Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87
-
Oh boy you're doing the thing where you put thoughts and words into the other person's mouth. You're just incapable of getting through a back and forth without doing that, huh?
actually I'm incapable of pretending I accept your bullshit.
What constitutes a "streak" to you? I'll have voted 3rd party then Dem. Oh no.
I defended you when you were accused of being a Hillary lover.
There are differing levels of "independent" thinkers.
Uh Maybe. I would put you on the lowest rung of that ladder if there are rungs.
The guys that called out Trump for what he is, then proceeded to defend him at every turn because he was their party's pick, aren't exactly up there on the "independent thinker" charts.
thank you for agreeing with me.
I support Trump because I support most of the stated directional policies. Many of the things I don't like about him I bitch about. Many things I defend him for are bulshit that those on the left have made up, and or things I don't care about. But even though I'm not 100% in lockstep doesn't mean I throw a fit if somebody calls me a Republican or a trump supporter. Vote for Gary Johnson again and I will apologize for calling you a Democrat.
I prefer to vote for policy rather than personality. And in this race personality is kind of a wash.
WSS
I prefer to vote for policy rather than personality. And in this race personality is kind of a wash.
Nailed it.
-
So, to clarify for Hoorta and little woodpecker -
I did not like Trump - wasn't my kind of celebrity. Usually, I don't like celebrities - with a few exceptions, like a few country music stars. and a few actors with the courage to be conservatives. etc.
But WHEN HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT - I still wasn't a fan. Until I started sincerely LISTENING to him, and I realized he was saying great things I have been wishing a president would finally stand up and say, for years. Then, I decided he was genuinely serious, and I was all in, as long as he kept those promises. He DID, and kept more promises than he even MADE. lol
That is reality.
I just sincerely and strongly DOUBT that someone is a "republican" and "voted for Trump" when they are all in on the green new deal,
bigger government, socialsim, pro-illegal immigration, pro-liberal extremist, usually pro-abortion, pro=Paris Accord,
etc. etc. etc.
I just don't buy it. I do know, that is the past, it was proven that a mode of manipulation of the left, was to call in to radio shows, and say you are a republican but diss the republican nominee running for president to be more effective at persuading.
-

