Skip to content

Benjamin watson's take

Political Discussion
20 8 297
  • @mld-woody said:

    The further division in politics and our country.

    The division started when Trump won an election that the arrogant Democrats thought they had in the bag.

    I would say the division started when 99% of the butt hurt Dems wouldn’t attend Trump’s inauguration.

    Or it could’ve been the Washington Post calling for an impeachment of Trump an hour after he took the oath of office.

    BTW, I don’t care what you think either.

    @canton-dawg said:

    The division started when Trump won an election that the arrogant Democrats thought they had in the bag.

    I would say the division started when 99% of the butt hurt Dems wouldn’t attend Trump’s inauguration.

    Or it could’ve been the Washington Post calling for an impeachment of Trump an hour after he took the oath of office.

    BTW, I don’t care what you think either.

    Nothing to do with electing the guy that spent his campaign insulting everyone else? 

    Alright 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    The division started when Trump won an election that the arrogant Democrats thought they had in the bag.

    I would say the division started when 99% of the butt hurt Dems wouldn’t attend Trump’s inauguration.

    Or it could’ve been the Washington Post calling for an impeachment of Trump an hour after he took the oath of office.

    BTW, I don’t care what you think either.

    Nothing to do with electing the guy that spent his campaign insulting everyone else? 

    Alright 

    @mld-woody said:

    Nothing to do with electing the guy that spent his campaign insulting everyone else? 

    Alright 

    You mean like when Hillary called us “deplorable”?

  • Back to the original post. I guess it doesn't really matter what anybody's printed position is. Regardless of what either candidate has his press team print out what would you guys guess what are the odds on any of those plans being implemented? A million to one? Longer odds than that?  I figure we spend about a third of the time arguing over hypothetical programs that have no chance of seeing the light of day. Are the other two thirds yapping about fascists and Nazis and Cheetos.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Nothing to do with electing the guy that spent his campaign insulting everyone else? 

    Alright 

    You mean like when Hillary called us “deplorable”?

    @canton-dawg said:

    You mean like when Hillary called us “deplorable”?

    Yes, that dog shit definitely equates to that mound of elephant shit

  • @canton-dawg said:

    You mean like when Hillary called us “deplorable”?

    Yes, that dog shit definitely equates to that mound of elephant shit

    @mld-woody said:

    Yes, that dog shit definitely equates to that mound of elephant shit

    Just as long as you realize the shit was slinging from both sides.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Yes, that dog shit definitely equates to that mound of elephant shit

    Just as long as you realize the shit was slinging from both sides.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Just as long as you realize the shit was slinging from both sides.

    No shit, it's politics. I just realize they aren't equal 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Just as long as you realize the shit was slinging from both sides.

    No shit, it's politics. I just realize they aren't equal 

    @mld-woody said:

    No shit, it's politics. I just realize they aren't equal 

    It’s politics?

    You’re a genius.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Just as long as you realize the shit was slinging from both sides.

    No shit, it's politics. I just realize they aren't equal 

    @mld-woody said:

    No shit, it's politics. I just realize they aren't equal 

    @canton-dawg said:

    It’s politics?

    You’re a genius.

    tenor.gif?itemid=13048649

  • I would at least like to see Harris. 

    Same thing I thought when McCain ran. When the president is very old or has s history of illness the chances of them dying in office our greater, so the VP matters more.

    Also, where did people think politics we're going to go when they elected Trump? His whole primary campaign was finding insults for his competition. We're at the logical "4years later" point of that timeline

    @mld-woody said:

    Also, where did people think politics we're going to go when they elected Trump? His whole primary campaign was finding insults for his competition. We're at the logical "4years later" point of that timeline

    I wanted to throw a wrench in the gears of our political system. His crowning achievement is making neocons in federal government irrelevant. I'd consider my vote a success.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Also, where did people think politics we're going to go when they elected Trump? His whole primary campaign was finding insults for his competition. We're at the logical "4years later" point of that timeline

    I wanted to throw a wrench in the gears of our political system. His crowning achievement is making neocons in federal government irrelevant. I'd consider my vote a success.

    @vaportrail said:

    I wanted to throw a wrench in the gears of our political system. His crowning achievement is making neocons in federal government irrelevant. I'd consider my vote a success.

    I get it. That was the appeal I saw in him too. Our political system needs to be completely reworked. 

    But it is looking more and more like blowing out a wall in your house by blindly throwing grenades

    Not to mention he basically just swapped one swamp for another