Common Ground - Thread 1 - Term Limits
-
I'm going to try and find things we can all agree on. See what's universal from the far right to the moderately left.
Attempt 1 - Congressional Term Limits
Is everyone in agreement that there should be a limit on the number of times someone can be a Senator or Congressman?
-
Absolutely.
-
I’ve been railing for decades on Congressional term limits
Bad news...Congress would have to draft a bill to set the wheels in motion, and we know those idiots won’t do that.
-
I’ve been railing for decades on Congressional term limits
Bad news...Congress would have to draft a bill to set the wheels in motion, and we know those idiots won’t do that.
I’ve been railing for decades on Congressional term limits
Bad news...Congress would have to draft a bill to set the wheels in motion, and we know those idiots won’t do that.
Yep.
-
Holy hell YES!! Add in the Supreme Court Justices to that list and it's perfect.
-
Every paid political position should have term limits. It was always meant to be a service, not a career. I’ve never heard a good argument against term limits.
-
Holy hell YES!! Add in the Supreme Court Justices to that list and it's perfect.
SCJ positions are not political positions.
I couldn’t even type that with a straight face.
-
Well good at least somebody posted about an actual issue. I don't hate the idea of term limits but I'm not in favor at the end of the day. First of all whatever small amount of democracy we have left should mean we can pick whatever asshole we want to represent us. II there would always be a freshman Senator or congress person in office either being led around by the Party Committee or a loose cannon. Third I would guess that the parties would always be in campaign mode oh, even though it's not far from that now. Any of those thoughts make sense to anybody
WSS
-
Holy hell YES!! Add in the Supreme Court Justices to that list and it's perfect.
Oh right, that too.
One president getting to fundamentally impact the rule of law in this country based on a death, retirement, etc is dumb.
I'd want them long enough so we're not just constantly flip flopping, but yeah you're right.
-
Holy hell YES!! Add in the Supreme Court Justices to that list and it's perfect.
Oh right, that too.
One president getting to fundamentally impact the rule of law in this country based on a death, retirement, etc is dumb.
I'd want them long enough so we're not just constantly flip flopping, but yeah you're right.
Oh right, that too.
One president getting to fundamentally impact the rule of law in this country based on a death, retirement, etc is dumb.
I'd want them long enough so we're not just constantly flip flopping, but yeah you're right.
That’s what Steve is getting at with elected positions, I think. I would like to see some kind of limit without having freshman goons every cycle.
SCOTUS needs to get back to what it was intended to do IMO. Interpret law, not create it.
-
Oh right, that too.
One president getting to fundamentally impact the rule of law in this country based on a death, retirement, etc is dumb.
I'd want them long enough so we're not just constantly flip flopping, but yeah you're right.
That’s what Steve is getting at with elected positions, I think. I would like to see some kind of limit without having freshman goons every cycle.
SCOTUS needs to get back to what it was intended to do IMO. Interpret law, not create it.
That’s what Steve is getting at with elected positions, I think. I would like to see some kind of limit without having freshman goons every cycle.
SCOTUS needs to get back to what it was intended to do IMO. Interpret law, not create it.
Even though it could bite either side in the ass at some point but the John Marshall idea of if it's not expressly forbidden and the Constitution it's okay.
WSS
-
-
Oh right, that too.
One president getting to fundamentally impact the rule of law in this country based on a death, retirement, etc is dumb.
I'd want them long enough so we're not just constantly flip flopping, but yeah you're right.
That’s what Steve is getting at with elected positions, I think. I would like to see some kind of limit without having freshman goons every cycle.
SCOTUS needs to get back to what it was intended to do IMO. Interpret law, not create it.
That’s what Steve is getting at with elected positions, I think. I would like to see some kind of limit without having freshman goons every cycle.
SCOTUS needs to get back to what it was intended to do IMO. Interpret law, not create it.
Sure, it doesn't need to be a limit of one term. You could do a handful, still have some experience, but not have "lifers" that are there for decades.
Hell, each party could internally have one super congressman that the other elected officials elect that doesn't directly represent a state or district. They can be the "experience" consultant for each party without the day to day responsibilities.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login