Of course, it's all coming down to Michigan...
-
So the results last night were showing Trump leading in Michigan. Then, overnight, 138k+ mail in ballots were counted: ALL for Joe Biden. Not a single one of those votes were for Trump or even a 3rd party candidate.
Seems legit.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Way to go Wolverines!
The talking heads on the TV said that it took them nearly 3 weeks to count the ballots after the 2016 election.
-
So the results last night were showing Trump leading in Michigan. Then, overnight, 138k+ mail in ballots were counted: ALL for Joe Biden. Not a single one of those votes were for Trump or even a 3rd party candidate.
Seems legit.
So the results last night were showing Trump leading in Michigan. Then, overnight, 138k+ mail in ballots were counted: ALL for Joe Biden. Not a single one of those votes were for Trump or even a 3rd party candidate.
Seems legit.
They probably only reported on the count for Biden and left out how many were for Trump.
-
So the results last night were showing Trump leading in Michigan. Then, overnight, 138k+ mail in ballots were counted: ALL for Joe Biden. Not a single one of those votes were for Trump or even a 3rd party candidate.
Seems legit.
So the results last night were showing Trump leading in Michigan. Then, overnight, 138k+ mail in ballots were counted: ALL for Joe Biden. Not a single one of those votes were for Trump or even a 3rd party candidate.
Seems legit.
If true, then that is statistically impossible and I don't need to be a polling expert or data scientist to know it.
^ The if in that sentence is as big as the typical American's ass, but should be easy enough to verify with those that are actually counting the ballots.
-
Oh God not you too...
It's called "counting the ballots from Detroit"...
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
-
Oh God not you too...
It's called "counting the ballots from Detroit"...
So you're saying out of all those 138k votes, not a SINGLE vote for Trump or a 3rd party candidate? Out of a city and metro area of 3.7 million people?
I guess it's not a statistical impossibility for me to hit the Powerball and simultaneously get struck by lightning while getting sucked off by a Playboy playmate either, but...
-
Oh God not you too...
It's called "counting the ballots from Detroit"...
So you're saying out of all those 138k votes, not a SINGLE vote for Trump or a 3rd party candidate? Out of a city and metro area of 3.7 million people?
I guess it's not a statistical impossibility for me to hit the Powerball and simultaneously get struck by lightning while getting sucked off by a Playboy playmate either, but...
So you're saying out of all those 138k votes, not a SINGLE vote for Trump or a 3rd party candidate? Out of a city and metro area of 3.7 million people?
I guess it's not a statistical impossibility for me to hit the Powerball and simultaneously get struck by lightning while getting sucked off by a Playboy playmate either, but...
Let's look at it another way
I'm smart enough to coordinate large scale voter fraud in the biggest election ever when everyone is looking for it...
... why would I make it so obvious that Joe schmoe at his computer can call me out on it? Why not spread those votes out?
Or, just a crazy thought, the little tally ticker on Google's page isn't absolutely perfect, mail in votes are still be counted that are already mainly pro Biden to begin with, AND they're coming from a city that's incredibly pro Dem. All leading to a big spike as votes are batched in.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
So you're saying out of all those 138k votes, not a SINGLE vote for Trump or a 3rd party candidate? Out of a city and metro area of 3.7 million people?
I guess it's not a statistical impossibility for me to hit the Powerball and simultaneously get struck by lightning while getting sucked off by a Playboy playmate either, but...
Let's look at it another way
I'm smart enough to coordinate large scale voter fraud in the biggest election ever when everyone is looking for it...
... why would I make it so obvious that Joe schmoe at his computer can call me out on it? Why not spread those votes out?
Or, just a crazy thought, the little tally ticker on Google's page isn't absolutely perfect, mail in votes are still be counted that are already mainly pro Biden to begin with, AND they're coming from a city that's incredibly pro Dem. All leading to a big spike as votes are batched in.
Let's look at it another way
I'm smart enough to coordinate large scale voter fraud in the biggest election ever when everyone is looking for it...
... why would I make it so obvious that Joe schmoe at his computer can call me out on it? Why not spread those votes out?
Or, just a crazy thought, the little tally ticker on Google's page isn't absolutely perfect, mail in votes are still be counted that are already mainly pro Biden to begin with, AND they're coming from a city that's incredibly pro Dem. All leading to a big spike as votes are batched in.
Doesn't it seem a little odd to you that this big spike would happen for one candidate only, though? Biden gains 138k+ votes all in one go at 6am and not a single one of those votes is for the other candidates?
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Let's look at it another way
I'm smart enough to coordinate large scale voter fraud in the biggest election ever when everyone is looking for it...
... why would I make it so obvious that Joe schmoe at his computer can call me out on it? Why not spread those votes out?
Or, just a crazy thought, the little tally ticker on Google's page isn't absolutely perfect, mail in votes are still be counted that are already mainly pro Biden to begin with, AND they're coming from a city that's incredibly pro Dem. All leading to a big spike as votes are batched in.
Doesn't it seem a little odd to you that this big spike would happen for one candidate only, though? Biden gains 138k+ votes all in one go at 6am and not a single one of those votes is for the other candidates?
Doesn't it seem a little odd to you that this big spike would happen for one candidate only, though? Biden gains 138k+ votes all in one go at 6am and not a single one of those votes is for the other candidates?
None of those counts are official. It's AP getting data. Not to mention all of the misinformation that's already been spread about these "magic votes" that I'm not even sure exactly what happened.
But again, why???? would you make your "voter fraud" so blatantly obvious?
Like with every other QAnon adjacent conspiracy theory you just have to use Occam's Razor
-
Let's look at it another way
I'm smart enough to coordinate large scale voter fraud in the biggest election ever when everyone is looking for it...
... why would I make it so obvious that Joe schmoe at his computer can call me out on it? Why not spread those votes out?
Or, just a crazy thought, the little tally ticker on Google's page isn't absolutely perfect, mail in votes are still be counted that are already mainly pro Biden to begin with, AND they're coming from a city that's incredibly pro Dem. All leading to a big spike as votes are batched in.
Doesn't it seem a little odd to you that this big spike would happen for one candidate only, though? Biden gains 138k+ votes all in one go at 6am and not a single one of those votes is for the other candidates?
-
Obvious election fraud going on in Michigan and PA. Probably GA also.
-
Good thing that state up north isn’t relying on Harbut to win. ?
-
Some serious Ballot stuffing going on. You cant cheat if you dont know hoe much you need to win by...that is the hold up...hence the 100k ballots showing up..
They arent even trying to hide it.
Funny how the battle ground states all have dem governors.
-
Some serious Ballot stuffing going on. You cant cheat if you dont know hoe much you need to win by...that is the hold up...hence the 100k ballots showing up..
They arent even trying to hide it.
Funny how the battle ground states all have dem governors.
Some serious Ballot stuffing going on. You cant cheat if you dont know hoe much you need to win by...that is the hold up...hence the 100k ballots showing up..
They arent even trying to hide it.
Funny how the battle ground states all have dem governors.
They have 80 percent turnout in detroit...that speaks volumes to the fuckery going on with this election.
Oh jeez...
-
Well at least OHIO is now eligible to join the Confederacy and all the Ex-Dixiecrats who are now the Republican Party down south. We could have just foregone all this crap if you'd kept your damn generals Grant & Sherman home back in '63.?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login