Skip to content

Win-Loss predictions

Locked The Browns Board
51 14 1.6k
  • I posted 8-8 in Dutch's questions, but let's see what I come up with now...

    @Baltimore-L

    Cincinnati-W

    - - - 

    Redskins-W

    @Dallas-W

    Colts-L

    @Pittsburgh-L

    @Cinci-W

    LV Raiders-W

    Houston Texans -L

    Philadelphia Eagles -L

    Jacksonville-W

     @ Tennessee Titans -L

    Baltimore Ravens -L

    @NYG-W

    @NYJ-W

    Pittsburgh-L

    8-8... I think we're not winning Ravens and Steelers with this D. They have good offenses and their defenses can kill our offense, or that is the feeling I have now... 

  • Late to the game, but I had us at 2-1 thru Week 3... and now I see Week 4 (@DAL) as a possible victory.

    @tour2ma said:

    Late to the game, but I had us at 2-1 thru Week 3... and now I see Week 4 (@DAL) as a possible victory.

    I actually have Philly as a possible W now instead of a loss, still 10-6 as Baltimore may sweep us.

  • @gorka said:

    After the first two games I'm feeling 7-9

    2020 will be the 25th losing season since 1990 for our "storied" franchise.

    "Storied" still applies.  In that storied implies historical greatness.   After all, the Browns have STILL won more championships than any other franchise than all but two :  Packers and Bears.  (tied with Giants).   They are still like 4th or 5th in postseason appearances....even though they only made one postseason in those last 25 years.    But, of course, they do need to move out of the "storied" category and into the "currently relevant" category. 

    @the-gipper said:

    "Storied" still applies.  In that storied implies historical greatness.   After all, the Browns have STILL won more championships than any other franchise than all but two :  Packers and Bears.  (tied with Giants).   They are still like 4th or 5th in postseason appearances....even though they only made one postseason in those last 25 years.    But, of course, they do need to move out of the "storied" category and into the "currently relevant" category. 

    Who gives a fuck.

  • @the-gipper said:

    "Storied" still applies.  In that storied implies historical greatness.   After all, the Browns have STILL won more championships than any other franchise than all but two :  Packers and Bears.  (tied with Giants).   They are still like 4th or 5th in postseason appearances....even though they only made one postseason in those last 25 years.    But, of course, they do need to move out of the "storied" category and into the "currently relevant" category. 

    Who gives a fuck.

    @gorka said:

    Who gives a fuck.

    You don't give a fuck if the Browns make a move to be currently relevant?

    Why are you here? 

  • @gorka said:

    Who gives a fuck.

    You don't give a fuck if the Browns make a move to be currently relevant?

    Why are you here? 

    @the-gipper said:

    You don't give a fuck if the Browns make a move to be currently relevant?

    Why are you here? 

    His cyber wrist is sore from all the circle-jerking he does with the other MAGAflakes over on the Political Board? 

  • .. and suddenly LVR does not look like an automatic "W"... ?

    Feels like we are going to be in a lot of shoot-outs this year.

  • @gorka said:

    Who gives a fuck.

    You don't give a fuck if the Browns make a move to be currently relevant?

    Why are you here? 

    @the-gipper said:

    You don't give a fuck if the Browns make a move to be currently relevant?

    Why are you here? 

    I'll take that as you getting your panties knotted over my not giving a fuck about cheap Browns championships.

  • @the-gipper said:

    You don't give a fuck if the Browns make a move to be currently relevant?

    Why are you here? 

    His cyber wrist is sore from all the circle-jerking he does with the other MAGAflakes over on the Political Board? 

    @dutch-oven said:

    His cyber wrist is sore from all the circle-jerking he does with the other MAGAflakes over on the Political Board? 

    You're just upset that I walked in on the circle jerk you had going on here. Sorry 'bout that.

  • .. and suddenly LVR does not look like an automatic "W"... ?

    Feels like we are going to be in a lot of shoot-outs this year.

    @tour2ma said:

    .. and suddenly LVR does not look like an automatic "W"... ?

    Feels like we are going to be in a lot of shoot-outs this year.

    Carr looks really good. Very poised against a very good defense.

  • @the-gipper said:

    You don't give a fuck if the Browns make a move to be currently relevant?

    Why are you here? 

    I'll take that as you getting your panties knotted over my not giving a fuck about cheap Browns championships.

    @gorka said:

    I'll take that as you getting your panties knotted over my not giving a fuck about cheap Browns championships.

    Well, we know that you are a member of the American ISIS....and that you give fuck all about anything honored, revered, sacred, traditional or historical....that you would tear down all of our American institutions.....but I still would think you would care about the Browns trying to do well, here and now.   But, apparently not.  That hate ethos really permeates everything about you it seems. 

  • @gorka said:

    I'll take that as you getting your panties knotted over my not giving a fuck about cheap Browns championships.

