Skip to content

When Trump Retweets Biased, Outlier, Sketchy at Best Polls...

Political Discussion
28 9 357
  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    116251588_283193159445642_7235893742737240206_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=mkCkWgE04dUAX_fZtLV&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=5644a9f9731aafa2dcb9236ce5b656bb&oe=5F732FB4

    Hate is taught. I agree. 

  • While we’re talking about Twatter, Mark Dice got suspended for a tweet sent to Kamala Harris.

    There goes Dorsey protecting those Libs again.

    8110DC80-6068-4614-82C7-D962CDF0A590.png

  • Here’s the meme he sent. . .

    E274AD2B-746F-48BC-9B13-F2B0C11342D7.jpeg

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    116251588_283193159445642_7235893742737240206_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=mkCkWgE04dUAX_fZtLV&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=5644a9f9731aafa2dcb9236ce5b656bb&oe=5F732FB4

    Sure as shit is MAGA!!!!!   

    Kyle Rittenhouse. Pic: Adam Rogan/The Journal Times via AP.

  • Shooting in self defense isn't hate.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    116251588_283193159445642_7235893742737240206_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=mkCkWgE04dUAX_fZtLV&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=5644a9f9731aafa2dcb9236ce5b656bb&oe=5F732FB4

    Sure as shit is MAGA!!!!!   

    Kyle Rittenhouse. Pic: Adam Rogan/The Journal Times via AP.

    @hoorta said:

    Sure as shit is MAGA!!!!!   

    if you don't know better than that...you are only here to instigate trouble.

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/us/david-dorn-st-louis-police-shot-trnd/index.html

    Retired St. Louis Police captain killed after responding to a pawnshop alarm during looting

    By Susannah Cullinane

    Updated 7:46 PM ET, Thu August 27, 2020

     
    David Dorn, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department
  • Shooting in self defense isn't hate.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Shooting in self defense isn't hate.

    And charged with murder "self Defense"?  Whatever....   

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Shooting in self defense isn't hate.

    And charged with murder "self Defense"?  Whatever....   

    @hoorta said:

    And charged with murder "self Defense"?  Whatever....   

    He'll be acquitted.

  • Obviously we should have all learned 4 years ago the polls are completely meaningless and they can say whatever you want them to say if you poll the right people. 

    Democrats obviously didn't learn anything from their crushing defeat in 2016. They're still counting chickens before they hatch. If they had literally any sense they'd be going "guys Biden is down by infinity points" to build the motivation for all the indigents and dregs of society that they claim to want to change the entire system for to drag their carcasses to the polls and vote. Or even fill out an absentee ballot in a timely fashion. 

  • Obviously we should have all learned 4 years ago the polls are completely meaningless and they can say whatever you want them to say if you poll the right people. 

    Democrats obviously didn't learn anything from their crushing defeat in 2016. They're still counting chickens before they hatch. If they had literally any sense they'd be going "guys Biden is down by infinity points" to build the motivation for all the indigents and dregs of society that they claim to want to change the entire system for to drag their carcasses to the polls and vote. Or even fill out an absentee ballot in a timely fashion. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Obviously we should have all learned 4 years ago the polls are completely meaningless and they can say whatever you want them to say if you poll the right people. 

    Democrats obviously didn't learn anything from their crushing defeat in 2016. They're still counting chickens before they hatch. If they had literally any sense they'd be going "guys Biden is down by infinity points" to build the motivation for all the indigents and dregs of society that they claim to want to change the entire system for to drag their carcasses to the polls and vote. Or even fill out an absentee ballot in a timely fashion. 

    No no no no no

    All of polling science and statistics isn't irrelevant now because they got the general election result wrong (even tho clinton won the popular vote, which the polls said) in an election with a completely unique and unaccounted for candidate. 

    Polls are still very much relevant 

    That's not to say groups can make them purposefully deceptive. But there are clearly good and bad polls out there. Just like news organizations. 

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Obviously we should have all learned 4 years ago the polls are completely meaningless and they can say whatever you want them to say if you poll the right people. 

    Democrats obviously didn't learn anything from their crushing defeat in 2016. They're still counting chickens before they hatch. If they had literally any sense they'd be going "guys Biden is down by infinity points" to build the motivation for all the indigents and dregs of society that they claim to want to change the entire system for to drag their carcasses to the polls and vote. Or even fill out an absentee ballot in a timely fashion. 

    No no no no no

    All of polling science and statistics isn't irrelevant now because they got the general election result wrong (even tho clinton won the popular vote, which the polls said) in an election with a completely unique and unaccounted for candidate. 

    Polls are still very much relevant 

    That's not to say groups can make them purposefully deceptive. But there are clearly good and bad polls out there. Just like news organizations. 

    @mld-woody said:

    No no no no no

    All of polling science and statistics isn't irrelevant now because they got the general election result wrong (even tho clinton won the popular vote, which the polls said) in an election with a completely unique and unaccounted for candidate. 

    Polls are still very much relevant 

    That's not to say groups can make them purposefully deceptive. But there are clearly good and bad polls out there. Just like news organizations. 

    So you’re saying the polls that had Hillary taking 94% of the popular vote in 2016 were accurate?

  • @mld-woody said:

    No no no no no

    All of polling science and statistics isn't irrelevant now because they got the general election result wrong (even tho clinton won the popular vote, which the polls said) in an election with a completely unique and unaccounted for candidate. 

    Polls are still very much relevant 

    That's not to say groups can make them purposefully deceptive. But there are clearly good and bad polls out there. Just like news organizations. 

    So you’re saying the polls that had Hillary taking 94% of the popular vote in 2016 were accurate?

    @canton-dawg said:

    So you’re saying the polls that had Hillary taking 94% of the popular vote in 2016 were accurate?

    Please show me the poll that had Hillary taking 94% of the popular vote.....

    If one did, then yes, it was clearly wrong. But no legitimate polling company would ever show that...

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Obviously we should have all learned 4 years ago the polls are completely meaningless and they can say whatever you want them to say if you poll the right people. 

    Democrats obviously didn't learn anything from their crushing defeat in 2016. They're still counting chickens before they hatch. If they had literally any sense they'd be going "guys Biden is down by infinity points" to build the motivation for all the indigents and dregs of society that they claim to want to change the entire system for to drag their carcasses to the polls and vote. Or even fill out an absentee ballot in a timely fashion. 

    No no no no no

    All of polling science and statistics isn't irrelevant now because they got the general election result wrong (even tho clinton won the popular vote, which the polls said) in an election with a completely unique and unaccounted for candidate. 

    Polls are still very much relevant 

    That's not to say groups can make them purposefully deceptive. But there are clearly good and bad polls out there. Just like news organizations. 

    @mld-woody said:

    No no no no no

    All of polling science and statistics isn't irrelevant now because they got the general election result wrong (even tho clinton won the popular vote, which the polls said) in an election with a completely unique and unaccounted for candidate. 

    Polls are still very much relevant 

    That's not to say groups can make them purposefully deceptive. But there are clearly good and bad polls out there. Just like news organizations. 

    Polls are very inaccurate now.  How many people answer their phone if they don't know who is calling?  How many don't give a fuck?  Polls are over rated.  MAGA.