-

EXACTLY.
btw, this "can't have a litmus test" is crap. You think obaMao didn't have a litmus test on his picks? hell yes he did.
but the left demands "no litmus" test on their candidates. But you let a conservative originalist be appointed.
all "litmus test" hell breaks loose.
hell with that crap.
-
and so it goes - the attacks on Amy Barrett has started.
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2020/09/21/the-attacks-on-amy-coney-barrett-have-begun/
-
You fell for the con cal.
Plain and simple
-
-
no con.
The results are outstanding - the list of good/great things
the Trump Admin has accomplished FOR AMERICA FIRST,
are in the hundreds.
Let us know when YOU can name just one thing obaMao/biden accomplished FOR AMERICA in eight years, woodpecker.
we'll wait.
-
hey, get this:
Joe Biden in 1992: No nominations to the Supreme Court in ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/joe-biden...Feb 23, 2016 · On the Senate floor on June 25, 1992, then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) urged President George H. W. Bush not to name a nominee to the Supreme Court until after the November election.
-
guess what? LOL
Schumer in 2007: Don't confirm any Bush Supreme Court nominee
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/schumer-in-2007...
Feb 15, 2016 · Chuck Schumer said in July 2007 that no George W. Bush nominee to the Supreme Court should be approved, except in extraordinary circumstances, 19 months before a new president was set to be...
-
Says the Biden voter. Please.
WSS
Ha ha ha
That lazy troll attempt was lazy
When I get remotely close to Cal and others in the blind, ignorant and embarrassing support of a shit candidate please let me know
-
Cal you can't even name one thing Trump has actually done that's positive
-
opposite parties, of course.
and obamao was a lame duck pres.
lefties don't go by the actual definitions of words because it
doesn't fit their twisted emotional knee jerk narrative.
So, they just use words incorrectly, as if they had different meanings.
-
Cal you can't even name one thing Trump has actually done that's positive
you first. go ahead, we'll wait.
-
Says the Biden voter. Please.
WSS
Ha ha ha
That lazy troll attempt was lazy
When I get remotely close to Cal and others in the blind, ignorant and embarrassing support of a shit candidate please let me know
Ha ha ha
That lazy troll attempt was lazy
When I get remotely close to Cal and others in the blind, ignorant and embarrassing support of a shit candidate please let me know
So you never stated you were voting for Biden?
(Not that I wholly trust word that comes out of your beak but...)
And frankly as bombastic as Cal can be I think you're possibly worse because at least he looks up some of this shit and for much of the time your only opinion is whatever you think will piss him off.
So did you or didn't you say you were voting Biden? You could probably lie and no one would ever know the difference.
WSS
-
Ha ha ha
That lazy troll attempt was lazy
When I get remotely close to Cal and others in the blind, ignorant and embarrassing support of a shit candidate please let me know
So you never stated you were voting for Biden?
(Not that I wholly trust word that comes out of your beak but...)
And frankly as bombastic as Cal can be I think you're possibly worse because at least he looks up some of this shit and for much of the time your only opinion is whatever you think will piss him off.
So did you or didn't you say you were voting Biden? You could probably lie and no one would ever know the difference.
WSS
So you never stated you were voting for Biden?
(Not that I wholly trust word that comes out of your beak but...)
And frankly as bombastic as Cal can be I think you're possibly worse because at least he looks up some of this shit and for much of the time your only opinion is whatever you think will piss him off.
So did you or didn't you say you were voting Biden? You could probably lie and no one would ever know the difference.
WSS
- It wouldn't matter if you trust what I say or not, you're just going to make up something to make like you feel you've "won" a back and forth... every... time...
- Cal doesn't look up anything haha. He just vomits up whatever the Blaze tells him to be afraid of or be angry at next. If you think he is putting any ounce of research or thought into that than geeez. No idea how anyone could realistically think that. I know you're going to irrationally support the little guy at every turn, but let's keep it realistic.
- If you think I'm basing my political beliefs on what pisses Cal or anyone else off here then you aren't very bright. I know most here will just blindly follow the letter R ... but not everyone puts that little thought behind their political beliefs.
Yes, I'm most likely voting for Biden. You're missing the point completely though if that is what you're harping on. You know exactly what you're doing here, it goes hand and hand with putting words in people's mouths. Or maybe I'm giving you too much credit? Entirely possible.
-
So you never stated you were voting for Biden?
(Not that I wholly trust word that comes out of your beak but...)
And frankly as bombastic as Cal can be I think you're possibly worse because at least he looks up some of this shit and for much of the time your only opinion is whatever you think will piss him off.
So did you or didn't you say you were voting Biden? You could probably lie and no one would ever know the difference.
WSS
- It wouldn't matter if you trust what I say or not, you're just going to make up something to make like you feel you've "won" a back and forth... every... time...
- Cal doesn't look up anything haha. He just vomits up whatever the Blaze tells him to be afraid of or be angry at next. If you think he is putting any ounce of research or thought into that than geeez. No idea how anyone could realistically think that. I know you're going to irrationally support the little guy at every turn, but let's keep it realistic.
- If you think I'm basing my political beliefs on what pisses Cal or anyone else off here then you aren't very bright. I know most here will just blindly follow the letter R ... but not everyone puts that little thought behind their political beliefs.
Yes, I'm most likely voting for Biden. You're missing the point completely though if that is what you're harping on. You know exactly what you're doing here, it goes hand and hand with putting words in people's mouths. Or maybe I'm giving you too much credit? Entirely possible.
- It wouldn't matter if you trust what I say or not, you're just going to make up something to make like you feel you've "won" a back and forth... every... time...
- Cal doesn't look up anything haha. He just vomits up whatever the Blaze tells him to be afraid of or be angry at next. If you think he is putting any ounce of research or thought into that than geeez. No idea how anyone could realistically think that. I know you're going to irrationally support the little guy at every turn, but let's keep it realistic.
- If you think I'm basing my political beliefs on what pisses Cal or anyone else off here then you aren't very bright. I know most here will just blindly follow the letter R ... but not everyone puts that little thought behind their political beliefs.
Yes, I'm most likely voting for Biden. You're missing the point completely though if that is what you're harping on. You know exactly what you're doing
here, it goes hand and hand with putting words in people's mouths. Or maybe I'm giving you too much credit? Entirely possible.

-
back when Graham had something resembling a spine
back before Trump whipped the entire party (and it's followers)
-
A great, effective ad … but. The RNC takes us on a trip down Memory Lane to 2016, when Senate Democrats along with Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi lectured America on the necessity — nay, the constitutional mandate — to immediately fill Supreme Court vacancies. Can’t wait for the DNC’s response video about what Republicans were saying at the same time, though:
See Also: Study: People do hide their true feelings about some things from pollsters — but not about Trump
Not long ago, Joe Biden said that “the American people deserve a fully-staffed court of nine.”
We agree.
Fill the seat! pic.twitter.com/K8GpnAMEly
— Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) September 21, 2020
The double inclusion of the same Joe Biden clip, declaring in 2016 that “the American people deserve a fully staffed court of nine,” is no accident. (Neither is the more recent clip of Kamala Harris.) The Trump campaign and the RNC plan to shove those words down the throats of Democrats and the media, probably every day. Here’s Kayleigh McEnany, telling CBS This Morning host Gayle King earlier today that she should ask Biden about his principles on filling Supreme Court vacancies:
President Trump says he will soon nominate a justice to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court.
White House @PressSec @KayleighMcEnany joins us with details on the president's timeline, and what she says the president is looking for in a nominee. pic.twitter.com/3nPk4tCJez
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login