    Well, we know that you are a member of the American ISIS....and that you give fuck all about anything honored, revered, sacred, traditional or historical....that you would tear down all of our American institutions.....but I still would think you would care about the Browns trying to do well, here and now.   But, apparently not.  That hate ethos really permeates everything about you it seems. 

    @the-gipper said:

    Well, we know that you are a member of the American ISIS....and that you give fuck all about anything honored, revered, sacred, traditional or historical....that you would tear down all of our American institutions.....but I still would think you would care about the Browns trying to do well, here and now.   But, apparently not.  That hate ethos really permeates everything about you it seems. 

    The Browns championships are garbage. Acquired at time when racism was commonplace. At a time when there were unwritten quotas for how many blacks were allowed to play on an NFL team.

    Don't you people care about those kinds of things? If you people are so bent on rendering statues illegitimate because of their ties to a racist past, then the same should apply to those stupid championships.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Well, we know that you are a member of the American ISIS....and that you give fuck all about anything honored, revered, sacred, traditional or historical....that you would tear down all of our American institutions.....but I still would think you would care about the Browns trying to do well, here and now.   But, apparently not.  That hate ethos really permeates everything about you it seems. 

    The Browns championships are garbage. Acquired at time when racism was commonplace. At a time when there were unwritten quotas for how many blacks were allowed to play on an NFL team.

    Don't you people care about those kinds of things? If you people are so bent on rendering statues illegitimate because of their ties to a racist past, then the same should apply to those stupid championships.

    @gorka said:

    The Browns championships are garbage. Acquired at time when racism was commonplace. At a time when there were unwritten quotas for how many blacks were allowed to play on an NFL team.

    Don't you people care about those kinds of things? If you people are so bent on rendering statues illegitimate because of their ties to a racist past, then the same should apply to those stupid championships.

    Well...some of us care....and some of us pay attention....but you do neither.    (and why would a racist like you worry about the racist past...isn't that the America you want to bring back? Your diatribe is only because you want to continue to honor your traitor/racist heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    In addition...you just proved your ignorance (likely willful ignorance).    The Cleveland Browns of the 1940s and 50s were the one team that DID have a number of black players on that team...when much of the rest of the NFL did not.  What race do you think Marion Motley was?  Bill Willis? Both HOF. Lesser known...but still black Sherman Howard. There may have been others.     They may have been as successful as they were because they were the one team to use a number of black players.   

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

  • @gorka said:

    The Browns championships are garbage. Acquired at time when racism was commonplace. At a time when there were unwritten quotas for how many blacks were allowed to play on an NFL team.

    Don't you people care about those kinds of things? If you people are so bent on rendering statues illegitimate because of their ties to a racist past, then the same should apply to those stupid championships.

    Well...some of us care....and some of us pay attention....but you do neither.    (and why would a racist like you worry about the racist past...isn't that the America you want to bring back? Your diatribe is only because you want to continue to honor your traitor/racist heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    In addition...you just proved your ignorance (likely willful ignorance).    The Cleveland Browns of the 1940s and 50s were the one team that DID have a number of black players on that team...when much of the rest of the NFL did not.  What race do you think Marion Motley was?  Bill Willis? Both HOF. Lesser known...but still black Sherman Howard. There may have been others.     They may have been as successful as they were because they were the one team to use a number of black players.   

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    @the-gipper said:

    Well...some of us care....and some of us pay attention....but you do neither.    (and why would a racist like you worry about the racist past...isn't that the America you want to bring back? Your diatribe is only because you want to continue to honor your traitor/racist heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    In addition...you just proved your ignorance (likely willful ignorance).    The Cleveland Browns of the 1940s and 50s were the one team that DID have a number of black players on that team...when much of the rest of the NFL did not.  What race do you think Marion Motley was?  Bill Willis? Both HOF. Lesser known...but still black Sherman Howard. There may have been others.     They may have been as successful as they were because they were the one team to use a number of black players.   

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    No fair using facts. 15 yds. personal foul.?

  • @gorka said:

    The Browns championships are garbage. Acquired at time when racism was commonplace. At a time when there were unwritten quotas for how many blacks were allowed to play on an NFL team.

    Don't you people care about those kinds of things? If you people are so bent on rendering statues illegitimate because of their ties to a racist past, then the same should apply to those stupid championships.

    Well...some of us care....and some of us pay attention....but you do neither.    (and why would a racist like you worry about the racist past...isn't that the America you want to bring back? Your diatribe is only because you want to continue to honor your traitor/racist heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    In addition...you just proved your ignorance (likely willful ignorance).    The Cleveland Browns of the 1940s and 50s were the one team that DID have a number of black players on that team...when much of the rest of the NFL did not.  What race do you think Marion Motley was?  Bill Willis? Both HOF. Lesser known...but still black Sherman Howard. There may have been others.     They may have been as successful as they were because they were the one team to use a number of black players.   

