Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87
-
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
The democrats orchestrated a hoax in order to remove a president from office. Where was your head then?
-
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
"scary female people"
-
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
"scary female people"
"scary female people"
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Sorry Woodrow. You staked your claim; told us you're voting for Joe Biden.
But, to coin a phrase, that's typical Woody. Bitching when you were called a liberal even though you said you were a Bernie Sanders supporter (the most liberal candidate in decades.)
If the shoe fits just man up and wear it.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
"scary female people"
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
-
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
In 2016, Ginsburg said Senate should hold SCOTUS confirmation hearing during election year
Ginsburg remarked in 2016 that 'nothing in the Constitution' precludes 11th hour nomination.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flashback-in-2016-ginsburg-senate-election-year-vacancy
-
"scary female people"
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
How you liberals love to form a false premise and use it to sit in judgement. Cal may have called him out, but didn't come to support him because he had no spine. The only irrationality here is your irrational hatred for Trump.
-
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Sorry Woodrow. You staked your claim; told us you're voting for Joe Biden.
But, to coin a phrase, that's typical Woody. Bitching when you were called a liberal even though you said you were a Bernie Sanders supporter (the most liberal candidate in decades.)
If the shoe fits just man up and wear it.
WSS
Sorry Woodrow. You staked your claim; told us you're voting for Joe Biden.
But, to coin a phrase, that's typical Woody. Bitching when you were called a liberal even though you said you were a Bernie Sanders supporter (the most liberal candidate in decades.)
If the shoe fits just man up and wear it.
WSS
I'll have to reach out to the Dems and let them know my registration must have not gone through...
Maybe they have Hoorta's too?
Or maybe you can't paint people into neat little boxes just because half of this board never leaves their Trump box and it makes it easier for you
-
Sorry Woodrow. You staked your claim; told us you're voting for Joe Biden.
But, to coin a phrase, that's typical Woody. Bitching when you were called a liberal even though you said you were a Bernie Sanders supporter (the most liberal candidate in decades.)
If the shoe fits just man up and wear it.
WSS
I'll have to reach out to the Dems and let them know my registration must have not gone through...
Maybe they have Hoorta's too?
Or maybe you can't paint people into neat little boxes just because half of this board never leaves their Trump box and it makes it easier for you
I'll have to reach out to the Dems and let them know my registration must have not gone through...
Maybe they have Hoorta's too?
Or maybe you can't paint people into neat little boxes just because half of this board never leaves their Trump box and it makes it easier for you
Exactly, because it's true. You're the kind of guy that would jerk off to pictures of Brad Pitt and then get mad if somebody says you're queer.
If you were voting libertarian Green Party socialist or Whig you might be able to pretend that you had an independent streak
But...
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
By the way I know everybody likes to feel that they're strong and independent thinkers. But when you cast your vote you're casting your vote to have that particular political party whichever one it is implement their policies and directions and serve their base. No matter how hard you pretend it's otherwise. You're embarrassed and now you're mad.
Spin it however you see fit but the fact remains.
WSS
-
I'll have to reach out to the Dems and let them know my registration must have not gone through...
Maybe they have Hoorta's too?
Or maybe you can't paint people into neat little boxes just because half of this board never leaves their Trump box and it makes it easier for you
Exactly, because it's true. You're the kind of guy that would jerk off to pictures of Brad Pitt and then get mad if somebody says you're queer.
If you were voting libertarian Green Party socialist or Whig you might be able to pretend that you had an independent streak
But...
WSS
Exactly, because it's true. You're the kind of guy that would jerk off to pictures of Brad Pitt and then get mad if somebody says you're queer.
If you were voting libertarian Green Party socialist or Whig you might be able to pretend that you had an independent streak
But...
WSS
By the way I know everybody likes to feel that they're strong and independent thinkers. But when you cast your vote you're casting your vote to have that particular political party whichever one it is implement their policies and directions and serve their base. No matter how hard you pretend it's otherwise. You're embarrassed and now you're mad.
Spin it however you see fit but the fact remains.
WSS
Oh boy you're doing the thing where you put thoughts and words into the other person's mouth. You're just incapable of getting through a back and forth without doing that, huh?
What constitutes a "streak" to you? I'll have voted 3rd party then Dem. Oh no.
There are differing levels of "independent" thinkers.
The guys that called out Trump for what he is, then proceeded to defend him at every turn because he was their party's pick, aren't exactly up there on the "independent thinker" charts.
-
Exactly, because it's true. You're the kind of guy that would jerk off to pictures of Brad Pitt and then get mad if somebody says you're queer.
