment?

    And then you come off holier than thou when some of us challenge your points/tone on the QB topic. Classic.

  • More contridictions .... "When two guys are in the middle of a QB battle ... someone is smoking the good shit if they think one of them has a chance" .... (hint: whoever was dumb enough to make the above statement is fried already)

    You know what I mean. I have been saying from the beginning that BQ should have been playing from the first game.

Log in to reply