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    @the-gipper said:

    Well...some of us care....and some of us pay attention....but you do neither.    (and why would a racist like you worry about the racist past...isn't that the America you want to bring back? Your diatribe is only because you want to continue to honor your traitor/racist heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    Yes of course, atop your perch of libtard superiority sitting in judgement of someone you don't know.

    I don't know you either, so what's your excuse for being a racist?

    In addition...you just proved your ignorance (likely willful ignorance).    The Cleveland Browns of the 1940s and 50s were the one team that DID have a number of black players on that team...when much of the rest of the NFL did not.  What race do you think Marion Motley was?  Bill Willis? Both HOF. Lesser known...but still black Sherman Howard. There may have been others.     They may have been as successful as they were because they were the one team to use a number of black players.   

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    Well fuck. Speaking of some of us who don't pay attention.

     I probably should have put it in large bold for antsy homers like you always anticipating the next time they get an opening to show off their football knowledge.  I said the Browns played in an era when there were quotas for the number of blacks on a team, not that the Browns didn't have black players. That entire era blows. I don't give a fuck about anyone's pre 1970 NFL championships. You can suck on those all you like.

    Do I make myself clear?

  • @the-gipper said:

    Well...some of us care....and some of us pay attention....but you do neither.    (and why would a racist like you worry about the racist past...isn't that the America you want to bring back? Your diatribe is only because you want to continue to honor your traitor/racist heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    In addition...you just proved your ignorance (likely willful ignorance).    The Cleveland Browns of the 1940s and 50s were the one team that DID have a number of black players on that team...when much of the rest of the NFL did not.  What race do you think Marion Motley was?  Bill Willis? Both HOF. Lesser known...but still black Sherman Howard. There may have been others.     They may have been as successful as they were because they were the one team to use a number of black players.   

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    No fair using facts. 15 yds. personal foul.?

    @texasag1969 said:

    No fair using facts. 15 yds. personal foul.?

    Facts that are irrelevant. 15yds. personal foul.

  • I have this week's game against Football Team as a must win.  - Reasoning:  You must beat the teams that you are supposed to beat.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Well...some of us care....and some of us pay attention....but you do neither.    (and why would a racist like you worry about the racist past...isn't that the America you want to bring back? Your diatribe is only because you want to continue to honor your traitor/racist heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    Yes of course, atop your perch of libtard superiority sitting in judgement of someone you don't know.

    I don't know you either, so what's your excuse for being a racist?

    In addition...you just proved your ignorance (likely willful ignorance).    The Cleveland Browns of the 1940s and 50s were the one team that DID have a number of black players on that team...when much of the rest of the NFL did not.  What race do you think Marion Motley was?  Bill Willis? Both HOF. Lesser known...but still black Sherman Howard. There may have been others.     They may have been as successful as they were because they were the one team to use a number of black players.   

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    Well fuck. Speaking of some of us who don't pay attention.

     I probably should have put it in large bold for antsy homers like you always anticipating the next time they get an opening to show off their football knowledge.  I said the Browns played in an era when there were quotas for the number of blacks on a team, not that the Browns didn't have black players. That entire era blows. I don't give a fuck about anyone's pre 1970 NFL championships. You can suck on those all you like.

    Do I make myself clear?

    @gorka said:

    heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    Yes of course, atop your perch of libtard superiority sitting in judgement of someone you don't know.

    I could be to the right of Attila the Hun and be intellectually superior to you.   And I don't sit in judgment of you....other than what you display here on this board....but given that, certainly it would not consist of a flattering judgment. 

    I don't know you either, so what's your excuse for being a racist?

    None, because I am not one.  But you are, and that is what racists like to do:  project and deflect their own prejudices onto others.

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    Well fuck. Speaking of some of us who don't pay attention.

     I probably should have put it in large bold for antsy homers like you always anticipating the next time they get an opening to show off their football knowledge.  I said the Browns played in an era when there were quotas for the number of blacks on a team, not that the Browns didn't have black players. That entire era blows. I don't give a fuck about anyone's pre 1970 NFL championships. You can suck on those all you like.

    Do I make myself clear?

    Yes, your ignorance, hate and racism comes through quite clear.   As well as being completely arbitrary....like choosing 1970 as some magic year for some reason.  It is not....EXCEPT to a Steeler fan who wants to whitewash their history prior to that point,...so, AHH, maybe there is the rub.  Aside from everything else, you apparently are a phony finook Steeler troll at heart.  Which may be the worst of your traits. 

  • It's going to be really hard to predict win/loss total for the Browns. You look at the way they came out in week 1 vs the way they played in week 2 and wonder "why couldn't they do this against the Ravens?" I understand the Bengals aren't the Ravens, but the effort looked lack luster. Until the Browns go on like a 3 game winning streak to show they can be consistant, I just can't really say what they'll do. A wild ass guess would be 7-9 being generous. 