If you were voting libertarian Green Party socialist or Whig you might be able to pretend that you had an independent streak
But...
WSS
By the way I know everybody likes to feel that they're strong and independent thinkers. But when you cast your vote you're casting your vote to have that particular political party whichever one it is implement their policies and directions and serve their base. No matter how hard you pretend it's otherwise. You're embarrassed and now you're mad.
Spin it however you see fit but the fact remains.
WSS
Oh boy you're doing the thing where you put thoughts and words into the other person's mouth. You're just incapable of getting through a back and forth without doing that, huh?
What constitutes a "streak" to you? I'll have voted 3rd party then Dem. Oh no.
There are differing levels of "independent" thinkers.
The guys that called out Trump for what he is, then proceeded to defend him at every turn because he was their party's pick, aren't exactly up there on the "independent thinker" charts.
Oh boy you're doing the thing where you put thoughts and words into the other person's mouth. You're just incapable of getting through a back and forth without doing that, huh?
actually I'm incapable of pretending I accept your bullshit.
What constitutes a "streak" to you? I'll have voted 3rd party then Dem. Oh no.
I defended you when you were accused of being a Hillary lover.
There are differing levels of "independent" thinkers.
Uh Maybe. I would put you on the lowest rung of that ladder if there are rungs.
The guys that called out Trump for what he is, then proceeded to defend him at every turn because he was their party's pick, aren't exactly up there on the "independent thinker" charts.
thank you for agreeing with me.
I support Trump because I support most of the stated directional policies. Many of the things I don't like about him I bitch about. Many things I defend him for are bulshit that those on the left have made up, and or things I don't care about. But even though I'm not 100% in lockstep doesn't mean I throw a fit if somebody calls me a Republican or a trump supporter. Vote for Gary Johnson again and I will apologize for calling you a Democrat.
I prefer to vote for policy rather than personality. And in this race personality is kind of a wash.
WSS
-
Oh boy you're doing the thing where you put thoughts and words into the other person's mouth. You're just incapable of getting through a back and forth without doing that, huh?
actually I'm incapable of pretending I accept your bullshit.
What constitutes a "streak" to you? I'll have voted 3rd party then Dem. Oh no.
I defended you when you were accused of being a Hillary lover.
There are differing levels of "independent" thinkers.
Uh Maybe. I would put you on the lowest rung of that ladder if there are rungs.
The guys that called out Trump for what he is, then proceeded to defend him at every turn because he was their party's pick, aren't exactly up there on the "independent thinker" charts.
thank you for agreeing with me.
I support Trump because I support most of the stated directional policies. Many of the things I don't like about him I bitch about. Many things I defend him for are bulshit that those on the left have made up, and or things I don't care about. But even though I'm not 100% in lockstep doesn't mean I throw a fit if somebody calls me a Republican or a trump supporter. Vote for Gary Johnson again and I will apologize for calling you a Democrat.
I prefer to vote for policy rather than personality. And in this race personality is kind of a wash.
WSS
I prefer to vote for policy rather than personality. And in this race personality is kind of a wash.
Nailed it.
-
So, to clarify for Hoorta and little woodpecker -
I did not like Trump - wasn't my kind of celebrity. Usually, I don't like celebrities - with a few exceptions, like a few country music stars. and a few actors with the courage to be conservatives. etc.
But WHEN HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT - I still wasn't a fan. Until I started sincerely LISTENING to him, and I realized he was saying great things I have been wishing a president would finally stand up and say, for years. Then, I decided he was genuinely serious, and I was all in, as long as he kept those promises. He DID, and kept more promises than he even MADE. lol
That is reality.
I just sincerely and strongly DOUBT that someone is a "republican" and "voted for Trump" when they are all in on the green new deal,
bigger government, socialsim, pro-illegal immigration, pro-liberal extremist, usually pro-abortion, pro=Paris Accord,
etc. etc. etc.
I just don't buy it. I do know, that is the past, it was proven that a mode of manipulation of the left, was to call in to radio shows, and say you are a republican but diss the republican nominee running for president to be more effective at persuading.
-
-
EXACTLY.
btw, this "can't have a litmus test" is crap. You think obaMao didn't have a litmus test on his picks? hell yes he did.
but the left demands "no litmus" test on their candidates. But you let a conservative originalist be appointed.
all "litmus test" hell breaks loose.
hell with that crap.
-
and so it goes - the attacks on Amy Barrett has started.
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2020/09/21/the-attacks-on-amy-coney-barrett-have-begun/
-
You fell for the con cal.
Plain and simple
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login