  • @gorka said:

    heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    Yes of course, atop your perch of libtard superiority sitting in judgement of someone you don't know.

    I could be to the right of Attila the Hun and be intellectually superior to you.   And I don't sit in judgment of you....other than what you display here on this board....but given that, certainly it would not consist of a flattering judgment. 

    I don't know you either, so what's your excuse for being a racist?

    None, because I am not one.  But you are, and that is what racists like to do:  project and deflect their own prejudices onto others.

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    Well fuck. Speaking of some of us who don't pay attention.

     I probably should have put it in large bold for antsy homers like you always anticipating the next time they get an opening to show off their football knowledge.  I said the Browns played in an era when there were quotas for the number of blacks on a team, not that the Browns didn't have black players. That entire era blows. I don't give a fuck about anyone's pre 1970 NFL championships. You can suck on those all you like.

    Do I make myself clear?

    Yes, your ignorance, hate and racism comes through quite clear.   As well as being completely arbitrary....like choosing 1970 as some magic year for some reason.  It is not....EXCEPT to a Steeler fan who wants to whitewash their history prior to that point,...so, AHH, maybe there is the rub.  Aside from everything else, you apparently are a phony finook Steeler troll at heart.  Which may be the worst of your traits. 

    @the-gipper said:

    Yes, your ignorance, hate and racism comes through quite clear.   As well as being completely arbitrary....like choosing 1970 as some magic year for some reason.  It is not....EXCEPT to a Steeler fan who wants to whitewash their history prior to that point,...so, AHH, maybe there is the rub.  Aside from everything else, you apparently are a phony finook Steeler troll at heart.  Which may be the worst of your traits. 

    ?

  • @gorka said:

    heroes from the Confederacy, not because you were concerned about racism in the mid 20th century.  You are wholly disingenuous and feckless)

    Yes of course, atop your perch of libtard superiority sitting in judgement of someone you don't know.

    I could be to the right of Attila the Hun and be intellectually superior to you.   And I don't sit in judgment of you....other than what you display here on this board....but given that, certainly it would not consist of a flattering judgment. 

    I don't know you either, so what's your excuse for being a racist?

    None, because I am not one.  But you are, and that is what racists like to do:  project and deflect their own prejudices onto others.

    And then the 1964 team:  Last time I looked, Jim Brown, Paul Warfield, Leroy Kelley, John Wooten,  and a number of other players were black.

    Well fuck. Speaking of some of us who don't pay attention.

     I probably should have put it in large bold for antsy homers like you always anticipating the next time they get an opening to show off their football knowledge.  I said the Browns played in an era when there were quotas for the number of blacks on a team, not that the Browns didn't have black players. That entire era blows. I don't give a fuck about anyone's pre 1970 NFL championships. You can suck on those all you like.

    Do I make myself clear?

    Yes, your ignorance, hate and racism comes through quite clear.   As well as being completely arbitrary....like choosing 1970 as some magic year for some reason.  It is not....EXCEPT to a Steeler fan who wants to whitewash their history prior to that point,...so, AHH, maybe there is the rub.  Aside from everything else, you apparently are a phony finook Steeler troll at heart.  Which may be the worst of your traits. 

    @the-gipper said:

    I could be to the right of Attila the Hun and be intellectually superior to you.   And I don't sit in judgment of you....other than what you display here on this board....but given that, certainly it would not consist of a flattering judgment. 

    You are intellectually superior to no one, but rather you're a narcissist enlightened by your own "intelligence".  That is the attitude you clearly display here on this board.

    Oh, and Attila says shut the fuck up about NFL Championships already.

    None, because I am not one.  But you are, and that is what racists like to do:  project and deflect their own prejudices onto others.

    Oh but you are, your racism comes through quite clear. Those that always cry "racist'  or accuse others of it the most are the real racists.

    Yes, your ignorance, hate and racism comes through quite clear.   As well as being completely arbitrary....like choosing 1970 as some magic year for some reason.  It is not....EXCEPT to a Steeler fan who wants to whitewash their history prior to that point,...so, AHH, maybe there is the rub.  Aside from everything else, you apparently are a phony finook Steeler troll at heart.  Which may be the worst of your traits. 

     "Some magic year?  Gee wiz kid, did  your intellectual superiority somehow escape you there?

    The reason for 1970 is because it was the year the AFL and NFL merged to form the modern NFL to which everyone on this board can relate to.

    And if your second false implication that I was a Steeler fan was correct,  I wouldn't have had to Google when Pitt became relevant.

    It wasn't until 1972. You being so intellectually superior should have known that too.

    Now don't run off...continue digging yourself a hole trying to prove how smart you are, and the racist that you're not (because you have friends that are black, right?) LOL.